Hillary Clinton is Seriously Dangerous

Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff

Re: Hillary Clinton is Seriously Dangerous

Postby dada » Wed Oct 12, 2016 9:59 pm

Wombaticus Rex wrote:Turns out, you were right.

Image

"Memes are an ecosystem of theft, and I'll tell you, I love it." - William Shakespeare


Nice! That deserves the broccoli dance. :dancingbroccoli:

Nordic » Wed Oct 12, 2016 9:18 pm wrote:
dada » Wed Oct 12, 2016 7:50 pm wrote:It makes me sad when I see smart people tweeting. It's like they're on meth, and there's nothing I can do but watch them ruin themselves.


That would make a great tweet.


I know, right? I could be awash in social media heart love right now. Just need to get a lobotomy first.

This gets me thinking, though. Could I do it? Pretend to be what they want me to be. The role waiting for me is 'prodigal son.' It would be a big hit, good photo ops. Say all the right things, be all cardboard cutout image with no substance. Post pictures of kitties and inane videogame nostalgia bullshit. Fake it for a few months, then really lay into them. Might be fun.

Fuck. Can't believe I'm even considering this. Geez, thanks a lot, Nordic.
Both his words and manner of speech seemed at first totally unfamiliar to me, and yet somehow they stirred memories - as an actor might be stirred by the forgotten lines of some role he had played far away and long ago.
User avatar
dada
 
Posts: 2600
Joined: Mon Dec 24, 2007 12:08 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Hillary Clinton is Seriously Dangerous

Postby OP ED » Wed Oct 12, 2016 10:11 pm

seemslikeadream » Wed Oct 12, 2016 3:54 pm wrote:
Luther Blissett » Wed Oct 12, 2016 3:49 pm wrote:I'm telling you, with a little effort you could collect on Trump and file it on through to them.

I don't think they're hiding info on Trump that's being handed to them.


I am not a hacker.....there's plenty of hackers out there

don't tell me no one has hacked anything on Trump and that Wiki doesn't have anything to leak on him..that's ridicules


What have they leaked on Trump?


I can't believe they don't have anything on Trump...that's insane

thousands and thousands of Clinton docs hacked ...but not one thing on Trump ....how interesting



I actually doubt that there's much dirt on trump that he hasn't freely bragged about on camera. As far as actual crime goes, his history involves traditional organized crime, the officially illegal sort which is not something one often emails about. Especially since we all know our accounts are monitored. Hilary's crimes are bureaucratic gray scale crimes of the vaguely acceptable as status quo policies, hence her inability to consider it necessary to adequately hide them.

That said, if wikileaks revealed Trump emails tomorrow that implicated him in every unsolved murder in the United States since I was born, his crimes would still pale in comparison to hers.
Giustizia mosse il mio alto fattore:
fecemi la divina podestate,
la somma sapienza e 'l primo amore.

:: ::
S.H.C.R.
User avatar
OP ED
 
Posts: 4673
Joined: Sat Jan 05, 2008 10:04 pm
Location: Detroit
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Hillary Clinton is Seriously Dangerous

Postby 82_28 » Wed Oct 12, 2016 10:13 pm

I believe I said this upthread and for some reason I happen to be a friend of those that are friends of the Clintons. Since high school in fact. So I have seen again, for some reason, their "hangin' out" side. They are semi regular/normal specimens out of view of the media. I can vouch for this -- I've seen just regular old photos of them. Question is, is what compels them? It has always puzzled me.

Always puzzled me since high school.
There is no me. There is no you. There is all. There is no you. There is no me. And that is all. A profound acceptance of an enormous pageantry. A haunting certainty that the unifying principle of this universe is love. -- Propagandhi
User avatar
82_28
 
Posts: 11194
Joined: Fri Nov 30, 2007 4:34 am
Location: North of Queen Anne
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Hillary Clinton is Seriously Dangerous

Postby OP ED » Wed Oct 12, 2016 10:14 pm

I have been considering ontological terrorism via Twitter for several years now. The algorithms that create trends are fairly simple to exploit.
Giustizia mosse il mio alto fattore:
fecemi la divina podestate,
la somma sapienza e 'l primo amore.

:: ::
S.H.C.R.
User avatar
OP ED
 
Posts: 4673
Joined: Sat Jan 05, 2008 10:04 pm
Location: Detroit
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Hillary Clinton is Seriously Dangerous

Postby Nordic » Wed Oct 12, 2016 10:41 pm

seemslikeadream » Wed Oct 12, 2016 3:54 pm wrote:
Luther Blissett » Wed Oct 12, 2016 3:49 pm wrote:I'm telling you, with a little effort you could collect on Trump and file it on through to them.

I don't think they're hiding info on Trump that's being handed to them.


I am not a hacker.....there's plenty of hackers out there

don't tell me no one has hacked anything on Trump and that Wiki doesn't have anything to leak on him..that's ridicules


What have they leaked on Trump?


I can't believe they don't have anything on Trump...that's insane

thousands and thousands of Clinton docs hacked ...but not one thing on Trump ....how interesting


Trump doesnt interest them because Trump isn't dangerous. Trump has zero political power. Trump is just a celebrity real estate developer from NYC.

Also I doubt he has a lot of secrets or writes many emails. He tweets everything already.
"He who wounds the ecosphere literally wounds God" -- Philip K. Dick
Nordic
 
Posts: 14230
Joined: Fri Nov 10, 2006 3:36 am
Location: California USA
Blog: View Blog (6)

Re: Hillary Clinton is Seriously Dangerous

Postby 8bitagent » Wed Oct 12, 2016 11:17 pm

If Anonymous isn't bluffing....holy shit.

Jeffrey Epstein/Franklin Coverup proof would be a tactical nuke on both the election, America and the world
http://www.anonews.co/anonymous-bill-clinton/
"Do you know who I am? I am the arm, and I sound like this..."-man from another place, twin peaks fire walk with me
User avatar
8bitagent
 
Posts: 12244
Joined: Fri Aug 24, 2007 6:49 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Hillary Clinton is Seriously Dangerous

Postby Novem5er » Wed Oct 12, 2016 11:22 pm

82_28 » Wed Oct 12, 2016 10:13 pm wrote:I believe I said this upthread and for some reason I happen to be a friend of those that are friends of the Clintons. Since high school in fact. So I have seen again, for some reason, their "hangin' out" side. They are semi regular/normal specimens out of view of the media. I can vouch for this -- I've seen just regular old photos of them. Question is, is what compels them? It has always puzzled me.

Always puzzled me since high school.


Please confirm: are they reptiles or not?

:)

RE: Trump and hacking, I think it should be noted that everything "hacked" about Clinton has been relatively recent (the last five years) and consisted only of email documents. We've seen no spreadsheets, contracts, financial reports, etc. It's just email, kept on a relatively unsecured server, which is probably the easiest type of server to get into.

Trump probably doesn't even use email. He's old school and probably just calls everyone or demands they meet him for a face-to-face. I'm sure there is dirt out there, but it's the kind of dirt that old-school private eyes would have to dig up, doing extensive ground work, surveillance, interviews, and burglaries. Trump is the kind of guy to have old snuff films locked away in an office safe.

But it's most likely that we already know about Trump's dirty laundry through 35 years in the public spotlight. I'm sure there's more "proof" to be had, but at this point, it'd be more like confirmation than revelation.
User avatar
Novem5er
 
Posts: 893
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2012 11:12 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Hillary Clinton is Seriously Dangerous

Postby Jerky » Wed Oct 12, 2016 11:24 pm

Wait... what did Anonymous say?

J
User avatar
Jerky
 
Posts: 2240
Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2005 6:28 pm
Location: Toronto, ON
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Hillary Clinton is Seriously Dangerous

Postby 8bitagent » Wed Oct 12, 2016 11:34 pm

Luther Blissett » Wed Oct 12, 2016 4:25 pm wrote:It all depends upon what others have given them. Unless you're extremely in the know it's impossible to tell what's been collected by whom and where it is.

I think those in possession of Trump leaks are probably much less afeared of the traditional mainstream institutional means of releasing information. Any media outfit would be thrilled for anything salacious. Not so with Clinton. The Fourth Estate is there to protect the imperialist candidate and any dissension from the left is met with hostility. (begrugingly I guess "dissension" from "the right" might be treated the same way but we all know who those types would be and what their motivations are) Wikileaks is supposed to be for dissident whistleblowers, not those with the backing of so much Western power and Wall Street money.

I'm all for continuing to embarrass the Trump campaign.

Let's say you got someone prominent within your target's campaign's business email addresses from one of her numerous DC gigs and posed as someone she might be tangentially associated with through a new gmail account. Hypothetically let's say you wrote, for instance, a small snippet of PHP code that runs a script to gather keystrokes, or, maybe, resets a password. Hypothetically maybe you embed the executable script in an old filetype that behaves like an image, or embed it directly into a PDF of a Wall Street Journal or other sympathetic conservative media outlet and deliver it to her. Or perhaps hypothetically maybe you would be inclined or motivated to just straight up phish her with something realistic-looking. English is your first language and you are crafty.

Skip forward a couple steps. I can assure you that you can feel safe enough to pass them on to the Washington Post and everyone involved will protect your anonymity.


Where is this left? Or even moderate left anymore? All I see at this point across social media is now an iron lockstep 1984 agenda between once pro Bernie left leaning news, mainstream media, the Bernie Left, the neocons,
and now the Republicans to blackout anything negative about the Clinton campaign. Outside of Drudge, Fox News and Breitbart, theres not a peep on the massive wikileaks unfolding. Not even the leftist sites that used to always love Wikileaks. Not even from the Bernie left who spent a year bashing Clinton. Now that we have an endless tsunami of stuff the Bernie people only wish had been released in the primaries...tumbleweeds.

Nothing but 24 hour celebrity sex stuff with Trump. Im looking the noise coming from Russia, US foreign policy experts...it ain't good. A number of even mainstream media reports like CNN illustrating
how we're hurtling toward a hot war with Russia. Which I'm sure is what Hillary and her Bush neocon PNAC backers cannot wait for in their apocalyptic vision
"Do you know who I am? I am the arm, and I sound like this..."-man from another place, twin peaks fire walk with me
User avatar
8bitagent
 
Posts: 12244
Joined: Fri Aug 24, 2007 6:49 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Hillary Clinton is Seriously Dangerous

Postby 8bitagent » Wed Oct 12, 2016 11:37 pm

Jerky » Wed Oct 12, 2016 10:24 pm wrote:Wait... what did Anonymous say?

J


Anonymous released a video within the last hour saying they allegedly have obtained a video of Bill Clinton with a 13 year old taped
as blackmail at Jeffrey Epstein's Lolita island in the early-mid 2000's. Im erring on bullshit, but this election and year has already been
so nuts, so who knows
"Do you know who I am? I am the arm, and I sound like this..."-man from another place, twin peaks fire walk with me
User avatar
8bitagent
 
Posts: 12244
Joined: Fri Aug 24, 2007 6:49 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Hillary Clinton is Seriously Dangerous

Postby JackRiddler » Wed Oct 12, 2016 11:46 pm

Of the two threads, this is the one that has me laughing the most lately. Thanks dada & brainsturbator!
We meet at the borders of our being, we dream something of each others reality. - Harvey of R.I.

To Justice my maker from on high did incline:
I am by virtue of its might divine,
The highest Wisdom and the first Love.

TopSecret WallSt. Iraq & more
User avatar
JackRiddler
 
Posts: 16007
Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2008 2:59 pm
Location: New York City
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Hillary Clinton is Seriously Dangerous

Postby Novem5er » Wed Oct 12, 2016 11:49 pm

8bitagent » Wed Oct 12, 2016 11:37 pm wrote:
Jerky » Wed Oct 12, 2016 10:24 pm wrote:Wait... what did Anonymous say?

J


Anonymous released a video within the last hour saying they allegedly have obtained a video of Bill Clinton with a 13 year old taped
as blackmail at Jeffrey Epstein's Lolita island in the early-mid 2000's. Im erring on bullshit, but this election and year has already been
so nuts, so who knows


I watched the Anonymous video you linked to, and they seem quite serious, but they actually don't say they have the video. They use very general terms like ".... a secret sex tape of Bill Clinton threatens to blow up the election. . . " and then they proceed to say how Hillary set up Trump, but now Trump is uncontrolled and fighting back, and at the end they predict that the Israeli intelligence will likely kill someone before the election to protect their world-wide intelligence network.

Interesting stuff, but Anonymous never says they have the video or that they will release it. They just state that it exists. I'm not sure how useful that information is unless there is proof of it. I've found Anonymous videos to be hit or miss over the years. At least the Russians are providing us with actual hacked emails . . . yuk yuk.
User avatar
Novem5er
 
Posts: 893
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2012 11:12 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Hillary Clinton is Seriously Dangerous

Postby 8bitagent » Thu Oct 13, 2016 12:19 am

Novem5er » Wed Oct 12, 2016 10:49 pm wrote:
8bitagent » Wed Oct 12, 2016 11:37 pm wrote:
Jerky » Wed Oct 12, 2016 10:24 pm wrote:Wait... what did Anonymous say?

J


Anonymous released a video within the last hour saying they allegedly have obtained a video of Bill Clinton with a 13 year old taped
as blackmail at Jeffrey Epstein's Lolita island in the early-mid 2000's. Im erring on bullshit, but this election and year has already been
so nuts, so who knows


I watched the Anonymous video you linked to, and they seem quite serious, but they actually don't say they have the video. They use very general terms like ".... a secret sex tape of Bill Clinton threatens to blow up the election. . . " and then they proceed to say how Hillary set up Trump, but now Trump is uncontrolled and fighting back, and at the end they predict that the Israeli intelligence will likely kill someone before the election to protect their world-wide intelligence network.

Interesting stuff, but Anonymous never says they have the video or that they will release it. They just state that it exists. I'm not sure how useful that information is unless there is proof of it. I've found Anonymous videos to be hit or miss over the years. At least the Russians are providing us with actual hacked emails . . . yuk yuk.


If Bill Clinton flew, at least 11 times without Secret Service on Jeffrey Epstein's Lolita Express plane to his island, ya know theres gotta be video of him. Even if Bill didnt partake in any schtooping.

I get the sense some of the hackers are America. I'm guessing those who hacked into John Podesta's current email and twitter account were American 4chan users.
"Do you know who I am? I am the arm, and I sound like this..."-man from another place, twin peaks fire walk with me
User avatar
8bitagent
 
Posts: 12244
Joined: Fri Aug 24, 2007 6:49 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Hillary Clinton is Seriously Dangerous

Postby OP ED » Thu Oct 13, 2016 12:23 am

Define "Anonymous"....

(What I see so far could be Trump fanboy opportunism)
Giustizia mosse il mio alto fattore:
fecemi la divina podestate,
la somma sapienza e 'l primo amore.

:: ::
S.H.C.R.
User avatar
OP ED
 
Posts: 4673
Joined: Sat Jan 05, 2008 10:04 pm
Location: Detroit
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Hillary Clinton is Seriously Dangerous

Postby seemslikeadream » Thu Oct 13, 2016 7:22 am

Lawsuit accusing Donald Trump of raping 13-year-old girl gets December hearing

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/nationa ... -1.2828413
Mazars and Deutsche Bank could have ended this nightmare before it started.
They could still get him out of office.
But instead, they want mass death.
Don’t forget that.
User avatar
seemslikeadream
 
Posts: 32090
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 11:28 pm
Location: into the black
Blog: View Blog (83)

PreviousNext

Return to General Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 159 guests