Googlization

Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff

Re: Googlization

Postby elfismiles » Mon Apr 16, 2012 10:03 am

Crowd-sourcing to circumvent its own privacy protocols ...


Google accused of invading privacy with pictures of house numbers
Google has sparked a new privacy row by forcing users to decipher blurred photos of private house numbers to access their own accounts.
Google has been accused of invading people’s privacy by using photographs of private house numbers for its online security checks.
By James Hall, Consumer Affairs Editor
10:30PM BST 15 Apr 2012

Internet users are being asked to read random property numbers snapped by Google's Street View cameras, as part of new security checks.

The tests weed out "bots" by ensuring that users are human. But Google has been accused of exploiting the data submitted in by the public for commercial gain - by adding the information to its own mapping system.

Campaign groups said that the use of pictures of real house numbers presents “serious” security issues, and accused the internet company of being “underhand and crude”.

The pictures of house numbers, which are taken from doors and fences on its Street View mapping service, appear on Google’s websites when internet users are asked security questions in order to access their accounts.

In order to gain access to the page, web users are asked to identify a blurry house number by typing it into a box.

The same image is presented to other Google users around the world at the same time. If enough people submit the same number, Google accepts they have accurately read the photo and are therefore not bots.

Traditionally these security checks – of which there are estimated 200 million a day - have involved typing blurred letters or words into a box.

Nick Pickles, director of privacy and civil liberties at Big Brother Watch, condemned the use of pictures of real house numbers as security questions.

“There is a serious privacy issue with identifying the individual number of people’s homes,” he said.

Mr Pickles also accused Google of using the pictures to further its own interests.

This is because security questions that involve typing a word into a box actually form part of the technology company’s Google Books project – which aims to digitize thousands of physical books that were written before the computer age.

When people type in garbled words they are helping the technology company to translate scanned images from old books where the ink used has bled or faded, meaning that the words can not be recognised by a computer programme.

Mr Pickles said that there is no such ‘public interest’ use in retyping house numbers.

Rather, Google uses the affirmative identification of a house number to sharpen up the image on its Street View or Google Maps service.

"It is clear that Google sees the people who use its services as a commodity to be used up. To use the public as unwitting data loggers is both underhand and crude.

"The 'Don't be evil' mantra appears to have been replaced with a thirst for knowledge," he said.

A Google spokesman confirmed that it has launched a global trial using house numbers as security questions. He said that the pictures are only used in 10 per cent of all questions.

The spokesman said that there are no security risks as the pictures of the numbers are cropped very closely. All pictures are taken from public roads and highways, he added.

When someone types the number in correctly, Google will then sharpen up the online image, the spokesman said.

“We are currently running an experiment in which characters from Street View images are appearing in CAPTCHAs [the security system that Google owns].

“We often extract data such as street names and traffic signs from Street View imagery to improve Google Maps with useful information like business addresses and locations,” the spokesman said.

Google said that it runs hundreds of trials such as this all the time. The aim is to make gaining access to websites safer, the spokesman said.

The point of security systems such as CAPTCHA is to stop legitimate websites being flooded with unwanted internet spam.


http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/9205486 ... mbers.html
User avatar
elfismiles
 
Posts: 8512
Joined: Fri Aug 11, 2006 6:46 pm
Blog: View Blog (4)

Re: Googlization

Postby Searcher08 » Mon Apr 16, 2012 11:17 am

One of the characteristics of Google as an organisation is that it often pulls the plug on services that it had previously provided - and often does this with little or no warning. It has also entered a phase where the great spirit of individual innovation that it previously exhibited - such as displayed in Google Labs - is being greatly reduced.
Google Labs: killed
Google Wave: whacked
Google Desktop: deep sixed

Google often says that it releases these as Open Source - Im not disputing that - what I'm saying is that if there is one word that can describe Google as a company, that word is CAPRICIOUS.

So half the world gets used to a model where Google provides a massive amount of free services - Search Email YouTube Maps etc etc in return for paying with advertiser related data.

On Jan 1st 2013 Google goes to a subscriber model, with the Free Basic Offering providing reduced functionality to what people are used to getting for free. You can start paying for service usage... and be ad free!

On Jan 1st 2015 with one week's warning - the Free Basic Offering was stopped and a Minimum Service Offering (equivalent to $5 a month) introduced.

I would strongly recommend that everyone has a fallback position to adopt in case of the above eg be able to use a totally Microsoft / Bing / Win 7-8 setup AND investigate what is outside of both Google and Microsoft.
User avatar
Searcher08
 
Posts: 5887
Joined: Thu Dec 20, 2007 10:21 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Googlization

Postby elfismiles » Mon Apr 16, 2012 12:55 pm


16 April 2012 - 03H08

FCC drops Google 'Street View' investigation

This file photo shows a special camera, designed to take photos for Google's 'Street View' mapping service. US government telecom regulators have ended an investigation into the service gathering data from private wireless hotspots. AFP - US government telecom regulators have ended an investigation into Google's "Street View" online mapping service gathering data from private wireless hotspots.

The Federal Communication Commission (FCC) enforcement bureau on Friday called for Google to pay a $25,000 penalty for stalling the probe but said that it could not accuse the Internet giant of breaking US law.

"We worked in good faith to answer the FCC's questions throughout the inquiry, and we're pleased that they have concluded that we complied with the law," Google spokesperson Niki Fenwick said in response to an AFP inquiry.

The FCC began the investigation in late 2010 after Google announced that Street View cars taking photographs of cities in more than 30 countries had inadvertently gathered data sent over unsecured Wi-Fi systems.

Information sucked up by passing Street View cars included passwords, emails, and other data that was being transmitted wirelessly over unprotected routers, according to the FCC.

Google has since stopped the collection of Wi-Fi data, used to provide location-based services such as driving directions in Google Maps and other products, by Street View cars.

Street View, which was launched in 2006, lets users view panoramic street scenes on Google Maps and take a virtual "walk" through cities such as New York, Paris or Hong Kong.

The FCC contended that Google delayed the investigation by ignoring requests for internal information such as emails related to Street View data collection and the names of employees who authorized or reviewed it.

"For many months, Google deliberately impeded and delayed the bureau's investigation by failing to respond to requests for material information," FCC enforcement bureau chief Michele Ellison said in a written report.

"Although a world leader in search capability, Google took the position that searching its employees' email 'would be a time consuming and burdensome task'," Ellison continued.

Similar reasoning was given for not wanting to dig up names or statements from Google workers who authorized the collection of Wi-Fi data or analyzed information gathered, according to the FCC.

A key engineer behind the Street View data collection software was said to have exerted his legal right not to make any statements on the record to investigators.

"Google's level of cooperation with this matter fell way short of what we expect and require," Ellison said while backing the decision to require the company to forfeit $25,000 as punishment.


http://www.france24.com/en/20120416-fcc ... estigation

User avatar
elfismiles
 
Posts: 8512
Joined: Fri Aug 11, 2006 6:46 pm
Blog: View Blog (4)

Re: Googlization

Postby Project Willow » Mon Apr 16, 2012 1:06 pm

I keep reading this thread title as Godzillation, which is also in progress atm.
User avatar
Project Willow
 
Posts: 4798
Joined: Sat May 07, 2005 9:37 pm
Location: Seattle
Blog: View Blog (1)

Re: Googlization

Postby elfismiles » Thu Apr 19, 2012 5:25 pm

Marc Rotenberg, EPIC Executive Director to AG Eric Holder
http://epic.org/privacy/streetview/EPIC ... -17-12.pdf
User avatar
elfismiles
 
Posts: 8512
Joined: Fri Aug 11, 2006 6:46 pm
Blog: View Blog (4)

Re: Googlization

Postby elfismiles » Wed Jun 06, 2012 11:09 am

email hacking was NOT what I first thought of when I saw this headline...

Google to warn users targeted by state-sponsored attacks




Google to warn users targeted by state-sponsored attacks
Posted By Josh Rogin Tuesday, June 5, 2012 - 2:40 PM

Image

UPDATE: A senior Senate aide confirmed that this evening he received a warning on his Gmail account that Google suspected he had been the target of a state-sponsored cyber attack.

Web giant Google is about to announce a new warning informing Gmail users when a specific type of attacker is trying to hijack their accounts -- governments and their proxies.

Later today, the company will announce a new warning system that will alert Gmail users when Google believes their accounts are being targeted by state-sponsored attacks. The new system isn't a response to a specific event or directed at any one country, but is part and parcel of Google's recent set of policy changes meant to allow users to protect themselves from malicious activity brought on by state actors. It also has the effect of making it more difficult for authoritarian regimes to target political and social activists by hacking their private communications.

"We are constantly on the lookout for malicious activity on our systems, in particular attempts by third parties to log into users' accounts unauthorized. When we have specific intelligence-either directly from users or from our own monitoring efforts-we show clear warning signs and put in place extra roadblocks to thwart these bad actors," reads a note to users by Eric Grosse, Google's vice president for security engineering, to be posted later today on Google's Online Security blog, obtained in advance by The Cable. "Today, we're taking that a step further for a subset of our users, who we believe may be the target of state-sponsored attacks."

When Google's internal systems monitoring suspicious internet activity, such as suspicious log-in attempts, conclude that such activities include the involvement of states or state-backed initiatives, the user will now receive the specialized, more prominent warning pictured above. The warning doesn't necessarily mean that a user's account has been hijacked, but is meant to alert users that Google believes a state sponsored attack has been attempted so they can increase their security vigilance.

Google wants to be clear they are not singling out any one government for criticism and that the effort is about giving users transparency about what is going on with their accounts, not about highlighting the malicious actions of foreign states.

"If you see this warning it does not necessarily mean that your account has been hijacked. It just means that we believe you may be a target, of phishing or malware for example, and that you should take immediate steps to secure your account," Grosse writes. "You might ask how we know this activity is state-sponsored. We can't go into the details without giving away information that would be helpful to these bad actors, but our detailed analysis-as well as victim reports-strongly suggest the involvement of states or groups that are state-sponsored."

Google insiders told The Cable that Google will not be giving out information on which governments it sees as the most egregious violators of web privacy. For Google, the new initiative is not an effort against governments but a way to help its users help defend and protect themselves.

Users who click through the new warning message will be directed to a page that outlines commonly seen security threats and suggests ways users can immediately raise their level of security on Gmail.

"We're constantly working to prevent harmful activity on our services, especially attempts to compromise our users' information," the insider said. "The primary message is: we believe that you're a target so you should take immediate steps to protect your account."

The new announcement comes only days after the company said they would alert users in mainland China when they use search terms that are likely to be censored by the Chinese government. According to another of Google's official blogs, that move was meant to improve the search experience for Chinese users by allowing them to avoid terms that would result in stalls or breaks in their search experience due to government filters.

For example, Google said that Chinese users searching the character for "river," which is "jiang" in Chinese, causes technical problems. The same character is also used in the search for former Chinese President Jiang Zemin.

Google didn't specifically mention Chinese censorship in its notice about Chinese search terms, apparently in an effort not to antagonize the Chinese government any more than necessary. Google and Beijing have been at odds since 2010, when the company announced it would no longer censor search terms on the Google.cn and moved the bulk of its Chinese operations to Hong Kong.

That move followed a series of Gmail attacks in 2010, directed at Chinese human rights activists, which were widely suspected to be linked to the Chinese government. Following those attacks, the government-controlled People's Daily publicly accused Google of being an agent for U.S. intelligence agencies.

While last week's announcement and this week's announcement are both being presented by Google as user based initiatives not directed at foreign governments, Google CEO Eric Schmidt has been speaking out publicly and forcefully in recent months about the potential negative role governments can play in circumventing internet freedom.

"While threats come from individuals and even groups of people, the biggest problem will be activities stemming from nations that seek to do harm," he said in London last month.

http://thecable.foreignpolicy.com/posts ... ed_attacks

User avatar
elfismiles
 
Posts: 8512
Joined: Fri Aug 11, 2006 6:46 pm
Blog: View Blog (4)

Previous

Return to General Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 172 guests