Kate Dixon wrote:Dear Compared 2, my friend, Hughes has immunity per press reports, per Desertfae, per his own statements. Prior to 1/1/97 there was only TRANSACTIONAL immunity (See statutes) in the State of California. Hughes said words to the effect that it was a government sanctioned covert hit. These are my sources re: the two items you mention above. What are your sources that state my sources are not correct or that contradict my information? ANSWER?????
Kate, you obviously are again twisting things. What did I say in my interview? Go back to that and LISTEN this time.
Kate Dixon wrote:Based on my own investigation so far, Heggstad now says Hughes offered him the bag money to do the hit and Heggstad said he declined to do the hit. Heggstad denies doing the hit. Now Heggstad is pointing the finger at Hughes saying Hughes did the hit. So simple. Just ask Heggstad, will you? He may answer your call if he not now motorbiking all over Latin America.
Ok, so again, you and VM are attempting to interfere. It's pretty obvious by what you have just said.
Kate Dixon wrote:John Paul Nichols, son of JPN (deceased) knew all about the money being given to Hughes to be the bag man to give the bag to Heggstad in Idlewyld to do the hit on Alvarez John Paul, a highly intelligent educated guy was a prime advisor and confidant of his own father John Philip Nichols (deceased) who is also named as a conspirator to commit murrder. I don't know any more details about this yet.
and where did you get this info from?
Kate Dixon wrote:So, if you don't like my comments or the sources for my facts so be it.
So far, Newsmakingnews was the FIRST to publish that Hughes was enroute to Riverside from Miami Dade jail, and the FIRST to publish that an amended complaint was filed agianst Hughes making him eligible for the death penalty and thus, having no bail. NMN beat KESQ, Desertfae's press releases and the LA Times and the Desert Sun regarding these two stories, and did a more depth reporting than they did re: these two topics.
Real news agencies have to vet their info before reporting it to avoid lawsuits, instead of just printing whatever they may want to pull out of thin air, or their opinions, guesses or whatever. NMN is NOT a real news agency, and in the past has speculated on multiple things, including me being an
'actress' LOL
Kate Dixon wrote:I tell you I am just carrying on in the tradition of Gary Webb and Danny Casolaro. I am exposing the so-called Octopus here step by step. I suggest you tune into NMN to find out what is happening in the Hughes case as it happens and for background in the case.
Folks, 'tune' into NMN for lies, guesses, bias opinions and info on how they attempt to interfere in multiple cases. lol
Kate Dixon wrote:It appears that RI board is just a place for your cheerleaders of the DA, AG and Sheriff to get together and slam anyone who is trying to report any facts or make any comment. All you guys, Chigger and compare2 and Desert want to do is FRY HUGHES AS SOON AS POSSIBLE AND ELIMINATE AND DESTROY ANYONE WHO WOULD REPORT ANYTHING OTHER THAN THAT HE SHOULD FRY AND THE DA, AG, AND SHERIFF ARE NICE GUYS. Come on, get a clue.
See my above comment for what I think of NMN and how you and VM "report facts". Wow, you sure sound like the "Hughes camp" that have been emailing me threats and abusive type things. You know, being Christian is a "get out of jail free card" according to the Hughes camp.
Hey, that's an idea, lets all do whatever we want because hey, if we accept God's forgiveness it's a free for all LOL. (disclaimer- I'm not really suggesting anyone do anything illegal at all, I'm being sarcastic).
Kate Dixon wrote:This complaint versus Hughes is swiss cheese given the immunity issue -- even KSEQ reported recently this was an issue. And the whole case hangs on Heggstand and John Paul Nichols singing like canaries to save themselves and pointing at Hughes. And what credibility to Heggstad and John Paul Nichols have on this matter? Oh, yes the case somehow also rests on Desert's tap of Hughes' statements during a ministry session in Fresno.
You have no idea what is going on in this case (even from a legal standpoint), it's no wonder you were disbarred. It sure sounds to me like you're trying to help Hughes... surprise, surprise... isn't this exactly what you guys did with PAT?
Kate Dixon wrote:It's easy for me to emulate Danny Casolaro and Gary Webb when you guys put your pom poms on and start cheerin' -- because guess what, people believe me NOT YOU.
A little full of yourself there eh Kate?
Kate Dixon wrote:You guys, (except for Desert who did some good work in the past, until she clammed up to help the AG fry Hughes), won't even give your names. Such shy guys. I, on the other hand, give my name, and address, and I am a semi-public person, because i am all over the web. If Danny were alive now, you guys would be 'the same thing to him you are doin' to me. So Merry Christmas. Tune into NMN and learn a thing or two that the mainstream media will not tell you.
OH WOW, is that
'almost' a compliment? hahahahaha. You don't know me, or what I am doing at all. Again, more of your opinion that you're trying to pass off as fact.
As for how you're treating others on RI, they see through what you and VM are doing, and you just don't like it. Get over yourself, you're not nearly as big as you think you are.
Oh and Merry Christmas to you too Kate lol. Tis the season to interfere in cases, report guesses, opinions, and not check facts, and put down others that don't agree with you.. oh, and help criminals.
Kate Dixon wrote:O, and to your dear Chigger, if you want to ask me a question about anything re: El Dorado County, please tell me who said what about me, so I can respond. You just post some vague rumor. I don't get that. What does El Dorado County have to do with the Hughe's case anyway?
Doogie, I think you got Kate so flustered here that she decided to blame Chigger lol
Kate Dixon wrote:Also Chigger, this is not an indictment re: Hughes, it is a complaint backed by an affidavit for arrest of Hughes signed by John Powers, deputy sheriff. And Heggstad and John Paul Nichols are not unindicted co-conspirators in an indictment, they are, rather, named as conspirators in the complaint who conpsired to murder Alverez, Boger and Castro, and they have not been arrested as far as I know and as far as the public records show. It is so nice to the people of the State of California to let two guys who are accused of conspiring to execute three people, to go free and walk around. Aren't they dangerous guys? And even if they have immunity, they are still dangerous guys, but the AG couldn't care about protecting the public from them, so let's thier role just hang in the air, for people to speculate about, unless of course, they figure it out.
Kate Dixon
You're contradicting yourself Kate.. first, you act like you want to help Heggstad and like he's innocent, then you turn around and call him dangerous... which is it Kate? Tell us how you really feel lol