...they preach this Gospel of trickling down economics and Capitalism. It's not trickling down! It's pissing on everybody!
They don't care!
- Immortal Technique @ Occupy Wall St.
Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff
...they preach this Gospel of trickling down economics and Capitalism. It's not trickling down! It's pissing on everybody!
They don't care!
- Immortal Technique @ Occupy Wall St.
GQ interviewer: How would you describe your fashion?
Steve Albini: I think fashion is repulsive. The whole idea that someone else can make clothing that is supposed to be in style and make other people look good is ridiculous. It sickens me to think that there is an industry that plays to the low self-esteem of the general public. I would like the fashion industry to collapse. I think it plays to the most superficial, most insecure parts of human nature. I hope GQ as a magazine fails. I hope that all of these people who make a living by looking pretty are eventually made destitute or forced to do something of substance. At least pornography has a function.
b 1924, African-American novelist, short story writer, playwright and essayist, civil rights activist, James Baldwin wrote:Now, it is true that the nature of society is to create, among its citizens, an illusion of safety; but it is also absolutely true that the safety is always necessarily an illusion. Artists are here to disturb the peace.[Wikipedia][Wikiquote]
Masculine third-person singular pronouns apply equally to female persons in the above, if you wish.b 1892, first American woman awarded Nobel Prize for Literature 1938, Pearl S. Buck wrote:The truly creative mind in any field is no more than this: A human creature born abnormally, inhumanly sensitive. To him... a touch is a blow, a sound is a noise, a misfortune is a tragedy, a joy is an ecstasy, a friend is a lover, a lover is a god, and failure is death. Add to this cruelly delicate organism the overpowering necessity to create, create, create—so that without the creating of music or poetry or books or buildings or something of meaning, his very breath is cut off from him. He must create, must pour out creation. By some strange, unknown, inward urgency he is not really alive unless he is creating. [Refer.]
whipstitch wrote:The mind craves for formulations and definitions, always eager to squeeze reality into a verbal shape - Nisargadatta
The state and its police were not neutral referees. They were on the side of the rich and powerful. Free speech? Try it, and the police will be there with their horses, their clubs, their guns, to stop you. From that moment on, I was no longer a liberal, a believer in the self-correcting character of American democracy. I was a radical, believing that something fundamental was wrong in this country—something rotten at the root. The situation required not just a new President, or new laws, but an uprooting of the old order, the introduction of a new kind of society—cooperative, peaceful, egalitarian.
...
To omit or to minimize...voices of resistance is to create the idea that power only rests with those who have the guns, who possess the wealth, who own the newspapers and the television stations. I want to point out that people who seem to have no power, whether working people, people of color, or women — once they organize and protest and create movements — have a voice no government can suppress.
Indeed, the stress placed by Federalists on national defense and a vigorous commercial policy often seemed to mask a radical shift in direction from the protection of individual liberty to the pursuit of national riches and glory. When the Anti-Federalists saw the new Constitution defended as having the "noble purposes" to make us "respectable as a nation abroad, and rich as individuals at home" and as calculated to promote "the grandueur and importance of America, until time shall be no more," they feared for the principles of the American governments - H Storing.
"You are not to inquire how your trade may be increased," Patrick Henry warned, "nor how you are to become a great and powerful people, but how your liberties can be secured; for liberty ought to be the direct end of your Government."
Nothing would prove more disastrous to our ideas, we contended, than to neglect the effect of the internal upon the external, of the psychological motives and needs upon existing institutions.
“I worry every day how I will keep a roof over my head in the future. My teeth are all broken and I cannot afford to get them fixed because all my $$ is going to Aetna. So actually you could say that I am neglecting my health in order to be able to pay for my insurance.”
We have to let go of what we think we deserve, because it was never a good thing to begin with, and it was always at the expense of the rest of the planet.
In a sense, we are in the same ethical and moral dilemma as the physicists in the days prior to the Manhattan Project. Those of us who work in this field see a developing potential for a nearly total control of human emotional status.
- Dr. Wayne Evans
U.S. Army Institute of Environmental Medicine, 1978
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest