Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff
It looks to me as if Clinton is angling for a negotiated departure by Mubarak, accompanied by an increase in political freedom. I think the US is aiming to structure the solution in a way that would protect its key interests: the peace treaty with Israel, the Suez canal, and co-operation against terrorism.
wallflower wrote:CNN reports in Alexandra army joining protesters, AlJezeera reports army and police clash in Cairo.
Jeff wrote:Part of my private joy this week has been seeing our supposed experts on the "Arab street" get it so wrong on the wrong side of living history. Janice Stein, for blightful instance. The protests are diminishing - It's not really about democracy - Egyptians want an improved standard of living, and sometimes an authoritarian regime can best deliver.wallflower wrote:CNN reports in Alexandra army joining protesters, AlJezeera reports army and police clash in Cairo.
And oh yeah - Mubarak has the armed forces solidly behind him.
vanlose kid:
earlier, mil left the scene in Suez after being fired on by police holed up in main station.
now they're coming back.
anothershamus wrote:...
If the military gets into it with the police that should be 'interesting'.
11.14am: @gamelaid, a lawyer and executive director for the Arabic Network for Human Rights Information, has tweeted that some army units in Suez are refusing to support the crackdown against the people.
The orginal tweet was in Arabic, so apologies for the translation if it is not 100% correct:
URGENT Suez: reports that some army units refused to support the police to confront the demonstrators, and the acceptance of other units, and did not intervene until now
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/blog/20 ... s#block-22
vanlose kid wrote:reports of clashes between mil and police in Cairo.
*
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 154 guests