Page 1 of 1

Undead accusing Hugh of sock puppetry

PostPosted: Tue Aug 09, 2011 9:04 am
by Bruce Dazzling
See below from the Carl Sagan thread.

Bruce Dazzling wrote:
undead wrote:This is not an accusation, but it is my honest opinion that HMW is a sock puppet, because I can't imagine a human being doing his schtick so consistently and without personality. What reason is there to do it on such an obscure website? Makes no sense. I'm sorry if I broke the rules, just had to express that.

Also, Carl Sagan is the man, still. I wish he were here to comment on all the new crop circles.


From the rules of the board:

The charge or insinuation of "disinfo agent" can almost never be proven, and poisons and often ends meaningful discussion. Therefore suggesting a poster is purposefully spreading disinformation is not permitted.


Please don't express it again, undead.

Re: Undead accusing Hugh of sock puppetry

PostPosted: Tue Aug 09, 2011 9:23 am
by Jeff
Thanks Bruce.

Re: Undead accusing Hugh of sock puppetry

PostPosted: Tue Aug 09, 2011 10:14 am
by Bruce Dazzling
Just noticed that Nordic had already beaten undead to the punch.

Bruce Dazzling wrote:
Nordic wrote:hugh singlehandedly ensures that this site will never be anything more than an internet backwater for "conspiracy theorists" if you know what i mean.

either he's insane, or that's his job. you decide.


Nordic, I just gave the same warning to undead.

The charge or insinuation of "disinfo agent" can almost never be proven, and poisons and often ends meaningful discussion. Therefore suggesting a poster is purposefully spreading disinformation is not permitted.


Please refrain from this type of accusation. It's counterproductive.

Thanks


I haven't put either of these warnings in their user notes as "official" warnings, because they both seem pretty minor.

What do you cats think?

Re: Undead accusing Hugh of sock puppetry

PostPosted: Tue Aug 09, 2011 10:43 am
by Jeff
You're right, that's too small to warrant that. I've rarely used the "official" warnings. Only when it was either that, or a ban. (Though that's not to suggest we shouldn't use them more often than that.)

[on edit:] That's a lot of thats.

Re: Undead accusing Hugh of sock puppetry

PostPosted: Tue Aug 09, 2011 11:25 am
by barracuda
Whatever Hugh really might be, "sock puppet" is probably the wrong term anyway.

I think I've issued formal warnings only twice in my tenure as a mod, and both times it was because I was under the influence of an irresistable urge to ban someone and I sated that desire through the formal warning mechanism. I was at the "if you do that one more time..." moment.

But I think it lets people know you kinda mean business.