The initial paragraph below is applicable across topics, not merely specific to Gates.
Belligerent Savant » Thu Apr 15, 2021 2:36 pm wrote:
...
What is the basis for this reflexive defense of Gates*? What is it based on? Surely not on any objective assessment, but perhaps more likely, a knee-jerk reaction against certain apparent 'trigger' phrases, or ideas, that are immediately associated with a potential 'right-leaning' viewpoint. You see, any reference to "implanted microchips", however valid, must be instantly derided as fringe right-wing talking points/"Conspiracy Theory". The Pseudo-leftist is then compelled to defend Gates. It's the same diseased mindset that in many respects is at least partially responsible for the ZEAL self-identified "leftists" displayed when they jumped on -- and continue to defend -- the lockdown/mask-wearing bandwagon, despite clear science that showcases minimum-at-best efficacy: because TRUMP uttered anti-mask sentiment. Reflexively, all those that loathe Trump refused to even CONSIDER that masks actually don't work as advertised. No different than PAVLOV's DOGS, anyone that falls prey to this. And it applies on the converse as well, of course; plenty of 'trigger' phrases out there to get those on the 'Right' worked up as well. Facile strawman constructions created to amplify white noise and divisive rhetoric, keeping the people divided and distracted from underlying activities.
*it goes without saying there is PLENTY of data out there to be highly dubious of Gates' intent@commieleejones
2016: Nature Magazine criticizes Moderna for excessive secrecy in its research and data (we now know they were receiving DARPA funding for 5 years by that time, from when Bancel became CEO in 2011) and wonders “whether they can be trusted.”
https://www.nature.com/articles/nbt.3488
@commieleejones
·
21h
Despite its secretive DARPA-funded research, Moderna received “$240 million upfront from AstraZeneca in 2013, $125 million from Alexion in 2014 and, just last month, $100 million and $20 million for vaccine deals with Merck and the Gates Foundation, respectively.
https://twitter.com/commieleejones/stat ... 77382?s=20@spencerlatu
The cover Bill Gates is receiving by the fake left denouncing “CoNsPiRaCiEs” and Twitter algorithms boosting this Gates defence force is fascinating. The ruling class war on humanity is so thinly veiled that intelligence has come up with controlled opposition narrative for Gates@FreyjaErlings
It's a grand fucking irony of our age that people think Bill Gates is trying to implant us all with microchips when the actual conspiracy he is behind and which is completely open and on record is preventing open source vaccines, preserving copyright and slowing vaccinations
@spencerlatu
·
2h
In clockwork fashion, days after 60 minutes explains that yes there are COVID-19 microchips, the fake left trolls have a new story about Gates. No matter what these LOL CIA Twitter trolls say, we know what’s really going on
https://twitter.com/spencerlatu/status/ ... 41024?s=20@cordeliers
Pentagon would like to implant a microchip in your body that supposedly would detect COVID infections.
Pentagon scientists invent microchip which senses COVID-19 in the body
https://www.msn.com/en-us/health/medica ... r-BB1fy3y7
·
Apr 12
Replying to
@cordeliers
The “LOL microchips” snark on this site and elsewhere provides cover for actual, highly sinister DARPA and Gates projects.
@cordeliers
·
Apr 13
"The work was funded by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and came about because of a direct request from Microsoft founder and philanthropist Bill Gates himself."
https://www.scientificamerican.com/arti ... accinated/
Invisible Ink Could Reveal whether Kids Have Been Vaccinated
@ClearVision99
·
Apr 12
Replying to
@cordeliers
But....but.. Izn't THiS a c0N$piRaCy ThE0rY??
https://twitter.com/cordeliers/status/1 ... 20000?s=20
Still, there will be those that will continue to wave away these developments, at least due in part to the implication that voicing scrutiny of Gates may potentially place you within range of viewpoints held by..... The Others.
Perhaps he's not as sinister as he appears to be -- there may well be other undisclosed factors at play and a number of grey areas occluded from view. But there's no doubt he's earned scrutiny, and there will likely be minimal accountability in the near-term.