Explosions at Brussels airport

[MinM]

@BraddJaffy

American wounded in Brussels was also at Boston Marathon bombing & in Paris during massacre http://nbcnews.to/1UieBVZ

* 7/22/08: GOP Tech Guru Mike Connell 'High IQ Forrest Gump...At Scene of Every Single Crime' Say Ohio Attorneys [12]

[Harvey]

@BraddJaffy

American wounded in Brussels was also at Boston Marathon bombing & in Paris during massacre http://nbcnews.to/1UieBVZ

* 7/22/08: GOP Tech Guru Mike Connell 'High IQ Forrest Gump...At Scene of Every Single Crime' Say Ohio Attorneys [12]

On the face of it, the first thing he should do is hire himself out by volunteering his movements to a social networking site so that everyone else can avoid future terrorist incidents.

Edited to heighten sarcasm.

[Harvey]

http://www.fort-russ.com/2016/03/erdogan-mentions-brussels-bombing-days.html

"The snakes you are sleeping with can bite you at any time," Erdogan added.

Trying to give himself some advice?

Edited to introduce some sarcasm.

Edited to add: Not against anyone here.

[backtoiam]

The Boston thing is known as a "puff" bomb, smoke bomb, or flash bang grenade. Lots of smoke, lots of noise, pretty damn good concussion shock wave if you are near it but no lasting damage which is why the Café in Paris had no damage other than a few chairs turned over in the floor. If one goes off a few feet from you its an ear shocker for sure, and you can feel the percussion for many yards. Once everybody scurries a, way in fright the scene is fairly "secure' and let cameras roll on the acting. They are getting better at this and this latest job proves that. They decided to provide less information because its less info to be debunked and besides people are getting used to it.

They decided to get a LOT LESS sophisticated because the stunt they pulled with the pregnant woman hanging on to a windowsill in Paris was a little too much and nobody bought it. So, they have decided less information is best because it gives less details for people to pick at.

For you old fucks contrast today's footage with the Vietnam war. Journalist crawling through miles of mud to keep up with the action and we got damn good footage of that. Dead bodies everywhere but today in domestic terror we have no bodies everywhere and multiple witnesses because they don't exist. These days its all sterile. Embedded reporters and the like...Respect for the victims, sorry, can't show ya the the details, unless of course, once in a Blue Moon some civilian does actually let his cheese slide off his crackers and kill a bunch of people and then the blood and guts roll on camera all day and night. Problem is, people seldom do that domestic mass bombing and killing in real life, so they have to make it up.

orwell and all that shit............

[Harvey]

Paris was a little too much and nobody bought it

Soon that attitude will be appropriated too. There'll be a top ten best crisis actor awards. Reviewers, the works. The winners won't attend. Because they're fucking dead.

Edited to add, don't try to spin it in your mind, it means exactly what you thought it meant, they're dead because they weren't fucking crisis actors. Somebody killed them and pretending it didn't happen allows the guilty to keep doing what they are allowed to do.

[backtoiam]

No shit. I'm watching CNN and there IS NO PARADE OF MULTIPLE DOZENS OF EYEWITNESSES AND CELL PHONE VIDEOS. only hillary, trump, kasich, wolf blitzer, cruz, anderson cooper, shaping my reality bubble. where is the blood and guts and multiple non stop witness testimony? it does not exist, that is why. now, on the the election right quick....blah blah blah....

occams razor is a mother fucker if you allow yourself to be cut with it...

[FourthBase]

The Boston thing is known as a "puff" bomb, smoke bomb, or flash bang grenade. Lots of smoke, lots of noise, pretty damn good concussion shock wave if you are near it but no lasting damage which is why the Café in Paris had no damage other than a few chairs turned over in the floor. If one goes off a few feet from you its an ear shocker for sure, and you can feel the percussion for many yards. Once everybody scurries a, way in fright the scene is fairly "secure' and let cameras roll on the acting. They are getting better at this and this latest job proves that. They decided to provide less information because its less info to be debunked and besides people are getting used to it.

They decided to get a LOT LESS sophisticated because the stunt they pulled with the pregnant woman hanging on to a windowsill in Paris was a little too much and nobody bought it. So, they have decided less information is best because it gives less details for people to pick at.

For you old fucks contrast today's footage with the Vietnam war. Journalist crawling through miles of mud to keep up with the action and we got damn good footage of that. Dead bodies everywhere but today in domestic terror we have no bodies everywhere and multiple witnesses because they don't exist. These days its all sterile. Embedded reporters and the like...Respect for the victims, sorry, can't show ya the the details, unless of course, once in a Blue Moon some civilian does actually let his cheese slide off his crackers and kill a bunch of people and then the blood and guts roll on camera all day and night. Problem is, people seldom do that domestic mass bombing and killing in real life, so they have to make it up.

orwell and all that shit............

Despicable hoaxer bullshit.

[backtoiam]

I'm sorry fourthbase. I knew that would get your goat and i expected it. Please don't hold it against me. I am only an analyst. I am not an ideology major.

[FourthBase]

I'm sorry fourthbase. I knew that would get your goat and i expected it. Please don't hold it against me. I am only an analyst. I am not an ideology major.

You joined this board last summer. So how the fuck did you know it would "get my goat"? You expected it? Like, as you were typing it and posting it you expected that in particular I would be angry?

Your "analysis" is nihilistic horseshit. I'm definitely going to hold that against you.

[Laodicean]

[tapitsbo]

Yeah, I don't buy what backtoiam is saying about this either. I don't buy it about Paris or Boston either. I think there were likely many suspicious ARG/training exercise/technical assistance/synchromystical-by-design aspects to these attacks, but I'm not convinced that they are hoaxes by a LONG stretch. Maybe an attempt to defend the hoax theory can serve us as an opportunity to more firmly debunk it. (The strategy of ignoring its existence provides fertile ground for unsightly blossoming of this thought-stopping idea.) It seemed pretty clear to me with Sandy Hook that the hoax meme was in set in place to dislodge pertinent and disturbingly revealing and dodgy aspects of that event.

[backtoiam]

There is an archive here fourthbase.

Yes I expected it to be controversial for you, because i DO READ these archives. I have to if I were to comment here. Sorry bud, but that was a flash bomb, once again. You need to understand something.

Once the "boom" and "smoke" clears out the locals, the professionals go to work. They do so with brutal effective agency but when they lie, well.....it don't always go as planned.

That is called the "contingent" point. Once you control the scene by scaring the onlookers away there is a small window for innocent onlookers to film what they wish.

The rest, is fake blood, that by a miracle does NOT COAGULATE IN THE SUNSHINE. Raw blood coagulates in minutes. You are talking to somebody that knows because one day I had several ounces of coagulated blood on my chest. I picked it up like a meat patty and threw it on the floor like a hamburger pattie. That blood gets thick quick. They saved my life obviously. But I know fake blood when I see it.

A doctor told me, "you realize you just died and came back to life don't ya?"

I been there, done it, got the merit badge. That was not blood. Sorry to bust your bubble but blood is blood. No shrapnel damage to existing businesses over the long term. Business as usual.

[backtoiam]

Yeah, I don't buy what backtoiam is saying about this either. I don't buy it about Paris or Boston either. I think there were likely many suspicious ARG/training exercise/technical assistance/synchromystical-by-design aspects to these attacks, but I'm not convinced that they are hoaxes by a LONG stretch.

You think peoples actually got killed? I hope not. That makes it worse.

[tapitsbo]

I believe they did get killed, and it is very much not a good thing. It happens on a regular basis in places like iraq. that shit is definitely not a hoax but you don't see cellphone footage of it in the media, do you?

[backtoiam]

"but you don't see cellphone footage of it in the media, do you?"

excellent point. where IS the non stop parade of first hand on the scene witnesses for all this?