Vatican Calls for ‘Central World Bank’

[eyeno]

.....were those of the Irish Catholic and some few of the Jewish aristocracy, not your everyday ethnic and religious folk

And this is relevant for what reason?

I have no idea if it is relevant or not. Ask the guy that wrote this big huge long article that includes practically everybody on the planet and let know what he says about it. I would be interested to know myself. Don't whine ok. The Catholics were singled out in this article.

[AhabsOtherLeg]

So don't stroke out because everybody on the planet takes an equal beating in this article

You can bet I certainly won't stroke out - I'm a Catholic.

But will you take an equal beating like everyone else?

I've never stroked out either, btw, being Catholic also. Sometimes wonder what it would feel like, but until marriage all my energies must be devoted to promoting and furthering the global dominance of the Church of Rome using all the Jesuitical deception and Papish rhetorical tricks at my disposal. Dr. Ian Paisley says that's what Catholics do, and he's a noted authority, so I also among my brethren must play my part.

The church? It was the Templars who allegedly came up with banking

I know that goddamnit! They were also the first multinational corporation. I wasn't talking about who came up with the idea in the first place, but about who now runs very large and influential banks. The Vatican Bank is large and influential, yes? And it does all the things I mentioned, as you know because you know all about the Banco Ambrosiano, Roberto Calvi, the Nazi rat-runs and Bishop Marcinkus, yes?

Yes. Exactly. So stop disagreeing.

But the first central/national bank was set up by a Scottish conman (they call them economists nowadays) to make money for himself from the French King and pay off his gambling debts. Name was John Law. He was a dick. Very clever though.

And the church, nicely, incinerated the fuckers.

But they weren't really out to eliminate usury, were they, with all the burnings and tortures, as their subsequent enthusiastic use of it in the banking sphere shows? They were out to eliminate Jewry, and thereby competition, like I said. And of course they aimed to wipe out heresy in general. So the burnings and tortures were only a good thing if you think getting rid of usury is so essential to our wellbeing that it's also worth getting rid of freedom of thought, action, religion, and expression in the furtherance of that cause, as the medieval Catholic Church allowed none or very little of each amongst it's adherents and dupes.

I know you hate the Templars, and there's many good reasons to do so, but remember that they were a Catholic military order, answerable only to the Pope himself (the pagan elements weren't very far outside the mainstream practices of the Church at the time, and the Baphomet stuff remains unproven), that the Pope destroyed them very reluctantly, that most were allowed to escape on condition that they didn't stage a comeback or uprising, that all their lands, holdings, wealth and traditions were inherited virtually unchanged by the Knights Hospitallers (who added large-scale commercial slave trading to the repertoire of evils) with the full approval of the Church, and that a more recent Pope pardoned The Templars unconditionally.

What the modern world needs is to be more like Phillip le Bel and the medieval Catholic church.

Ah, you don't really mean that.

[Searcher08]

As a lapsed Catholic myself, I would just like to mention that when asked what proof he had that the Pope was a Communist, the Rev Dr Ian Paisley provided evidence that the Blessed Randi himself would have found difficult to debunk:
"BECAUSE HE WEARS RED SOCKS"

[AhabsOtherLeg]

Actually... I remember there was a bizarre thread here about the Pope's red shoes a while back. It was an American woman who was releasing Youtube videos, she was apparently in touch with the Pleideans, and she said the Pope's red shoes proved... something or other. She also seemed to be an evangelical of a sort. I wonder if she'd misconstrued the works of the good Reverend Doctor via a garbled second-hand interpretation from her own church, and worked his soundly logical and fact-based conclusions from back in the day into a big Above Top Secret mush. Would explain a lot. Well, a bit. Maybe.

He does wear red shoes (or pantofole) as well though. So red shoes AND red socks. Golitsyn was right!

[Elihu]

I have also read the same. I read that the church keynesians worked tirelessly to get rid of usuryZIRP.

a communist utopia beckons

[Stephen Morgan]

Actually... I remember there was a bizarre thread here about the Pope's red shoes a while back. It was an American woman who was releasing Youtube videos, she was apparently in touch with the Pleideans, and she said the Pope's red shoes proved... something or other. She also seemed to be an evangelical of a sort. I wonder if she'd misconstrued the works of the good Reverend Doctor via a garbled second-hand interpretation from her own church, and worked his soundly logical and fact-based conclusions from back in the day into a big Above Top Secret mush. Would explain a lot. Well, a bit. Maybe.

He does wear red shoes (or pantofole) as well though. So red shoes AND red socks. Golitsyn was right!

Wasn't the former British ambassador to America known as "red socks"?

[Stephen Morgan]

The church? It was the Templars who allegedly came up with banking

I know that goddamnit! They were also the first multinational corporation. I wasn't talking about who came up with the idea in the first place, but about who now runs very large and influential banks.

The Papists? I'm not sure about that.

The Vatican Bank is large and influential, yes? And it does all the things I mentioned, as you know because you know all about the Banco Ambrosiano, Roberto Calvi, the Nazi rat-runs and Bishop Marcinkus, yes?

I know all. I know the Vatican Bank, the IOR, almost bankrupted paying off it's involvement in the Calvi affair. It's not exactly the HSBC.

Yes. Exactly. So stop disagreeing.

But the first central/national bank was set up by a Scottish conman (they call them economists nowadays) to make money for himself from the French King and pay off his gambling debts. Name was John Law. He was a dick. Very clever though.

Law.

And the church, nicely, incinerated the fuckers.

But they weren't really out to eliminate usury, were they, with all the burnings and tortures, as their subsequent enthusiastic use of it in the banking sphere shows?

And Stalin didn't much care for Jews, but he still dealt with Hitler for us, very generously.

They were out to eliminate Jewry, and thereby competition, like I said.

Were there a lot of Jews in the Knights Templar? I used to be able to see one of the places they were held after their arrest in England when looking out of my kitchen window, and I've been to one of the four places they kept their baphomet idols, as family lived there. Lots of graffiti, big on it were the Templars. Didn't see anything seeming to be Jewish, though.

And of course they aimed to wipe out heresy in general. So the burnings and tortures were only a good thing if you think getting rid of usury is so essential to our wellbeing that it's also worth getting rid of freedom of thought, action, religion, and expression in the furtherance of that cause, as the medieval Catholic Church allowed none or very little of each amongst it's adherents and dupes.

That would be a tough choice.

I know you hate the Templars, and there's many good reasons to do so, but remember that they were a Catholic military order, answerable only to the Pope himself (the pagan elements weren't very far outside the mainstream practices of the Church at the time, and the Baphomet stuff remains unproven),

It was confessed, at least by my local Templars. Not under torture either, not in England. Anyway, I don't particularly hate the Templars at all.

that the Pope destroyed them very reluctantly, that most were allowed to escape on condition that they didn't stage a comeback or uprising, that all their lands, holdings, wealth and traditions were inherited virtually unchanged by the Knights Hospitallers (who added large-scale commercial slave trading to the repertoire of evils) with the full approval of the Church, and that a more recent Pope pardoned The Templars unconditionally.

What can you expect from a Nazi? Yes, they were allowed to escape for the most part, in Portugal and some other places they just had a name change. In England they weren't even arrested until five years after their French suppression.

What the modern world needs is to be more like Phillip le Bel and the medieval Catholic church.

Ah, you don't really mean that.

Well, taking on board their attitude towards the Templars and applying it to banks might be nice.