Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff
DrEvil » Mon Dec 30, 2013 4:17 pm wrote:Wouldn't it be easier if people just add the people they're referring to in front of 'Holocaust'?
The Jewish Holocaust, The Irish Holocaust, The Native-American Holocaust, etc.
I still think the Jewish Holocaust is more relevant today than many of the others, because (as far as I know) no one is advocating the extermination of the Irish, or claiming that the world is run by a secret cabal of Irish bankers.
People still want to wipe out the Jews.
BrandonD » Mon Dec 30, 2013 8:22 pm wrote:I honestly don't understand the function of a post like this, in a forum like this. Is this really an "epidemic" worth addressing?
I agree with Jakell that "holocaust denial" or questioning that particular official story does not automatically imply anti-semitism, any more than questioning the official story of 9/11 automatically implies anti-Americanism. Those are really just tactics to shut people up.
I was not personally present at the holocaust, so in my reality it is within the realm of possibility that elements of it might be untrue. At the same time, the story as I understand it might also be entirely 100% accurate from top to bottom. This is simply being honest and impartial.
I keep this same intellectual distance with regard to all major historical events that have made a huge cultural impact, the holocaust is certainly not unique in that regard, so if the lack of a hard-line "conclusion" makes me anti-semitic then I suppose I'm also anti-every-other-religion-and-nationality-in-the-world.
It seems that having intellectual detachment has fallen out of fashion. We've made pathology fashionable.
DrEvil » Mon Dec 30, 2013 9:17 pm wrote:Wouldn't it be easier if people just add the people they're referring to in front of 'Holocaust'?
The Jewish Holocaust, The Irish Holocaust, The Native-American Holocaust, etc.
I still think the Jewish Holocaust is more relevant today than many of the others, because (as far as I know) no one is advocating the extermination of the Irish, or claiming that the world is run by a secret cabal of Irish bankers.
People still want to wipe out the Jews.
brainpanhandler » Mon Dec 30, 2013 9:20 pm wrote:@ Jakell,
Thank you for your thoughtful, well reasoned contributions. What you are saying may seem self evident on the face of it, but you'll have to fight and scratch for every inch. Don't let it get you down.
"...People still want to wipe out the Jews....".
"....White Nationalists/supremacists have been banking on societal collapse, and have remained underground within traditional nationalisms biding their time. I have observed this within British Nationalism,...."
bluenoseclaret » Mon Dec 30, 2013 10:42 pm wrote:Dr Evil"...People still want to wipe out the Jews....".
Just curious, could you provide any evidence for this rather sweeping comment.
Jakell"....White Nationalists/supremacists have been banking on societal collapse, and have remained underground within traditional nationalisms biding their time. I have observed this within British Nationalism,...."
I'm intrigued, could you provide any more info to support the above view.
Thanks
Spend some time on a white nationalist/supremacist site and you will find that 'The Jews' are still regarded by these folks as the source of the world's ills and the direct enemy of the 'White Race'. You will hardly see genocidal directly feelings expressed, but it is the logical conclusion of their feelings. Neither did the Nazis express such things at the outset
minime » Mon Dec 30, 2013 11:31 pm wrote:Spend some time on a white nationalist/supremacist site and you will find that 'The Jews' are still regarded by these folks as the source of the world's ills and the direct enemy of the 'White Race'. You will hardly see genocidal directly feelings expressed, but it is the logical conclusion of their feelings. Neither did the Nazis express such things at the outset
And you had such promise.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 157 guests