Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff
Iamwhomiam » 23 Oct 2017 23:59 wrote:That video was posted two days ago by Heaven Swan:
http://www.rigorousintuition.ca/board2/viewtopic.php?f=8&t=40709&p=645718&hilit=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.nytimes.com%2Fvideo%2Fus%2F100000005473328#p645718
Clearly, your not reading what others have been posting.
Heaven Swan » Tue Oct 24, 2017 1:27 am wrote:At the link is a great post about symbolism and motives, it's long and has lots of photos so I'm recopying only the last two paragraphs.
Re: the motive, I find the last paragraph to be quite profound. It may sum up our answer. One crazed act inspires another...and one thing is certain...there will be others.
http://www.nickvanderleek.com/2017/10/b ... vides.html
Bestselling True Crime Author provides motive for Las Vegas gunman Stephen Paddock [UPDATED]
Stephen Paddock's motive was revenge. How do we know? Revenge for what? It's not rocket-science, just a tried-and-tested true crime approach - by Nick van der Leek
Last two paragraphs of the post:
We get an added sense, from the fact that Paddock took his own life, that he knew what he was doing was wrong, and was willing to pay a price for it. But he felt justified, if he was going to lose in the gamble of life and love, then someone else [it didn't matter who] also had to pay the price. Who? The society that had rejected him. The breaking of the glass of the Mandalay Hotel is symbolic of the transparency not only into the room of Paddock's broken world, but also into the world itself. We live in a world of broken people, and when we discover the world to be empty and meaningless we're devastated. We have no idea how to put the pieces of ourselves back together again. That is an indictment not only of disconnected, addicted individuals, but of a society so disconnected from itself that it has begun to elect madmen to tell it what it wants to hear, and reality be damned.
In such a world, where there is no meaning, no significance and no consequence, where money maketh and unmaketh the man, where money is the sole arbiter of value....in such a world, make no mistake, madmen will continue to come out of the woodwork. One mad act inspires another. One fragile identity seeds more fragile identities. A world where lives are reduced to money and violence isn't a world that respects life. It's a world that respects madness. Until further notice, this is the world we find ourselves in. When we're asked what the motive is of madmen, we can't see them not because they're obscure, but because we've succumbed to the madness as well. It's a madness composed of the inability to think for ourselves.
PufPuf93 » Mon Oct 23, 2017 11:11 am wrote:The key to this story is where Paddock got the money and possibly some of his acquaintances we have yet to learn.
I can see as a motivation that say he had played out his wealth and provided for his woman friend before the massacre.
I can conceive that Paddock is a patsy and/or part of a larger conspiracy (that maybe went wrong).
Could even be the too common situation where the FBI is working both sides of the equation.
Like to know if he maintained any contact from Lockheed Martin days.
Heaven Swan » 23 Oct 2017 17:34 wrote:Regarding the adjoining room--there's nothing strange or baffling about this---hotels worldwide often have contiguous rooms that they outfit with special doors that can be sealed off (when they rent the rooms to separate parties) or left unlocked when they rent out the rooms together, usually to more than one guest.
That said, how tedious! This thread has gotten bogged down in minutiae.
On the other hand, I appreciate 82_28's post about Las Vegas.
The tragic event seems deeply symbolic--
While America goes down in flames, a deranged and slovenly millionaire blows his brains out, taking 59+ souls along with him, in the heart of the country's glitzy shrine to meaninglessness, debauchery and greed...
peartreed » 23 Oct 2017 18:55 wrote:Paddock’s nihilistic motivation likely stems from his identification with his father’s criminality, as the spawn of evil, combined with his more recent increasing dissatisfaction and boredom with the drive for material acquisition that motivates the rest of us. To match or exceed Daddy’s notoriety he sought infamy as release.
Iamwhomiam » 23 Oct 2017 20:16 wrote:stickdog99 » Mon Oct 23, 2017 1:37 am wrote:It would be nice if you recognized my response to your question, stickdog.
It's quite frustrating to take the time to answer your questions, and pointless, in fact, if you fail to recognize your question was answered.
Your first two questions have already been answered in this thread. The adjoining room was part and parcel to the complimentary suite, to use or not to use it was Paddock's whim alone. It was not a room let out for rent.
There have been hundreds of posts on thread. I thought some Aussie claimed that he had rented the adjoining room. I thought the reason the LVPD had Paddock's check in date wrong is because he paid for his suite while his original, earlier booked room had been comped. Who provided the information that "the adjoining room was part and parcel to the complimentary suite, to use or not to use it was Paddock's whim alone"? Who said "it was not a room let out for rent"? When was this information released? How does this jibe with Lombardo's claim that Paddock paid for his suite? Why would Paddock pay for a second room to use at his whim when the suite he paid for was more than large enough for a family of four?
I don't know if any other has chosen to answer you stickdog, because I haven't read further. It seems you and perhaps others are convinced this mass murder was instigated by the FBI. I asked you to explain what you felt would be a motive for the FBI to commit this particular mass murder you chose not to answer and you now expect me to answer more of your questions?
You've been researching social media and the MSM for information about this event since it occurred, just like many of us. Why do I believe the room was comped and that it was reserved for comping preferred customers at the casino? Because it was reported and I read it or listened to it after someone posted it in this thread or from a link someone here provided to another source. I suspect it must have originated with the hotel management. so don't expect me to search it out for you. Try google.
If anything, the Aussie, if he actually exists, was in a room next to Paddock, was in the room next to 32134 or to the left of the room adjoining the suite (as shown in correct graphics of the floor plan), 2 doors down from the suite.
You know the FBI did it and I don't even know if "Paddock" ever existed. Your turn.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 49 guests