Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff
compared2what? wrote:eyeno, you have a moral imperative to be more sensitive to the dangers posed by your own limitations than that. Under all circumstances. Without exception.
Asta wrote:Doctors have become not much more than drug pushers.
Grizzly wrote:Wait until the State tells you you have Oppositional defiant disorder (ODD)....![]()
![]()
![]()
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opposition ... t_disorder
HolyWiki wrote:Begging the question (or petitio principii, "assuming the initial point") is a type of logical fallacy in which the proposition to be proven is assumed implicitly or explicitly in the premise.
compared2what? wrote:No. You could be the greatest living expert on Zyprexa and metabolic disturbance in the world today. You still wouldn't be doing anything but endangering others by handing out advice about it on the internet without one word of qualification or demurral. You don't even know the proposed dosage.
I don't doubt your good intentions. But they don't excuse your heedlessness. Nothing does. And nothing could. You should know better.
eyeno wrote:compared2what? wrote:No. You could be the greatest living expert on Zyprexa and metabolic disturbance in the world today. You still wouldn't be doing anything but endangering others by handing out advice about it on the internet without one word of qualification or demurral. You don't even know the proposed dosage.
I don't doubt your good intentions. But they don't excuse your heedlessness. Nothing does. And nothing could. You should know better.
For pete's sake all I did was post side effects from wikipedia. The effects may not coincide with your endorsement that the the drugs are probably not a health risk but there is no need to nag me for posting the side effects. Could we have less of this please?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 183 guests