JackRiddler wrote:Clay and Shawn Pickering are real-live human beings living in New York City, and I met them at a couple of the 9/11 disinformation festivals run by Les Jamieson since his hijacking of St. Mark's Church as a venue.
Nice guys in person. Don't want to say anything bad about them. Wouldn't buy anything they claim.
Not surprised they're real humans at all. Love to know how they got those names-
drivers license, birth certificate, parents' intent. No matter.
Love to know what else they're up to. The Disclosure Project-New York is disinfo.
If innocently misguided then they're being used opportunistically
by this
Dr. Salla.
HE'S a psy-operator and there could be another one feeding disinfo to Clay and Shawn so that Salla can then transmit the disinfo message referring to them very clumsily as "Clay and Shawn" a dozen times instead of writing "the Pickerings" like a normal person.
This visibility process is like a film projector's electric light bulb circuit where the brothers with the two keywords serve as the filiment between two pathways and thus get illuminated while they serve to project the false picture.
"The Controllers." Of course. I knew that was familiar.
A
title-hijacking of Martin Cannon's good expose of the alien abduction hoax.
Hugh:
You've really got to start thinking twice. Talk about hijacking - what purpose does it serve to reproduce the entire post with the names Clay and Shawn in giant point? That's a lot to scroll through.
The purpose of the large font of "Clay and Shawn" plus one occurance of "Clay/Shawn" was to make it easy to just scan, not be re- read, in order to see the high incidence of the two keywords.
Hey- I always edit my posts with a razor blade to cut out chaff. Context.If there was a story about a grandson of Clay Shaw's, and his name was Clay Shaw III, and he was pimping Prozac or Scientology, would that also qualify as keyword hijacking?
Dilution of
mutual exclusivity (single object association in the brain) has an absolute value no matter the intent.
But many people with strategically useful names have had their careers greased for visibility to turn them into unwitting keyword hijacking tools.
Most commonly, actors have been cast in an appropriately themed movie based only on their name.
A women led a class action lawsuit against the CIA for being used in the MKULTRA mind control experiments and won in 1988 so a 1989 movie with Roy Scheider called
'Listen to Me' was made to discredit her using a college debating team plot as the device. The lead male student was played by Kirk
Cameron.
Of course, the doctor in Canada running CIA experiments was named Dr Ewen
Cameron.
This was also the movie that has someone holding a sign on the college campus that says "Join the Contras." Ah, Reagan-Bush crime days.
'Listen to Me' is an odd movie title, very awkward and suggestive of selfish 'teen-age angst.' Another negative framing device for the intended target. But there's another target.
http://historymatters.gmu.edu/d/6440
"Listen to me" seems a generic phrase but
it is hijacked from one of Paul Robeson's most brilliant debates (get it?) with the House Committee on Un-American Activities (HUAC)
where he famously said "You are the un-Americans and you ought to be ashamed of yourselves." The audio is amazing to listen to. They had to adjourn the hearings because Robeson was tearing them up in public.