London Calling -- Again

by **GDN01** » Thu Jul 21, 2005 1:24 pm

Put the words in a different order... Shepherd's Bush Oval Warren Street Usher in Bush's Official War in the Streets. Shepherd can be a verb, meaning to usher something through, to guide it. The Oval office is the executive branch office, not the military, Warren - when you say it sounds like War in. Was this a message not a warning?

by **rain** » Thu Jul 21, 2005 1:42 pm

maybe, but I thought, 'who's the shepherd?'. guess I still consider shrubby&co. 2IC. heya antiaristo. was wondering when you'd get around to considering things from the Southern perspective. and hey, don't you diss on those frenchies. 'kiss a frenchman today'. oops, sorry. oh well, I'm sure they'll understand. it's continental, oui!

by **Bismillah** » Thu Jul 21, 2005 2:17 pm

Shepherd's Bush, Oval, Warren Street....hmmmm... Surely it means "George Bush (a good egg) is being watched over by the Good Shepherd while our thoroughfares are filled with frightened rabbits"? I'll get back to you on the numerology aspect after I have consulted my own entrails. ("What does it all mean?" - De La Soul)

by **Sokolova** » Thu Jul 21, 2005 2:20 pm

There's something weird about this. One report says a man put a rucksack on a train and then ran away. The rucksack was later found to have nothing dangerous in it. I mean what is that? Watching it develop, I had the feeling of a kind of seeded chaos - of something fake and dodgy, but difficult to define exactly. Like a kind of con trick - 'oooh look at THAT', or something. Just something not RIGHT. The 'reports' didn't make sense. I mean either there's an explosion or there isn't. It seems just too wooly even allowing for the chaos. Compare it to last time and it just doesn't feel right. Simultaneous suicide bombers that ALL failed? No. There's something not right here. That's my initial impressions. But sorry - the search for meaning in the location names is just a lot of silly occultist nonsense that detracts from the real question. Ellie

by **antiaristo** » Thu Jul 21, 2005 4:13 pm

heya rain, The busbomb was in Columbia Road.

by **rain** » Thu Jul 21, 2005 4:47 pm

oh that's too deep for me. I'm still trying to figure out who agamemnon handed the staff to.

by **GDN01** » Thu Jul 21, 2005 5:12 pm

Who's wagging the terrorist?

by **rain** » Thu Jul 21, 2005 5:14 pm

so I'm just trying to think through the logistics of this little exercise. like how well you'd have to know the terrain. detonators, rucksacks, timetables ... it's mindboggling. o.k., I need a nap. now everybody stay calm and we'll have our laws rushed through and you'll all get micro-chipped and we'll all be feeling a lot safer. oh, and don't bother thinking about a bolt to Ireland. we've got that covered too.<img src=http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/smile.gif ALT=":)"> <img src=http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/ohwell.gif ALT=":\">

by **antiaristo** » Thu Jul 21, 2005 5:23 pm

rain, It's the PASSPORT that matters. You are MUCH better off in a "foreign" country in Europe. I'm Irish, living in Spain. LEGALLY she can't touch me.

by **rain** » Thu Jul 21, 2005 5:49 pm

conjures up some funny images being 'much better off in a "foreign" country in Europe. but then it's been going on for sooooo long. actually when I read about that little deal, made me think about Fitzgerald. hope you've got room John, could be expecting company. that's how Brittany started, you know

by **hmm** » Thu Jul 21, 2005 6:37 pm

it would only take one well placed infiltrator to mess up this attack.say one of the many intelligence agencies has been monitoring this group up close,as has been the suggestion about some of the 9-11 hijackers,then sabotaging the bombs while letting the attack go ahead could serve a dual purpose.. now which dual purpose would be a second leap of faith and i try to keep to one per post <img src=http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/wink.gif ALT=";)"> This attack has left alot more evidence than the last one so i think its safe to say someones worried tonight

by **digby** » Thu Jul 21, 2005 7:51 pm

"This attack has left alot more evidence than the last one so i think its safe to say someones worried tonight" Or maybe that was the purpose--to plant all the evidence necessary to 'prove' who dun it? Clean up all the messy details of 7/7? Also I just heard that the Brits response will be to pass legislation incriminating 'incitement to violence' which will allow the UK to start deporting Muslims.

by **Dreams End** » Thu Jul 21, 2005 7:58 pm

This is from my blog at <a href="http://dreamsend.blogspot.com.">dreamsend.blogspot.com.</a> Really weird. As usual, I'm too lazy to redo the links, so please go the blog if you want to check out the links. However, the radio report that is central to this piece can be found at: <a href="http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=4765343">www.npr.org/templates/sto...Id=4765343</a> When is a Line a Cross? Go listen to this report from Guardian reporter Duncan Campbell on All Things Considered (a radio news program here in the U.S.) Here's what I heard him say when I listened to this interview. (Please listen to the story and write me back in the comments section if I heard it wrong. I can't get the link to work due to technical difficulties.) 1. The bombings are similar because, as in the first bombing, there was one bomb in the north, one in the south, one in the east and one in the west. 2. The intent, as put forward by an "Al Qaeda related website," was to place a fiery cross in the heart of Londond. I was a little stunned when I heard this. Had I not had enough coffee today? Can YOU guess, why I'm stunned? Oh, reader, you are SO VERY clever. That's right, the original bombs went off in a straight line. One in the east, two in the middle and one in the west. What an odd oversight. Did the NPR reporter interviewing Mr. Campbell ask about this little discrepancy? Do I have to answer that question? Are rhetorical questions annoying? As for the fiery cross, the only "Al Qaeda postings" I know about is the bogus and error filled "claim of responsibility". Well, I'm sorry, there's no mention of a "fiery cross" in the heart of London. Read it yourself here. It does say this: Britain is now burning with fear, terror and panic in its northern, southern, eastern, and western quarters. Does that sound like a fiery cross to you? I think you MIGHT be able to argue that they meant the bombs went off in these quarters, though they didn't mention that...they simply said there was fear in those quarters. Please post, in comments, any alleged Al Qaeda claims of making this "fiery cross". I could simply not have seen it and I don't find it by googling. Conveniently, these bombings were also on three trains and a bus. This shows that the original bomb that was detonated on the bus was MEANT to be detonated on the bus. No mistake here. The first bus was a little odd, mind you, because the driver got lost and had to ask for directions, but still, it was all part of their EVIL PLAN. This second bombing proves it. But here's a little riddle. What's missing from this round of bombings? Well, one thing that's missing, thank Goddess, is bodies. No one was killed. In fact, it appears that only the detonators went off. On ALL FOUR BOMBS. Clearly, the more skilled bomber from the first round of bombings was on vacation. But because there are no bodies, what would you imagine the police would have at least one of? Yep, BOMBERS! They did not manage to catch a single one of them. Not one. Darn their luck! First the video camera didn't work on the bus during the first bombing and now this! Where's Clouseau when you need him? Campbell says there are reports that one of the bombers was "black" and the other possibly "asian." I don't think that's going to get them far. Surely the camera on THIS bus didn't fail, though. In fact, Campbell says they will be releasing the video tonight or tomorrow. I eagerly await this video footage. So what are we to make of this blatant lie that the orginal bombings went off in a cross pattern? Did he simply misspeak? Is there some message they want everyone to be sure to take from these bombings (other than pass the Patriot Act renewal bill, which was being debated here in the U.S. AS THE BOMBS WENT OFF. England is considering similar such measures.) I'm not sure. But this is the most blatant piece of disinformation I have ever heard. I give it a 9.5 (with a 2.3 degree of difficulty for so blatantly contradicting known facts.) Do let NPR know about this little SNAFU, won't you?

by **digby** » Thu Jul 21, 2005 8:35 pm

LOL--A fiery cross does not sound like symbolism Islamic fanatics would cotton to. Sounds more like Campbell was trying to re-inforce the notion that this is a cultural war for the very survival of the West and its 'values'- -a top ten hit in the propaganda spin top forty here in the US. "..there was one bomb in the north, one in the south, one in the east and one in the west." Reminds me of the WMD song & dance: "We KNOW where they are--in Tikrit and the areas north, south, east, and west of there." Compass Crusaders for Lease. (was he thinking of Russia, Pakistan, Israel..?)

by **heath7** » Thu Jul 21, 2005 8:47 pm

Interesting side note: Today, I just happened to have the TV tuned to FOX 'news' when a reporter in London was broadcasting live. While reporting, a crash of glass could be heard in the background, and the reporter pointed out that someone had just blatantly smashed the windshield on their 'news' vehicle. <img src=http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/roll.gif ALT=":rollin"> I didn't get the reporter's name or anything, but I know it was like 3:30 pm Eastern time when it happened. Funny as it was by itself, I thought of how shortly after the 7/7 bombings, Chrisiane Amanpour was broadcasting from London for CNN and a street passerby stopped for the camera and started lamenting Britain's involvement in the war, and blaming that for the terrorist attacks, which Amanpour responded to by saying she'd been hearing a lot of the same sentiment there in London. These incidents are almost surreal to me, because I can't imagine Americans behaving that way right now. Are we not hearing the whole story from England? Are people there fed-up to a magnitude that we Americans aren't grasping? Are the people ready to tar and feather some slimy politicians over there? I know, I know! I'm just seeing too much into it, but it sure makes for great entertainment.

London Calling -- Again

Re: Theories...

re:theories....

Fact, fancy and hieromancy

Re: Fact, fancy and hieromancy

Theories

re:theories

What does it mean?

re:theories

Ireland

Ireland,yourland,theirland,anyland

re:theories

London Calling--Again

When is a line a cross?

London Calling--Again

Re: London Calling -- Again

Who is online