<!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>I have seen these "proofs" <!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>for a couple years now advertised on TV.</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END--> Thought it was sick then and still do. However they have had this website for quite a while, before 911 Proof was a big deal in the MSM. So I would have to say <!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>it could be a smoke screen but not a hi jack.</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END--><hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--><br><br>But the dangerous doubts about the 9/11 cover story were almost immediate and voiced by people who get heard.<br><br>So clever marketing or cover-up aid? No "proof" of which this is but <!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>the timing still fits possible cover-up aid and thus a hijacking.<br></strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END--><br><br>Mike Ruppert was pointing at LIHOP/MIHOP in November 2001 and Canadian Barrie Zwick was on TV in January 2002 pointing at the holes in the cover story.<br><br><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://www.oilempire.us/towers.html">www.oilempire.us/towers.html</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--><br><!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>The Great Deception, <!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>January - February, 2002</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END--><br><br>Barrie Zwicker's film The Great Deception was a six part television commentary for Vision TV of Toronto that was the first documentary to highlight the video of George W. Bush reading to second graders after he was told the second tower was hit (Great Deception aired more than two years before Michael Moore's film Fahrenheit 9/11). The transcript of the film is reposted at
www.oilempire.us/great-deception.html<br>Great Deception was an amazing profile of the basic issues of complicity, one of the earliest serious efforts to document the truth behind the official story. It is a nice compliment to <!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>Michael Ruppert's November 2001 speech</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END--> recorded in the film The Truth and Lies of 9/11.<hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--><br><br>It was still December, 2001 when Lyndon Larouche (not a promotion, DE) was writing about 9/11 as a stepping stone designed to lead to Caspian Sea oil and gas per Zbigniew Brzezinski's book, 'The Grand Chessboard: American Primacy and Its Geostrategic Imperatives.'<br><br><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://www.pegmusic.com/lyn-brzez_01-12-23.html">www.pegmusic.com/lyn-brzez_01-12-23.html</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--><br><!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>ZBIGNIEW BRZEZINSKI & SEPT. 11TH, 2001<br><br> by Lyndon H. LaRouche, Jr.<br> <!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>December 23, 2001</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END--><hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--><br><br><br>(Take him or leave him, Larouche gets read and stirs things up.) <br><br>It was January 2002 when former German cabinet minister Andreas von Bulow said in a mainstream media interview that 9/11 reaked of geopolitical-motivated inside job.<br><br><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://www.ratical.org/ratville/CAH/VonBuelow.html">www.ratical.org/ratville/...uelow.html</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--><br><!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>Former German Cabinet Minister Attacks<br>Official Brainwashing On September 11 Issue<br>Points at "Mad Dog" Zbig and Huntington<br><br>Source: Tagesspiegel, <!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>13 Jan 2002</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END--><br><br>In a full-page interview with the Sunday edition (Jan. 13) of the Berlin Tagesspiegel daily, former German Minister of Technology, Andreas von Buelow, said he does not buy any of the official theories that have been presented to date, on the events of September 11.<br><br>The apparent failure of the U.S. Administration including its 26 secret agencies with an annual budget of $30 billion, to come up with any convincing assessment, was one big problem that von Buelow addressed, in quite some detail.<br><br>He then addressed the role of the official "brainwashing of the Western mass democracies" on the Sept. 11 issue, in promoting the new enemy image of "Islamic terrorism," along lines developed earlier, by senior advisors of the U.S. Administration:<br><br>"I am not the origin of the idea of the enemy image. It originates with Zbigniew Brzezinski and Samuel Huntington, two pioneers of American secret intelligence and foreign policies.<br><br>"Already in the mid-1990s, Huntington opined that people in Europe and the USA needed someone they could hate -- that would strengthen the identification with their own society. And Brzezinski, that mad dog, already at his time as advisor to President Jimmy Carter, campaigned for the sole right of the USA to all the world's raw materials, especially crude oil and natural gas."<br><br>Von Buelow also addressed the role of Brzezinski, personally, in setting up the afghani operation of armed "Islamic" guerilla warfare against the USSR Afghanistan invasion in and after 1979 -- the Taliban being generated by the same operation, after all.<br><br>As for the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks as such, von Buelow remarked: "Planning the attacks was a master deed, in technical and organizational terms. To hijack four big airliners within a few minutes and fly them into targets within a single hour and doing so on complicated flight routes! That is unthinkable, without backing from the secret apparatuses of state and industry."<br><br>He added that laying false tracks of investigation has been an accompanying feature of covert operations ever since they have been launched by influential agencies, so that he is convinced that the full truth behind Sept. 11 still has to be sought. <hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--> <p></p><i>Edited by: <A HREF=http://p216.ezboard.com/brigorousintuition.showUserPublicProfile?gid=hughmanateewins>Hugh Manatee Wins</A> at: 11/6/06 1:45 pm<br></i>