Is Porn Bad for You?

Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff

Re: Is Porn Bad for You?

Postby Stephen Morgan » Wed Nov 23, 2011 4:20 am

compared2what? wrote:It troubles me to see the "consumption of porn" (first sentence) equated, without qualification or demur, with buying "images of the rape and/or torture of minors," which are produced by "the crime industry and its bankers" and then purchased by "disconnected sociopaths with minimal capacity for empathy."


Got to have empathy to watch porn, or normal porn. Whole point is to be aroused by the arousal on screen, artificial though it may well be. Those are the two most arousing things in a woman, I think, being aroused or openly trying to be arousing. Being a beautiful woman isn't enough. There's a very beautiful woman who works at the local co-op, but I've never got an erection in there. Not even the time she was bending over to refill the coke. That's not creeping you out, right? In fact I've only once had an erection in a public place, and thar was due to a relatively ugly girl who happened to be saying disgusting yet arousing things. In a library, too. Terrible, what youth get up to these days, and what I overhear them talking about.

That might well be why they tend to have both men and women in porn, for members of both sexes who identify with each sex. Because the last thing I want to see in a porno is an erect penis. Right offputting.

Here's why it troubles me:

Almost all men masturbate regularly starting in adolescence and for the whole rest of their adult lives. And that includes almost all gay men, straight men, men who hate women, men who love women, men who also regularly have sex with a long-term partner, and men who never have sex with any partner. Because it includes almost all healthy men. With the exception of men who have been so aggressively conditioned to fear and abhor the practice by religious indoctrination that the conditioning certainly amounts to a form of emotional abuse and arguably amounts to a form of sexual abuse.


You know most women masturbate too. Not quite the same percentage or frequency, at least not be female admission. When asked women always claim less heterosexual partners than men on average, which indicates either dishonesty or a lot of men unknowingly boffing trannies. Probably because men are under pressure to big up their prowess and women their alleged virtue. Same goes here. After all, "erotica" is almost entirely aimed at women and is a massive industry, and there are whole factories somewhere churning out vibrators and dildos and so on, and as dildos are amongst some of the oldest artefacts of human civilisation, this has been going on for a while. Women just prefer to displace their sexual perversions onto men, society's sexual scapegoat.

Almost all men who masturbate regularly -- ie, almost all men -- sometimes use pornography as an aid to masturbation. And most of them regularly use it. I'm not totally happy with the figures I'm finding, since all of them were produced by the same far-right Christian groups with whom the basic talking points of the internet-porn-badness public awareness campaign originated. So they might not be wholly reliable.


Everyone does. Even if it's just a shampoo advert.

Howver, fwiw and until I have the time to come up with some better search terms, according to a survey in which I can't see any obvious flaw or bias, about seventy percent of male internet users avail themselves of online pornography at least once a month. Which strikes me as both reasonable and plausible, on a common-sense basis.


They might look at it but do they find anything worth wanking to?

Turning to pornography itself: There's a lot of it everywhere, and even more of it on the internet. Prior to the internet, most of it was commercially produced in the San Fernando Valley and a few other places by adults and with adult performers, a large number of whom came from abusive backgrounds (including but not limited to sexually abusive backgrounds) and a significant number of whom were exploited and abused by people who directly profited from keeping them personally and emotionally subjugated to themselves. And also, quite freqently, drug addicted. HIV infections were very widespread among professionial porno actors for a while there, too. Moreover, professional commercial porn production in the United States is and long has been a mob-controlled business.


See: Linda Lovelace. Watch Inside Deep Throat. Goes into the hypno-mafia using her.

In short: Serious human rights abuses for which there should be zero tolerance were endemic in the commercial porn industry before the internet and they still are. However, rape and torture are not comprehensively representative of those abuses. Nor are they exemplary instances of it in any conventional sense of the words "rape" and "torture" when broadly applied to the commercial porn industry, which is dependent on going out of its way not to use underage performers for its continued existence, cf -- Tracy Lords.


She was in a sci-fi show I used to watch, "First Wave". Only the last series, perhaps they thought it would bring in viewers. Didn't. Pity, it was a perfectly adequate, if somewhat run of the mill, scifi drama. Not as bad as canceling Farscape for Tremors - the series, but still.
Those who dream by night in the dusty recesses of their minds wake in the day to find that all was vanity; but the dreamers of the day are dangerous men, for they may act their dream with open eyes, and make it possible. -- Lawrence of Arabia
User avatar
Stephen Morgan
 
Posts: 3736
Joined: Thu Apr 19, 2007 6:37 am
Location: England
Blog: View Blog (9)

Re: Is Porn Bad for You?

Postby compared2what? » Wed Nov 23, 2011 4:38 am

Thanks, slomo. I don't think it's sex-negative in intent, though. It really shouldn't be too hard to see that just about everybody's feelings on such a subject actually originate from an instinctively life-positive-which-is-sex-positive-inclusive impulse, no matter what route they travel after that or where they end up.

Haters excepted when present, of course. But they're usually not here. Or at least not while flying under the full flag of hateration.
______________

The release of dopamine in the mesolimbic pathway is implicated in addiction (and in a large number of other conditions), but the addiction itself isn't to dopamine, strictly speaking. It's to the consumption of stuff that, among a variety of other things, prompts....Well. A release of dopamine in the mesolimbic pathway.

Also: It's probably worth noting that one of the reasons that dopamine is implicated in as many conditions as it is (which is many) is that it's the only neurotransmitter the comings and goings of which state-of-the-art functional magnetic resonance imaging is capable of detecting. So, you know. They can see it. Therefore, it tends to stand out more than the implicated factors that they can't see (and may not even know about) do.

It's not neuro rocket science, really.
“If someone comes out of a liquor store with a weapon and 50 dollars in cash I don’t care if a Drone kills him or a policeman kills him.” -- Rand Paul
User avatar
compared2what?
 
Posts: 8383
Joined: Sun Oct 21, 2007 6:31 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Is Porn Bad for You?

Postby compared2what? » Wed Nov 23, 2011 4:55 am

Stephen Morgan wrote:You know most women masturbate too.


I do, yes. Fancy that.

However, most porn (as that word is generally understood) caters to a male demographic and is therefore (unsurprisingly) mostly consumed by them. No value judgment attaches to that, imo. But it is what it is. So when you're talking about whether porn is or is not bad for "you," the "you" is implicitly addressed to men.

I don't make those rules, btw. Nor do I endorse them. I just recognize them when I see them. Much like Justice What's-His-Name and that much-quoted thing he said about obscenity.

Almost all men who masturbate regularly -- ie, almost all men -- sometimes use pornography as an aid to masturbation. And most of them regularly use it. I'm not totally happy with the figures I'm finding, since all of them were produced by the same far-right Christian groups with whom the basic talking points of the internet-porn-badness public awareness campaign originated. So they might not be wholly reliable.


Everyone does. Even if it's just a shampoo advert.


I know.


See: Linda Lovelace. Watch Inside Deep Throat. Goes into the hypno-mafia using her.


Dude, I was reading Linda Lovelace's Ordeal when you would have still been in short trousers if you hadn't been born years after they stopped being commonly worn.

But thanks for the tip!

:lovehearts:
“If someone comes out of a liquor store with a weapon and 50 dollars in cash I don’t care if a Drone kills him or a policeman kills him.” -- Rand Paul
User avatar
compared2what?
 
Posts: 8383
Joined: Sun Oct 21, 2007 6:31 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Is Porn Bad for You?

Postby compared2what? » Wed Nov 23, 2011 6:21 am

Stephen Morgan wrote:
Got to have empathy to watch porn, or normal porn. Whole point is to be aroused by the arousal on screen, artificial though it may well be. Those are the two most arousing things in a woman, I think, being aroused or openly trying to be arousing. Being a beautiful woman isn't enough. There's a very beautiful woman who works at the local co-op, but I've never got an erection in there. Not even the time she was bending over to refill the coke. That's not creeping you out, right?


No, of course not. And my apologies for having overlooked the question earlier.

You did strike a chord in my memory for which I can't really account for the third consecutive time, though. It's reflected in the phraseology of my previous reply to you, in fact. Exists on YouTube only in this form. evidently.

Stop doing that. I mean it.
“If someone comes out of a liquor store with a weapon and 50 dollars in cash I don’t care if a Drone kills him or a policeman kills him.” -- Rand Paul
User avatar
compared2what?
 
Posts: 8383
Joined: Sun Oct 21, 2007 6:31 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Is Porn Bad for You?

Postby blanc » Wed Nov 23, 2011 8:22 am

I'll keep this brief though doing so risks misinterpretation. Someone always interprets porn as 'pictures of naked women.' in order to imply that the arguments against porn are concerned with some kind of repression. I'm thinking more legalistically as
http://www.cps.gov.uk/legal/l_to_o/obsc ... lications/
Where some real difference of opinion may exist is in the relative guilt of those complicit (through purchase) with crimes, and the extent to which individuals who use borderline material can be sure which side of the border the material is - I mean, is there enslavement you don't see on camera? how good a judge are you of age? etc
I wish that SMorgan was right when he says that you need empathy to watch porn - I really think that in the case of material which falls the wrong side of the law, you need to be completely insensitive to at least some of the individuals you see on screen. I don't think the world would stop if, in sympathy with the abused, porn users who think they have a conscience boycotted pornography as a political gesture. I'm pretty sure they'd survive. I don't think that I care two hoots if porn users who consider that they have a conscience and only view harmless stuff filmed with the full uncoerced co-operation of those depicted feel put down by my robust name calling, because I know so many nice people who feel put down every time anyone implies that porn is filmed with consent, because, for them it wasn't, and I do seriously doubt the competences claimed. If you know how what you're watching came into being, and it harmed no-one, then obviously the names aren't for you. I've heard and read such utter tosh about how the consumer 'knows' that the star of the film they discuss is enjoying it, and of an appropriate age. Such as 'you can tell because she's smiling'. I'll shut up now.
blanc
 
Posts: 1946
Joined: Sun Feb 05, 2006 4:00 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Is Porn Bad for You?

Postby Stephen Morgan » Wed Nov 23, 2011 10:51 am

compared2what? wrote:Dude, I was reading Linda Lovelace's Ordeal when you would have still been in short trousers if you hadn't been born years after they stopped being commonly worn.

But thanks for the tip!

:lovehearts:


I wore short trousers when I was young. Probably got it from the grandparents.

Channel 4 has a habit of showing pornomentaries. There was one about Emmanuelle, the "Inside Deep Throat", which I believe is still on their website for non-foreigners, and so on.

While we're on the subject the Emmanuelle one claims to have been written by a woman as a marketing ploy.

compared2what? wrote:
Stephen Morgan wrote:Got to have empathy to watch porn, or normal porn. Whole point is to be aroused by the arousal on screen, artificial though it may well be. Those are the two most arousing things in a woman, I think, being aroused or openly trying to be arousing. Being a beautiful woman isn't enough. There's a very beautiful woman who works at the local co-op, but I've never got an erection in there. Not even the time she was bending over to refill the coke. That's not creeping you out, right?


No, of course not. And my apologies for having overlooked the question earlier.

You did strike a chord in my memory for which I can't really account for the third consecutive time, though. It's reflected in the phraseology of my previous reply to you, in fact. Exists on YouTube only in this form. evidently.

Stop doing that. I mean it.


We don't have cheerleaders round these parts.

Maybe over Wigan way. Superleague and that. Egg chasing. Not round here.
Those who dream by night in the dusty recesses of their minds wake in the day to find that all was vanity; but the dreamers of the day are dangerous men, for they may act their dream with open eyes, and make it possible. -- Lawrence of Arabia
User avatar
Stephen Morgan
 
Posts: 3736
Joined: Thu Apr 19, 2007 6:37 am
Location: England
Blog: View Blog (9)

Re: Is Porn Bad for You?

Postby Stephen Morgan » Wed Nov 23, 2011 10:55 am

blanc wrote:I'll keep this brief though doing so risks misinterpretation. Someone always interprets porn as 'pictures of naked women.' in order to imply that the arguments against porn are concerned with some kind of repression. I'm thinking more legalistically as
http://www.cps.gov.uk/legal/l_to_o/obsc ... lications/


It's all porn. Like not all drugs are chrystal meth.

The Obscene Publications, though, reminds me of the imfamous scandal of the Met Obscene Publications Squad, which was a Freemason scandal in which the Obscene Publication Squad, the Porn Squad, used a masonic lodge to take bungs from the local pornmongers. MAde a great deal of money until a whistleblower came along.

Where some real difference of opinion may exist is in the relative guilt of those complicit (through purchase) with crimes,


Thanks to the internet most porn is now free.

and the extent to which individuals who use borderline material can be sure which side of the border the material is - I mean, is there enslavement you don't see on camera? how good a judge are you of age? etc
I wish that SMorgan was right when he says that you need empathy to watch porn - I really think that in the case of material which falls the wrong side of the law, you need to be completely insensitive to at least some of the individuals you see on screen.


Insensitivity would lead to a lack of motivation. Antipathy, perhaps, for the horribly abusive type of porn, or empathy for the more normal type.

I don't think the world would stop if, in sympathy with the abused, porn users who think they have a conscience boycotted pornography as a political gesture. I'm pretty sure they'd survive. I don't think that I care two hoots if porn users who consider that they have a conscience and only view harmless stuff filmed with the full uncoerced co-operation of those depicted feel put down by my robust name calling, because I know so many nice people who feel put down every time anyone implies that porn is filmed with consent, because, for them it wasn't, and I do seriously doubt the competences claimed. If you know how what you're watching came into being, and it harmed no-one, then obviously the names aren't for you. I've heard and read such utter tosh about how the consumer 'knows' that the star of the film they discuss is enjoying it, and of an appropriate age. Such as 'you can tell because she's smiling'. I'll shut up now.


A lot of the fetish porn is a sort of cottage industry.
Those who dream by night in the dusty recesses of their minds wake in the day to find that all was vanity; but the dreamers of the day are dangerous men, for they may act their dream with open eyes, and make it possible. -- Lawrence of Arabia
User avatar
Stephen Morgan
 
Posts: 3736
Joined: Thu Apr 19, 2007 6:37 am
Location: England
Blog: View Blog (9)

Re: Is Porn Bad for You?

Postby semper occultus » Wed Nov 23, 2011 11:13 am

Stephen Morgan wrote:While we're on the subject the Emmanuelle one claims to have been written by a woman as a marketing ploy.


wasn't that the Story of O ? afaik not a "ploy" although stand to be corrected on that.....( in a strictly non-porny/fetishistic manner...)
User avatar
semper occultus
 
Posts: 2974
Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 2:01 pm
Location: London,England
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Is Porn Bad for You?

Postby American Dream » Wed Nov 23, 2011 1:43 pm

Just found this- hopefully it adds something meaningful to this thread:

Why Do Men Visit Strip Clubs? Their Confessions Revealed

By Tracy Clark-Flory, Salon
Posted on November 22, 2011


http://www.alternet.org/story/153184/wh ... s_revealed


Why do men visit strip clubs? The answer to that question may seem so obvious as to not even warrant asking in the first place, but the new blog "Letters From Men Who Go to Strip Clubs” proves just how wrong that assumption is. It’s the brainchild of journalist Susannah Breslin and just the latest in a series of “Letters” projects in which men email her with brief confessionals about why they gravitate toward the sex industry – whether it’s by watching porn at home, trolling Craigslist for a cheap blow job or tucking dollar bills into strippers’ g-strings – some of which she then posts online. The result is essentially open-source sociological data — and some of it is bizarrely poetic.

“In the dead of night, alone at home, the loneliness sometimes becomes unbearable,” writes one man. “There aren’t many places to go in the middle of the night, and most of those choices don’t necessarily ensure any kind of reasonable human interaction.” Another man explains, “Nobody talks to me, nobody cares what I say. I’m a 24-year-old drone who wastes his days sitting at a computer reviewing spreadsheets that don’t really matter,” he says. “I just want to talk to someone who cares, and $1 every 3 minutes is a lot less than $250 an hour for a therapist.”

It isn’t just sad sacks looking for companionship — although there are plenty of those — it’s also men who harbor intense resentment toward women: “I’m old in years – 61 – even though I’m an 18-year-old at heart, and I like to think this is my revenge for all the beautiful women in the world whom I can’t approach, whom I can’t get, this idea that I can have some young beauty dance and smile at me any time I want.” There are also the guys who are happily married and simply enjoy the occasional entertainment of beautiful, naked women.

Reading these letters, you become acutely aware of the vulnerability in their wanting, the dependency of their desire. This isn’t an accident: Breslin, who for years lived in the San Fernando Valley covering the adult industry, says she was never interested in the real stars of porn — the women. As she wrote for theGood Men Project, “Stripped of their clothes by the medium, stripped of their dignity by the nature of their work, and stripped of their pride by the all-seeing, unblinking eye of the camera that followed their every desperate thrust, Porn Valley’s working stiffs offer a peek behind the curtain of masculinity at manhood laid bare” — and so too do the men of the latest “Letters” project.

Breslin spoke to me by phone from her apartment in Chicago about Letters From Men Who Go to Strip Clubs, what she’s learned about male desire and why feminist debates about the sex industry drive her nuts.

You seem particularly interested in men’s role in the sex industry. Why do you think that is?

To me, the sex industries are this great petri dish for discovering what drives people, because you get to see them behave in extreme ways. A lot of the focus is on the women, though, because that’s more titillating. Often times, people studying or writing about sex work are men, and they’re more drawn to questions like, “What kind of woman does this? What is her life like? What kind of female mind does it take to be able to sell her body for sex?” I’ve always been very interested in men and trying to figure out how the male mind works, and sex work seemed like a way to really find that out. The sex industry is like the private X-rated Disneyland for men. In the sex work world, men get to do things that are socially unacceptable, whether that’s getting fucked in the ass or being ruthless sexually, so the analogy I like is the Wizard of Oz — I always want to see what’s behind the curtain.

Sometimes it seems like every stripper, every call girl, every sex worker of every stripe has a blog — but johns and strip-club regulars? Not so much. You hit on the fact that the stories of sex workers themselves might be more titillating, but why else aren’t we hearing from the men?

Well, I think there’s a taboo these days around men talking openly about their sexual fantasies or their participation in the sex industry. Right now, it’s quote-unquote not OK for a man to have sex with a prostitute or to be married and go to a strip club, and that’s partly due to political correctness and partly due to feminism that those things are pathologized.

Speaking of feminism and pathology, a recent Slate piece about the misogyny of porn moguls like Larry Flynt and Hugh Hefner rubbed you the wrong way. You responded on your Forbes blog by arguing that porn simply shows male desire as it is. I wonder, how did your years in Porn Valley change your view of men?

I know a lot about sex work, but I feel like I also got a great education in men. The main thing was that it made me more sympathetic toward men. When you’re on the set of a gang bang and there’s a hundred guys all fucking one woman, you actually see that it’s not just a bunch of animals. You see how complicated it is to be a man — you know, you’re supposed to be big and strong, but you also have these desires and conflicted feelings. Ideally, anything laid bare will invoke compassion, and that’s what it made me feel. Like a friend of mine says, “You see men as they are and you love them anyway.”

What about how your experience reporting on sex work influenced your view of feminism? You’re often critical of feminism, especially where it intersects with the sex industry.

When it comes to sex work, a lot of the time feminism gets it wrong. They sit at one extreme or another. First, feminism as a movement took the stance that sex work is bad and inherently exploitative of women. And then there’s this movement in the last 10 years or so that, no, sex workers are empowered and they’re in control of their bodies and they’re feminists too and we should support that. Both of those are just radical positions and, in my opinion, any radical position is going to be inherently wrong. There are women in the sex industry who are completely fucked and strung out on drugs and being exploited and being victimized. And there are also women like Nina Hartley who are born to do sex work and are high functioning and understand themselves and how to function in that world.

My main problem with feminism and sex work is that the majority of feminists talking about sex work are in the academy. They took women’s studies classes and 99 percent of what they learned about sex work is, like, on the Internet or from one porn star they met once. If you have something to say about it, you should go into that world and study it and get to know those people and spend time there. Instead, feminism is just manufacturing abstractions about what sex work is, and they’re too chicken to go in and really explore the industry. So for the most part, feminism can’t tell me anything about sex work because they’re too busy posturing as feminists to find out what that world is really like.

It’s funny because, as you know, I emailed you when I was an aspiring journalist in college and I asked you for advice on how to end up doing what you were doing at the time, which was reporting on the realities of the industry. You were totally supportive but you were also like, look, whatever you do, don’t go to Porn Valley. Your exact words were, “It’s a meat-grinder for the human condition.”

I mean, studying the sex industry is really challenging work. It’s hard to be a sex worker, it’s hard to inhabit that world and it’s also hard to study it and be around it, because it’s brutal. It’s not, in my opinion, a business like any other. These are people whose jobs are to stick part of their body into somebody else’s body, or have somebody else’s body inside of their body. That’s tough work.

That’s part of why not a lot of women have written about it. The payoff after you’ve spent time writing about or working in the sex industry is your understanding of human nature is unrivaled. You just see people flayed. You see what impulses really drive us. It was hard for me for several years to come back from that. Once you’ve seen humanity laid bare, there’s a time when you kind of want to unsee it, go back to living in Cinderella land.

It’s always complicated. It’s never black and white. It’s never all misogynist or all feminist. It’s complicated because it’s a business that reflects our interior, and the interior is always conflicted and at war with itself.

Your friend’s line – the one about seeing men as they are and loving them anyway – resonates with me. I was drawn to the world of Internet porn as a curious post-pubescent girl in an attempt to figure out what boys and men wanted, and later as a journalist writing about sex. It was so much darker, and so much more complicated and foreign, than I could have imagined it would be. For a long while I struggled to reconcile my affection and love for men with the reality of what I found out there in the ether.

The sex industry can be really ruthless and brutal. If you’re around that enough, you start to wonder if everybody’s impulses are really base and everyone’s either trying to fuck or kill each other. You don’t see the flipside of healthy nuclear families and dads who mow the lawn on the weekends and swimming lessons in the toddler pool. Over time, I’ve been able to have a yin and yang attitude about it, which is that that darkness is always there, but there’s also this other part of it that is about lightness.

The thing I would say most male porn stars have in common is that they desperately want women to love them. I did a TV pilot years ago that was gonna be about my life as a sex writer and when we were done wrapping the pilot, the executive producer and I had lunch and he said, “So what is the porn industry really about?” And I said, “What do you think it’s about?” He said, “Love,” and I said, “Yeah, that’s right.” It’s like I wrote in the Forbes post, the story is that the guy always gets the girl. Women are exalted, and sometimes the misogyny you see is actually a reaction to intense desire. It’s a challenge to be able to hold those seemingly contradictory ideas in your head at the same time — you know, “I totally want to possess this woman because I love her so much, but at the same time, being ruled by that desire makes me want to kill her.” And that’s how you end up with crazy gang-bang videos.

Getting back to the latest “Letters” project, what have you learned from it so far?

The “Letters” projects have been of varying success, but I love it as a genre because I find the letters very endearing. I’m always kind of surprised by how enamored men are by women. What I see as a sub-context in the latest project is how much power the stripper has. She’s the focus. It’s not about a guy manipulating some woman to get what he wants, it’s about, “I have to pay to get this girl to even pay attention to me and when she does, she gives me the thing that I want that I can’t get at work and I can’t get from my wife and can’t get by myself,” and I think they’re sort of awed by that.

That gets back to that common theme of love –

I think the other piece of it is the loneliness. They’re starving for human connection. I think our female desire is for emotional connection to transcend that inescapable loneliness of being a human being, and theirs is physical, so they go to these places where someone will touch them.



Tracy Clark-Flory is a staff writer at Salon. Follow @tracyclarkflory on Twitter.
American Dream
 
Posts: 19946
Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2007 4:56 pm
Location: Planet Earth
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Is Porn Bad for You?

Postby barracuda » Wed Nov 23, 2011 3:52 pm

blanc wrote:I don't think the world would stop if, in sympathy with the abused, porn users who think they have a conscience boycotted pornography as a political gesture. I'm pretty sure they'd survive.


"O bid me walk in fire but do not rob us of that darling joy." A Lysistrata play transformed into a monolgue is has a certain charming self-reference: deny yourself your own sex that the wars must end. As threats go, it seems rather an empty one, for the mind can still summon at will the necessary acoutrements of imagined passion enough to satisfy most appetites.* Imagination is not so easily curtailed, and desires being what they are, substitutes would surely fill the void let behind by such a boycott, at which point the issue becomes one of the purity or perversion of the mind of the individuals, and just how abusive or complicit dark or lustful thoughts are within the scope of the question of harm. And what of drawings and sketches that might be produced as a by-product of such an embargo? More or less disturbing or destructive? Maybe there's no harm in that.

This kind of experiment demonstrates just how poorly understood the motivations are behind dolphin flogging in general, as well as casting in a harsh light the stigmas associated with the more detached exercises of libido. But by all means, let's pick a date for a General Strike on what is more commonly known as pornography and follow through with unbridled gusto. I agree that for most people, lacking the actual photographic shadows of the porn industry would hardly have them skipping beat in their regularly scheduled or spontaneousy improvised jacking- or jilling-off. The world would continue to turn, and the desires of men and women would continue to be simply shameful, I'd wager, if not at least viewed as more destructive in some sense than creative. Which is a shame.

I don't think that I care two hoots if porn users who consider that they have a conscience and only view harmless stuff filmed with the full uncoerced co-operation of those depicted feel put down by my robust name calling, because I know so many nice people who feel put down every time anyone implies that porn is filmed with consent, because, for them it wasn't, and I do seriously doubt the competences claimed. If you know how what you're watching came into being, and it harmed no-one, then obviously the names aren't for you. I've heard and read such utter tosh about how the consumer 'knows' that the star of the film they discuss is enjoying it, and of an appropriate age. Such as 'you can tell because she's smiling'.


You seem to be describing some type of "organic" or "free-range" pornography. At least among men, I can't recall running into any special-interest group or even individuals composed of such porn-vegans who assiduous read the labels and perform the due diligence in that regard. Mostly because the sensations which happen to stir a person's sexual senses aren't really anyone's to dictate, not even for themselves. That kind of sensory stimuation is formed from such a complex of experiences and environments that it can be impossible to trace to the source. It's hard to lay blame on folks as to what turns them on. Most people would have difficulty even articulating that, beyond an inward acknowledging and wordless recognition of it. They just get flushed, though no fault of their own.

*If you'd argue that I'm deliberately misinterpreting your hypothetical, you'd probably be right.
The most dangerous traps are the ones you set for yourself. - Phillip Marlowe
User avatar
barracuda
 
Posts: 12890
Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 5:58 pm
Location: Niles, California
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Is Porn Bad for You?

Postby Simulist » Wed Nov 23, 2011 4:07 pm

It may be that "Is Porn Bad for You?" is just one of those subjects that some people simply cannot discuss — mostly because they've got their minds already made up, appear to have little use for subtlety on this topic, and really don't want to be confused with facts.

Compared2what? has offered a number of such facts along with convincing arguments to contextualize and to amplify them; so have several others in the course of this more than twenty page discussion. In fact, here or elsewhere on this board, a recognizable poster related her own mostly-positive experience in the adult industry. Has any of this ever appeared even to phase the true believers who are dogmatically opposed to porn? Not much. If at all. Maybe that's to be expected. It's a little like trying to tell someone who's dogmatically opposed to alcohol that it's okay that you have a glass of wine with dinner.

Of course some porn is bad for you — many adult industry insiders, like Chi Chi LaRue, eagerly agree — but is all porn bad?

No. Because that's pretty silly.
"The most strongly enforced of all known taboos is the taboo against knowing who or what you really are behind the mask of your apparently separate, independent, and isolated ego."
    — Alan Watts
User avatar
Simulist
 
Posts: 4713
Joined: Thu Dec 31, 2009 10:13 pm
Location: Here, and now.
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Is Porn Bad for You?

Postby Harvey » Wed Nov 23, 2011 4:13 pm

Simulist wrote:but is all porn bad?

No. Because that's pretty silly.



Why?

It's an honest and simple question, not a trap, an accusation, or anything else. I'm looking for a good reasoned argument. That is all.
And while we spoke of many things, fools and kings
This he said to me
"The greatest thing
You'll ever learn
Is just to love
And be loved
In return"


Eden Ahbez
User avatar
Harvey
 
Posts: 4201
Joined: Mon May 09, 2011 4:49 am
Blog: View Blog (20)

Re: Is Porn Bad for You?

Postby Simulist » Wed Nov 23, 2011 4:22 pm

Harvey wrote:
Simulist wrote:but is all porn bad?

No. Because that's pretty silly.



Why?

It's an honest and simple question, not a trap, an accusation, or anything else. I'm looking for a good reasoned argument. That is all.

Because it's never been proven — or even convincingly demonstrated — that "all porn is bad for you" scientifically.

And until it is, such a claim seems "pretty silly."
"The most strongly enforced of all known taboos is the taboo against knowing who or what you really are behind the mask of your apparently separate, independent, and isolated ego."
    — Alan Watts
User avatar
Simulist
 
Posts: 4713
Joined: Thu Dec 31, 2009 10:13 pm
Location: Here, and now.
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Is Porn Bad for You?

Postby Harvey » Wed Nov 23, 2011 4:26 pm

Simulist wrote:
Harvey wrote:
Simulist wrote:but is all porn bad?

No. Because that's pretty silly.



Why?

It's an honest and simple question, not a trap, an accusation, or anything else. I'm looking for a good reasoned argument. That is all.

Because it's never been proven — or even convincingly demonstrated — that "all porn is bad for you" scientifically.

And until it is, such a claim seems "pretty silly."


Okay. Is there any argument that it is good for us?
And while we spoke of many things, fools and kings
This he said to me
"The greatest thing
You'll ever learn
Is just to love
And be loved
In return"


Eden Ahbez
User avatar
Harvey
 
Posts: 4201
Joined: Mon May 09, 2011 4:49 am
Blog: View Blog (20)

Re: Is Porn Bad for You?

Postby yathrib » Wed Nov 23, 2011 4:44 pm

Have we defined porn, beyond the "know it when I see it" criterion? Or are we defining it strictly as material produced by the adult entertainment industry? It seems like more of a male thing, but I am convinced that all men look at it, and always have, no matter what ideals or beliefs they profess. I am somewhat of an exception due to my fascination with Penthouse Forum in my mid teens, something I've been told on this very board was unusual and aberrant. But I would ask whether it is healthy to have belief systems that make all this a deep dark secret? Do these belief systems in fact push adherents to deeper and darker areas than they might have otherwise explored if their needs had been accepted as normal and unremarkable?

On the other hand, is the widespread availability of just about every variety at the click of a mouse a good thing? Here, the puritan in me comes out. I think porn aficionados should need to work for their fix. Just my opinion.
Blessed are those who hunger and thirst that justice prevail.

If you bring forth what is within you, what you bring forth will save you. If you do not bring forth what is within you, what you do not bring forth will destroy you.
yathrib
 
Posts: 1880
Joined: Tue May 16, 2006 11:44 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)
PreviousNext

Return to General Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 173 guests