I am not posting on this thread because it is totally dominated at this point by just one view point and I can't make any point about logic, law or the facts without a huge smear campaign that is really really meaningless. How this case goes in court will be fascinating with many pros and cons. So I am only hear to mention that this obvious typo is corrected.
Kate Dixon
I regret that, and apologize if you felt smeared by me. I don't agree with your hypothesis regarding Hughes's immunity and I don't understand why you frame your critiques of what you perceive as various past and future flaws in the investigation and/or the case by highlighting Rachel's part in them, especially when she wasn't and/or won't be the person responsible for them. And I obviously have some problems wrt your conduct and judgment in those areas. But I'm really, sincerely not acting out of personal animosity. And I really, sincerely would rather be engaged in an amiable exchange of views than a bitch-slapping contest. So I wanted to tell you that. FWIW.
Apart from which....Since it does get pretty rough on this board sometimes, and since I've definitely felt genuinely injured by it on occasion, I'm certainly not going to minimize or dismiss your feelings or try to tell you they're unreasonable or anything like that. They're your feelings, and you should post or not post as the mood take you, obviously. But either way, I wanted to say that I was sorry that it was a painful experience for you. And either way, I also wanted to wish you well.
Best,
c2w