CBC story on London's coincident exercises

by **st4** » Tue Jul 12, 2005 1:22 am

(Hi Sweejak) Someone posted my "What Really Happened On 9/11" thread there and it was soon locked by a MOD because it had a couple of WhatReallyHappened.com references in it. <img src=http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/eyes.gif ALT=":rolleyes">

by **Sweejak** » Tue Jul 12, 2005 1:38 am

hey st4! WRH is a clearing house, like Rense. Sources from the world over. Might as well try to ban on the planet. Some links at Rense: The Independent The Guardian Intervention Mag The Tribune Wapo BBC Ha aretz John Pilger Globe and Mail AP Are they going to ban those too? I smell fear.

by **maggrwaggr** » Tue Jul 12, 2005 3:46 am

and check out the responses: <a href="http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2005/7/12/15852/6065">www.dailykos.com/storyonl...15852/6065</a> Similar to what's going on at DU

by **Sweejak** » Tue Jul 12, 2005 3:50 am

Food fight! <a href="http://wagnews.blogspot.com/2005/07/alex-jones-is-wrong-on-london-terror.html">wagnews.blogspot.com/2005...error.html</a> Ok, it's divisive and diversionary but there is some info on the terror drills that should be noted.

by **trunews** » Wed Jul 13, 2005 3:09 am

"Radio host, Alex Jones is spreading misleading, false and overblown claims linking Peter Power, a crisis management consultant and former member of Britain's anti-terror police, to a 'terrorism drill' which Jones alleges was used to provide cover for State perpetrators of the multiple blasts. The wild allegations leave others presenting so-called "conspiracy theories" about these attacks open to ridicule --because of false claims by the most reknowned radio show on these topics." <a href="http://wagnews.blogspot.com/2005/07/alex-jones-is-wrong-on-london-terror.html">wagnews.blogspot.com/2005...error.html</a> OR: <a href="http://tinyurl.com/8fcpw">tinyurl.com/8fcpw</a> RELATED: "Did you know that GCN – the network which carries Alex Jones and Jeff Rense – is an ABC affiliate? Yes, ABC - as in the Disney-owned American Broadcasting Corporation – the epitome of mainstream corporate media and home of propagandists such as Peter Jennings. Now, we’re not sure how deeply ABC’s tentacles extend into the Genesis Communications Network, and we’re fairly certain that its President Ted Anderson and others will brush-off this “affiliation” and say it amounts to nothing; but here’s the way we see things. Any time there is a financial arrangement made between two entities – for whatever purpose – there exists a huge probability that some sort of manipulation will result at a future point in time (if it hasn’t already). In addition, any time the “alternative” media starts co-mingling with the MAINSTREAM media, it has to give people an uneasy feeling. What it boils down to is that if GCN is giving money to ABC to be its affiliate, it amounts to nothing more than feeding the beast. A perfect analogy would be a parent giving their nine-year old son to Michael Jackson for an “innocent” sleepover. So yes, if you subscribe to GCN, you are indirectly financing ABC. To us, something just doesn't sound right about that." <a href="http://www.libertyforum.org/showflat.php?Cat=&Board=news_news&Number=293672292#Post293672292">www.libertyforum.org/show...t293672292</a> OR: <a href="http://tinyurl.com/afy8q">tinyurl.com/afy8q</a>

by **Sweejak** » Wed Jul 13, 2005 3:24 am

I don't like GCN and I hate the commercials. My understanding is that they use ABC's satellites or something, hell I probably do too for my internet. And isn't all shortwave now owned by mostly one company? Fintan's headline has changed BTW.. if memory serves it said ALEX JONES EXPOSED!!! not "Alex Jones is wrong" Here is the deal as I see it, and this has nothing to do with the info for the time being: Fintan, for some reason, has a vendetta against Jones and that will cause him to overshoot which in this case is just what happened. Yes, you will get knee jerk reactions on both sides but the complaints, largely, are about the hypocrisy, not the info. In fact a number of commenters accepted Fintan's take, about the info anyway. Now if every time Fintan made a mistake Jones would launch a headline "FINTAN DUNNE EXPOSED!!!" that would be equally divisive, inflammatory and a time waster. I won't try to guess at the exact motivation, but eventually that will become clear enough given time. Here is a similar thread, and this is about information. <a href="http://wagnews.blogspot.com/2005/07/london-bombs-patsy-number-2-sharon.html">wagnews.blogspot.com/2005...haron.html</a> Quote: AP kicked the story off, but the Israeli angle is a smokescreen - just as it was on 9/11. Recall the story of a pre-attack instant message from an Israeli-owned network and the tale of Israeli agents dancing in the street in celebration. These are deliberate misdirections designed to deflect blame onto Israel as being somehow linked to the attacks. Wait a sec. .... The "tale" of the instant messages? It's not a tale, it is verified by the top levels of Odigo! And neither is it a tale about the dancing Israelis. These are as close to proven facts as you can get without actually having been there. To play the game I can now say: FINTAN DUNNE EXPOSED!! Aside from that his idea that this, the London bombing/Israeli thing, may be just one black op painting another black op has some legs. So, I think here is a prime example of reading between the lines of whoever is presenting the news, sifting the good from the bad, assigning it some rank in your belief system and moving on. That is something everyone has to do on his own.

CBC story on London's coincident exercises

DU censorship

Re: DU censorship

check out this thread at DailyKos

Re: check out this thread at DailyKos

Propagandamatrix.com Caught spreading disinfo?

Re: Propagandamatrix.com Caught spreading disinfo?

Who is online