A Few Words on the Blatant Disrespect Being Shown to Angela DavisLet’s make this plain.
There have been intense, wide-spread and polarizing responses to my article on a statement made by scholar, freedom fighter, former political prisoner and icon Angela Davis during her Sept. 30 keynote address at the “Black Matters: The Futures of Black Scholarship and Activism” conference at the University of Texas at Austin.
During her address, Davis said, “I have serious problems with the other candidate, but I am not so narcissistic to say I cannot bring myself to vote for her.”
“Her” being Hillary Clinton as opposed to white supremacist, fascist and completely disreputable Donald Trump. No, I’m not adding caveats here about Hillary Clinton. Check my record on that. Now, in this space, I want to clarify a few things that really should not need clarification.
Angela Davis did not “endorse” Hillary Clinton as some Clinton supporters have breathlessly claimed—and to claim otherwise is just as ridiculous as those small-minds who claim a vote against Clinton is a vote for Trump who, as Davis has previously noted, “traffics in white rage.” What Davis did is make plain her electoral strategy embedded within her broader commitment to realizing collective liberation for black people.
She did not say that she was “with her”; she said that she was with us.
As noted in the article, Davis is just as committed to independent politics and liberation from a white supremacist system as she has always been.
I absolutely believe that Davis is operating from a position that she believes to have the true interests of Black, Latinx, Indigenous, working class people and those living in deep poverty at the center—as she always has.
I do not, however, trust the same to be true of most Clinton supporters who are now cheering Davis’ comment. In my experience, these are the same supporters pretending that the extensive damage New Democrats have done—by covertly rebranding themselves as Republicans with a heart—has not devastated communities of color.Undeniably, Davis’ statement at the Black Matters conference carries tremendous weight—primarily because it creates space to discuss diverging and converging paths to freedom and liberation. As Davis said during her keynote, “We should have learned by now … the arena of electoral politics militates against the expression of radical militant perspective.”
According to attendees’ tweets, Davis also said that she tries not to tell young people what to do because she resented that when she was younger. That is important to note here because the conversations surrounding Davis’ comment have largely devolved into reductionist charges that she is trying to shame people into voting for Hillary Clinton.
These discussions are dangerous, misleading and frankly, embarrassing.Without question, using the term “narcissism” is politically loaded right now because that kind of argument—egocentric, immature, ignorant, naive, selfish, dangerous—is being lobbed indiscriminately by mostly middle-class liberals at anyone who isn’t voting for Hillary Clinton. There is a movement that is full of people who are not only saying what they want to see in concrete terms and presenting pathways to those possibilities, but actively divesting from politicians who don’t work toward those goals. That cannot and should not be reduced to mere “narcissism.”
Still, that in no way, shape or form should indict Angela Davis—
Angela Davis—on charges of not being committed to us and fighting for us with the means that she believes to be most effective. Choosing to not vote for a third-party candidate is not synonymous with no longer being invested in the construction of an independent party; that struggle, as Davis has said, is an ongoing, urgent and strenuous process.
I have reached out to Angela Davis in hopes that she will sit in circle with those of us who have modeled her radicalism in our own lives so she may answer any questions that we may have.
But the truth is she owes us no explanation. She has placed her life on the line for us. She is on the forefront of emancipatory, intersectional black feminist thought and the fight for liberation for oppressed people around the world. And she has consistently called out the white supremacist project that is the United States of America for what it is.
Be clear: If we’ve reached the point in the ride where we cannot engage Angela Davis with respect, then we’re going in the wrong direction.
But let me also say to HRC supporters who don’t align with Davis’ radical politics (at all): back up with the “Look Angela Davis said it; my Clintonians and I are right and everyone else is ignorant” narrative. Give us 50 feet. Don’t hide behind Angela Davis to push neoliberal politics and your favorite. The brilliance of Angela Davis—and the love and care she has shown for oppressed people around the world—goes far beyond this election.
What she stands for, many of you have never and would never—even if gifted the opportunity.
In this election, the
Who is just as important to contend with as the
Why. This does not mean that we can not disagree with the Why; Davis has encouraged us to challenge our heroes, herself included.
Still, I will build on Davis’ statement here and say that it is equally as important that we challenge our comrades.
Going forward, it is my deepest hope that we all engage Angela Davis’ statement in the context that it was given, and engage her with the love and respect that she has always shown us and that she unequivocally deserves.
