Canadian_watcher wrote:@lyrimal (AKA embittered former poster, no doubt).. hmmm. after re-reading I think current poster. but anyway...
That isn't meant to be me, is it? I know you think I'm a horrible person, but I hope you don't think I'm ashamed of my views, or cowardly enough to hide behind sock puppets and so on.
There are many terrific and useful discussions that we could get in to about the justice system and why people end up in jail, etc. Poverty and lack of education, cyclical abuse, in the case of aboriginal and native peoples there is a serious culture clash that makes for a spiral towards encounters with the 'justice system' and the unfairness of these things needs to be looked at. NO DOUBT.
But you know what ANOTHER really important aspect of the fact that there are far far more men in jail than women is?
Men commit more crimes.
Deal with it.
Women don't apply for so many high-paying jobs, women do work they enjoy instead of whoring themselves to the highest bidder, women make up most the voters but don't vote for women. Suck it up and quit your whining.
And by 'deal with it' I mean not only that you should accept it, but that if you want to see it change you'd better get off your ass and get busy educating young men that might otherwise be ensnared in the prison system - work with them on addictions, gang interactions, literacy, mental health and psychological problem. If you want to KEEP them going to jail in record numbers here's what you do:
Tell them it's all women's fault.
Now get your head out of your ass because that's the end of my patience with your bullshit.
What we need to do is provide a proper education and a realistic path out of poverty, so that social scientists asking poor boys what they want to do get answers other than "go on the dole" and "professional footballer". Obviously the feminist bias of the education system isn't the only thing that needs to be overcome there, the main thing that would help would be to reduce inequitable wealth distribution with nice high tax rates for the rich which would need to be ruthlessly enforced. That doesn't mean there shouldn't also be a systematic rebalancing of the education system toward the class disadvantaged by the current system.
Of course even that aspect is "feminists", not "women". However, I see some virtue in teaching people the identity of their oppressors, one of which is feminism (of girls as well as boys, although boys get the worst of it). Isn't necessary, though, they'll probably figure it out themselves eventually.
tru3magic wrote:Canadian_watcher wrote:Men commit more crimes.
Men are
convicted of more crimes. I don't know the exact numbers, but this is true. It is my opinion males also commit more crimes. Lastly, it is my opinion that females are more likely to not be issued a ticket/fine from a male cop, probably further skewing the statistic.
I, too, believe men commit most crimes, even though some of those crimes shouldn't be crimes. Women commit an equal share of crimes in the home, things like domestic violence, but less outside the home.
I would like to ask this of the women here....do you feel a male cop letting you off a ticket due to being female is a misogynistic act?
IT is a statistical fact that women receive considerably shorter sentences when convicted of the same crime, even when convicted with a man for having been partners in the commission of literally the same crime.
Canadian_watcher wrote:tru3magic wrote:Canadian_watcher wrote:what the fuck do you care - are you trying to find a job?
Casually, it's been known to happen. It's a question of working potentially being less unpleasant than signing on. I am pragmatic about these things. But either way, as I've said before, I base my interest in these things on abstract justice, not the nitty-gritty of my own life.
I think he is trying to prove his point about male and female job opportunities being fairly equal from 10 pages back(?) That study has NO WHERE NEAR ENOUGH information to be considered acceptable though.
http://abcnews.go.com/Business/wireStory?id=12287887"Female candidates who didn't include a photo with their resumes were called in for an interview 16.6 percent of the time [...] and 13.7 percent of men who didn't include a picture."
Same information, different study. The facts are plain, the same CV with a female name is more likely to get you the job, or at least an interview.
nothing he ever says has anywhere near enough information to be acceptable.
in fact almost nothing he says is acceptable in any way.
Flattery will get you nowhere.
Joe Hillshoist wrote:lyrimal wrote:The single most damaging statistic to modern American domestic equality and human rights (from the American domain, with which I am familiar) is the fact that nearly ten times more men than women have their very freedom and lives taken away from them by our supposed system of justice... letting alone for now all the other very real ways men have it terribly worse than women. Because we live in the most incarceration-happy nation on this planet, this disparity, in turn, translates to American males living in a state of omnipresent jeopardy with which most American women simply cannot relate.
That would be "insecurity", per the evolutionary psychology style article from before. Obviously it's the business class cashing in on the suffering of others, paying for false convictions, lobbying for harsher sentences, to keep their private prisons going. The role of men in modern society is to suffer for others, whether in the military or in prison or in the nastier parts of the workforce. Men are commodities of little value which can be made to suffer for a healthy profit. The same thing can't be said of women.
Would you like to know how it came to be so easy to scapegoat such a disproportionate number of men in this society? By holding them to matriarchal standards. Men are expected, genetically and, ironically, culturally, to be less subservient, and on the flip-side, more confronting, and they are punished mercilessly for it, both legally and extra-legally. When women do demonstrate less subservience... as a related and potent example, men and women are pretty evenly divided on drug use representation within society, yet many, many more men are imprisoned for drug crimes.
To be fair, due to the greater pressure on men to earn to spend and be in positions of apparent authority men might be more likely to take up dealing, on top of using. Although in American I'm not sure how much that would raise the chances of incarceration.
...In no way, shape, or form am I advocating more women be locked up or executed.
Isn't the incarceration rate in the states a race issue (with other shit on top like privatisation, drug laws etc.). This thread is about misogyny.
They are both forms of bigotry but to set them up in opposition like you have done is to play both sides against the bosses.
Well, race is an important issue but the disparities are greater in regard to sex. Differences in sentencing for the same crime, for example, show quite clearly that blacks get longer sentences than whites, and men longer than women, with the sexual difference being bigger.
Those who dream by night in the dusty recesses of their minds wake in the day to find that all was vanity; but the dreamers of the day are dangerous men, for they may act their dream with open eyes, and make it possible. -- Lawrence of Arabia