Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff
23 wrote:DrVolin wrote:I'm willing to entertain anything, but who would benefit over this?
At first blush, my guess is anyone who is a proponent of nationalizing the oil industry.
Monumental catastrophes are great backdrops for Government takeovers.
Hugo Farnsworth wrote:The bad news is that it is bad, an environmental catastrophe.
The good news is that, at this rate of flow, the well will probably collapse on itself ("bridge over"). The other good news is that out of all the places in the world to spill oil, the Gulf of Mexico's ecology is probably better suited to deal with this toxic crap than any other.
What is really killing the GoM's ecology faster than the oil industry is the agricultural runoff in the central USA that ends up in the Mississippi, and then into the Gulf. There are now "dead zones" in the GoM that are devoid of dissolved oxygen (hypoxia). http://lab.visual-logic.com/?p=331
Economic interests in the US have long treated Louisiana like a red-headed stepchild, the same mentality that now strip-mines Appalachia and blows off the tops of mountains in that region. The coast of Louisiana is disappearing because of the intense canal dredging that took place during the 20th century to extract the oil. Oyster beds and estuaries are disappearing so fast that it defies the imagination. That's just one eco-disaster among so many others. So much in that state has been lost forever--I will give you one example: Up until the early 20th century, there were stands of cypress trees so huge and tall (some of them nearly as large as the Sequoia in California) that, had they not fallen to the axes of lumber companies, would be national parks today. Try to imagine paddling down a bayou or in Atchafalaya Bay and seeing a tree the size of a small skyscraper.
DrVolin wrote:And another parallel: No claim of responsibility.
Hugo Farnsworth wrote:If the well does not "bridge over" and plug itself
DrVolin wrote:And another parallel: No claim of responsibility.
nathan28 wrote:DrVolin wrote:Okay, you have officially gone into total paranoia land.
It is very, very clear who the parties involved in this incident are.
Iamwhomiam wrote:The first report I had heard on this disaster was on the day or day after it occurred and it related tha 47,000 gal per day were being released. Later that same day I was surprised to hear only 1,000 gpd was leaking.
As I see it, this could be a so called false flag created disaster for two reasons - 1) that it would completely submerge the sure to pass climate bill and/or 2) to harden our resolve, a least in the minds of the public, that we must continue our resource wars in the middle east in order to liberate their, er, people. Sounds a bit radical tho, imo.
It could have been caused by nothing more than a static spark igniting the escaping natural gas. Regardless of its cause, it is an extreme environmental catastrophe.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 159 guests