occupyoakland Occupy Oakland
Name of officer in SD holding "non-lethal" weapon C. Johnson -Name of High ranking officer on scene J.H. Chilles. Just Sayin #OccupySD #OWS
2 hours ago
---
Police Clear Occupy SD Protestors Out Of Civic Center Plaza
Last Update: 5:00 am
SAN DIEGO - Law enforcement personnel in riot gear cleared Occupy San Diego protestors out of Civic Center Plaza early Friday, making some arrests in the process, police said. The operation began about 2 a.m. after officials declared the three-week-old event an unlawful assembly, said San Diego police Officer David Stafford. It lasted about 45 minutes, and there were no immediate reports of injuries. Protestors plan to reassemble at 8:45 a.m. for a solidarity march from Civic Center Plaza to the Wells Fargo Building downtown, Fox 5 News reported. During the plaza-clearance sweep, some protestors scattered around downtown San Diego while others were arrested, Stafford said without saying how many. The operation was carried out by some 20 police officers assisted by a score of San Diego County sheriff's deputies, also in riot gear, witnesses said. They reported seeing about a half-dozen protestors being arrested for refusing to leave.
http://www.sandiego6.com/news/local/sto ... qgssA.cspx
===
WeOccupyAmerica We Occupy America
@
@TheRealSomebody #OWS free speech disempowered, San Diego media team arrested. Looks like DHS's next gambit.
1 minute ago
===
Must see!..imo-
"Tonight Belongs To Occupy Wall Street!" as Protesters Take Control of NYPD Netting
TheOther99 had an amazing video up via their livestream from the Occupy Wall Street Solidarity with Occupy Oakland march. Protesters in New York not only took to the streets, but they took over NYPD police netting as well.
===

FTSE 100 directors' pay jumps 49pc
Directors of FTSE 100 companies enjoyed an average increase of 49pc in total earnings in the last financial year, to £2.7m.
By Angela Monaghan5:45AM BST 28 Oct 2011
The report by Incomes Data Services (IDS) also said that chief executives' earnings rose by 43pc to £3.86m.
"Britain's economy may be struggling to return to pre-recession levels of output, but the same cannot be said of FTSE 100 directors' remuneration," said Steve Tatton, editor of the IDS report.
Total earnings include fixed pay, benefits, bonuses, value of long-term incentive plans and gains made on the exercise of any share options cashed in during the year.
Earnings among finance directors rose on average by 34pc to £2m.
The report comes at a time when high inflation, high unemployment, and low wage growth is weighing down on UK household budgets.
Separate data published by IDS this week showed median pay settlements in the private sector were 2.6pc in the three months to August.
IDS said: "At a time when employees are experiencing real wage cuts and risk losing their livelihoods, without further explanation it may be difficult for FTSE 100 companies to justify the significant increase in earnings awarded to their directors.
"The pay gap between the boardroom and the shop floor does not yet show any signs of closing."
The Centre for Economics and Business Research (CEBR) said separately that total City bonus pay-outs for 2011/12 were expected to fall 38pc compared with a year earlier to £4.2bn. The last time bonuses were lower was in 2002/03.
CEBR said that would reduce the bonus pot to a third of its pre-recession level, with total bonuses peaking at £11.6bn in 2007/08.
The eurozone debt crisis had constrained activity in the City, and several major banks had reported weak third-quarter results, CEBR said. City bonuses are expected to remain broadly flat through 2012/13, it added.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/jobs ... -49pc.html
===

Which Bank Is the Worst?
Wonder why Occupy Wall Street is so angry with Bank of America and its brethren? Gary Rivlin names and shames the worst big banks.
by Gary Rivlin | October 25, 2011 6:48 PM EDT
If the Occupy Wall Street protesters want to target a single big bank, which should they choose?
The decision wouldn’t be easy, given the bad behavior of the country’s biggest brand-name banks. We look at the country’s four largest—Bank of America, JPMorgan Chase, Citigroup, and Wells Fargo—and throw in Goldman Sachs, a natural target of any protest. Here’s a taste of the deadliest sins committed by the banks, followed by a full account of all the gory details at each bank. Warning: It isn’t pretty
The Seven Deadliest Sins of the Big Banks
1. JPMorgan Chase kicks 54 military families out of their homes—despite a law against doing so.
2. Wells Fargo gives bonuses to loan officers to put minority borrowers into high-priced subprime mortgages—internally dubbed “ghetto loans.”
3. Citigroup, Bank of America, and Goldman Sachs all pay huge fines to settle charges they duped their own clients.
4. Goldman Sachs assists in Europe’s economic collapse by helping Greece mask the truth about its finances.
5. JPMorgan turns a blind eye to Bernie Madoff’s deceptions.
6. Bank of America pays $137 million to settle government claims it rigged the municipal-bond market.
7. Despite these and other unpardonable sins, banks showers tens of millions of dollars in bonus money on top executives.
Customers of all the big banks complain that being behind on your payments means a Kafkaesque journey through a maze where straight answers are impossible to come by.
full-
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2 ... print.html
===
Exxon Mobil Profit Soars 41% on Higher Prices, Refining Margins
EARNINGS OCTOBER 28, 2011
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000142 ... 07892.html
===
TeaPartyCitizen Hiem Zarkofzt
Gun shows are a friend of #ows
6 minutes ago
===
The study that shows why Occupy Wall Street struck a nerve
By Eugene Robinson, Published: October 27
The hard-right conservatives who dominate the Republican Party claim to despise the redistribution of wealth, but secretly they love it — as long as the process involves depriving the poor and middle class to benefit the rich, not the other way around.
That is precisely what has been happening, as a jaw-dropping new report by the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office demonstrates. Three decades of trickle-down economic theory, see-no-evil deregulation and tax-cutting fervor have led to massive redistribution. Another word for what’s been happening might be theft.
The gist of the CBO study, titled “Trends in the Distribution of Household Income Between 1979 and 2007,” is that while we’ve become wealthier overall, these new riches have largely bypassed many Americans and instead flowed mostly to the affluent. Perhaps my memory is faulty, but I don’t remember voting to turn the United States into a nation starkly divided between haves and have-nots. Yet that’s where we’ve been led.
Overall, in inflation-adjusted dollars, average after-tax household income grew by 62 percent during the period under study, according to the CBO. This sounds great — but only until you look a little closer.
For those at the bottom — the one-fifth of households with the lowest incomes — the increase was just 18 percent. For the middle three-fifths, the average increase was 40 percent. Spread over nearly 30 years, these gains are modest, not meteoric.
By contrast, look at the top 1 percent of earners. Their after-tax household income increased by an astonishing 275 percent. For those keeping track, this means it nearly quadrupled. Nice work, if you can get it.
This is not what Republicans want you to think of when you hear the word redistribution. You’re supposed to imagine the evil masterminds as Bolsheviks, not bankers. You’re supposed to envision the lazy free-riders who benefit from redistribution as the “poor,” and the industrious job-creators who get robbed as the “wealthy” — not the other way around.
full-
http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/ ... ingtonpost
===
LilEsBella Lili
Another overnight raid, like the military does #OWS RT @nytimes: Arrests Made at Wall St. Protest in Nashville nyti.ms/sa0t6M
10 minutes ago
OccupyNashville Occupy Nashville
#OWSNashville raided by THP Officers @ 3am / 2 Dozen arrested - Call Mayor Dean (6158626000) DEMAND their release! bit.ly/uOhaqw #OWS
1 hour ago
===
NYC-
Recorded live on October 28, 2011 6:42 AM CST
Police takes generators
http://www.ustream.tv/recorded/18158973 ... ium=social
===
OccupyMELBOURNE OccupyMELBOURNE
We can't wait to see everyone tomorrow, 12 noon, State Library for a peaceful walk to Treasury Gardens #occupymelbourne #OWS
51 minutes ago
===
OCTOBER 28, 2011 12:00 A.M.
OWS Needs a Republican President
It’s tough to have a revolution while supporting the status quo.
There’s only one way the Occupy Wall Street movement can become like the tea parties, and that’s for Barack Obama to lose in 2012. Why? Because Obama is the most divisive figure in American politics today.
I suspect that sentence reads funny to some people because in the mainstream press, “divisive” is usually a term reserved for “conservatives we disagree with.” But as a factual matter it can apply to anybody who is, well, divisive.
Obviously, Obama divides the right and left. That’s not all that interesting or relevant (even if it does represent a failure to live up to his “one America” rhetoric from 2008). But Obama also divides everyone else. Independents, whom he desperately needs to win re-election, are split over Obama, with the bulk siding with Republicans.
Even more significant, the left is deeply divided over Obama. According to reports, the Occupy Wall Street movement is torn over whether to support the incumbent president. Polling of the protestors is sketchy at best, but so far it’s pretty clear that most of the protestors liked Obama in 2008, and now roughly half of them are disillusioned by, disappointed in, or opposed to Obama.
That should only make sense, right? If Occupy Wall Street is a sincere, organic, grassroots movement for radical change and overturning the status quo, it can’t be 100 percent behind the guy who’s been running the country for the last three years.
Moreover, Democrats had near total control of the government for Obama’s first two years. Together, Obama and congressional Democrats already got their Wall Street and student-loan reforms, their health-care overhaul, and a huge stimulus. And yet Occupy Wall Street is still furious with the political status quo. Does anyone believe Obama can both run on his record and co-opt the Occupy Wall Streeters?
A “political hip-hop artist” who goes by the name “Immortal Technique” summarizes the view of many OWSers. “We’re willing to put [Obama’s] second term on the altar of democracy and sacrifice it if we need to,” I.T. told Rawstory.com, “to send a message to the rest of the world saying, ‘If you promise us change, and then you deliver nothing but the same, if you do these little superficial changes to pacify the people, to placate people, then you expose yourself.’”
Of course, Occupy Wall Street is just one facet of Obama’s larger problem. Why is he running as a left-leaning populist these days? Because he has to unify and energize his mopey and dispirited base, and hope that he can woo back independents later.
full-
http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/ ... h-goldberg
---
Dumbass Goldberg gets it wrong of course by claiming Indies don't support OWS, as they DO, and by a commanding margin. Goldie ignores that obvious fact that blows up his rntire conclusion. His ;analysis' of Obamas half measures gets it completely wrong too, but thats the propaganda Goldie puts out.