Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff
DrEvil » Fri Feb 26, 2016 9:57 pm wrote:^^Pretty sure it's still on the theoretical stage, except for some small trials.
Speaking of: whatever happened to that guy who did his own experiment somewhere off the coast of Alaska? He dumped a load of something (iron sulfide?) in the ocean without permission.
FourthBase » Sun Feb 28, 2016 6:59 pm wrote:http://www.nature.com/nclimate/journal/v6/n3/pdf/nclimate2938.pdf
Good news!
FourthBase » 29 Feb 2016 03:59 wrote:http://www.nature.com/nclimate/journal/v6/n3/pdf/nclimate2938.pdf
Good news!
Firstly, climate scientists agree that global warming has not ‘stopped’ – global surface temperatures and ocean heat content have continued to increase, sea levels are still rising, and the planet is retaining ~0.5 days of the sun’s incoming energy per year.
...
Overall, there is compelling evidence that there has been a temporary slowdown in observed global surface warming, especially when examined relative to our expectations, which can be explained by a combination of factors. Research into the nature and causes of this event has triggered improved understanding of observational biases, radiative forcing and internal variability. This has led to more widespread recognition that modulation by internal variability is large enough to produce a significantly reduced rate of surface temperature increase for a decade or even more — particularly if internal variability is augmented by the externally driven cooling caused by a succession of volcanic eruptions.
The legacy of this new understanding will certainly outlive the recent warming slowdown.
Joe Hillshoist » Mon Feb 29, 2016 6:41 am wrote:Methane - I hope not.
A feedback loop between decreasing ice cover and decreasing reflection of sunlight might also explain the excess heat.
smoking since 1879 » 29 Feb 2016 22:39 wrote:Joe Hillshoist » Mon Feb 29, 2016 6:41 am wrote:Methane - I hope not.
A feedback loop between decreasing ice cover and decreasing reflection of sunlight might also explain the excess heat.
yup Joe, that's how I see it, and the warming soil releases it's stinky gas
Joe Hillshoist » Mon Feb 29, 2016 12:41 am wrote:Methane - I hope not.
A feedback loop between decreasing ice cover and decreasing reflection of sunlight might also explain the excess heat.
Luther Blissett » 29 Feb 2016 23:54 wrote:Joe Hillshoist » Mon Feb 29, 2016 12:41 am wrote:Methane - I hope not.
A feedback loop between decreasing ice cover and decreasing reflection of sunlight might also explain the excess heat.
It's even worse than that - the arctic is pretty much shrouded in complete darkness at this time of the year and still has managed to creep above freezing. There isn't even any sunlight to absorb through this hot arctic winter - it's all residual heat from 2015's record-shattering heat, disrupted ocean currents, and changes in ocean stratification.
But when we fight we win, and your child's generation will be far more progressive than any of us ever were.
Luther Blissett » Mon Feb 29, 2016 2:54 pm wrote:Joe Hillshoist » Mon Feb 29, 2016 12:41 am wrote:Methane - I hope not.
A feedback loop between decreasing ice cover and decreasing reflection of sunlight might also explain the excess heat.
It's even worse than that - the arctic is pretty much shrouded in complete darkness at this time of the year and still has managed to creep above freezing. There isn't even any sunlight to absorb through this hot arctic winter - it's all residual heat from 2015's record-shattering heat, disrupted ocean currents, and changes in ocean stratification.
But when we fight we win, and your child's generation will be far more progressive than any of us ever were.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 166 guests