I'm Super - Thanks For Asking

Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff

Re: I'm Super - Thanks For Asking

Postby seemslikeadream » Fri Mar 09, 2012 1:39 pm

'Hey Jackass, stop using our music on your racist, misogynist, right wing clown show."



Rage Against the Machine to Rush Limbaugh: 'Stop Using Our Music in Your Right-Wing Clown Show'
Tom Morello demands that radio host drop Rage tunes


Tom Morello demands that Rush Limbaugh drop Rage tunes from his playlist.

By MATTHEW PERPETUA
March 9, 2012 8:55 AM ET
Tom Morello of Rage Against the Machine is the latest rock star to demand that Rush Limbaugh stop using his music on the air. "Rush Limbaugh played "Sleep Now in the Fire" as a bumper on his show today," Morello told Rolling Stone last night. "Our response: 'Hey Jackass, stop using our music on your racist, misogynist, right wing clown show." (He later tweeted the same message.)

Peter Gabriel, Rush and the Fabulous Thunderbirds have made public statements asking for their music to be pulled from Limbaugh's syndicated talk show following the host's personal attack on Georgetown law student Sandra Fluke, whom he called a "slut" and a "prostitute" for defending women's reproductive rights.

Though artists can certainly make their feelings known about the use of their music on the radio, they have no real legal power in actually enforcing demands to cease and desist. Radio networks are covered under blanket agreements for "public performance" of the songs in major publishing catalogs, and so long as those networks pay their licensing fees, they are allowed to play whatever they like within the bounds of FCC regulations.

Attorney Larry Iser, who successfully had music by Jackson Browne and Talking Heads removed from political ads by John McCain and Charlie Crist, tells Rolling Stone that while artists have limited rights in this matter, they still have plenty of influence in the court of public opinion. "The Constitution is the Constitution, and thank goodness for it," says Iser. "They do have a legal right to stand up and make as much noise as possible about how appalled they are."
Mazars and Deutsche Bank could have ended this nightmare before it started.
They could still get him out of office.
But instead, they want mass death.
Don’t forget that.
User avatar
seemslikeadream
 
Posts: 32090
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 11:28 pm
Location: into the black
Blog: View Blog (83)

Re: I'm Super - Thanks For Asking

Postby seemslikeadream » Fri Mar 09, 2012 1:41 pm

NeonLX wrote: it's being catapulted at us for whatever reason.


It's being capapulted at us because women really don't like being called sluts....it's kinda like the n word....especially all the while these fucks got their probs up our vaginas....while they're on viagra :roll:

Meet The Anti-Choice ALEC
by Jessica Pieklo
March 8, 2012
11:55 pm

Republicans insist there is no war on women, yet a new report from the Sunlight Foundation confirms a deliberate, concerted strategy to push ultrasound legislation across the states.

And the anti-abortion Americans United for Life (AUL) proudly confirms it’s behind the assault.

The group authored a model bill called “The Woman’s Ultrasound Right to Know Act” that serves as the “inspiration” for many of the ultrasound bills currently under consideration in over a dozen states. Sound familiar? It should. It’s the same exact strategy the American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC) employes in pushing its privatization legislation.

In its investigation the Sunlight Foundation used a technology called SuperFastMatch to compare the ultrasound bills pending across the country and the model bill drafted by AUL. The analysis showed text matching in all 13 bills with some bills more closely matched than others.

Of those most closely matched is the dreadful Texas ultrasound law. That may likely be because the bill was upheld by the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals. According to the Sunlight analysis the Texas bill shares multiple instances of identical text with 12 of the 12 bills to which it was compared, including Virginia.

We can expect to see more of this. AUL just rolled out its model legislation for 2012.

It also means that these are not locally-grown bills borne out of the concerns of legislators constituents but pressure bills drawn up by outside groups pushing their own agenda.
Mazars and Deutsche Bank could have ended this nightmare before it started.
They could still get him out of office.
But instead, they want mass death.
Don’t forget that.
User avatar
seemslikeadream
 
Posts: 32090
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 11:28 pm
Location: into the black
Blog: View Blog (83)

Re: I'm Super - Thanks For Asking

Postby Nordic » Fri Mar 09, 2012 1:59 pm

But do we really think that anyone who's actually in the PTB wants abortion to become illegal in this country?

Of course they don't. They want their daughters, mistresses, and even wives to have access to that stuff without having to fly to Sweden or wherever.

Abortion should be officially added to "god, gays, and guns". In fact, its probably bigger than all three of these together as a push-button divide-and-conquer ploy.
"He who wounds the ecosphere literally wounds God" -- Philip K. Dick
Nordic
 
Posts: 14230
Joined: Fri Nov 10, 2006 3:36 am
Location: California USA
Blog: View Blog (6)

Re: I'm Super - Thanks For Asking

Postby seemslikeadream » Fri Mar 09, 2012 2:21 pm

Nordic wrote:But do we really think that anyone who's actually in the PTB wants abortion to become illegal in this country?

Of course they don't. They want their daughters, mistresses, and even wives to have access to that stuff without having to fly to Sweden or wherever.

Abortion should be officially added to "god, gays, and guns". In fact, its probably bigger than all three of these together as a push-button divide-and-conquer ploy.



The rich never had to fly anywhere to get an abortion legal or not



In 53 Seconds, Utah Legislature Rushes to Strip Women of Rights

by Jodi Jacobson, Editor in Chief, RH Reality Check
March 9, 2012 - 9:00am

Rep. Carol Spackman Moss speaks against the bill. [img src]
The Salt Lake Tribune reports that the Utah Senate debated only 53 seconds yesterday--International Women's Day--before passing a bill to strip women of their rights. The bill will require women seeking an abortion to endure a 72-hour delay between the first appointment for an abortion and the actual procedure, accomplishing nothing but raising the financial costs (child care, time off work, transportation) and personal emotional stress of the individual women in question.

Senators voted 22 to 6 to pass HB461, and sent it to Gov. Gary Herbert for his signature.
Mazars and Deutsche Bank could have ended this nightmare before it started.
They could still get him out of office.
But instead, they want mass death.
Don’t forget that.
User avatar
seemslikeadream
 
Posts: 32090
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 11:28 pm
Location: into the black
Blog: View Blog (83)

Re: I'm Super - Thanks For Asking

Postby seemslikeadream » Fri Mar 09, 2012 2:52 pm

Image


When Women Used Lysol as Birth Control
A look back at shocking ads for the popular, dangerous, and ineffective antiseptic douche. —Nicole Pasulka



The current attack on access to birth control had us thinking back to the first half of the 20th century, when contraceptive methods taken for granted today, like condoms and diaphragms, were expensive, hard to find, and often required a potentially humiliating exam by a disapproving doctor.

Of course, women who couldn’t afford or gain access to medically administered birth control had to come up with their own strategies for staying baby free. Douching was cheap, accessible, and widely advertised as a feminine hygiene product; however, as Andrea Tone writes in the book Devices and Desires: A History of Contraceptives in America, it was also the most common form of birth control from 1940 until 1960—when the oral contraceptive pill arrived on the market.

The most popular brand of douche was Lysol—an antiseptic soap whose pre-1953 formula contained cresol, a phenol compound reported in some cases to cause inflammation, burning, and even death. By 1911 doctors had recorded 193 Lysol poisonings and five deaths from uterine irrigation. Despite reports to the contrary, Lysol was aggressively marketed to women as safe and gentle. Once cresol was replaced with ortho-hydroxydiphenyl in the formula, Lysol was pushed as a germicide good for cleaning toilet bowls and treating ringworm, and Lehn & Fink's, the company that made the disinfectant, continued to market it as safeguard for women's "dainty feminine allure."

Douching may have been cheaper than condoms or diaphragms and available over the counter in most drugstores, but it didn’t work. In a 1933 study, Tone writes, nearly half of the 507 women who used douching as a birth control method ended up pregnant.

But if false advertising with highly suspect results weren't bad enough, the ads promoted a level of misogyny and female insecurity both laughable and frightening by today's standards. Images of wives locked out their homes or trapped by cobwebs are surrounded by text asserting a woman should "question herself" if her husband's interest seemed to have faded. If her husband is treating her badly, the message was, "she was really the one to blame."

These ads and the product they're hawking are a chilling reminder of a time when most women had limited access to birth control or reliable medical knowledge about contraception. Corporate muscle moved into the void to advertise Lysol as contraception under the widely recognized euphemism of “feminine hygiene,” and as Tone writes, “the strategy won sales by jeopardizing women’s health."


Image


good interview with Frank Rich
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/26315908/ns/msnbc_tv-rachel_maddow_show/#46674150



When They Say "It's Not About Birth Control," You Know... It's About Birth Control
Mazars and Deutsche Bank could have ended this nightmare before it started.
They could still get him out of office.
But instead, they want mass death.
Don’t forget that.
User avatar
seemslikeadream
 
Posts: 32090
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 11:28 pm
Location: into the black
Blog: View Blog (83)

Re: I'm Super - Thanks For Asking

Postby AlicetheKurious » Fri Mar 09, 2012 3:44 pm

Can somebody point me to a web-site that outlines the arguments against legal, safe abortions and contraception?

Because I honestly can't think of any that can't be demolished in one sentence or less, and I'm wracking my brains.
"If you're not careful the newspapers will have you hating the oppressed and loving the people doing the oppressing." - Malcolm X
User avatar
AlicetheKurious
 
Posts: 5348
Joined: Thu Nov 30, 2006 11:20 am
Location: Egypt
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: I'm Super - Thanks For Asking

Postby Nordic » Sat Mar 10, 2012 5:17 am

Here, someone seems to have put into words what I've been feeling about this mess:

http://alethonews.wordpress.com/2012/03 ... al-whores/

Liberal Whores

By Margaret Kimberley | Black Agenda Report | March 7, 2012

If liberals are good for anything, it is being outraged about all the wrong things. If one were to measure the amount of media debate in the past week, the conclusion might be that a law student being called a slut was the worst thing happening in the nation and the world. Liberals can’t be bothered to protest against war, even if they did so during the Bush administration, or indefinite detention, or targeted killings, or drone strikes, or the destruction of Libya or Somalia.

Rush Limbaugh, a man who would have to have been invented if he didn’t exist, called law student Sandra Fluke, a “slut” and a “whore” after she testified in favor of religious institutions being required to include contraception in their health care plans.

The liberals then lost their collective minds. There was no limit to their ire. One would have thought that Rush Limbaugh was killing Afghan children with drones, or torturing black Libyans, or planning to attack Iran. Of course, Limbaugh has absolutely no power to do any of those things. He is a celebrity, a media personality who advocates the right wing point of view. He is a sexist and a racist, but he has no power to take anyone’s life. That is Barack Obama‘s job.

Obama, like all American presidents, is among the slickest politicians of all time, but he is certainly no fool. He knew that Limbaugh handed him a political gift and he ran with it. Obama personally telephoned the aggrieved young woman while his liberal sycophants demanded that advertisers drop Limbaugh’s program. Republicans joined in the beat down and admonished the erstwhile standard bearer for his offensive language. Limbaugh was political toast, and Obama was king.

What could happen if these same people used as much energy opposing policies that literally kill thousands of people around the world? Quite a lot would change, but they don’t take actions against people in power because they don’t really care about what they do.

At the same time that these angry and outraged citizens were claiming victory against a radio personality they ought to be ignoring, the attorney general of the United States publicly claimed that the president of the United States has the right to kill at will whenever he feels like it.

Eric Holder traveled to an august educational institution, Northwestern University, and told a group of law students that they should get any crazy ideas about civil liberties out of their little heads. Holder asserts that the president can in fact decide to kill anyone he wants, as long as he claims that person is a terrorist. He doesn’t have to bother with indictments, charges, court rooms and other such old fashioned notions. Anwar al-Awlaki and his teenage son were both American citizens and were both killed by their president because he and a secret panel said they should die.

In making the case against the constitutional requirement for due process, the chief law enforcement officer in the country says that, “Due process and judicial process are not one in the same.” If that statement seems strange, it is because it is a bold faced lie. Never before, not even in the Bush administration, did lawyers make such bizarre arguments.

Despite being the attorney general, Holder is like middle level managers everywhere, saying that black is white or up is down if his boss says so. If his boss says that a person is a terrorist, then that person is dead and the rules will be changed to make it all very legal.

It is too bad that no one leapt to the defense of the Northwestern University law students who were forced to hear Holder’s offensive statements. There was no Sandra Fluke treatment for them. No one will call them and sympathize because they were exposed to vile language. In this case the offensive language came straight from the top, so if anyone was offended, well it is just too bad.

Perhaps liberals are sluts and whores. They are people of easy virtue, they don’t really have any principles and they sell themselves pretty cheaply. If Eric Holder isn’t a whore, then who is?

The same can be said for his boss too. No one becomes president without making the rounds on many a casting couch, the rich people’s casting couch. If they give the thumbs up, then the presidency is within reach. No one should be called a whore merely because they are sexually active. Selling oneself in order to be the head killer in chief on the planet is another matter. That is slut work of the very highest order.

Ms. Kimberley lives in New York City, and can be reached via e-Mail at Margaret.Kimberley(at)BlackAgendaReport.com.


On edit:

More at her blog:

http://freedomrider.blogspot.com/

Ignore Rush Limbaugh

The 1% are laughing themselves silly. While they continue to steal the rest of us blind, and destroy the planet, democrats are having pissing matches with the likes of Rush Limbaugh because he called a college student a slut. The people and corporations at the top could give a rats butt about abortion or birth control because the two major parties do their bidding, even as they fight over social issues.

As I pointed out in my weekly Black Agenda Report column, republicans are taking extreme positions on abortion and birth control because Obama has stolen their thunder. As Ben Stein said, he is the perfect republican candidate. He has agreed to republican austerity measures, destroyed Libya, killed American citizens at will, and plans more war for Iran and or Syria. Instead of protesting these outrages, liberals get the pants in a twist over Rush Limbaugh. The divide and conquer strategy which keeps the status quo, very much status quo, is alive and well.

No, I wouldn't want Rush Limbaugh to call me a slut or a prostitute, but seriously people, the bail outs continue, unemployment numbers have improved only because millions are no longer counted in the numbers, and we spend time thinking about Limbaugh?

If he didn't exist, we would have to invent him. I have joked that Obama pays Limbaugh, Palin and company to make racist or sexist or stupid remarks, because everyone stops questioning him in order to defend him from the barbarians.

Here is the real question which should be on everyone's mind. Will Obama attack Iran before or after election day? Ponder that and ignore Rush Limbaugh.

Obama's phone call to the parents of the aggrieved young woman is all the proof one needs. The 1% get theirs, and we get political theater because the economic elite are in cahoots with both parties and the corporate media never point this out.
"He who wounds the ecosphere literally wounds God" -- Philip K. Dick
Nordic
 
Posts: 14230
Joined: Fri Nov 10, 2006 3:36 am
Location: California USA
Blog: View Blog (6)

Re: I'm Super - Thanks For Asking

Postby Sounder » Sat Mar 10, 2012 9:06 am

From freedom rider...
If he didn't exist, we would have to invent him. I have joked that Obama pays Limbaugh, Palin and company to make racist or sexist or stupid remarks, because everyone stops questioning him in order to defend him from the barbarians.


Any diversionary narrative can indirectly generate profits as we throw money at manufactured problems.

War on Whatever

See sig
All these things will continue as long as coercion remains a central element of our mentality.
Sounder
 
Posts: 4054
Joined: Thu Nov 09, 2006 8:49 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: I'm Super - Thanks For Asking

Postby Marie Laveau » Sat Mar 10, 2012 9:35 am

Per the original post about the demise of the old, white, male, racist, misogynist overlords (who, as it so happens, have made EVERYONE'S life a - relative- misery, around the world):

I used to talk to this young kid, back in the darkest days of the Bush regime. One day I said, "Do you think they will win?"

His answer: "They've already lost; why do you think they're trying so hard."

And they are desperately trying. The unfortunate thing is, the damage they can do until they die is horrific.
Marie Laveau
 
Posts: 547
Joined: Sat Aug 06, 2011 9:17 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: I'm Super - Thanks For Asking

Postby seemslikeadream » Sat Mar 10, 2012 10:38 am

Marie Laveau wrote:Per the original post about the demise of the old, white, male, racist, misogynist overlords (who, as it so happens, have made EVERYONE'S life a - relative- misery, around the world):

I used to talk to this young kid, back in the darkest days of the Bush regime. One day I said, "Do you think they will win?"

His answer: "They've already lost; why do you think they're trying so hard."

And they are desperately trying. The unfortunate thing is, the damage they can do until they die is horrific.


yes old frighten white men and their impending doom, it's happening, inevitable....I'm super - thanks for asking

I should have titled this thread Republican Meltdown Watch.....
Image
Image
Last edited by seemslikeadream on Sat Mar 10, 2012 10:53 am, edited 1 time in total.
Mazars and Deutsche Bank could have ended this nightmare before it started.
They could still get him out of office.
But instead, they want mass death.
Don’t forget that.
User avatar
seemslikeadream
 
Posts: 32090
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 11:28 pm
Location: into the black
Blog: View Blog (83)

Re: I'm Super - Thanks For Asking

Postby Marie Laveau » Sat Mar 10, 2012 10:48 am

Well, I'm sorry if you disagree. I do think they are seeing their end.

And, honestly, it's not without scientific justification, of a sorts.

Many years ago I had twins born prematurely. The oldest lived six months, always in neo-natal intensive care. Something I observed with other long-term patients there, and mentioned to one of the nurses after she died, is how they seemingly were getting stronger and better for a few days to a week or so before they died.

She said this is almost inevitable. That almost every baby who ended up dying, toward the end would look like they were healing.

Since then I've discussed this with other friends in the medical community and it seems to be very common in many dying patients across the spectrum: they seem like they are going through a, sometimes miraculous, healing.

This may be a strange analogy, but I think it's indicative of this group. They "seem" to be getting stronger, but the decay is there. And the end is inevitable.

And aren't you one of the people who jumped all over me for saying magical thinking wasn't going to help get us out of the mess we're in? And that these old white guys created, btw.

Of course, as I said, the damage they can do on their way out is horrific. And the mess they leave us really does need a miracle to fix.

Oh, well. Just an opinion.
Marie Laveau
 
Posts: 547
Joined: Sat Aug 06, 2011 9:17 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: I'm Super - Thanks For Asking

Postby Marie Laveau » Sat Mar 10, 2012 11:27 am

Evil grows unchecked in the space between double standards

This is an interesting phrase.

As I always say, there's a big difference between being pro-life and being anti-abortion.

And the shoe fits the other side, too.

War, anyone?
Marie Laveau
 
Posts: 547
Joined: Sat Aug 06, 2011 9:17 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: I'm Super - Thanks For Asking

Postby seemslikeadream » Sat Mar 10, 2012 2:15 pm

The Self-Destruction Of Limbaugh, Murdoch and Beck
March 09, 2012 2:03 pm ET by Eric Boehlert

This week's sudden unraveling of Rush Limbaugh's radio standing as the untouchable king of conservative media strangely mirrors deep difficulties recently faced by Rupert Murdoch and Glenn Beck, two other far-right press titans.

Limbaugh supposedly boast 20 millions listeners (in truth, he likely doesn't come close), and is routinely singled out by Republicans themselves as a GOP kingmaker and someone who must not be crossed. As the proprietor of Fox News, and the vanity publisher of the money-losing New York Post, Murdoch is the Godfather of right-wing media in America, stamping his trademark mendacity onto the conservative press. And not that long ago Beck was drawing three million viewers to his Fox News show, which made him the cable channel's most-watched personality and a rising media superstar.

Together, the far-right triumvirate helped define the movement's message on a daily, even hourly, basis. They were also seen as invincible forces.

And now look at them.

In the last year the trio has suffered extraordinary setbacks; setbacks that were entirely their own doing and setbacks that highlight the dangers of not operating under simple guidelines of fairness of common sense. Instead, led by the likes of Limbaugh, Murdoch and Beck, the conservative press has adopted a strange brand of radicalism that embraces falsehoods, smears and even law breaking, all of which places their practice well outside the mainstream culture.

In the last year, that brand of recklessness, built upon a foundation of spite, has produced three very public crises for Limbaugh, Murdoch and Beck. All three players have been badly damaged professionally and all three were led astray by their exaggerated belief that the rules don't apply to them.

For Beck, it was the misguided conviction that he could go on national television and denounce the President of the United States as a "racist" who has a "deep-seeded hatred for white people." For Murdoch, it was a culture of corruption inside NewsCorp. where his newspaper executives felt that the wholesale breaking of the law by hacking phones and paying off public officials was an acceptable way to report out stories. And for Limbaugh, it was the still-shocking assumption that he could dedicate three days of his national radio show to insulting and denigrating a Georgetown University law student, and do it by name.

In the end, Beck's race-baiting cost him hundreds of advertisers and eventually his job at Fox News. Murdoch's professional reputation has been permanently stained by the phone-hacking scandal while his company has been saddled with nearly a $1 billion legal bill to clean up the ethical messes inside his companies. And Limbaugh is now facing the worst crisis of his two-decade career as advertisers flee his program. (He's become so toxic even one non-profit group asked that its unpaid ad bepulled from Limbaugh's broadcast.)

What's fascinating about their startling falls from grace is that each one represented a clear case of self-destruction. Limbaugh hand Murdoch and Beck weren't cut down by their political foes or by partisan dirty tricks. They were cut down by their own moral and ethical failings.

Meaning, Limbaugh's opponents didn't make him call Sandra Fluke a slut and a prostitute, and liberal didn't force him to spend days smearing the women in the most humiliating ways possible, painting her as a greedy nymphomaniac whose parents ought to be deeply ashamed. Nobody egged him on into doing that. In fact, after the initial "slut" and "prostitute" insults, liberals demanded Limbaugh stop using that kind of ugly language. If anything, Limbaugh's foes tried to save him from himself. (By contrast, many of his partisan fans immediately cheered his Fluke attacks.)

The same is true with Beck and Murdoch. Who on the left would have even dreamt up a plot to somehow to get Beck call the president a racist, or to later ramble for weeks about how pro-democracy demonstrators in Egypt represented a spear tip to a looming American left-backed Caliphate uprising in the Middle East. Who even thinks like that, other than Beck?

As for Murdoch, he's cultivated a culture of corruption that's so firmly entrenched that one of his newspaper executives allegedly tried to secure a vote in parliament from a conservative politician in exchange for offering favorable coverage in a Murdoch newspaper. Again, who does that? Who works for a newspaper and doubles as a vote whip for a political party?

All of this behavior is reprehensible and of course falls completely outside the purview of journalism, as even loosely defined to include cable and AM talk shows. For the conservative media, there are no checks in place anymore. Instead, all the introspection has been eliminated and replaced by robotic, partisan defense regardless of the circumstances.

The guardrails have been taken down, leaving the way for reckless drivers like Limbaugh, Murdoch and Beck to crash their careers.
Mazars and Deutsche Bank could have ended this nightmare before it started.
They could still get him out of office.
But instead, they want mass death.
Don’t forget that.
User avatar
seemslikeadream
 
Posts: 32090
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 11:28 pm
Location: into the black
Blog: View Blog (83)

Re: I'm Super - Thanks For Asking

Postby brainpanhandler » Sat Mar 10, 2012 2:55 pm

The guardrails have been taken down, leaving the way for reckless drivers like Limbaugh, Murdoch and Beck to crash their careers.


I'm not even sure Brietbart is actually dead. Decapitation and cremation is the only way to be sure.
"Nothing in all the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity." - Martin Luther King Jr.
User avatar
brainpanhandler
 
Posts: 5121
Joined: Fri Dec 29, 2006 9:38 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: I'm Super - Thanks For Asking

Postby Nordic » Sat Mar 10, 2012 3:26 pm

brainpanhandler wrote:
The guardrails have been taken down, leaving the way for reckless drivers like Limbaugh, Murdoch and Beck to crash their careers.


I'm not even sure Brietbart is actually dead. Decapitation and cremation is the only way to be sure.



Don't worry, Obama had his body buried at sea.
"He who wounds the ecosphere literally wounds God" -- Philip K. Dick
Nordic
 
Posts: 14230
Joined: Fri Nov 10, 2006 3:36 am
Location: California USA
Blog: View Blog (6)

PreviousNext

Return to General Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests