The "MR. Global" yakadoodle in a hat (in the video posted upthread) was going off about Britain now moving towards some Chinese-Russian scheme that is a response to Rothschild reptilian domination or whatever, but it is interesting that timing of this coincided:
‘Our views are either similar or coincide’: Putin on comprehensive strategic China-Russia alliance
In terms of cooperation in the international arena, besides the United Nations, Putin noted the importance of the joint work in the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) and BRICS. The SCO, Putin said, remains an “essential element” that ensures stability and security in the region, as he expressed hope that more nations will join the bloc.
Beijing-based SCO, created in 2001, is a political and security organization. It comprises China, Russia, Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, Tajikistan, and Kyrgyzstan. India and Pakistan are expected to become full members of the SCO after they are formally admitted into the organization at the SCO summit in Uzbekistan’s capital Tashkent, which begins on Thursday. The work of the organization includes intelligence sharing, counter-terrorism operations, and a joint fight against cyber terrorism in Central Asia.
“At the summit held last year in Ufa, Russia, we decided to admit another two states to the SCO - India, and Pakistan. We are to formalize this decision at the Tashkent meeting. We will also consider the intentions of other countries to join our work,” Putin said, adding that admitting more members will turn the organization into a “very powerful” association that “commands respect and is relevant both in the region and worldwide.”
https://www.rt.com/news/347879-putin-ru ... -alliance/It seems overly facile to pretend that this is some great blow against oligarchs and, of course, the Reptilians, as the outcome vis-a-vis China and Russia is not quite a given:
He Weiwen, co-director of the China-US-EU Study Centre under the China Association of International Trade, part of the Ministry of Commerce, is blunt; “The European Union is likely to adopt a more protectionist approach when dealing with China. For Chinese companies which have set up headquarters or branches in the UK, they may not be able to enjoy tariff-free access to the wider European market after Britain leave the EU.”
That applies, for instance, to leading Chinese high-tech companies like Huawei and Tencent. Between 2000 and 2015, Britain was the top European destination for Chinese direct investment, and was the second-largest trading partner with China inside the EU.
Still, it may all revert into a win-win for China. Germany, France and Luxembourg – all of them competing with London for the juicy offshore yuan business – will increase their role. Chen Long, economist with Bank of Dongguan, is confident “the European continent, especially Central and Eastern European countries, will be more actively involved in China’s ‘One Belt, One Road’ programs.”
And, as a British friend of mine pointed out, the UK has a royal family that is still legally empowered to rule over the legislature, itself consisting of an unelected upper house and an non-directly elected PM, so for them to claim it is a return to democratic rule...It seems pretty obvious that the break-off of the EU will take years and cost billions, such that I sincerely doubt that Britainers will ever see any great benefit in the short term of 5-10 years, and by that time who knows what the political-economic landscape will be...