WTC 7: FOX & Geraldo are on the case

[seemslikeadream]

[82_28]

Clever clever. . .

[MinM]

http://onlinejournal.com/artman/publish ... 6588.shtml

kenny's sideshow: Geraldo Rivera and the WTC 7 Demoliton

Ironically, since Schorr was taken off CBS 35-years ago, Fox News has done the only worthwhile reporting on Watergate, and 9/11 too, for that matter...

rigorousintuition.ca - View topic - What about Watergate?

[AlicetheKurious]

It seems that a new unofficial official narrative is being launched, by "one of the world's leading investigative reporters" and "one of the most respected journalists in America"....uber-zionist shill Geraldo Rivera.

Apparently, the evidence for controlled demolition can no longer be suppressed through media silence or ridicule, so what to do? What to do?

Co-opt it, of course! Plan B: enter controlled brave investigative journalistsTM who will peddle a whole new narrative based on a limited hang-out for controlled demolition, to divert attention away from the compelling evidence that implicates Israel's Likudnik conspirators and profiteers onto safer targets.

Controlled opposition!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-HcliJUk ... r_embedded

Sorry, I can't embed the video for some reason.

[Alfred Joe's Boy]

Part of the NWO's effort to convince the conquered people that they aren't conquered yet.

[operator kos]

Just a few quick thoughts in reaction...

On the one hand, it's quite an honor to be in one of the most loathsome and obnoxious groups in the country.

What's up with his call for racial profiling at the very end of the clip? What a non-sequitor. Or was it intentional, to associate those who question 9/11 with racist ideas?

And then the other guy ends with a promise to bring the TRUTH.... the PLAIN (PLANE) TRUTH!? Very funny, guys.

[JackRiddler]

An official admission that WTC 7 was demolished, for whatever reason in whatever way, would initiate the end of any credibility to the official story of 9/11. Doesn't matter if it's intended as a limited hangout (which, properly defined, is a defensive move in which a partial truth is admitted in an effort to forestall more).

[nathan28]

An official admission that WTC 7 was demolished, for whatever reason in whatever way, would initiate the end of any credibility to the official story of 9/11.

Which matters how? This is exactly like fucking Iran-Contra. It practically is Iran-Contra. Revelations ten years late--"So, uh, about that cocaine..."--didn't, won't and can't matter.

[Hugh Manatee Wins]

Why Geraldo and Fox?

Because the latest dangerous publicity idea from Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth is:
"Adopt a coffee shop and pamphlet."

Since latte-sipping Lefties will be exposed to subversive (factual) 9/11 inside job (what movie?) information, it is being pre-emptively contaminated by
Geraldo and Fox as a form of 'proximity contamination,' a negative framing technique used in psyops layout routinely.

Sort of like making the first author of the 'bin Laden Book of the Month Club' be William Blum.

[JackRiddler]

An official admission that WTC 7 was demolished, for whatever reason in whatever way, would initiate the end of any credibility to the official story of 9/11.

Which matters how? This is exactly like fucking Iran-Contra. It practically is Iran-Contra. Revelations ten years late--"So, uh, about that cocaine..."--didn't, won't and can't matter.

We're both in NYC. I think you're underestimating how people would react to such a revelation -- which, I hasten to add, I do not therefore expect. I also consider the Geraldo story on it to be an attempt to defuse, not to magnify, the effects of the "Building What" ad campaign. And, furthermore, to be minor.

I agree that this is Iran-Contra insofar as it's the same crew involved. But 9/11 is still the one day that changed the world, still being used in that function, and it killed 3000 people in New York. It's not a set of discrete, hidden, in large part plausibly deniable events in foreign policy over many years time. The later cocaine revelations made ripples mainly in the black community, with the Pincus-NYT-LAT-all media hit job on Webb succeeding in defusing it beyond that.

Anyway, the government side is not risking any kind of limited hangout, not WTC 7 or Flight 93, and they don't have to.

.

[AlicetheKurious]

An official admission that WTC 7 was demolished, for whatever reason in whatever way, would initiate the end of any credibility to the official story of 9/11. Doesn't matter if it's intended as a limited hangout (which, properly defined, is a defensive move in which a partial truth is admitted in an effort to forestall more).

Well, of course. Regardless of any "official admission", the official story of how WTC 7 went down is already caput. The whole purpose of a limited hangout is to co-opt evidence that points to the real perps and hijack it so that it points elsewhere.

I wouldn't be surprised if ol' Geraldo and similar hacks 'discovered' that WTC 7 and the other buildings had been rigged with controlled demolition explosives at the time they were built (so they could be brought down safely when they became obsolete, of course) but that this information had been classified for obvious reasons. The planes, see, by crashing into the buildings, had accidentally activated the explosives, giving the terrorists a bigger bang for their buck than they had expected and causing the government to panic and go into damage-control mode.

Yet another embarrassing example of government incompetence. Get it?

I'm not saying that this particular meadow is necessarily where Geraldo & Fox are leading their flock, but this narrative neatly accounts for the cd explosives while diverting attention away from Silverstein, Lowy, Eisenberg, Lauder, Kroll, Hauer, et al and their scheme to privatise the WTC then demolish it for enormous profit, all while achieving Israel's objectives, as well as ZIM, Odigo, ("remote-control planes") Zakheim, the dancing Israelis and the "Israelis dressed as Arabs" driving around Manhattan in vans smelling of explosives, etc.

The objective of this and any other 'limited hangout' is to forestall any serious investigation that uses even the most basic investigative techniques to address the questions: "cui bono?" and "who had the motive, means and opportunity to execute the September 11 attacks?" while taking into account ALL the available evidence.

[MinM]

Judge Napolitano follows up with Geraldo Rivera on the WTC 7 Demolition

Napolitano calls Rivera "one of the most respected journalists in America."

Rivera says his new open minded outlook on 9/11 is all because he "cares so much."


Part deux of what appears may be an ongoing Fox and intelligence services psyops. The CIA and Mossad, among others, are gauging the responses to this limited acknowledgment of some basic 9/11 truths. Where this is leading is still speculation. It is not leading to full disclosure of what happened...

kenny's sideshow: Judge Napolitano follows up with Geraldo Rivera on the WTC 7 Demolition
-----

GERALDO - The Education Forum


Geraldo Rivera Recalls Capone Vault, Says He'd Vote for FOX Colleague | PopEater.com

rigorousintuition.ca - View topic - Live 9/11 protest on Geraldo/Fox News

[Nordic]

I just want to dd to this that my own anecdotal evidence is that more and more people (in my universe at least, which is likely atypical) no longer believe the official story YET when you mention Building 7 they respond with a blank stare, a complete unawareness as to the very existence of it. Similarily I often get the same reaction when I mention the anthrax attacks ande the other day one fellow told me he was pretty sure the anthrax attacks happened prior to 911!!! I am facsinated at how 911 messed with people's heads.

[sunny]

Well, of course. Regardless of any "official admission", the official story of how WTC 7 went down is already caput. The whole purpose of a limited hangout is to co-opt evidence that points to the real perps and hijack it so that it points elsewhere.

Totally agreed. I wonder how they will blame 'Al Qaida' for planting the explosives? Should be a hoot.

[JackRiddler]

Geraldo Rivera is going to do nothing of the sort. The chances are zero, so imagine away. His soft-pedaled one-time hit piece in response to the "Building What" ad campaign is unlikely to have any follow-up, and the follow-up would be more of the same tepid playing to a conspiratainment demographic, but you spin it into a platform for expounding your wish scenario (which could be true, but for which your evidence is thin and selective) that it's already proven that a bunch of Zionists etc. etc.

Even if untrue, the official story is not kaput as long as it works.