#OCCUPYWALLSTREET campaign - September 17

Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff

Re: #OCCUPYWALLSTREET campaign - September 17

Postby 2012 Countdown » Fri Oct 28, 2011 8:33 am

occupyoakland Occupy Oakland
Name of officer in SD holding "non-lethal" weapon C. Johnson -Name of High ranking officer on scene J.H. Chilles. Just Sayin #OccupySD #OWS
2 hours ago


---

Police Clear Occupy SD Protestors Out Of Civic Center Plaza
Last Update: 5:00 am
SAN DIEGO - Law enforcement personnel in riot gear cleared Occupy San Diego protestors out of Civic Center Plaza early Friday, making some arrests in the process, police said. The operation began about 2 a.m. after officials declared the three-week-old event an unlawful assembly, said San Diego police Officer David Stafford. It lasted about 45 minutes, and there were no immediate reports of injuries. Protestors plan to reassemble at 8:45 a.m. for a solidarity march from Civic Center Plaza to the Wells Fargo Building downtown, Fox 5 News reported. During the plaza-clearance sweep, some protestors scattered around downtown San Diego while others were arrested, Stafford said without saying how many. The operation was carried out by some 20 police officers assisted by a score of San Diego County sheriff's deputies, also in riot gear, witnesses said. They reported seeing about a half-dozen protestors being arrested for refusing to leave.

http://www.sandiego6.com/news/local/sto ... qgssA.cspx

===
WeOccupyAmerica We Occupy America
@
@TheRealSomebody #OWS free speech disempowered, San Diego media team arrested. Looks like DHS's next gambit.
1 minute ago

===

Must see!..imo-
"Tonight Belongs To Occupy Wall Street!" as Protesters Take Control of NYPD Netting

TheOther99 had an amazing video up via their livestream from the Occupy Wall Street Solidarity with Occupy Oakland march. Protesters in New York not only took to the streets, but they took over NYPD police netting as well.


===
Image
FTSE 100 directors' pay jumps 49pc
Directors of FTSE 100 companies enjoyed an average increase of 49pc in total earnings in the last financial year, to £2.7m.

By Angela Monaghan5:45AM BST 28 Oct 2011

The report by Incomes Data Services (IDS) also said that chief executives' earnings rose by 43pc to £3.86m.
"Britain's economy may be struggling to return to pre-recession levels of output, but the same cannot be said of FTSE 100 directors' remuneration," said Steve Tatton, editor of the IDS report.
Total earnings include fixed pay, benefits, bonuses, value of long-term incentive plans and gains made on the exercise of any share options cashed in during the year.
Earnings among finance directors rose on average by 34pc to £2m.
The report comes at a time when high inflation, high unemployment, and low wage growth is weighing down on UK household budgets.
Separate data published by IDS this week showed median pay settlements in the private sector were 2.6pc in the three months to August.
IDS said: "At a time when employees are experiencing real wage cuts and risk losing their livelihoods, without further explanation it may be difficult for FTSE 100 companies to justify the significant increase in earnings awarded to their directors.
"The pay gap between the boardroom and the shop floor does not yet show any signs of closing."
The Centre for Economics and Business Research (CEBR) said separately that total City bonus pay-outs for 2011/12 were expected to fall 38pc compared with a year earlier to £4.2bn. The last time bonuses were lower was in 2002/03.
CEBR said that would reduce the bonus pot to a third of its pre-recession level, with total bonuses peaking at £11.6bn in 2007/08.
The eurozone debt crisis had constrained activity in the City, and several major banks had reported weak third-quarter results, CEBR said. City bonuses are expected to remain broadly flat through 2012/13, it added.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/jobs ... -49pc.html

===
Image

Which Bank Is the Worst?
Wonder why Occupy Wall Street is so angry with Bank of America and its brethren? Gary Rivlin names and shames the worst big banks.

by Gary Rivlin | October 25, 2011 6:48 PM EDT
If the Occupy Wall Street protesters want to target a single big bank, which should they choose?

The decision wouldn’t be easy, given the bad behavior of the country’s biggest brand-name banks. We look at the country’s four largest—Bank of America, JPMorgan Chase, Citigroup, and Wells Fargo—and throw in Goldman Sachs, a natural target of any protest. Here’s a taste of the deadliest sins committed by the banks, followed by a full account of all the gory details at each bank. Warning: It isn’t pretty

The Seven Deadliest Sins of the Big Banks
1. JPMorgan Chase kicks 54 military families out of their homes—despite a law against doing so.
2. Wells Fargo gives bonuses to loan officers to put minority borrowers into high-priced subprime mortgages—internally dubbed “ghetto loans.”
3. Citigroup, Bank of America, and Goldman Sachs all pay huge fines to settle charges they duped their own clients.
4. Goldman Sachs assists in Europe’s economic collapse by helping Greece mask the truth about its finances.
5. JPMorgan turns a blind eye to Bernie Madoff’s deceptions.
6. Bank of America pays $137 million to settle government claims it rigged the municipal-bond market.
7. Despite these and other unpardonable sins, banks showers tens of millions of dollars in bonus money on top executives.

Customers of all the big banks complain that being behind on your payments means a Kafkaesque journey through a maze where straight answers are impossible to come by.

full-
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2 ... print.html

===

Exxon Mobil Profit Soars 41% on Higher Prices, Refining Margins
EARNINGS OCTOBER 28, 2011
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000142 ... 07892.html

===

TeaPartyCitizen Hiem Zarkofzt
Gun shows are a friend of #ows
6 minutes ago


===

The study that shows why Occupy Wall Street struck a nerve
By Eugene Robinson, Published: October 27

The hard-right conservatives who dominate the Republican Party claim to despise the redistribution of wealth, but secretly they love it — as long as the process involves depriving the poor and middle class to benefit the rich, not the other way around.

That is precisely what has been happening, as a jaw-dropping new report by the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office demonstrates. Three decades of trickle-down economic theory, see-no-evil deregulation and tax-cutting fervor have led to massive redistribution. Another word for what’s been happening might be theft.

The gist of the CBO study, titled “Trends in the Distribution of Household Income Between 1979 and 2007,” is that while we’ve become wealthier overall, these new riches have largely bypassed many Americans and instead flowed mostly to the affluent. Perhaps my memory is faulty, but I don’t remember voting to turn the United States into a nation starkly divided between haves and have-nots. Yet that’s where we’ve been led.

Overall, in inflation-adjusted dollars, average after-tax household income grew by 62 percent during the period under study, according to the CBO. This sounds great — but only until you look a little closer.

For those at the bottom — the one-fifth of households with the lowest incomes — the increase was just 18 percent. For the middle three-fifths, the average increase was 40 percent. Spread over nearly 30 years, these gains are modest, not meteoric.

By contrast, look at the top 1 percent of earners. Their after-tax household income increased by an astonishing 275 percent. For those keeping track, this means it nearly quadrupled. Nice work, if you can get it.

This is not what Republicans want you to think of when you hear the word redistribution. You’re supposed to imagine the evil masterminds as Bolsheviks, not bankers. You’re supposed to envision the lazy free-riders who benefit from redistribution as the “poor,” and the industrious job-creators who get robbed as the “wealthy” — not the other way around.

full-
http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/ ... ingtonpost

===

LilEsBella Lili
Another overnight raid, like the military does #OWS RT @nytimes: Arrests Made at Wall St. Protest in Nashville nyti.ms/sa0t6M
10 minutes ago


OccupyNashville Occupy Nashville
#OWSNashville raided by THP Officers @ 3am / 2 Dozen arrested - Call Mayor Dean (6158626000) DEMAND their release! bit.ly/uOhaqw #OWS
1 hour ago


===

NYC-

Recorded live on October 28, 2011 6:42 AM CST
Police takes generators


http://www.ustream.tv/recorded/18158973 ... ium=social

===

OccupyMELBOURNE OccupyMELBOURNE
We can't wait to see everyone tomorrow, 12 noon, State Library for a peaceful walk to Treasury Gardens #occupymelbourne #OWS
51 minutes ago


===

OCTOBER 28, 2011 12:00 A.M.
OWS Needs a Republican President
It’s tough to have a revolution while supporting the status quo.


There’s only one way the Occupy Wall Street movement can become like the tea parties, and that’s for Barack Obama to lose in 2012. Why? Because Obama is the most divisive figure in American politics today.
I suspect that sentence reads funny to some people because in the mainstream press, “divisive” is usually a term reserved for “conservatives we disagree with.” But as a factual matter it can apply to anybody who is, well, divisive.


Obviously, Obama divides the right and left. That’s not all that interesting or relevant (even if it does represent a failure to live up to his “one America” rhetoric from 2008). But Obama also divides everyone else. Independents, whom he desperately needs to win re-election, are split over Obama, with the bulk siding with Republicans.
Even more significant, the left is deeply divided over Obama. According to reports, the Occupy Wall Street movement is torn over whether to support the incumbent president. Polling of the protestors is sketchy at best, but so far it’s pretty clear that most of the protestors liked Obama in 2008, and now roughly half of them are disillusioned by, disappointed in, or opposed to Obama.

That should only make sense, right? If Occupy Wall Street is a sincere, organic, grassroots movement for radical change and overturning the status quo, it can’t be 100 percent behind the guy who’s been running the country for the last three years.

Moreover, Democrats had near total control of the government for Obama’s first two years. Together, Obama and congressional Democrats already got their Wall Street and student-loan reforms, their health-care overhaul, and a huge stimulus. And yet Occupy Wall Street is still furious with the political status quo. Does anyone believe Obama can both run on his record and co-opt the Occupy Wall Streeters?

A “political hip-hop artist” who goes by the name “Immortal Technique” summarizes the view of many OWSers. “We’re willing to put [Obama’s] second term on the altar of democracy and sacrifice it if we need to,” I.T. told Rawstory.com, “to send a message to the rest of the world saying, ‘If you promise us change, and then you deliver nothing but the same, if you do these little superficial changes to pacify the people, to placate people, then you expose yourself.’”

Of course, Occupy Wall Street is just one facet of Obama’s larger problem. Why is he running as a left-leaning populist these days? Because he has to unify and energize his mopey and dispirited base, and hope that he can woo back independents later.

full-
http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/ ... h-goldberg

---

Dumbass Goldberg gets it wrong of course by claiming Indies don't support OWS, as they DO, and by a commanding margin. Goldie ignores that obvious fact that blows up his rntire conclusion. His ;analysis' of Obamas half measures gets it completely wrong too, but thats the propaganda Goldie puts out.
Last edited by 2012 Countdown on Fri Oct 28, 2011 8:55 am, edited 2 times in total.
George Carlin ~ "Its called 'The American Dream', because you have to be asleep to believe it."
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=acLW1vFO-2Q
User avatar
2012 Countdown
 
Posts: 2293
Joined: Wed Jan 30, 2008 1:27 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: #OCCUPYWALLSTREET campaign - September 17

Postby wordspeak2 » Fri Oct 28, 2011 8:45 am

There seems to be some confusion on the call for a general strike. It looks to me like Occupy Oakland is calling for a general strike in Oakland specifically, not nationally- which makes sense, and could be really successful, imo.

Meanwhile, Adbusters is apparently floating the idea of a national general strike.
http://www.forbes.com/sites/kenrapoza/2 ... rike-idea/

I do not think the time is yet right for a national general strike; I think it would fail and potentially spoil our ability to use that trump card tactic down the line.
wordspeak2
 
Posts: 1209
Joined: Mon Nov 13, 2006 5:20 pm
Location: Massachusetts
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: #OCCUPYWALLSTREET campaign - September 17

Postby seemslikeadream » Fri Oct 28, 2011 9:50 am


Anonymous downs Oakland police site after violence
Dan Kaplan
October 27, 2011

Last updated on October 27, 2011 08:15 PM

The hacktivist group Anonymous is making good on its promise of digital retaliation against the Oakland Police Department for the force it used against protesters this week.

A distributed denial-of-service attack against the department's website -- www.oaklandpolice.com -- is underway, and the website currently is unreachable.

In addition, members of the collective have begun releasing information about Oakland police officers, and the call is out for additional help.

"The time has come to retaliate against Oakland police via all non-violent means, beginning with 'doxing' of individual officers and particularly higher-ups involved in the department's conduct of late," read an Anonymous statement, posted to Pastebin.

An Oakland police spokesperson could not immediately be reached for comment.

Doxing references the public release of information about individuals.

Anonymous' operation, dubbed "OpUprise," comes in response to the actions Tuesday night of Oakland police trying to squash a largely peaceful demonstration organized to protest the clearing of an encampment where Occupy Oakland members had been staying.

Police used tear gas, rubber bullets and flash grenades against the demonstrators, according to reports and video posted on YouTube. Authorities have said the response was warranted because some of the rally participants were throwing objects at them.

The most seriously injured victim was Scott Olsen, an Iraq War veteran, who suffered a fractured skull after being struck by a police projectile. His condition was upgraded to "fair" today, according to reports.

According to the Pastebin document, Anonymous is offering a "no questions asked" $1,000 reward for information about the officer who threw the projectile at Olsen.

The police's response led to much criticism of Oakland Mayor Jean Quan, who responded with a statement that expressed sympathy with victims and promise to decrease police presence around Frank Ogawa plaza, where some of the demonstrators, many of whom are protesting corporate influence in politics and the country's large wealth inequality gap, have been living.

UPDATE: The Oakland police website appeared operational again, as of Thursday evening EST.
Mazars and Deutsche Bank could have ended this nightmare before it started.
They could still get him out of office.
But instead, they want mass death.
Don’t forget that.
User avatar
seemslikeadream
 
Posts: 32090
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 11:28 pm
Location: into the black
Blog: View Blog (83)

Re: #OCCUPYWALLSTREET campaign - September 17

Postby Jeff » Fri Oct 28, 2011 10:16 am

User avatar
Jeff
Site Admin
 
Posts: 11134
Joined: Fri Oct 20, 2000 8:01 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: #OCCUPYWALLSTREET campaign - September 17

Postby wordspeak2 » Fri Oct 28, 2011 10:18 am

NICE re the shutdown of the Oakland police web site. Where Anonymous sometimes turns me off a little with the dramatic music on their videos, this kind of thing has me cheering. Cyber-attack away on the pigs.

Meanwhile, ACLU is now taking reports of police violence from folks at the other night's march, and if they get enough of them they're going to file a class-action lawsuit.

Cornel West is pretty good, btw. He keeps his cool really well.
wordspeak2
 
Posts: 1209
Joined: Mon Nov 13, 2006 5:20 pm
Location: Massachusetts
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: #OCCUPYWALLSTREET campaign - September 17

Postby Peachtree Pam » Fri Oct 28, 2011 10:44 am

I think this fits in this thread, given that some protesters have targeted Bank Of America as a super criminal entity.

Ten Reasons Not to Bank On (or With) Bank of America
Thursday 27 October 2011

by: Nomi Prins, Truthout | News Analysis


Charging customers for a debit card is just one reason not to bank at BoA. Recent Occupy Santa Cruz Bank of America incident illustrates how sensitive B of A is to protest. This "too big to fail" bank may collapse like a house made of junk bonds and become a taxpayer burden. Here are a few other reasons why you shouldn't bank with them.

There is no shortage of hatred for the biggest banks. Indeed, the Occupy Wall Street movement is leading a national revolution against these Byzantine, powerful Goliaths for the economic devastation they have caused. This makes it difficult to choose the worst of the bunch. That said, a strong case can be made that Bank of America deserves the title of the nation's most despised bank.

Here are ten reasons to take your money out of Bank of America - and park it at a credit union or community bank near you. (And yes, that may be near impossible if you have a mortgage with them, as refinancing away from any big bank nowadays is a nightmare.)

1. B of A rejects the right of customers to protest. When two Occupy Santa Cruz protesters in California marched into a local Bank of America to close their accounts, the response was, "You cannot be a protester and a customer at the same time," followed by a threat to call the police if the women didn't leave. (The attending officer later reiterated the bank manager's message.) Meanwhile, the fact that Bank of America charges a fee for closing an account prompted Rep. Brad Miller (D-North Carolina), who resides in Bank of America's headquarters state, to introduce a bill to protect customers from such fees.

2. To recoup ongoing losses from its stupendously dumb acquisitions of Countrywide Financial and Merrill Lynch, B of A pillages its customers. Thus, despite massive public outrage, the $5 debit usage fee for customers with less than a $5,000 balance and no mortgage with the bank will begin in 2012. B of A was the first large bank to confirm it would charge this fee, which is the highest in current discourse among the banks.

On October 18, Consumers Union wrote a letter to B of A chief Brian Moynihan asking him to reconsider this fee, which impacts poorer clients disproportionately. The letter summed it up nicely: "Consumers should not be required to pay a costly fee that appears to be arbitrary and designed to generate income to make up for Bank of America's bad business decisions rather than covering the costs of providing debit card services." Banks collect 24 cents from retailers for each customer swipe, much more than the median 8 cents it costs a bank to process the purchase. Senator Dick Durbin's (D-Illinois) response was to urge customers: "Vote with your feet. Get the heck out of that bank."

3. B of A's other fees are just as bad. According to its last annual report, the bank has 29.3 million active online subscribers who paid over $300 billion worth of bills in 2010. In May, B of A raised its checking account fees, which included e-banking, to $12, in line with JP Morgan Chase's decision to do the same, up from $8.95 per month. In June, it started a $35 overdraft fee, even on overdrafts of one cent. Next year, it will incorporate basic checking with a new "essentials'' account structure that makes monthly fees unavoidable, that will not include free bill pay, and that has a mandatory $6 minimum fee.

Last Monday, Bank of America was charged (along with JP Morgan Chase and Wells Fargo) with colluding with the two major credit card companies, Visa and MasterCard, to keep ATM fees high; in other words, they were charged with "price-fixing," in direct opposition to antitrust laws. This is the third of three such suits filed recently, each seeking class action status.

4. Bank of America takes gross advantage of the military.

It is the official bank of the US military and has branches by or on many bases, which provides the firm with another locus of extortion. B of A can entice military personnel to take out loans at usurious rates. Personal loans made to soldiers for a few thousand dollars can actually keep them indebted for the rest of their lives.

Last May, Bank of America paid $22 million to settle charges of improperly foreclosing on active-duty troops. The firm spun these foreclosures as being Countrywide's fault for having started them before becoming part of B of A.

5. Bank of America is officially rated the biggest, scariest bank. Its stock price also fared the worst of the group of banks (which also included Citigroup and Wells Fargo) when Moody's Investors Service downgraded it on September 21.

B of A's long-term holding company (parent bank) rating was chopped two notches to Baa1 from A2, and its retail bank rating was cut two notches from A2 to Aa3, placing B of A four notches below rival JP Morgan Chase and one below Citigroup, the third-largest US bank. Its bank holding company has the lowest rating among the top five banks with the largest derivatives positions.

This caused great fear for investors involved in derivatives trades with the Merrill Lynch division, prompting them to request trades be moved to the part of the bank with the better rating - the retail part with the insured (peoples') deposits. That way, B of A doesn't have to pony up as much collateral to back the trades, as it would in a subsidiary with a lower rating. The Fed was recklessly happy to approve, despite the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation's (FDIC) misgiving about having to insure more risk, even if it can borrow from the US Treasury to do so. Meanwhile, Bank of America's stock price got so crushed that Warren Buffett scooped up a $5 billion preferred stock deal, effectively betting that the government won't let this big bank go bust.

6. B of A's derivatives position keeps rising. The total amount of derivatives in the FDIC-insured portion of B of A as of mid-year was $53.7 trillion, up 10 percent from $48.9 trillion the prior year, and up nearly 35 percent from its pre-fall crisis level of $40 trillion (the Merrill Lynch securities division holds $22 trillion in addition.) The bank has $5 trillion of credit derivatives, nearly double its $2.7 trillion pre-Merrill amount. In addition, because of its inherent zombie status and rating downgrades, the cost of insuring B of A against a possible default continues to rise in the credit derivatives market - a pattern that American International group (AIG) once followed.

7. Bank of America got the most AIG money of the big depositor banks. By virtue of having acquired Merrill Lynch's AIG-related portfolio, B of A got to keep approximately $12 billion worth of federal AIG backing, too. It also received more government subsidies than any other mega-bank except Citigroup. Its stimulus package included an initial Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP) helping of $15 billion for the bank and $10 billion for Merrill, plus a second helping of $20 billion in January 2009 after it became clear that Merrill's losses had spiked to $15 billion - in order to ensure the takeover from hell went through and Fed chairman Ben Bernanke, then-Treasury Secretary Hank Paulson, and then-Merrill Lynch executive John Thain could pat themselves on the back for saving the world. The government guaranteed $118 billion in assets, mostly Merrill's, in the new merged firm. With the benefit of the Fed's nearly 0 percent money policy, and a depositor base to plunder, B of A repaid that aid.

In terms of overall federal subsidies (including TARP), Bank of America was second only to Citigroup ($230 billion compared to $415 billion). None of that got in the way of former B of A CEO Ken Lewis' personal take, a $63 million retirement plan, in addition to the $63 million he scored during the three years before his departure.

8. Bank of America leads the big bank fraud lawsuit settlement tally. So far, it has racked up the largest settlement, $8.5 billion in June, to settle claims related to $100 billion worth of Countrywide-spun mortgage securities backed by faulty loans, with bigwig investors like Pimco, BlackRock, and the Federal Reserve Bank of New York.

B of A is also being sued by state and federal regulators for questionable foreclosure practices and a union benefits plan for hiding foreclosure problems that impacted its share price. It is one of 17 major US financial institutions being sued by the Federal Housing Finance Agency for billions of dollars of mortgage-securities-related losses that may require B of A to potentially repurchase $50 billion worth of allegedly fraudulent securities. Earlier this year, B of A settled for $3 billion regarding bad loans that they had repackaged by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, as well as agreed to a $624 million settlement in a securities fraud class-action suit filed by New York Sate and City pension fund regarding Countrywide stock losses. Then there's AIG's August lawsuit, in which AIG wants $10 billion in damages for mortgage-related securities it bought and against which it claims B of A committed securities fraud.

That's a lot of pain for a Federal Reserve-approved $4.1 billion acquisition. Meanwhile, since the settlement didn't lead to a financial restatement, under the supremely elastic (read: useless) Dodd-Frank Act, executives get to keep their related bonuses.

9. Even after lawsuits, B of A would still rather please investors than customers. Investors that won money in the $8.5 billion settlement were upset that B of A was continuing to service loans, instead of foreclosing on them more quickly. Now, B of A had a nasty incentive to kick people out of homes faster, rather than work with them to refinance or restructure mortgages. Two months later, their foreclosure process has, in fact, sped up.
Bank of America foreclosure notices are surging again following a slight robo-signing- related slowdown, meaning they are now sending out a greater increase in default notices (90-day overdue loans) than other banks. The bank has $30 billion in residential mortgage loans in default, which will become foreclosures for thousands of families.

10. Bank of America, despite having been buoyed up by the government, did not pay taxes, and, given its glorious ineptness, will be laying off 30,000 workers. Not only did the bank pay no federal taxes for 2010 (or 2009) by making use of its posted pre-tax loss of $5.4 billion, it actually cited a tax benefit of $1 billion. Meanwhile, it has announced plans to cut up to 30,000 jobs over the next few years as part of its plan to save $5 billion, ostensibly due to the settlements it's paying for engaging in upper-management-approved fraud.


http://www.truth-out.org/ten-reasons-no ... 1319648479
Finally, consider the two reasons that any of this list is possible. One is the Glass-Steagall Act repeal, which enables banks to comingle straight costumer business with reckless securities creation and trading. The second reason is coddling by a Fed that finances and approves every bad move. B of A is the poster child for a Glass-Steagall repeal gone wrong. Lewis pulled in a slew of other banks under the B of A umbrella, making it - at one time - the country's largest bank, including the infamous Countrywide Financial and Merrill Lynch. Now it has $2.26 trillion in total assets and $1.8 trillion assets in insured subsidiaries, $1.2 trillion of customer deposits ($1.066 trillion in the United States) and about $804 billion in FDIC-insured deposits - all part of the giant, risk-laden mess that is B of A.

Without being broken up via a new, strong Glass-Steagall Act, when banks need to find ways to make money, they resort to extorting it from their sitting ducks, er - customers. Meanwhile, that's where credit unions, which are not-for-profits owned by their members and not by outside shareholders, come in. They generally don't engage in crazy derivatives trades, or charge unnecessary fees for holding your money or for letting you pay bills with it, or for online banking. In terms of personal attention, among other economic reasons, the credit and smaller community banks are a much better bet.
Peachtree Pam
 
Posts: 950
Joined: Sat Jul 02, 2005 9:46 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: #OCCUPYWALLSTREET campaign - September 17

Postby Luposapien » Fri Oct 28, 2011 10:44 am

Nothing pressing to add, just passing along a little morsel of shit from NPR that I caught while negotiating the morning traffic on the way to work. They were reporting on the eviction of the Occupy San Diego site, and, paraphrasing (couldn't find a quick link to it on their website, and have no inclination to listen to the full broadcast again to dig it out), said that while some protesters scattered prior to the police moving in, some "chose to be arrested" instead. See, no problem with the arrests. After all, it's what the protesters "chose" to happen to them.

I know there are bigger things to get worked up about, but it's these sneaky little instances of the twisting of language and meaning that tend to really piss me off. At least the folks on Fox are upfront about their gleeful, retrograde cheering of brutality and greed.
Last edited by Luposapien on Fri Oct 28, 2011 10:54 am, edited 2 times in total.
If you can't laugh at yourself, then everyone else will.
User avatar
Luposapien
 
Posts: 428
Joined: Mon Nov 13, 2006 2:24 pm
Location: Approximately Austin
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: #OCCUPYWALLSTREET campaign - September 17

Postby elfismiles » Fri Oct 28, 2011 10:52 am


Trouble Every Day (1966)
Frank Zappa (and The Mothers of Invention)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TiVFfOOm_GI

"Trouble Every Day" is a song by The Mothers of Invention, released on their 1966 debut album Freak Out!.

Frank Zappa wrote the song in 1965 at 1819 Bellevue Avenue, Echo Park, Los Angeles (the suburban residence of a methamphetamine chemist referred to by Zappa as "Wild Bill the Mannequin-Fucker")[1] after watching news coverage of the Watts Riots.[2] Originally dubbed "The Watts Riot Song,"[2] its primary lyrical themes are racial violence, social injustice, and sensationalist journalism.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trouble_Every_Day_(song)

Frank Zappa - Trouble Every Day Lyrics

Well I'm about to get sick
From watchin' my TV
Been checkin' out the news
Until my eyeballs fail to see
I mean to say that every day
Is just another rotten mess
And when it's gonna change, my friend
Is anybody's guess

So I'm watchin' and I'm waitin'
Hopin' for the best
Even think I'll go to prayin'
Every time I hear 'em sayin'
That there's no way to delay
That trouble comin' every day
No way to delay
That trouble comin' every day

Wednesday I watched the riot . . .
Seen the cops out on the street
Watched 'em throwin' rocks and stuff
And chokin' in the heat
Listened to reports
About the whisky passin' 'round
Seen the smoke and fire
And the market burnin' down
Watched while everybody
On his street would take a turn
To stomp and smash and bash and crash
And slash and bust and burn

And I'm watchin' and I'm waitin'
Hopin' for the best
Even think I'll go to prayin'
Every time I hear 'em sayin'
That there's no way to delay
That trouble comin' every day
No way to delay
That trouble comin' every day

Well, you can cool it,
You can heat it . . .
'Cause, baby, I don't need it . . .
Take your TV tube and eat it
'N all that phony stuff on sports
'N all the unconfirmed reports
You know I watched that rotten box
Until my head begin to hurt
From checkin' out the way
The newsman say they get the dirt
Before the guys on channel so-and-so

And further they assert
That any show they'll interrupt
To bring you news if it comes up
They say that if the place blows up
They will be the first to tell,
Because the boys they got downtown
Are workin' hard and doin' swell,
And if anybody gets the news
Before it hits the street,
They say that no one blabs it faster
Their coverage can't be beat

And if another woman driver
Gets machine-gunned from her seat
They'll send some joker with a brownie
And you'll see it all complete

So I'm watchin' and I'm waitin'
Hopin' for the best
Even think I'll go to prayin'
Every time I hear 'em sayin'
That there's no way to delay
That trouble comin' every day
No way to delay
That trouble comin' every day

Hey, you know something people?
I'm not black
But there's a whole lots a times
I wish I could say I'm not white

Well, I seen the fires burnin'
And the local people turnin'
On the merchants and the shops
Who used to sell their brooms and mops
And every other household item
Watched the mob just turn and bite 'em
And they say it served 'em right
Because a few of them are white,
And it's the same across the nation
Black and white discrimination
Yellin' "You can't understand me!"
'N all that other jazz they hand me
In the papers and TV and
All that mass stupidity
That seems to grow more every day
Each time you hear some nitwit say
He wants to go and do you in
Because the color of your skin
Just don't appeal to him
(No matter if it's black or white)
Because he's out for blood tonight

You know we got to sit around at home
And watch this thing begin
But I bet there won't be many live
To see it really end
'Cause the fire in the street
Ain't like the fire in the heart
And in the eyes of all these people
Don't you know that this could start
On any street in any town
In any state if any clown
Decides that now's the time to fight
For some ideal he thinks is right
And if a million more agree
There ain't no Great Society
As it applies to you and me
Our country isn't free
And the law refuses to see
If all that you can ever be
Is just a lousy janitor
Unless your uncle owns a store
You know that five in every four
Just won't amount to nothin' more
Gonna watch the rats go across the floor
And make up songs about being poor

Blow your harmonica, son!

http://www.lyricstime.com/frank-zappa-t ... yrics.html

User avatar
elfismiles
 
Posts: 8512
Joined: Fri Aug 11, 2006 6:46 pm
Blog: View Blog (4)

Re: #OCCUPYWALLSTREET campaign - September 17

Postby seemslikeadream » Fri Oct 28, 2011 12:01 pm

we are Little Brother....and we have more cameras!

Rick Overton on capturing police brutality on protesters
Mazars and Deutsche Bank could have ended this nightmare before it started.
They could still get him out of office.
But instead, they want mass death.
Don’t forget that.
User avatar
seemslikeadream
 
Posts: 32090
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 11:28 pm
Location: into the black
Blog: View Blog (83)

Re: #OCCUPYWALLSTREET campaign - September 17

Postby 2012 Countdown » Fri Oct 28, 2011 12:13 pm

Egyptians march from Tahrir Square to support Occupy Oakland protestors
By Xeni Jardin at 8:12 am Friday, Oct 28
As they vowed earlier this week to do, Egyptian pro-democracy protesters marched from Tahrir square to the U.S. Embassy today to march in support of Occupy Oakland—and against the type of police brutality witnessed in Oakland on Tuesday night, and commonly experienced in Egypt.

In this post, photos from Egyptian blogger Mohammed Maree, who is there at the march live-tweeting these snapshots. All photos are his. The larger demonstration back at Tahrir was about issues closer to home: Egyptians are demanding that the military transfer power quickly to a representative civilian government.

Maree is a journalist with Egytimes.org. He is also a human rights activist and a veterinarian.

http://boingboing.net/2011/10/28/tahrir ... vrit=36761
Image

Image

===
Great photos at link
George Carlin ~ "Its called 'The American Dream', because you have to be asleep to believe it."
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=acLW1vFO-2Q
User avatar
2012 Countdown
 
Posts: 2293
Joined: Wed Jan 30, 2008 1:27 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: #OCCUPYWALLSTREET campaign - September 17

Postby operator kos » Fri Oct 28, 2011 12:24 pm



mediafire deleted the link. :( any other place i can get this? tech is one of my favorite artists of all time.
User avatar
operator kos
 
Posts: 1288
Joined: Sat Oct 13, 2007 2:45 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: #OCCUPYWALLSTREET campaign - September 17

Postby seemslikeadream » Fri Oct 28, 2011 12:43 pm

operator kos wrote:


mediafire deleted the link. :( any other place i can get this? tech is one of my favorite artists of all time.


Mazars and Deutsche Bank could have ended this nightmare before it started.
They could still get him out of office.
But instead, they want mass death.
Don’t forget that.
User avatar
seemslikeadream
 
Posts: 32090
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 11:28 pm
Location: into the black
Blog: View Blog (83)

Re: #OCCUPYWALLSTREET campaign - September 17

Postby The Consul » Fri Oct 28, 2011 1:06 pm



This guy would say Dickens was a socialist. This whole "Free Market" belief system is so strange, they really act as if they believe if left alone utterly, then we would all live in shangrila. Some in mansions, the rest in camps. That any intelligent person could go on television and deny any culpabillity by wall street and the banks is obscene. The reactionary counteroffensive is coalescing around the mantra Blame Government. These rat bastards that rewrite history as they speak have no respect for the truth and lack common human decency to recognize the suffering of others. He has claimed elsewhere that he pays 50% in taxes, more than any of his "150 employees". How lucky we are and how grateful we should be to have such masters of justice and integrity trickling down on us.
" Morals is the butter for those who have no bread."
— B. Traven
User avatar
The Consul
 
Posts: 1247
Joined: Fri Mar 26, 2010 2:41 am
Location: Ompholos, Disambiguation
Blog: View Blog (13)

Re: #OCCUPYWALLSTREET campaign - September 17

Postby Laodicean » Fri Oct 28, 2011 1:11 pm

operator kos wrote:


mediafire deleted the link. :( any other place i can get this? tech is one of my favorite artists of all time.


Here is another link via Hulkshare.com:

http://hulkshare.com/5it72yr3a7vy

or here:

http://www.mediafire.com/?bm0wfu4wk8l9zzk
Last edited by Laodicean on Fri Oct 28, 2011 1:19 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Laodicean
 
Posts: 3530
Joined: Wed Jan 27, 2010 9:39 pm
Blog: View Blog (16)

Re: #OCCUPYWALLSTREET campaign - September 17

Postby Jeff » Fri Oct 28, 2011 1:18 pm

2012 Countdown wrote:Egyptians march from Tahrir Square to support Occupy Oakland protestors
By Xeni Jardin at 8:12 am Friday, Oct 28
As they vowed earlier this week to do, Egyptian pro-democracy protesters marched from Tahrir square to the U.S. Embassy today to march in support of Occupy Oakland—and against the type of police brutality witnessed in Oakland on Tuesday night, and commonly experienced in Egypt.


In the same spirit:

User avatar
Jeff
Site Admin
 
Posts: 11134
Joined: Fri Oct 20, 2000 8:01 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

PreviousNext

Return to General Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests