
Thank you for participating in this automated moderation intervention. Stop cussing at each other, now.
Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff
jakell » 17 Feb 2016 23:50 wrote:Joe Hillshoist » Wed Feb 17, 2016 1:39 pm wrote:
Its your choice... you could have accept the criticism, illustrated why it was wrong but you tried to avoid it instead.
Your criticism wasn't wrong though, and I described this here:jakell » Wed Feb 17, 2016 11:30 am wrote:
Yes, that was stated a bit too crudely in attempt to relate to the title I was more thinking of my experience with the development of the BNP.
In reality, I can't really think of any incidents that relate to the title of this thread, so it's hard to find a pattern. In the past we had small scale stuff that was personal and fairly brief (and poorly planned) and the other end of the scale was more or less demo scale stuff where the only real violence was between the fascists and the antis.
This incident seems to occupy some middle ground, and is harder to link with either individuals or organisations. Possibly some new model along the lines that you describe is needed.
Seems you have a neat way of ending this sort of discussion though. 'No platform', or that other, creepier, interpretation
This sort of thing is not necessarily about ideological motivation though, I'm thinking of the widespread and (apparently) spontaneous UK riots in 2011 which spread quickly via social media from the very small beginnings of one particular funeral to become something almost nationwide.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 153 guests