Art with girls and birds. NSFW, at all.

Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff

Calendrier Magique, Austin de Croze/Manuel Orazi, 1895

Postby compared2what? » Wed Sep 10, 2008 1:50 am

Image Image[/i]
User avatar
compared2what?
 
Posts: 8383
Joined: Sun Oct 21, 2007 6:31 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Girls, penguins, American Museum of Natural History, 1961

Postby compared2what? » Wed Sep 10, 2008 4:06 am

Image
User avatar
compared2what?
 
Posts: 8383
Joined: Sun Oct 21, 2007 6:31 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby compared2what? » Thu Sep 11, 2008 6:50 am

Image
User avatar
compared2what?
 
Posts: 8383
Joined: Sun Oct 21, 2007 6:31 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby barracuda » Sat Sep 13, 2008 4:16 pm

"Operationally what these psychedelics do is they dissolve cultural conditioning. Cultural conditioning is like software, but beneath the software is the hardware of brain and organism and by dissolving the cultural conditioning to speak English, German, Swahili or whatever, then one returns to this ur-sprach, this primal language of the animal body and can explore the real dimension of feeling that culture has a tendency to cut us off from. Culture replaces authentic feeling with words. As an example of this, imagine an infant lying in its cradle, and the window is open, and into the room comes something, marvelous, mysterious, glittering, shedding light of many colors, movement, sound, a tranformative hierophany of integrated perception and the child is enthralled and then the mother comes into the room and she says to the child, "that's a bird, baby, that's a bird," instantly the complex wave of the angel peacock irridescent transformative mystery is collapsed, into the word. All mystery is gone, the child learns this is a bird, this is a bird, and by the time we're five or six years old all the mystery of reality has been carefully tiled over with words. This is a bird, this is a house, this is the sky, and we seal ourselves in within a linguistic shell of disempowered perception, and what the psychedelics do is they burst apart this cultural envelope of confinement and return us really to the legacy and birthright of the organism."

Terence McKenna
The most dangerous traps are the ones you set for yourself. - Phillip Marlowe
User avatar
barracuda
 
Posts: 12890
Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 5:58 pm
Location: Niles, California
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby Seamus OBlimey » Mon Sep 15, 2008 3:21 pm

User avatar
Seamus OBlimey
 
Posts: 3154
Joined: Wed Jun 14, 2006 4:14 pm
Location: Gods own country
Blog: View Blog (0)

U.S. Public Health Service posters, 1919 (l); 1922 (r)

Postby compared2what? » Sun Sep 21, 2008 8:04 am

Image Image
User avatar
compared2what?
 
Posts: 8383
Joined: Sun Oct 21, 2007 6:31 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby OP ED » Sun Sep 21, 2008 12:56 pm

i still don't get it.
User avatar
OP ED
 
Posts: 4673
Joined: Sat Jan 05, 2008 10:04 pm
Location: Detroit
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby compared2what? » Sun Sep 21, 2008 5:11 pm

OP ED wrote:i still don't get it.


Don't get what, sweetheart?
User avatar
compared2what?
 
Posts: 8383
Joined: Sun Oct 21, 2007 6:31 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby OP ED » Sun Sep 21, 2008 11:42 pm

maybe its just too obvious to see, or perhaps I overlooked it on account of all the pretty pictures.

wtf does "NSFW" mean?

i've looked at this thread a dozen times or more. I don't think I've actually contributed any pictures. strange.

i have a short attention span.
swan-on-swan action tends to make me forget what I was thinking of previously.

note to self: less drugs.
User avatar
OP ED
 
Posts: 4673
Joined: Sat Jan 05, 2008 10:04 pm
Location: Detroit
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby compared2what? » Mon Sep 22, 2008 12:57 am

Oh. I thought maybe you didn't get that the 1919 Public Health poster was part of a series for boys, and the 1922 Public Health poster that recycles the same image was part of a series for girls. And I was wondering if you had suddenly become severely impaired.

The NSFW thing makes perfect sense, along the following lines:

(a) This thread arose out of the "Great Tits Cope Well With Warming" thread;

(b) it therefore entails a de facto presumption that all girl/bird art is pornographic, because I say so; and

(c) I say so because it's amusing me to regard it that way. Why are you trying to rain on my parade?

I very much hope this clears up any unnecessary confusion. Below please find another Leda and the Swan painting for you. By Otto Dix. I'm feeling kind of Weimar today.

Sincerely yours,

c2w

Image
User avatar
compared2what?
 
Posts: 8383
Joined: Sun Oct 21, 2007 6:31 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby brainpanhandler » Mon Sep 22, 2008 7:19 am

NSFW = not safe for work (although I think the W part can have other meanings).

As in, you might not want to be opening and looking at this thread at work for the reasons C2W mentions. It hasn't really panned out that way.

Image
"Nothing in all the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity." - Martin Luther King Jr.
User avatar
brainpanhandler
 
Posts: 5114
Joined: Fri Dec 29, 2006 9:38 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby compared2what? » Mon Sep 22, 2008 8:50 am

brainpanhandler wrote:NSFW = not safe for work (although I think the W part can have other meanings).

As in, you might not want to be opening and looking at this thread at work for the reasons C2W mentions. It hasn't really panned out that way.


Yes, it has! All art with girls and birds is Triple-X-rated, by definition! Why? Because I sai....Oh, forget it. No one ever listens to me anyway.

Think I'll go eat worms.

:)
User avatar
compared2what?
 
Posts: 8383
Joined: Sun Oct 21, 2007 6:31 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby Seamus OBlimey » Mon Sep 22, 2008 3:29 pm

compared2what? wrote:(b) it therefore entails a de facto presumption that all girl/bird art is pornographic, because I say so; and


You can say that again!
User avatar
Seamus OBlimey
 
Posts: 3154
Joined: Wed Jun 14, 2006 4:14 pm
Location: Gods own country
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby Seamus OBlimey » Mon Sep 22, 2008 3:54 pm

Brainy, I saw this much..

Image

and thought Oh No! I haven't? Not again?

So I was so relieved to see that tit.

Nice one.
User avatar
Seamus OBlimey
 
Posts: 3154
Joined: Wed Jun 14, 2006 4:14 pm
Location: Gods own country
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby sunny » Mon Sep 22, 2008 5:37 pm

Image
Choose love
sunny
 
Posts: 5220
Joined: Mon May 16, 2005 10:18 pm
Location: Alabama
Blog: View Blog (1)

PreviousNext

Return to L'Encyclopedie

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests