Michael James Riconosciuto

[Anita]

AD wags a finger at me for suggesting he/she is a disinfo agent, yet I recall saying no such thing, I'm more inclined to think this person suffers from exceptionally low IQ and can't think rationally. On the other hand, I suppose it is possible he overheard his own conscience talking...

Funny how he isn't so worried about sticking to the topic when providing a channel for VM to slam anyone she wants. Nice distractions. Am I the only one here who recalls an issue being made about posting links to websites that publish personal information? I guess my name and address don't count because my post total isn't high enough and I must really be accusing someone of being an agent of disinfo rather than an idiot who chooses to help people who are actively assisting murderers. I have an idea AD, why don't you post a few more pages of VM's delusional BS and bury any facts that might actually surface on this thread.

I will grant Virginia this much, I don't think she intended to get the McGowan family killed, I say this because she called me very distraught shortly after the murders, urging me to keep my children close, she clearly knew that she had set it off. She recklessly put many lives at risk and caused the death of a family. The McGowan murders are terribly tragic, yet these aren't the only deaths that were caused by the NMN tag team. Go ahead AD, explain to us how VM's "unbiased" crap belongs on this thread, as if she actually knows anything beyond what she needs to paint in order to try to keep her own ass out of jail. Kate Dixon doesn't like the death penalty, yet she likes killers. Could it be that she is worried the law will catch up to her? She should be worried. The phone records, the jail records, ongoing interference in current investigations, all of these things are catching up with the NMN people.

Meanwhile, I'd like to hear how the most knowledgeable Virginia McCullough managed to find proof that Rachel was an actress, and still qualifies as someone who deserves input into a thread about a scientist who has been extorted and stalked since he was a kid, who has suffered the loss of several friends and loved ones to these murderers, and who continues to be lied about by people who have nothing to give but malice.

Nice job, AD <~I'm not suggesting you are paid to do this, just donating your time to help a bunch of pedophiles and killers.

http://www.michaelriconosciuto.com/finders

Funny how there is a finders thread at this forum, yet nobody seems to know who it was that blew the whistle on this group. Go ahead, tell me again how he's the bad guy.

[American Dream]

Here are the lyrics to a song which I believe was written by Anita Langley on behalf of Michael Riconosciuto:




Wizard


Shining through the eyes of a friend

Intrepid as a soul to question the vast

Undying as the tangled threads of destiny

Reaching from the secret deeds past



The focal point, gathering place, Cadre

Parallels upon an unswaying vision

United in a concrete cause

To release the wizard from prison



Swing far and wide, pillars topple!

Resistance crumbles, rats scurrying

Tempers flared at truth's burying

Intelligent spies spin, tables turning



The Adversary is confused

Tumultuous conflagration

Detracts from his profiteering

As he trembles, he's sneering



A wild blinded beast has been cornered

Adorned with gold rings and things

His surface gloss is cracking

As he reaches for a shiny object

Oblivious to his lacking



He is destined to fall slain upon the altar

Buried by a broken Promis

Which seeks to be mended

By the one for whom the secret is intended



Cadre unites, a chorus of voices

Parallel upon an unswaying vision

United in a concrete cause

To release the wizard from prison





Maybe at some point Ms. Langley will choose to enlighten us further regarding her own position vs. a vis the controversial Mr. Riconosciuto...

[Anita]

I'll keep this simple. That is a very old song and the first sentence says it all. Michael has friends who love him, so I wrote the song "through the eyes of a friend" and added my own sense of things to come. I do things like that because I am a musician and I interpret. Nice deflection, but I am not here to promote my music and I have never discussed this song with Michael. Btw, for anyone who might have a suggestion for me, I have tried to remove my website tag from my posts but it's not even listed in my profile, don't know what I'm missing there. I should point out that I have also written a song for Rachel and another for those who struggle with the octopus. I also wrote one for the Colbert Nation, that man is the cat's meow! No big deal, just my personality.

The reason I have a website with some of my music posted is because I didn't want the creepy puppetmaster article with my address and phone number to come up first whenever someone wanted to search out my name. At least people can see I'm a human, not some doormat for a crazy person. Now you are posting that crap here!

[Searcher08]

Here are the lyrics to a song which I believe was written by Anita Langley on behalf of Michael Riconosciuto:



Maybe at some point Ms. Langley will choose to enlighten us further regarding her own position vs. a vis the controversial Mr. Riconosciuto...

Maybe at some point American Dream will choose to enlighten us further regarding his own position vs a vis the controversial NewsMakingNews and the points which Anita raised, which have not been addressed.

My understanding is that linking to sites which publish other R.I. members personal information is a big no-no around here.

Anita has raised safety issues arising out of this - and this issue deserves a better response than posting the lyrics of a song.

[American Dream]

You will notice that Anita Langley's statement above provides a very minimal explanation of the song she wrote but pretty much ignores her extensive history of working with and for Michael Riconosciuto.

This history includes not only the more notorious incidents such as publicizing dire warnings of impending biological attacks and missile attacks (which never happened), but also serving as his direct representative in the outer world in all manner of things, including a significant involvement in running websites (some of which Anita is been trying to link to and promote here), websites which she seems to help run on Mike's behalf. Please note that the previous only scratches the surface- Anita Langley's activity has for many years been deeply, deeply intertwined with that of Michael Riconosciuto.

Notice carefully the degree to which Anita Langley has chosen to be honest and forthcoming here about her own relationship with Michael Riconosciuto and the degree to which she makes a visible effort to minimize and obscure that relationship.

This all is extremely relevant to the actual topic of this thread, i.e.: Michael Riconosciuto and how trustworthy he might actually be, or not.

[sunny]

Btw, for anyone who might have a suggestion for me, I have tried to remove my website tag from my posts but it's not even listed in my profile, don't know what I'm missing there.

Anita, go to your profile and click 'edit signature'.

Anita has raised safety issues arising out of this - and this issue deserves a better response than posting the lyrics of a song.

Yes it does. AD: I have little clue about what is going on here or what your beef is with Anita-all I see is a woman pleading with you that link(s) you have posted are putting her life and the life of her children in danger. Your opinion of her matters not, you are out of line here and I'm asking you nicely to remove said link(s).

[American Dream]

As stated earlier in the thread Anita has pm'ed Jeff about this and I did also, per the stated procedures in the guidelines. I am waiting for his response back and as stated earlier I am indeed a reasonable person and will certainly respect Jeff's opinion on this topic.

To be quite honest, I consider Anita's complaint to be somewhat dubious as it concerns an article that has been up for years now and that is widely available to anyone who nows how to use a search engine. Given that Anita Langley is I think very, very close to Michael Riconosciuto and that the article in question raises critical concerns about him and about his relationship with Ms. Langley, I consider her comments to be disingenous. But I will respect what Jeff determines in this regards.

I will be away from the computer for big chunks of time today but will wait and see if and when Jeff responds, either by pm and/or here

[Sounder]

Has there ever been an apology, retraction or explanation from Virginia in regard to her accusations toward desertfae?

Because till I see this, her name is mud, and of course by extension, yours also AD.

[American Dream]

I think we're getting to a point in this process that might prove to be truly enlightening. We are beginning to see that Anita Langley promotes one particular version of reality regarding Michael Riconosciuto, Cabazon, the Octopus etc.- and Virginia McCullough presents a very different story regarding these sorts of things.

Once we get the stories clearly laid out here on this board, it should be possible to compare and contrast both and to critically evaluate them.

This I hope will significantly help us all in having an informed understanding of what is up with Michael Riconosciuto and the story of "the Octopus", and by extension help us to better understand what is actually going on in Conspiracy Land in general...

[barracuda]

Let me ask you this, American Dream: have you ever seen a responsible news organisation publish the address and phone number of an individual with Anita's connection to the article in question? What do you think might be the journalistic purpose of doing that? Please ask Virginia this, and give me your own thoughts as well.

[American Dream]

I'm very busy now but I did go back to my original post which contains the NMN article which Anita Langley objects to. I see that I am not able to edit that post now anyway. I was considering posting instead the text of the article- minus the address and phone number.

One relevant question for Anita: Are you asserting that this information is not otherwise public and would not be available to people who were looking to find you?

Anyway- that's all for now- gotta run!



A.D.

[barracuda]

When you're not so busy, I can probably help you with that, and maybe you can give me a considered answer to my questions above.

[Searcher08]

I think we're getting to a point in this process that might prove to be truly enlightening. We are beginning to see that Anita Langley promotes one particular version of reality regarding Michael Riconosciuto, Cabazon, the Octopus etc.- and Virginia McCullough presents a very different story regarding these sorts of things.

Once we get the stories clearly laid out here on this board, it should be possible to compare and contrast both and to critically evaluate them.

This I hope will significantly help us all in having an informed understanding of what is up with Michael Riconosciuto and the story of "the Octopus", and by extension help us to better understand what is actually going on in Conspiracy Land in general...

By what specific standard(s) do you propose these stories are 'critically evaluated'?

Will you be contacting Michael Riconoscuito in jail to get his side of the story?

I don't understand what you mean by
'an informed understanding of what is up with Michael Riconoscuito'?
nor
'by extension help us to better understand what is actually going on in Conspiracy Land in general...'

I am concerned that Anita's fears seem to be unacknowledged. PROMIS is a very dangerous subject to get into, with a very high 'body count' and safety concerns need to be heard, especially as desertfae and Anita are mothers as well as researchers.

[American Dream]

barracuda wrote:

Let me ask you this, Ame[googlevideo]rican Dream: have you ever seen a responsible news organisation publish the address and phone number of an individual with Anita's connection to the article in question? What do you think might be the journalistic purpose of doing that? Please ask Virginia this, and give me your own thoughts as well.

Hi barracuda-

Unfortunately, I still don't have time for a long, or even highly considered response but in short, no- the only times that I recall right now seeing a mainstream corporate-type newspaper in the United States give out individual people's addresses would be in local papers, in their police blotter sections. As to the journalistic purpose. not sure.

Virginia McCullough quite likely will read your comments here and respond if she chooses- I have no power over this. You are also welcome to do as I did and write her at the address she gives at the end of every article. In fact, that would be much better if you did that, as it takes the burden off of me as being the sole mediator.

Searcher08 wrote:

By what specific standard(s) do you propose these stories are 'critically evaluated'?

Will you be contacting Michael Riconoscuito in jail to get his side of the story?

I think each of us can evaluate the two differing narratives by our own standards. I would hope that these standards include basic logic and ordinary rules of evidence, but ultimately that will be up to each individual to decide for themselves...

As to Michael Riconosciuto- no I wouldn't contact him personally. I want nothing to do with him at all. Fortunately though, we have Anita Langley here on this board, who I understand has long functioned as his eyes, ears, and voice, here on the outside.

[dbcooper41]

sorry if i asked a loaded question.

PROMIS is a very dangerous subject to get into, with a very high 'body count' and safety concerns need to be heard,

and i promise my question had nothing to do with promis. is this one of those topics that should not be discussed? i've found a few like that where a google search for certain combinations of terms results in an explosion of activity in my pc.
i ran into MJR's name while i was following the wtc demolition story. he's not implicated in that , yet, but there was a reference to him building the real okc bomb at Dyno-Nobel.
can anyone vouch for this story?
and a very serious question.
was this series of postings meant to warn off anyone who might be venturing down this road? capiche?