Connecticut Elementary School Massacre

Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff

Re: Connecticut Elementary School Massacre

Postby slimmouse » Fri Mar 01, 2013 4:57 pm

solace wrote:
slimmouse wrote:Lest we forget,

Image


Wounded Knee was awful BUT it didn't happen at a school. Another David Icke fail.


Well of course it didnt happen at a school. How terrible. That said, for the slaughtered, it could have been a school, A wedding, A funeral - take your pick really. I guess, semantic masturbation aside, theres an important point nonetheless? I certainly get it.
slimmouse
 
Posts: 6129
Joined: Fri May 20, 2005 7:41 am
Location: Just outside of you.
Blog: View Blog (3)

Re: Connecticut Elementary School Massacre

Postby solace » Fri Mar 01, 2013 6:25 pm

"semantic masturbation aside,"

ffs whatever.
solace
 
Posts: 392
Joined: Fri May 27, 2011 11:38 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Connecticut Elementary School Massacre

Postby LolaB » Fri Mar 01, 2013 7:04 pm

Here is a recent and extensive timeline that has many of the details / eye witness info people were pining for earlier in this thread.

http://www.globalresearch.ca/updated-sandy-hook-school-massacre-timeline/5324851

Multiple links at the source. Made perfect sense to me.
Hat tip to MacC.
User avatar
LolaB
 
Posts: 107
Joined: Tue Dec 13, 2005 12:20 am
Location: Topanga CA
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Connecticut Elementary School Massacre

Postby JackRiddler » Fri Mar 01, 2013 7:49 pm

slimmouse wrote:Image
I guess, semantic masturbation aside, theres an important point nonetheless? I certainly get it.


Besides your apparent inability to make easy to understand distinctions of relevant detail, and thus to characterize language itself as "semantic masturbation," the point is that there is no historical distortion to which either Icke or the gun worshipers will not stoop.

This one is a shameful abuse of this particular group of victims. "They" didn't "give up their guns." The native Ameicans were militarily defeated in the course of many armed conflicts in which the invading side had more arms and numbers, and subjected to massacres such as Wounded Knee whether or not they were armed. The Lakota Sioux had a few guns at Wounded Knee and were blamed, presumably falsely, for shooting first

Almost every thread we gotta deal with what David Icke thinks? Seriously? Should this board ban for stupid?
Last edited by JackRiddler on Fri Mar 01, 2013 8:35 pm, edited 1 time in total.
We meet at the borders of our being, we dream something of each others reality. - Harvey of R.I.

To Justice my maker from on high did incline:
I am by virtue of its might divine,
The highest Wisdom and the first Love.

TopSecret WallSt. Iraq & more
User avatar
JackRiddler
 
Posts: 16007
Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2008 2:59 pm
Location: New York City
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Connecticut Elementary School Massacre

Postby slimmouse » Fri Mar 01, 2013 8:34 pm

JackRiddler wrote:[
Should this board ban for stupid? I mean, almost every thread we gotta deal with what David Icke thinks? Seriously?


Well thats fascinating Jack. How about banning for exaggeration, quoting people completely out of context, names that havent even been mentioned , and any other number of similar activities you regularly indulge yourself in wrt myself and certain other members of this board who appear to rain on your seemingly immaculate mental parade? You really don't know how ignorant you sound to someone like myself, do you? Well Jack, the fact is you frequently are, whether you understand that or not

Sometimes you should perhaps pay attention to your own thought policiing of what I have little doubyt is probbably every board you participate in.

You once accused me of tactics akin to some xth grade bully, or some similar retort.

Glass houses and stones Jack- Another thing you should be aware of Sir.
slimmouse
 
Posts: 6129
Joined: Fri May 20, 2005 7:41 am
Location: Just outside of you.
Blog: View Blog (3)

Re: Connecticut Elementary School Massacre

Postby JackRiddler » Fri Mar 01, 2013 8:43 pm

@ slimmouse

The URL for the graphic is from the David Icke site. Not coincidentally, because that's your favorite shithouse, although you seem to think it is a lending library and you like to swallow deeply of its sewage and then spew it into this site, for our edification, as if we didn't already know what the likes of Icke have to offer.

But what's the difference, words are "semantic masturbation." You want to make this about yourself but you mean nothing. You have nothing to offer, ever, except to whine and give out generic platitudes when you're called on your bullshit. You are dirt. This is only about "you," or your sock-puppet ass, because you so consistently bring the aggressive stupidity.

Wounded Knee was not a school. Language matters. The Sioux there didn't die because they "gave up their guns." They were defeated in combat and massacred, no matter how much they fought. The Indians are not a prop for the NRA fantasies of today. Neither are the Jews of 1938 in Germany, another group you've tried to tell us died because they "gave up their guns."
We meet at the borders of our being, we dream something of each others reality. - Harvey of R.I.

To Justice my maker from on high did incline:
I am by virtue of its might divine,
The highest Wisdom and the first Love.

TopSecret WallSt. Iraq & more
User avatar
JackRiddler
 
Posts: 16007
Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2008 2:59 pm
Location: New York City
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Connecticut Elementary School Massacre

Postby solace » Fri Mar 01, 2013 9:02 pm

JackRiddler wrote:@ slimmouse

The URL for the graphic is from the David Icke site. Not coincidentally, because that's your favorite shithouse, although you seem to think it is a lending library and you like to swallow deeply of its sewage and then spew it into this site, for our edification, as if we didn't already know what the likes of Icke have to offer.

But what's the difference, words are "semantic masturbation." You want to make this about yourself but you mean nothing. You have nothing to offer, ever, except to whine and give out generic platitudes when you're called on your bullshit. You are dirt. This is only about "you," or your sock-puppet ass, because you so consistently bring the aggressive stupidity.

Wounded Knee was not a school. Language matters. The Sioux there didn't die because they "gave up their guns." They were defeated in combat and massacred, no matter how much they fought. The Indians are not a prop for the NRA fantasies of today. Neither are the Jews of 1938 in Germany, another group you've tried to tell us died because they "gave up their guns."



Well said and Amen.
solace
 
Posts: 392
Joined: Fri May 27, 2011 11:38 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Connecticut Elementary School Massacre

Postby Elvis » Fri Mar 01, 2013 9:14 pm

Another discussion reduced to name-calling and personal attack. Sigh.

Give it a freakin' rest.
“The purpose of studying economics is not to acquire a set of ready-made answers to economic questions, but to learn how to avoid being deceived by economists.” ― Joan Robinson
User avatar
Elvis
 
Posts: 7567
Joined: Fri Apr 11, 2008 7:24 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Connecticut Elementary School Massacre

Postby stoneonstone » Fri Mar 01, 2013 9:22 pm

Maybe everyone get Sherman to set Mr. Peabody's Way Back Machine to May 18, 1927, and set it for Bath Township, Michigan. 38 elementary school children and 6 adults murdered and at least 58 injured.

And yet no far reaching erosion of rights in its wake. Oh, and a pretty open inquest almost immediately conducted.
User avatar
stoneonstone
 
Posts: 226
Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2006 12:11 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Connecticut Elementary School Massacre

Postby Canadian_watcher » Sat Mar 02, 2013 12:59 am

Iamwhomiam wrote:Canadian_watcher, "I realize the knee-jerk response that such killers are insane is unsatisfying. I think the reality is extremely complex and has to be evaluated case-by-case, but in the end I would still be of the opinion that madness is almost always in evidence, whatever "madness" turns out to entail. Some sort of mind-sickness beyond the control of the killers leads them to these actions."

I would imagine most people would believe one need be mad to commit murder, but that would be far from true. The act is insane, whether by an individual acting out on their own motive or committed by soldiers on the battlefield or conspirators.

The murderer in the Seattle massacre had no history of mental illness whatsoever.

Anger solves nothing and is unuseful, unless, of course, anger is the point of such a conspiracy with the purpose of moving forward a political agenda, rather than its motivation for one or more acting out so violently.


I'm not sure why this is directed at me, however I'll respond such as I can.

I agree - you have to be off your rocker in some way - whether programmed not to feel (as in soldiers) or because you snapped (as in a hundred million other individuals) - in order to kill. Then again, society has made a pretty sick-making rocker, and IMHO there are justifiable homicides. I wouldn`t say that this qualifies, mind you. I don`t think that there could ever be a justification for this, unless you are completely without human empathy and understanding.

As far as I can tell, this caveat leaves a great many suspects. Not only Adam Lanza, who I still know virtually nothing about, destroyed hard-drive and all. I mean, what`s the internet snooping bill for, anyway? Fuck the bill - they can find out anything anyone did online, hard drive or not. Such a joke.

I'm not following this story, but the pieces are easily picked up and pulled apart.

Might I gently suggest that you have a somewhat distinct view on these types of situations - one that helps and also hurts a search for the truth. I mean that with respect.
Satire is a sort of glass, wherein beholders do generally discover everybody's face but their own.-- Jonathan Swift

When a true genius appears, you can know him by this sign: that all the dunces are in a confederacy against him. -- Jonathan Swift
User avatar
Canadian_watcher
 
Posts: 3706
Joined: Thu Dec 07, 2006 6:30 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Connecticut Elementary School Massacre

Postby Iamwhomiam » Sat Mar 02, 2013 3:34 am

My comment wasn't directed to you, C_w.

I was just responding with my thoughts about your comment, in part agreeing and also disagreeing, only to add that some perfectly sane, clear-minded people commit murder and as I believe in preternatural evil, that some murders are committed by people possessed by such an evil.

You also wrote, "Might I gently suggest that you have a somewhat distinct view on these types of situations - one that helps and also hurts a search for the truth. I mean that with respect."

I'm not offended. Thank you for your honesty.
I do not see how my perspective could hinder the truth. My frustration earlier was mostly on specious speculation, some quite wild and in my opinion, doing so endangered innocents. I mean the bodies weren't even cold when it first started. I'm a bit more methodical, gathering what I've learned, analyzing the body of evidence and drawing conclusions. To my way of thinking, some here seem to work backwards. They come to conclusions and then try to fit scant evidence without regard for consequences.
Let's remember this is a discussion board and not a court of law. Our conversations have little impact on any beyond our own readers and any conclusions we reach will have no bearing on this or any other case. Let's remember too, that our search for truth here has no impact on those whose search for truth matters in the real world beyond these pages. But we sure do like to argue!
After all, anyone can claim 'conspiracy' about almost anything at all, for whatever stated motive. Doesn't make it true, tho.
User avatar
Iamwhomiam
 
Posts: 6572
Joined: Thu Sep 27, 2007 2:47 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Connecticut Elementary School Massacre

Postby lupercal » Sat Mar 02, 2013 11:47 am

Now here's something odd: Frontline apparently relied heavily on an unflattering portrait of Lanza provided by one Richard Novia, a dubiously qualified figure who was hired as "as chief of security" by the Newtown school district in 1993 from a "security and investigative background." Apparently security chief Novia recruited Lanza to join his "tech club":

Richard Novia served as chief of security in Newtown’s school district and ran the tech club at Newtown High School. He recruited Adam to join the tech club, hoping to encourage him to become more social. According to Novia, Adam’s mother, Nancy, was at a loss as to how to help her son. “She was failing at bringing him out of his little world,” Novia said. “And I said that I think I can help him.”


Sounds like he helped alright. Under Novia's watch, Lanza had "episodes" of withdrawal while seated in a darkened room lit only by glowing CRTs where he learned to "comply" with Novia's commands:

So there was a time where we had a controlled room for the video productions of our channel 17. He would like to be in there. The only illumination of the room is the monitors, and intentionally it’s dark in that room. He’d like that type of environment. He’d like that quiet, close the door in the control room, stay in there. I would say, “No, no, no, you’re on to do this.” … And we had reached a point where he would actually respond to that. So that was progress. “You’re gonna be behind camera 4.” Now, he wouldn’t say no, he wouldn’t say yes. He wouldn’t say anything. But he got to a point where he was able to comply.

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline ... -withdraw/


:shock: :shock:

Image
User avatar
lupercal
 
Posts: 1439
Joined: Tue Jun 02, 2009 8:06 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

let me take my chances on the wall of death

Postby IanEye » Sat Mar 02, 2013 1:04 pm

lupercal wrote:Under Novia's watch, Lanza had "episodes" of withdrawal while seated in a darkened room lit only by glowing CRTs where he learned to "comply" with Novia's commands:

The only illumination of the room is the monitors, and intentionally it’s dark in that room.




lupercal, this going to blow your mind so you might want to sit down, but:

you've just described every television editing bay i have ever worked in.

even odder, the reason they keep the lights off is to match the light level in theaters, where i've been told they actually turn the house lights off while a film is playing.

curiouser and curiouser, i hear they do this on Broadway as well...

User avatar
IanEye
 
Posts: 4865
Joined: Tue Jan 17, 2006 10:33 pm
Blog: View Blog (29)

Re: Connecticut Elementary School Massacre

Postby lupercal » Sat Mar 02, 2013 1:23 pm

IanEye wrote:you've just described every television editing bay i have ever worked in.


If you find yourself standing up and barking like a dog on the count of three, now you'll know why. :shrug:


p.s. that will be fifty dollars. :D
User avatar
lupercal
 
Posts: 1439
Joined: Tue Jun 02, 2009 8:06 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Connecticut Elementary School Massacre

Postby Iamwhomiam » Sat Mar 02, 2013 2:42 pm

Well now, ya learn something new every day. Funny how bolding type some think accentuates truth so we all will see and agree. Breezed by without any mention of the trenchcoat mafia, too, simply unforgivable! I'm sure others would have pulled some stronger points present below.

Here's the PBS article in its entirety:

Richard Novia: “Adam Had Episodes. He Would Completely Withdraw.”
February 19, 2013, 9:42 pm ET

Richard, you arrived in Newtown in 1993?

At the school systems? Yes. I lived in Newtown.

Can you talk about what you encountered about the climate, what the environment of the town high school is, and what you set about doing?

They had the typical problems most schools do: substance abuse, some gang stuff, leaving campuses — all kinds of little problems that made [the school system hire] persons like myself to put them in perspective, [and give] assessments and recommendations to prevent these things from happening.

And what are the cliques that you identified?


For example, you had your black dressers, or your cloaks. You had sports cliques. There are many, many types of cliques in the school system, I made an objective to identify them and understand them. …

Now you mentioned from your security and investigative background, you had an affinity for electronics … so you went on about starting a tech club, a computer club at the high school?

Right, I was basically a geek. … So I could see that several types of students, the geeky type, or the nerds, which I related to very well, were missing something on the campuses at the time, and it was a way for me to pull them in.

And these were also types of students that often become victims of bullying, harassing, hazing. So I developed a tech club, to bring these students in and interact with them. And it grew from two or three to as high at 40 kids.

Now the time that we get into the mid-2000s, did you have Ryan Lanza in your tech club?

Yes. Yes I did. …

And at what point did you expand the tech club?

We began to interact with the middle schools, the students in the 6th and 7th grades, and bring programs to them. So the tech club members and myself would take robotics down there. They would have to assemble them, put them together and then program them, make them follow little patterns on the floor with the robots. And this was a way to engage the middle school. They felt they were making friends earlier on. They were finding their ways to be who they were. [It was] a way to exercise their intelligence.

You met Adam Lanza there?

Yes.

While he was in middle school?

I believe so, while the tech club was in expansion mode. We would invite them to the high school for the events. We would video tape a football game, a basketball game, a graduation, parades — all kinds of stuff at the high school level. And the middle school was now involved, so they would be bussed up to the high school after school for these events.

You remember if Adam came to those events early on?

Inside events, when we had like activities like tech club night sleepovers. We’d spend a weekend or overnight in the school, lock it down. I’m in charge, as a director of security. You had 30 kids, some of them were middle schoolers whose parents allow them to come over and stay overnight. He did partake in those.

Did Ryan stay close?

Early on Ryan, unfortunately, he had to [be] somewhat of a caregiver for his brother, when all he wanted to do is be a typical 16 year old and have his fun, which meant video shoots and computer games and all kinds of stuff throughout the night. But yeah, they were together at one point.

How did your connection with Adam evolve from the moment you first met him on through the year and two years that he was in your orbit?

From when I first met him, I recognized him as a person who would be likely to be bullied or picked on. … I identified him both because he had mental disorders, challenges. … And my objective at that time was to watch him very closely and make sure that didn’t happen.

… How do you help him or deal with him?

I interacted with his parent early on to find out as much as I could –

Nancy Lanza?

Nancy yes, who I think is a wonderful woman. … As a staff member, and certainly a person who’s gonna be overseeing your child, I need to know what I’m dealing with. You might have an allergy to peanut butter. It’s that simple, I need to know this sort of stuff.

So my interaction with Nancy Lanza was really: “Tell me about Adam. Tell me how you deal with Adam.”

And what did she say about Adam?

Oh, she told me that he had several disorders.

Did she say he had Asperger’s?

Yes. I believe, yeah, she did. That’s where I first [got] the information. Because I was going to be responsible for him and wanted to do well by him and integrate him.

Did she also say that he had a sensory processing disorder?

Yes, she did. Yes.

And did that fall into one of the areas of concern, because maybe he wouldn’t report an injury, report pain, seek help as someone else would?

Exactly. So my first interaction with her was to understand what I had to be concerned about, what I needed to know about him. But also since she had been the mother over the years, how was it that she was dealing with him and what could I do?

And what did she say about that?

Specifically that kind of thing, she was failing at bringing him out of his little world. And I said that I think I can help him. I think can I integrate him better through the tech club.

What was her reaction to that?

She didn’t think it would work. She was very concerned to let him out, although she really, really, desperately needed him to be more social. So she went along with it and I think we saw some success.

Did she express as the months went by that in a sense, you were right?

Well, she was a good parent. This was a parent who was actively involved with her children, their educational processes, their groups, their friends. The older son didn’t need her care. He was way ahead of most.

The younger son needed extra care. Video productions, software — he would master this stuff very quickly. But still to get him to speak one or two words, it was very, very hard.

But over time I was able to get closer and closer to him, to a point where I felt that I could sit next to him and he wouldn’t pull away. He wouldn’t withdraw, and he was comfortable. You could see him maybe not so much as cringe.

Did Nancy acknowledge that and let you know that she recognized that?

Yes, she did. She saw it working. Not just her — administrators, teachers, all the students that were around him would report that slowly but surely, he was coming out. He was succeeding, and I was happy.

He’s not my only one, OK. There’s lots of kids like this, and they might belong to a different group. But the object is to socialize them.

How often to do you recall Nancy being on campus on a weekly basis?

In his freshman year, there were periods of time where I think I saw her two or three times a week. I think I saw her two or three times a week, and then you’d have a good month or two and I’d see her once.

Why would she typically be there two or three—

Adam had episodes. It was the best way I can describe them to you. He would completely withdraw. Again he would go backwards. He would pull back within himself entirely. And getting him to come back out of that required an attention, my attention. …

Would she be called to the school?

Yes. … I did recall calling her once on a overnight where I think I sent him home.

So what happened on that overnight?

We were doing well and at some point, again he would have his episode. This episode would be where he completely withdraws from the social activity that you’re involved with. Will not communicate. Adam, what’s going on? No answer.

You could see it slowly happening. Most of the tech club kids are aware of him and his situations, in a loving and caring way, and would say, “Hey Mr. Novia,” you know, “you need to go take a look at Adam.” He would separate himself from the group, not far, but at the same time, not want to be too far away where he didn’t feel safe.

Was there a time when he was in a darkened room, the only illumination was the glow of the screens, and he wouldn’t come out?

Yeah, I mean, that was an example I’ve given before to help understand his personality. He likes isolation. He likes to be alone. But at the same time, not. He likes to be near, but not too close.

So there was a time where we had a controlled room for the video productions of our channel 17. He would like to be in there. The only illumination of the room is the monitors, and intentionally it’s dark in that room. He’d like that type of environment. He’d like that quiet, close the door in the control room, stay in there. I would say, “No, no, no, you’re on to do this.” … And we had reached a point where he would actually respond to that. So that was progress. “You’re gonna be behind camera 4.” Now, he wouldn’t say no, he wouldn’t say yes. He wouldn’t say anything. But he got to a point where he was able to comply. And walk along and do things and do activities.

And then later on, he would actually follow the groups around. And an episode would be the complete reverse of that: Not willing to communicate, not willing to talk, and not willing to share or able to share was a better word.

Was there any trigger to that? Was there any proceeding event that you identified?

My opinion would be that he would become accustomed to certain things and when you try to raise that level or bar, he would pull back.

A change from the routine?

Yeah, excitement. I’ll give you an example. On a normal tech club afternoon, the kids don’t go home. They just stay on campus with me. I’m usually there 16 hours a day anyways, and we’ll be in the tech club room, where all the computers are.

You might [play] capture the flag. He’s not used to that, has no idea what it is. All the kids are gathering and they are starting to get excited. You’d lose him. So you had the change and he wasn’t able to go along with those changes as fluidly as the other students, who would say: “What is capture the flag? I want in, I want in.”

And the times you called … what was the typical interaction with Nancy Lanza?

She knew, because she had raised him. There really wasn’t that much of a discussion. It would be more like, “Nancy, you need to come up to the school.” This is old stuff now, so she’d just come up to the school. And I’d say, “He’s having an episode and I’d prefer that he’d go home.”

Other times, there had been many occasions where I thought not to send him home. … I’d go up and sit next to him. If he was sitting on the floor in the corner somewhere, I would do the same. And if it took a half an hour to sit there in silence with him, at some point, you’d go, “How we doing?” And you wouldn’t get an answer.

So I had read a book many years before that on how to interact with this type of behavior. I had studied the DSM-5 repeatedly on his behalf and on many other students’ behalf. I had a gadget with me at one time. I handed him the gadget, put it down. And he wouldn’t take it. But at some point, he started to play with it. And that actually, at some point, got him to start to come back and interact and be ready to go take part in the events. No answer, but physically getting up and going.

Was Adam on a track to violence?

No. Not at that time. Not at that time he was not.

His manifestation would be what? In the hallways for example? During class change, between bells?

That would scare him more than anything, in the beginning especially. I’m sure he got better, but he would avoid the crowds in the halls. Anybody could imagine or remember what this is. There’s hundreds of kids going in between lockers, opening up and closing, you know, mayhem in the hallways between bells. People rushing to the cafeteria, rushing to their classes.

That would make him nervous. And he would maybe shy against them, or wait. Maybe he’d be late for class. He would wait where there was no kids and then move along and then he would take the locker situation. But he had an escort at times. I mean there’s staffers. I was around. My people were around.

Were there times when he might not come to a class or wander out of a class?

It wasn’t until his later times that he I believe he had actual classes. Special ed — he was part of that group. They have their own rooms, so he was in there a lot and did not have to go room to room in the beginning. Later on, they’re trying to integrate him so he would be put in a classroom and see how that works.

At some point did you learn that Nancy Lanza had taken Adam out of high school?

At the same time I was leaving the Board of Education, she pulled him out too. He couldn’t come back for that school year.

Why do you think she pulled him out?

I don’t know. I’ve pondered this issue for a long time. I have often wondered that if she just felt one of his main support networks were no longer there. I don’t know. He may have gotten worse. I don’t know. He may have pulled back farther at that point. I don’t have an answer for that because like I said, I was gone. I had no interactions with Adam after that. Today, I wish I did.

… Did it ever come to your attention that Nancy was into shooting sports?

No. That shocked me. I was absolutely shocked to hear that Nancy would have had anything to do with guns. I was stunned.

You own firearms?

Yes I do.

And you’ve been an instructor on the range?

Yes.

You believe that shooting with Ryan and Adam was a mistake?

Yes, I do.

Even if they bonded? She expressed to friends that it was a bonding experience.

No.

Why?

No. … I have a child who loves to do the hot-rod driving on race cars, and he’s just 16 years old. He’s got himself a wonderful, wonderful simulator on the TV. He’s playing the video games. … So the result is I should have been able to foresee that my son loved the speed, when I bought him his first car. And it wasn’t a couple of weeks after that that he got ticketed for 100-and-something miles per hour on a street in Newtown and I went well, OK, that was my mistake, because you play these games.

So what Adam had shown at that point early on [was] some high interest in the violent aspect of those games.

You know that firsthand?

I remember that he would opt to sit on the computer playing games like that than to go play DDR, which is Dance Dance Revolution.

You would remember what game he may have played?

The best of my recollection, and some people have said there are other games too, but it was World of Warcraft at that time. But again, these are simulators, and the more a person like him is playing these games, even a normal human being like yourself and I who are healthy would be desensitized towards the violence. A person in his situation would become involved to a much higher level, where they might act out, just as my son did on the racing game.

When it was observed that Adam in high school was playing violent video games, did anyone try to dissuade him?

A lot of kids were playing violent video games. But they’re healthy. Healthy kids. Adam was not a healthy child.
User avatar
Iamwhomiam
 
Posts: 6572
Joined: Thu Sep 27, 2007 2:47 am
Blog: View Blog (0)
PreviousNext

Return to General Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 157 guests