JackRiddler wrote:Wombaticus Rex wrote:Jack, that's the exact response that these kind of psychological operations are intended to achieve and I appreciate the illustration. Consensus is all I'm talking about. Controlled debate is a technique, and it's the technique that interests me. The merits of the content are pretty secondary. To me.
Anyways, Chemtrails "actually happen" too, just like UFOs. Just because people are failing to make accurate conclusions or seek quality information doesn't mean they're fucking hallucinating. Does it?
Please let's leave "chemtrails" aside for the moment. Please leave aside the knowing but vague tone and specify what you mean:
"Jack, that's the
exact response that
these kind of
psychological operations are
intended to achieve and I appreciate the illustration."
Which kind of psychological operations? Done by whom? Intended to achieve what? Which "exact response"? Educate me.
Really? Aight:
Rejection, prima facie rejection. You were just mentioning the same
desired effects upstream in terms of how 9/11 Truth played out. Mere proximity is contagious, that's why we have more than half the rules we do here.
What impressed me the most about
The Mighty Wurlitzer was how much Full Spectrum Dominance was basically applied to the entire Dewey Decimal catalog of human research & endeavor. The strategic insight that
ongoing, constant background psychological operations was the best approach -- you can't just wait for the next conflict. There were entire covert departments and many many millions devoted to achieving total consensus control from anthropology to physics. Tim Shorrock's book Spies for Hire lays out how much this kind of spookery has been outsourced, totally under control of private actors and beyond any semblance of accountability.
A lot of what you have in bold is a single thread -- psychological operations (a term you're not even remotely unfamiliar with) projects get established around "desired effects." Most missions do. So I bring up Chemtrails because that's a special interest group that got gamed, with great success, and continues to be a honeypot for disinformation artists to this day. In this respect, fluoride is no different, and to complicate matters still further, St. Stanley Kubrick himself shoulders much of the blame for that.
Chemtrails research touched upon a lot of CIA drug smuggling operations, and that's the "they" and the "desired effect" all rolled up into one. Certainly geo-engineering has never been much of a secret, there are many firms actively doing business and carefully describing their operations. However, a number of the companies being identified as chemtrail culprits, sketchy private companies with open access to military bases, were actually involved in something else entirely.
This song might sound familiar to Paul Bennewitz.The nature of the operations is nothing new or special -- infiltration and countermeasures. You hit your target from within and without, in the case of an ideological community you want to feed them bad information and turn sympathetic journalists loose on the resulting horseshittery. "Fluoride being bad for you" used to be how they stereotyped those wacky
John Birchers, after all. I use "Psychological Operations" to refer to a spectrum of activities that are being performed by corporate and military actors, primarily through non-combatant channels. AKA "most of what passes for Culture in the United States, from the NY Post to The Atlantic, from Fox News to the NYT." Business as usual.
