Johnny Gosch update

Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff

Re: Johnny Gosch update

Postby FourthBase » Fri Sep 01, 2006 9:03 pm

The branding also appears to back up Rusty Nelson some:<br><br><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://www.tedgunderson.com/Investigations/Russell%20Nelson.htm">www.tedgunderson.com/Inve...Nelson.htm</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--><br><br><!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>This was much the way that he would keep able to providing children, usually young boys, located by Sam Soda and gay prostitutes for his ‘friends' as well as for various sadistic and cult rituals where they would torcher [torture] and <!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>brand</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END--> them as they were being sexually abused , orally, anally, and however else they could possibly think of.<hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--><br><br><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://www.freerepublic.com/forum/a3887c3d420c5.htm">www.freerepublic.com/foru...d420c5.htm</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--><br><br><!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>Besides Yorkshire TV, the most notable among the electronic media which became interested in the Franklin story was the TV program, America's Most Wanted (AMW). In several episodes, AMW opened up a whole new dimension on just how high up politically the story went and how wide it reached across the country. For a while, I had great hopes. For example, AMW interviewed Paul Bonacci in prison and broadcast his account of a host of specific details about individuals, places, activities, kidnappings, etc., in which he said he had participated.<br><br>To the shock of AMW (and sometimes, of myself), the incidents Paul Bonacci described, when investigated by AMW, turned out to be exactly as Paul had recounted. <!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>For instance, a young boy named "Jimmy" who had been branded by pedophile perpetrators--like you would brand a steer</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END-->. END<hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--> <br><br><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://letsroll911.org/ipw-web/bulletin/bb/viewtopic.php?t=6703&start=0">letsroll911.org/ipw-web/b...03&start=0</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--><br><br>(Supposedly from the Franklin Coverup, per "Loretta")<br><br><!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>FYI-After being kidnapped Johnny tried to escape the care of the homosexual man and lesbian woman he was given to; <!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>When caught, he was punished by being branded on his ass with the same brand they branded their cows with</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END-->....<hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--> <br><br>Doesn't sound like that's the location, Jeff, right?<br>Unless there was more than one branding?<br><br><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://politics.abovetopsecret.com/thread125549/pg">politics.abovetopsecret.c...d125549/pg</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--><br><br>("conversation between Ted Gunderson and Alex Merklinger", 3/5/05)<br><br><!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>GUNDERSON: Now, there's one of the kids that I talked to, I forget his name offhand. Jim something, who was one of the kids in the Franklin case that had been branded, --they branded these kids back in the eighties. <!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>He told me that Johnny Gosch was branded on his hip.</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END--> Now I haven't seen any pictures of Jeff Gannon's hip, but it's not likely that he's gonna get rid of a brand-mark. They brand them just like cattle.<hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--> <br> <p></p><i></i>
User avatar
FourthBase
 
Posts: 7057
Joined: Thu May 05, 2005 4:41 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Johnny Gosch update

Postby chiggerbit » Fri Sep 01, 2006 9:29 pm

Dead link:<br><br> <!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://208.138.42.193/forum/a37ef8e1f479f.htm">208.138.42.193/forum/a37ef8e1f479f.htm</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--> <br><br>In the United States District Court For the District of Nebraska<br>Paul A. Bonacci, Plaintiff 4:CV91-3037 <br>vs <br>Lawrence E. King, Defendant Memorandum of Decision <br>Filed February 22, 1999 <br><br>On February 27, 1998, I found that default judgment should be entered against the defendant Lawrence E. King in favor of the plaintiff, Paul A. Bonacci. A trial on the issue of the damages due the plaintiff by that defendant was had on February 5, 1999.<br> <br>Two counts are alleged against the defendant: King in the complaint. Count V alleges a conspiracy with public officers to deprive the plaintiff of his civil rights, designed to continue to subject the plaintiff to emotional abuse and to prevent him from informing authorities of criminal conduct. Count VIII charges battery, false imprisonment, infliction of emotional distress, negligence and conspiracy to deprive the plaintiff of civil rights. Between December 1980 and 1988, the complaint alleges, the defendant King continually subjected the plaintiff to repeated sexual assaults, false imprisonments, infliction of extreme emotional distress, organized and directed satanic rituals, forced the plaintiff to "scavenge" for children to be a part of the defendant King's sexual abuse and pornography ring, forced the plaintiff to engage in numerous masochistic orgies with other minor children. The defendant King's default has made those allegations true against him. The issue now is the relief to be granted monetarily. <br>The now uncontradicted evidence is that the plaintiff has suffered much. He has suffered burns, broken fingers, beating of the head and face and other indignities by the wrongful actions of the defendant King. In addition to the misery of going through the experiences just related over a period of eight years, the plaintiff has suffered the lingering results to the present time. He is a victim of multiple personality disorder, involving as many as fourteen distinct personalities aside from his primary personality. He has given up a desired military career and received threats on his life. He suffers from sleeplessness, has bad dreams, has difficulty in holding a job, is fearful that others are following him, fears getting killed, has depressing flashbacks, and is verbally violent on occasion, all in connection with the multiple personality disorder and caused by the wrongful activities of the defendant King. <br><br>Almost certainly the defendant King has little remaining financial resources, but a fair judgment to compensate the plaintiff is necessary. For the sixteen years since the abuse of the plaintiff began I conclude that a fair compensation for the damages he has suffered is $800,000. A punitive damage award also is justified, but the amount needs to be limited because of the small effect that such a judgment would have on the defendant King, given his financial condition and presence in prison. I deem the punitive damage award of $200,000 to be adequate. <br><br>Dated February 19, 1999. <br>By the Court <br>/s/Warren Urborn <br>United States Senior District Judge <br><br> <br> <p></p><i></i>
chiggerbit
 
Posts: 8594
Joined: Tue May 10, 2005 12:23 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Disturbing Shit

Postby El Tedo » Fri Sep 01, 2006 9:56 pm

Both photos are up at <!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://www.johnnygosch.com">www.johnnygosch.com</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--><br><br>This story is the strangest, most disturbing "conspiracy" I've ever heard and its being proven true one little bit at a time. Truely mid-blowing stuff.<br><br>The 'branding' in the first photo is a little iffy though. A higher rez image needs to be examined-- it looks like a pentagram though. The weird white tape or cloth there all tied up with is so creepy. This is some creepy, creepy shit. <p></p><i></i>
El Tedo
 
Posts: 34
Joined: Wed Jul 12, 2006 1:53 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Disturbing Shit

Postby sunny » Fri Sep 01, 2006 10:01 pm

EL Tedo, any idea why I am FORBIDDEN to access that site? <p></p><i></i>
sunny
 
Posts: 5220
Joined: Mon May 16, 2005 10:18 pm
Location: Alabama
Blog: View Blog (1)

Re: Disturbing Shit

Postby chiggerbit » Fri Sep 01, 2006 10:14 pm

Other Noreen history:<br><br><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://www.ctrl.org/silence/memo.html">www.ctrl.org/silence/memo.html</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--> <p></p><i></i>
chiggerbit
 
Posts: 8594
Joined: Tue May 10, 2005 12:23 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Disturbing Shit

Postby NewKid » Fri Sep 01, 2006 10:18 pm

I'm forbidden too. <p></p><i></i>
NewKid
 
Posts: 1036
Joined: Fri Oct 21, 2005 1:57 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Disturbing Shit

Postby Rigorous Intuition » Fri Sep 01, 2006 10:19 pm

I'm getting the same message. <p></p><i></i>
Rigorous Intuition
 
Posts: 1744
Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2005 3:36 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Disturbing Shit

Postby El Tedo » Fri Sep 01, 2006 10:19 pm

<br><!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>EL Tedo, any idea why I am FORBIDDEN to access that site?<hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--><br><br>I don't know- what have you done? <!--EZCODE EMOTICON START ;) --><img src=http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/wink.gif ALT=";)"><!--EZCODE EMOTICON END--> <br><br>Well since Mrs. Gosch has posted it- no reason to keep it secret: <br><br><!--EZCODE IMAGE START--><img src="http://www.johnnygosch.com/images/JT.jpg" style="border:0;"/><!--EZCODE IMAGE END--> <p></p><i></i>
El Tedo
 
Posts: 34
Joined: Wed Jul 12, 2006 1:53 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Disturbing Shit

Postby FourthBase » Fri Sep 01, 2006 10:20 pm

OK, just brainstorming here...<br><br>- Gosch is wearing two different pants in each photo, does that mean that the kidnappers already had some clothing that would fit him, or did they buy new clothing?<br><br>- The pants in the brand photo don't look at first glance to be sweatpants, but the resolution is too low to tell. They look too fitting and tapered, but since this was the 80's, maybe sweatpants were designed differently?<br><br>- The brand does not look like a "pentagram" to me, it looks like a plus sign with a circle or square around it. And actually, if it were a fresh branding, you'd think that it'd show up in the picture more. It kind of looks lighter, like marker.<br><br>- That's Gosch on the right in the other photo? Doesn't seem to be the same kid as the brand photo, but Noreen would know better. Did authorities confirm that Gosch is the kid in the brand photo and the kid on the right in the other? And Noreen confirmed it for sure?<br><br>- Noreen got these on her birthday, so unless it has some sick reverse meaning, that seems to say that they're a "birthday gift", and therefore a real break in the case. <p></p><i></i>
User avatar
FourthBase
 
Posts: 7057
Joined: Thu May 05, 2005 4:41 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Disturbing Shit

Postby NewKid » Fri Sep 01, 2006 10:24 pm

The pic's not coming thru for me. Sunny, Jeff, what about you? <p></p><i></i>
NewKid
 
Posts: 1036
Joined: Fri Oct 21, 2005 1:57 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Disturbing Shit

Postby Avalon » Fri Sep 01, 2006 10:29 pm

Me too. And they don't allow Wayback Machine robots in. <p></p><i></i>
User avatar
Avalon
 
Posts: 1529
Joined: Tue Jun 21, 2005 2:53 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Disturbing Shit

Postby chiggerbit » Fri Sep 01, 2006 10:34 pm

Another old interview with Noreen:<br><br><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://dragonkeypress.com/blog/?page_id=908">dragonkeypress.com/blog/?page_id=908</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--> <p></p><i></i>
chiggerbit
 
Posts: 8594
Joined: Tue May 10, 2005 12:23 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Disturbing Shit

Postby Rigorous Intuition » Fri Sep 01, 2006 10:34 pm

Broken link for me as well. <p></p><i></i>
Rigorous Intuition
 
Posts: 1744
Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2005 3:36 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Disturbing Shit

Postby El Tedo » Fri Sep 01, 2006 10:35 pm

<!--EZCODE ITALIC START--><em>- Gosch is wearing two different pants in each photo, does that mean that the kidnappers already had some clothing that would fit him, or did they buy new clothing?<br></em><!--EZCODE ITALIC END--><br>They could've been taken weeks or months apart. <br><br><!--EZCODE ITALIC START--><em>- The pants in the brand photo don't look at first glance to be sweatpants, but the resolution is too low to tell. They look too fitting and tapered, but since this was the 80's, maybe sweatpants were designed differently?</em><!--EZCODE ITALIC END--><br><br>I think they look weird because they're taped or tied up at the bottom.<br><br><!--EZCODE ITALIC START--><em>- The brand does not look like a "pentagram" to me, it looks like a plus sign with a circle or square around it. And actually, if it were a fresh branding, you'd think that it'd show up in the picture more. It kind of looks lighter, like marker.</em><!--EZCODE ITALIC END--> <br><br>It looks strange almost doctored, though I'm pretty sure its a star-pentagram. The left side fainter than the right.<br><br><!--EZCODE ITALIC START--><em>- That's Gosch on the right in the other photo? Doesn't seem to be the same kid as the brand photo, but Noreen would know better. Did authorities confirm that Gosch is the kid in the brand photo and the kid on the right in the other? And Noreen confirmed it for sure?</em><!--EZCODE ITALIC END--><br><br>I have a hard time matching the two Johnnys aswell. But I think we can trust that Noreen knows best.<br><br><!--EZCODE ITALIC START--><em>- Noreen got these on her birthday, so unless it has some sick reverse meaning, that seems to say that they're a "birthday gift", and therefore a real break in the case.</em><!--EZCODE ITALIC END--><br><br>I think we should expect Mr. Gannon to commit "suicide" soon.<br><br>I don't know why I'm the only one who can see the pictures. Maybe its a browser thing, I'm using Safari on a mac... I dunno I'm no computer whiz. <p></p><i></i>
El Tedo
 
Posts: 34
Joined: Wed Jul 12, 2006 1:53 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Disturbing Shit

Postby FourthBase » Fri Sep 01, 2006 10:39 pm

I can see them, and I'm on IE.<br>Just in case, I saved them. <p></p><i></i>
User avatar
FourthBase
 
Posts: 7057
Joined: Thu May 05, 2005 4:41 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

PreviousNext

Return to Franklin Scandal

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest