Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff
dbcooper41 wrote:the post quoted below raises a couple of questions in my feeble old mind.
1- how was barracuda able to repost what i had deleted in my edit? i suppose he could make a copy of every post when it is made just in case they get edited. but my post was only up for about 30 minutes so he must be effecient.
2- do some people, non-moderators, have special editing rights?
3- if barracuda was reposting for me, on general principle, why not repost everything i wrote.
dbcooper41 wrote:
i thought my observations about the carlos arredondo/ john mixon/ susan hurley/ erin hurley/ jeff bauman connections were more interesting than the erin hurley/ jeff bauman/ poor reporting remarks which were reposted. but that's just an opinion.
not trying to start anything. just wondering.
barracuda wrote:dbcooper41 wrote:justdrew wrote:wow. some people knew each other... AMAZING.
come on FFS
sorry, you're of course right.
there is nothing unusual about the hero and number one victim being connected(which no one has bothered to mention before.)
i'll edit my posts.
if anyone is interested we can discuss privately without pissing off the rest of the board.
Project Willow wrote:During the discussion of any major news topic, one can expect three reactions: a small number of posters who inject the most preposterous ideas which would never have been entertained before; a number of posters who turn discussion into debates over favoritism and gatekeeping; endless interpersonal bickering, belittling, name-calling, and attempts at shaming.
There are truly gifted people here who remain engaged despite such silliness, but the cost to benefit ratio, is dwindling everyday.
simulist wrote:Because of this I sincerely hope Jeff and his staff are listening, and that we can find a viable solution to these matters quite soon.
Canadian_watcher wrote:but no one wants to answer as to why Barracuda, as of late last week, still had moderator privileges that I and at least two other people here can prove outright?
right?
I've noticed that the 'group' has avoided this completely while simultaneously having the audacity to imply that I've ignored their posts.
hilarious chicanery - juvenile and blatant - except that, when in the tank, you are at the mercy of the fish. Back on land, where there's air, none of this would wash.
Canadian_watcher wrote:but no one wants to answer as to why Barracuda, as of late last week, still had moderator privileges that I and at least two other people here can prove outright?
right?
I've noticed that the 'group' has avoided this completely while simultaneously having the audacity to imply that I've ignored their posts.
hilarious chicanery - juvenile and blatant - except that, when in the tank, you are at the mercy of the fish. Back on land, where there's air, none of this would wash.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 161 guests