stefano » Tue Nov 10, 2015 11:32 am wrote:On the luggage - it's common cause that the plane broke up in the air, right? Those are bags that fell from high up, whether or not they correspond to our idea of what bags that fell from high up must look like. Here's another photo showing that most bags are in bad shape.
No, it's not "common cause" that the plane broke up in the air. The ONLY facts we know are that the plane was flying at over 30,000 feet, when there was a so far unidentified noise, and then all its signals shut down and it began to plummet to the ground. No distress signal was sent from the plane. Nothing.
stefano wrote:And these are from the Malaysia Air plane disaster in Ukraine, which also broke up at cruising altitude after a catastrophic explosion:
The Malaysian airplane was shot down by a missile from a Ukrainian air force base. Russian investigators have identified the missile as an obsolete model that is only used by the Ukrainian Air Force. The European investigators acknowledge that the plane was shot down by a ground-to-air missile, but claim that they were unable to identify the model.
stefano wrote:And why do you think it wasn't a bomb, Alice? Why would they do it any other way? They had or have an agent at Sharm El-Sheikh airport or at a hotel who put a bomb on the plane, and so they knew where to stand and
film that video (although when I saw that I didn't think it looked very convincing).
First, that video is of a fighter plane shot down in Afghanistan. The Russian airplane was an Airbus. Even a layman can tell the difference, which is rather obvious.
The Russian airbus was fully fueled, which means that it was carrying 45 tons of jet fuel. A bomb would have caused one hell of a fire, that would have burned the plane and everybody on it to a crisp. According to the initial reports by the Egyptian authorities, none of the passengers' bodies have revealed any trace of explosive substances, and the physical evidence so far does not indicate that the plane was hit by a missile. Neither were any of the bodies burned, nor was the luggage, nor was any sign of fire found on the body of the plane.
stefano wrote:It sounds like the Russians are accepting that now - cancelling all flights to Egypt, not only ones to Sharm El-Sheikh like the British and the Irish. Why would they do that if they thought it was something else?
Because though the evidence so far indicates it was not a bomb or a missile, there are other possibilities. The timing of the crash, which coincided with President Sisi's trip to London; the fact that downing the plane hits two birds with one stone ("punishing" the Russians for their humiliating exposure of the "ISIS" psyop in Syria, and "punishing" the Egyptians for slipping the imperialist leash); and the incredible coincidence that, very close to where the airplane suddenly shut down and began to drop, Israel was hosting the largest air force drills in its history, with the US, which had begun the day before the crash.
Finally, the fact that Egypt has totally reestablished Egyptian control over the Sinai is driving the Israelis nuts. It is crucial for their plans that Sinai be viewed as a dangerous no-man's-land, a savage wilderness no longer subject to Egypt's sovereignty, infested with Islamist terrorists. This is patently not the case, and it is particularly galling that Sharm El-Sheikh continues to be a major tourist destination, and that it continues to be the site of important international events such as the Economic Development Conference, which was attended by dozens of heads of state top officials, including from the EU and North America, Asia, Africa and Latin America; and the Arab League Summit, which was attended by dozens of monarchs and presidents and prime ministers from across the region.
Thus, like with any crime, if the evidence reveals that a crime has indeed been committed, we must first ask the question: "cui bono?" Then, once all the physical evidence has been carefully examined and analyzed, the second question is "Who had the means, motive and opportunity to commit this crime?"
The Russian Prime Minister Medvedev has, carefully picking his words, said that it appears the plane was brought down by "a terrorist act". In other words, he has reason to believe somebody murdered those 224 innocent people in cold blood. Since so far there is no evidence that a bomb or missile was used, you are free to come to your own conclusions.
"If you're not careful the newspapers will have you hating the oppressed and loving the people doing the oppressing." - Malcolm X