Alex Jones Interviews Former ISI Chief

Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff

Postby Nordic » Thu Dec 11, 2008 12:06 am

elfismiles wrote:
Fareed Zakaria: Former ISI Head In Pakistan Says 911 Was An Inside Job

Airing Date Dec.07, 2008

Pakistan's former Intelligence Chief, General Hamid Gul, speaks with CNN's Fareed Zakaria

Says 911 was an inside job.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=19R9H01IB1s




Hm, interesting coincidence that right as this guy is coming out saying 9/11 is an inside job, and he might actually be in a position to KNOW and start presenting some embarrassing evidence to back up his claim, he is painted as a major, huge "bad guy" by the U.S.

I'd have to agree with timetunneler, below, that Pakistan, and guys like Gul, have served their purpose and are now about to be buried alive, you know, kind of like the Joker's accomplices in the beginning of "The Dark Knight".
Nordic
 
Posts: 14230
Joined: Fri Nov 10, 2006 3:36 am
Location: California USA
Blog: View Blog (6)

Postby kenoma » Thu Dec 11, 2008 9:24 am

Nordic wrote:
Hm, interesting coincidence that right as this guy is coming out saying 9/11 is an inside job, and he might actually be in a position to KNOW and start presenting some embarrassing evidence to back up his claim, he is painted as a major, huge "bad guy" by the U.S.


Well, he's been saying this for a long time:

Transcript: UPI United Press International, Sep. 26, 2001 interviews General Gul

De Borchgrave: So who did Black Sept. 11?

Gul: Mossad and its accomplices. The U.S. spends $40 billion a year on its 11 intelligence agencies. That's $400 billion in 10 years. Yet the Bush Administration says it was taken by surprise. I don't believe it. Within 10 minutes of the second twin tower being hit in the World Trade Center CNN said Osama bin Laden had done it. That was a planned piece of disinformation by the real perpetrators. It created an instant mindset and put public opinion into a trance, which prevented even intelligent people from thinking for themselves.....


He doesn't really have any inside information - he argues on the basis of the planes that weren't scrambled.
His opinions on 9/11 have nothing to do with the US call for his arrest. It's a destabilization technique, forcing the civilian government to go head to head with the military. Getting him on CNN to talk about 911 and Mumbai as inside jobs was just a way of making him look like an anti-American madman.

Edit: And the whole thing is set up to make it look like the crazy man's ideas are representative of the entire Pakistani military. Fareed Zakaria:

Let me reiterate what I said at the outset. Some of General Gul's views are simply false. There is a mountain of evidence about 9/11 that refutes his assertions.

But I did feel it was important to listen to his voice - a rare public opportunity to listen to somebody from the highest levels of the Pakistani military. He doesn't represent all of it, but it is, as I say, a rare chance to listen to some senior voice from within the ISI.


It's a psyop - Gul hasnt been in the ISI for about 18 years. But the CNN audience is being prepped for a new enemy.
Expectation calibration and expectation management is essential at home and internationally. - Obama foreign policy advisor Samantha Power, February 21, 2008
User avatar
kenoma
 
Posts: 498
Joined: Sat Mar 01, 2008 1:32 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby Searcher08 » Thu Dec 11, 2008 10:40 am

I don't think that the ISI are being hung out to dry because doing so would probably result in the financial tap of Afghan heroin being turned off. I think the ISI are in very tight with the Bush crowd.

On the other hand likudnik Israel and BJP India seem to be growing much closer and Israel has definitely got Pakistan as an key enemy of the state, going back as far as David Ben-Gurion.

One thing I find hard to figure out in all of this is the relation of Israel to Saudi Arabia in the Deep Politics arena. Dan Hopsicker unearthed some utterly bizarre stuff tying the House Of Saud to the successors of the Meyer Lansky mafia organisation in Florida (!) AFAIK most of the funding for the Pak fundamentalists comes from Saudi, but the Israelis seem very quiet about them.
User avatar
Searcher08
 
Posts: 5887
Joined: Thu Dec 20, 2007 10:21 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby American Dream » Thu Dec 11, 2008 11:00 am

Searcher08 wrote:
One thing I find hard to figure out in all of this is the relation of Israel to Saudi Arabia in the Deep Politics arena. Dan Hopsicker unearthed some utterly bizarre stuff tying the House Of Saud to the successors of the Meyer Lansky mafia organisation in Florida (!) AFAIK most of the funding for the Pak fundamentalists comes from Saudi, but the Israelis seem very quiet about them.




Image
American Dream
 
Posts: 19946
Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2007 4:56 pm
Location: Planet Earth
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby timetunneler » Fri Dec 12, 2008 2:33 am

For those seriously interested in trying to decipher what this is all about... 9/11, the Mumbai attacks, Intelligence games, mutual assured blackmail..

Excerpts From here:

Truth, Lies, and The Legend of 9/11
http://www.globalresearch.ca/articles/KUP310A.html

Flashback: Assembling The Legend

As we shall see, the various elements of the 9/11 Legend were assembled with the help of a number of international players. Through the Pakistani ISI (an organization, in fact, with close historical ties to the CIA and British intelligence), the Taliban were armed and installed as the resident overlords of Afghanistan. Under the watchful eye of German intelligence, lead hijacker Mohamed Atta would set up his Hamburg "cell" of conspirators, sharing a flat with senior al-Qaida operative Ramzi Binalshibh. Through French authorities, particularly with the assistance of Judge Jean-Louis Bruguiere (a friend of John O'Neill), Zacarias Moussaoui (arrested August 2001) and senior Al-Qaida leader Abu Zubaydah (the first "big fish" captured in March 2002) would work their way into the official 9/11 Legend. By way of Spanish Police Chief Juan Cotino (who was also a senior figure in Europol), other al-Qaida cells were discovered as further proof of bin Laden's global reach. In fact, as the 9/11 Legend would have it, Mohamed Atta had rendezvoused with Ramzi Binalshibh in Spain sometime in July 2001, where the two presumably made final preparations for September 11. Around the same time, the FBI's lead point man on al-Qaida, John O'Neill, was in Madrid to discuss counter-terror issues with Police Chief Cotino. Thereafter, O'Neill made his last public appearance (before his retirement the next month) at a counter-terror conference held at a three-star hotel in the Spanish resort town of Salou - coincidentally, only a few days before Mohammed Atta had checked into the very same hotel in his last international trip before September 11 (a curious fact reported in John Miller's book "The Cell"). Atta's previous trip to Madrid had been in January 2001, within days of the very first Europol Conference On Terrorism, also held in Madrid.

Finally, the United Kingdom served as a major transit point, educational center, and source of "evidence" pointing to the hijackers and various al-Qaida operatives - most notably, Omar Saeed, Zacarias Moussaoui, and Richard Reid, the so-called "shoe bomber." Thus, the very countries that were so prominent in furnishing the various elements of the 9/11 Legend - "burnishing" it with a globalized gloss - also happened to be the same countries that served as senior partners in the War On Terror.

The fact that France and Germany have since headed up opposition to the War In Iraq should not be taken as an irreconcilable contradiction in this regard. Rather, just the opposite. As we shall see, a strategy to cast doubt on the War In Iraq - fuelled by elements in the CIA and some of the more vociferous supporters of the War On Terror - has actually worked to strengthen the credibility of the overall 9/11 Legend. In counter-point to that strategy lies a fall-back option that "localizes" any potential conspiracy to a "rogue" clique of "hawks" holding President Bush in their ideological sway - the markedly Jewish and pro-Israeli neo-conservatives, an apparent CIA "cut-out" helmed by Richard Mellon Scaife during the Clinton years, then by Richard Cheney in the early months after 9/11 before he mostly disappeared from public view along with his defibrillator, and most famously now, by Richard Perle (a product of the RAND Corporation).

As I argued previously in The Propaganda Preparation For 9/11, the Saudis, Pakistanis, and Israelis were set up as the primary alternate foreign patsies to divert attention from the far more plausible (and obvious) involvement of the U.S./U.K./E.U., the very alliance which now spearheads the War On Terror even as it choreographs the Official 9/11 Legend. As we shall see, with the relatively recent prominence of Khalid Shaikh Mohammed as 9/11 mastermind, Iraq now takes its place as a plausible patsy (particularly since Colin Powell's introduction of a new al-Qaeda leader by the name of Abu Musab Zarqawi, a Baghdad-based Palestinian whose legend and motives will no doubt grow out of the recently completed War In Iraq). With regard to the Saudis, their actual involvement was more indirect - as they financed the various Pakistani madrassas (Muslim yeshivas) that served as a farming system for the hordes of wild-eyed Wahhabi idealists looking to set up camp in Afghanistan. Still, their domination of the Middle East media served to give an impression - to Western eyes - that bin Laden was more intimately known among the Arab/Muslim masses than he was by an insular clique in the Western security establishment

...

Assembling The 9/11 Counter-Legends (or, Stacking Your Patsies)

The events of September 11 gave birth to three parallel threads - or counter-legends - pointing the way to the culpability of three possible foreign suspects, or patsies - namely, Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, and Israel. Of the three, the Saudis were the patsies of choice for the mainstream "critics", who were a motley assortment of neo-cons, FBI investigators, or "retired" national security types opposed to the war in Iraq. The Pakistan/ISI thread to 9/11 flared up most noticeably in the events surrounding the death of Daniel Pearl and the alleged involvement of Omar Saeed Sheikh - events which were used, in fact, to smother the Pakistani/ISI connection to the 9/11 money trail. As regards Israel, the most radical opponents of the War On Terror were nursed on the twin threads of an Israeli spy ring and a neo-con cabal supposedly at the helm of the Bush Administration.

It was not by accident that these three countries were chosen to play the role of second-tier patsies - for each of them contained insular cliques of operatives which had played seminal roles in the covert arms and drug trade - in cahoots with their more senior Anglo-American handlers - throughout the Reagan-Bush years. Moreover, these countries would make useful patsies for the very reason that they were essentially outside the "established" - i.e. Euro-American - ring of nations. In other words, if insular cliques of criminal operatives were to be ferreted out of Germany, France, or Italy, no one would think to brand these nations wholesale with the mark of Cain. The same could not be said of Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, and Israel, whose very security - physical, political, and economic - would be staked to the publicized activities of their own respective political/criminal cliques.

...

Moreover, much of the political and corporate elites within these countries were integrally networked with their American counterparts - indeed, largely subservient to them - to such a degree that they would also serve as useful proxies in building their own counter-legends under Anglo-Euro-American supervision. In the early stages of the 9/11 Legend, Saudi Arabia and Pakistan were employed as the central bases for building up a terrorist home front within the borders of Afghanistan. As for Israel - despite its aforementioned spy ring and its supposedly allied neo-con "cabal" - its most direct and public contribution to the 9/11 Legend in fact occurred after 9/11, with the November 2002 coordinated attack on an Israeli-owned hotel and airliner in Kenya - an attack for which Israeli investigators now marshaled evidence as proof of Osama bin Laden's opening shot against the State of Israel (which was more likely Israel's "buy-in" in return for a promised attack on the Saddam Hussein regime).

Thus, evidence could be amassed to cast aspersions on the activities of each of these three countries, depending on the intended audience. On another level, political elites within these countries could be assured that any aspersions would be relegated to insular "rogue" cliques.

...

With three alternative counter-legends in place to co-exist with the Official (i.e. mainstream) 9/11 Legend, the stage was thereby set to muddy the real trail leading to the events of September 11. With the participation of a global network of well-connected spinmeisters - both passive and active - each of the 9/11 threads could thus be nurtured through a series of carefully calibrated revelations.

...

In reading the detailed revelations of Brisard, Dasquie, and Thomas, one enters the proverbial hall of mirrors, where subtle truths reflect back upon themselves as half-lies, and perceptions splinter amid a cascade of contradictions. Such is the world of the disinformation operative. As a first defense, all you need to know is when you're in it, not particularly what's in it.

...

In his book, The Secret War Against The Jews, Loftus documented in painful detail the anti-Semitic history of the powerful Anglo-American "Establishment", the Wasp clique which, through their oil and industrial holdings, has had a stranglehold on American foreign - and military - policy for close to a century. Loftus, clearly intimate with a great many operatives in the intelligence community - whom he refers to as the "old spies" - had posited that the Jews were repeatedly used as pawns and scapegoats in the grand match played out by these men on the geopolitical chessboard. Loftus' reading of this Establishment - which encompasses the likes of the Rockefellers, the Dulles brothers, the Bakers, and the Bushes - dovetails nicely with the writings of scholars like Peter Dale Scott (whose personal integrity and research skills are beyond question). In other words, Loftus knows who is the real power behind the throne.

...

Moreover, the top people in the private security sector have the authority, prestige, and, most importantly, the skill to carry out - successfully and below the radar - the kinds of domestic operations that have been pegged as the province of shaggy al-Qaida operatives. Who, after all, could best ensure that 19 terrorists would be able to make it aboard four separate flights without any real danger of detection? And who, after all, would be best placed to ensure a complete and successful implosion of not just the two Twin Towers, but the neighboring building - 7 World Trade Center - which housed a bio-warfare "command and control bunker" under the direction of Jerry Hauer?

...

In this respect, we could imagine Binalshibh and Atta as being "handled" by elements in German intelligence (with the assistance of federal German prosecutor Kay Nehm, perhaps), while French intelligence (in conjunction with Bruguiere, perhaps) would "handle" operatives such as Ressam or Zubaydah. As for the U.K., it is likely that Omar Saeed was their agent, for the obvious reason that Saeed's ideological transformation began there. Less certain, though plausible, is the prospect that Omar Saeed was in fact being "handled" by both British and Indian intelligence. That would, perhaps, explain the curious fact that, in the aftermath of 9/11, Indian authorities always seemed to have the inside scoop on the whereabouts and activities of Omar Saeed. As early as September 23, 2001 (the date of Omar Saeed's post-9/11 public debut), British authorities went on record as querying India on the whereabouts of Saeed - suggesting, by implication, that India had inside knowledge on this purportedly Pakistani ISI operative. Was Saeed, then, a double agent, putting himself at the service of the Pakistani ISI Chief, when in fact he was operating on behalf of Indian intelligence all along?

...

Certainly India had a stake in scapegoating the ISI for 9/11. Moreover, if there was an accompanying plan to use a second tier of proxy/patsies - generally, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, and Israel - this second tier would, by necessity, have to be outside the innermost "loop" yet employed in some direct, though compartmentalized, capacity. With concerted "leaks" pointing suspicions toward the second tier, the members of that tier could either be lulled - in the case of Saudi Arabia and Pakistan, blame could be placed at the feet of "rogue" neo-cons for the leaks - or, alternatively, their silence could be coerced through the very real threat of "mainstreaming" the evidence already in place to implicate them (in the case of Israel). Certainly, given the scope of mainstream coverage in this respect, this scenario would seem most plausible.

...

Given the obvious murkiness of these complex interactions, it would be impossible at this point to fully posit what exactly went wrong in that first week of October 2001, when the Money Trail Story was picking up steam. Was the Omar Saeed "leak" a mischievous ploy by India to shore up its geopolitical interests vis-a-vis Pakistan? Was it a set-up to pressure the Americans? Or did the Indians, as outsiders, learn of the plan to use the Pakistani ISI as a proxy/patsy, and thereby sought to pressure the Americans against too heavily favoring their Pakistani proxy. It is not within the scope of this article to fully solve that riddle (if indeed it can be solved with the available evidence at hand). Rather, the intent is to put in place the contours of a general hypothesis that would plausibly be able to account for many of the strange coincidences, synchronicities, and conveniently timed set-ups that are so much a part of the 9/11 Legend. In short, without the proper analytical foundation, the events surrounding September 11 would remain a disjointed, inscrutable medley of facts - exactly in keeping with the intentions of its covert architects.

...

As I stated before, one way to pull off a tightly compartmentalized conspiracy is to ensure that all key parties are potentially open to blackmail, thereby ensuring that no one individual player may grab the upper hand by unilaterally incriminating the others. In this respect, we may see that bin Laden was set up to play his headliner role in the Official 9/11 Legend precisely due to his family connections with the Bushes and the Saudi royal family. Recall that, similarly, the Bushes had family connections with the Hinckleys. Thus, if Vice-President Bush had ascended to the Presidency in the aftermath of a Reagan assassination, he, too, would have been kept on a very short leash - by reason of his obvious connection with the lone gunman, if for no other.


Image

he certainly knows what it means to "play ball" and take one in the ass for Team Octopus.

P.S. - This is about the best article you will ever find on the roots and mechanics of global terror bar none as far as I'm concerned. Nobody, no group and no country is spared or protected by this guy as far as I can tell
timetunneler
 
Posts: 333
Joined: Sat Mar 17, 2007 3:54 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby Penguin » Fri Dec 12, 2008 8:16 am

Thanks. I like that take.
Penguin
 
Posts: 5089
Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2007 5:56 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby bks » Fri Dec 12, 2008 8:58 am

Very glad for this discussion.

Jeff has posted much of the supporting information that still would seem to stand in favor of a real ISI link. I will emphasize only two things:

1. Musharraf took action against ISI chief Mahmud Ahmed after the news story broke. I doubt he would have done so solely on the basis of Indian intelligence. He may well have been pressured to do so by the US based on Indian intelligence, but the official action taken against Ahmed adds another layer of intrigue for those who want to propound the 'cover story' angle.

2. A Pakistani journalist named Amir Mir apparently was able to independently confirm Amhed's and Omar Saeed Shiekh's involvement. While this news is conveyed by an Indian writer who also happens to be a former high commissioner to Pakistan, he does not appear to be the source for the information:

Another and even more suspicious aspect of US behavior toward Pakistan is what strategic analyst G Parthasarathi, a former Indian high commissioner to Pakistan, calls "an astonishing measure of American forbearance in dealing with a Pakistani terrorist involved in kidnapping American tourists in India, killing an American journalist in Karachi, the [September 11] attacks on New York and Washington and the attack on our parliament". Parthasarathi is referring to Omar Sheikh Mohammad, who was released from an Indian jail in Kashmir along with two other prominent terrorists and escorted to Kabul by then Indian external affairs minister Jaswant Singh as a deal to save the lives of the passengers of Indian Airlines flight IC814 that had been hijacked from Kathmandu and taken to Kabul. Sheikh was later arrested for his involvement in the murder of American journalist Daniel Pearl in Karachi and sentenced to death.

Parthasarathi documents the instances of US forbearance toward this terrorist. Even though sentences of anti-terrorism courts in Pakistan are expeditiously confirmed and implemented, he says, Sheikh's appeal still lies pending. Eyebrows were raised when Sheikh surrendered to an Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) official, Brigadier Ejaz Shah, in Lahore and not to the police. Shah was known to be a protege of generals Musharraf and Aziz Khan.

Shah's subsequent nomination as high commissioner to Australia was rejected by the Australian government. He is now Pakistan's ambassador to Indonesia. What is interesting to note is that ambassadorial appointments are normally given in Pakistan to retired generals and not low-ranking ISI brigadiers.

It has now been reported by a respected Lahore-based Pakistani journalist, Amir Mir, continues Parthasarathi, that during his interrogation by US and Pakistani investigators, Sheikh revealed that he had been on the payroll of the Pakistani ISI and that the terrorist attacks on the Kashmir State Assembly building in October 2001 and the Indian parliament in December 2001 had the backing of the ISI.

Amir Mir has also confirmed that Sheikh transferred a sum of $100,000 that had been provided to him by then ISI chief General Mahmood Ahmed to Mohammad Atta - the leader of the hijackers involved in the September 11 terrorist attacks. He also alleges that the United States' Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) believes that Omar met Atta during one of his visits to Kandahar and knew of his plans for the September 11 terrorist strikes. On October 9, 2001, the Pakistani daily Dawn reported that the ISI director general, Lieutenant-General Mahmoud Ahmed, was fired after FBI investigators established a link between him and a $100,000 wire transfer to Atta in the summer of 2000. This report was also carried by the Wall Street Journal. Parthasarathi's comment: "There does appear to be a conspiracy of silence on this score, because Syed Omar Sheikh is evidently a man who knows too much and can embarrass both the Musharraf dispensation and the Bush administration."


http://www.atimes.com/atimes/South_Asia/GA27Df05.html[/i]
bks
 
Posts: 1093
Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 2:44 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Alex Jones Interviews Former ISI Chief

Postby crikkett » Fri Dec 12, 2008 9:11 am

8bitagent wrote:Hamid Gul, who ...appeared on CNN saying both 9/11 and Mumbai was the work of CIA and Zionists:
http://911blogger.com/node/18763


My tired eyes play tricks on me, I couldve sworn that your passage read 'Mumbai was the work of CIA and Zinnias'
Image

Time for bed
Image
crikkett
 
Posts: 2206
Joined: Sun Sep 09, 2007 12:03 pm
Blog: View Blog (5)

Re: Alex Jones Interviews Former ISI Chief

Postby Joe Hillshoist » Fri Jan 22, 2010 11:37 am

Jeff wrote:There are US sources for the Pakistani transaction, especially early days in the investigation, when there was mainstream attention to the 9/11 money trail, before it led to embarrassing places and awkward conclusions.

CNN, Oct 1
WASHINGTON (CNN) -- As much as $100,000 was wired in the past year from Pakistan to Mohamed Atta, the suspected leader of the terrorist hijackings, CNN has been told by law enforcement sources.
http://archives.cnn.com/2001/US/10/01/i ... tan.funds/

From ABC's This Week, Sept 30

As to September 11, federal authorities have told ABC News they've now tracked more than $100,000 from banks in Pakistan to two banks in Florida to accounts held by suspected hijack ringleader Mohamed Atta.

As well this morning, ``Time'' magazine is reporting that some of that money came in the days just before the attack and can be traced directly to people connected to Osama bin Laden.

It's all part of what has been a successful FBI effort so far to close in on the hijackers' high command, the money men, the planners, and the mastermind, Sam.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/na ... 93001.html

Then the story breaks that the FBI and Indian intelligence have traced the transactions to Saeed Sheikh and Ahmad, and - not a small fact - Ahmad suddenly resigns, reportedly under US pressure, closing the door to unpleasant and public inquiry.

Levy - and I do have high regard for Who Killed Daniel Pearl? - writes "I've spoken with people in Washington who confirm unofficially that the cell phone number decoded by RAW - 0300 94587772 - is Omar's, and that the list of calls made from it are the same as were shown to me in India."

There's also the redaction of Ahmad from the official transcript of Rice's press conference of May 16 2002, and also from CNN's:

CNN:
QUESTION: Are you aware of the reports at the time that (inaudible) was in Washington on September 11. And on September 10, $ 100,000 was wired from Pakistan to these groups here in this area? And while he was here, was he meeting with you or anybody in the administration?

RICE: I have not seen that report, and he was certainly not meeting with me.

White House:
Q Dr. Rice, are you aware of the reports at the time that -- was in Washington on September 11th, and on September 10th, $ 100,000 was wired to Pakistan to this group here in this area? While he was here meeting with you or anybody in the administration?

DR. RICE: I have not seen that report, and he was certainly not meeting with me.

Federal News Service:
Q Are you aware of the reports at the time that ISI chief was in Washington on September 11th, and on September 10th, $ 100,000 was wired from Pakistan to these groups here in this area? And why he was here? Was he meeting with you or anybody in the administration?

MS. RICE: I have not seen that report, and he was certainly not meeting with me.


Anyway, like I've said, I think there's a there there to the ISI connection, but that doesn't mean there isn't also an Indian deep politics.


I was in a long thread with a bunch of serial rationalists, and the poorest ad for 9/11 truth, on a blog last year, and really went chasing that ISI $100K Indian intell thing. the notes I had are on the hd on my old computer tho, and at the moment its unaccessible...

I was coming round to the conclusion that the source for all the FBIs info was Indian intel sources... but i never got to follow it up. That the investigation wasn't so much a joint one as an Indian one.

Its hard to shake the idea of some ISI connection tho, but....


Aside - Lots of the flaws in this discussion seem to be in the terms we use to define stuff.

Perhaps we should only use individuals names, and refernce their positions or the agencies they work for in brackets afterward, cos the focus on instituations ... I dunno we are dealing with networks of people who are probably not actually aligned to the aims of the institutions they are working for...

9/11 is not a Pakistan job... it's an Enterpise job. An Octopus job. A collaboration by criminals, mobsters, intelligence agents, pedo-kings, murderers, and other assorted assholes and criminals all spinning webs and cutting deals to keep themselves in the clear.


(cheers tt) - Aside over

As far as the reports coming from "indian intelligence services", who made them? I think the Hindi right wing is gonna scare the fuck out of people in the next 10 or 20 years.

I wish my computer hadn't fucked out cos six weeks ago these questions were a bit clearer in my mind, and I had a couple of notes and a trail of links. I think I started at history commons tho. Most of my doubts stemmed from the ISI/wired $100K reports seeming to resolve back to the same sources Indian intel.

Basically I was heading to this conclusion:

kenoma wrote:None of the sources you cite seem to me credibly independent of the original Indian story about Mahmood: they all cite the FBI sources who were presumably so impressed by India's investigation.


Of course that doesn't mean it didn't happen, cos it certainly fits with his resignation, and the removal of the refs from CNN and the white house transcript.

But I do find it a bit disturbing cos those money transfers were something I always liked to point people to if 9/11 comes up in polite conversation. It doesn't mean it didn't happen, but...
Joe Hillshoist
 
Posts: 10616
Joined: Mon Jun 12, 2006 10:45 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Alex Jones Interviews Former ISI Chief

Postby seemslikeadream » Thu Dec 01, 2016 11:52 am

Bumping in honor of AlanStrangis who I saw peeking in this morning :P


Looking forward to President elect select Trump's interview with Alex


These Are Real Notes From A Real Conversation Between Donald Trump And The Prime Minister Of Pakistan

Michael Ballaban
Yesterday 1:58pmFiled to:

WE'RE FUCKED

These are the real notes from a real conversation between President-elect Donald Trump and Nawaz Sharif, the Prime Minister of Pakistan. This is a screenshot from the website of the Press Information Department of the government of Pakistan. It has not been altered in any way.


In case it’s hard to read in the screenshot:

PR No. 298 PM TELEPHONES PRESIDENT-ELECT USA Islamabad: November 30, 2016

Prime Minister Muhammad Nawaz Sharif called President-elect USA Donald Trump and felicitated him on his victory. President Trump said Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif you have a very good reputation. You are a terrific guy. You are doing amazing work which is visible in every way. I am looking forward to see you soon. As I am talking to you Prime Minister, I feel I am talking to a person I have known for long. Your country is amazing with tremendous opportunities. Pakistanis are one of the most intelligent people. I am ready and willing to play any role that you want me to play to address and find solutions to the outstanding problems. It will be an honor and I will personally do it. Feel free to call me any time even before 20th January that is before I assume my office.

On being invited to visit Pakistan by the Prime Minister, Mr. Trump said that he would love to come to a fantastic country, fantastic place of fantastic people. Please convey to the Pakistani people that they are amazing and all Pakistanis I have known are exceptional people, said Mr. Donald Trump.

*****
Pakistan is considered a major non-NATO ally by the United States.
http://theconcourse.deadspin.com/these- ... 1789523737
Mazars and Deutsche Bank could have ended this nightmare before it started.
They could still get him out of office.
But instead, they want mass death.
Don’t forget that.
User avatar
seemslikeadream
 
Posts: 32090
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 11:28 pm
Location: into the black
Blog: View Blog (83)
Previous

Return to General Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 159 guests