Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff
Searcher08 wrote:...this guy KNEW how things worked, he KNEW what things would get him screwed-over - so why the whole hooker thing?
Experts who advise banks and individuals on anti-money laundering regulations, said that the two banks were just following the law when they reported the suspicious financial transactions to federal authorities.
These officials said that banks are likely to more closely monitor the transactions of politicians like Mr. Spitzer than those of average customers. In part, that is because of legislation passed after the 2001 terrorist attacks.
As part of the “know your customer” requirements, banks must assess their clients’ financial patterns and set guidelines to ensure that an alarm is sounded if there are unusual transactions, said Bob Serino, a former deputy chief counsel at the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency who now advises banks and individuals on anti-money laundering regulations.
sunny wrote:I can't help but feel sorry for the girl. (She's the same age as my daughter) She's being raked over the coals by the late night comics and everyone else. I keep hearing her quote over and over in my head: "I just don't want to be thought of as a monster".
What was the point of outing this poor girl?
It's sick and predatory and irresponsible, and serves no legitimate purpose at all.
JackRiddler wrote:3) The present story is a front; the Bush DOJ was watching Spitzer anyway, and they got the bank to file a SAR, and the bank is now claiming it did it at its own discretion.
JackRiddler wrote:WHAT WAS HE THINKING?
1) Incredible hubris, arrogance and feeling of invulnerability, masking something he knows will trigger his own self-destruction. This kind of behavior has precedents in the annals of politics.
2) He trusts someone at the bank to cover for him, for some reason. If so: Why? An arrangement with buddies at the bank would also have precedent in the annals of politics.
Unless, of course,
3) The present story is a front; the Bush DOJ was watching Spitzer anyway, and they got the bank to file a SAR, and the bank is now claiming it did it at its own discretion.
But if she keeps her wits about her, she'll be fine.
JackRiddler wrote:Barracuda:
Hey, your number 5 is my number 1 in different words, you.
As for your number 4... how the bleep should I know? What do you figure is the freight train? A bigger scandal? Did Wall Street put out a hit on him? Are Peak Oil and the Asteroid of 2008 due to strike at the Ides of March?
MacCruiskeen wrote:Why didn't he pay cash?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 161 guests