So why even raise it other than as an egregious misframing?
This thread, overall, includes volumes of valuable compelling information counter to the dominant narratives.
Do you fucking think I care if you engage with me or not? Get over yourself dude. Offended by my comment about embracing vaccine passports? Snarky attitude butts up against Patrician. What the fuck ever. I'm not apologizing for my outrage and disgust. There needs to be more outrage and people taking to the streets. Especially not tolerating people who used to preach about punching Nazis but are now screaming that we need everyone vaxxed, they defend big pharma or suggest we need vaccine papers. To be clear, that is not JR.
JR stated long time ago he lives in NYC, or used to, so some first hand observations would be useful. My point was more about what are people in NYC doing to protest this authoritarian move to deploy show me your papers? Are you actively out doing something? Resigned and depressed? Too busy? Confused? Lost hope? What are others in NYC doing? Rolling over or up in arms?
Back to the so called virus samples.... It's not that simple and if you read the details released by the CDC itself it becomes more clear that there is very high likelihood they did not have an isolated sample. So claims about poison pills and catnip can be setup aside. Read what Jon Rappoport has written and uncovered. He has made claims for months that there was no isolated virus, now I believe he is really onto something. No shock that it is coming out regarding the joke PCR testing. All the references JR posted about virus samples are likely real, but what exactly were those researchers doing? Isolating what? At this point it really doesn't matter, except to validate arguments here. The general population does not care, they've been brainwashed and denial of that is a show stopper here and now. The battle has no chance quibbling over the nuances of virus samples, tests and who said what. IMO
Read what Rappoport put together and decide for yourself. I don't give a flying fuck if you think this is catnip. It's worth reading because it demonstrates that it is NOT perfectly clear that the virus was isolated and that the CDC even states that.
CDC/FDA confess: they had no virus when they concocted the test for the virus Jul
29
by Jon Rappoport
July 29, 2021
(To join our email list, click here.)
The CDC has issued a document that bulges with interesting and devastating admissions.
The release is titled, “07/21/2021: Lab Alert: Changes to CDC RT-PCR for SARS-CoV-2 Testing.” [1] It begins explosively:
“After December 31, 2021, CDC will withdraw the request to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) of the CDC 2019-Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel, the assay first introduced in February 2020 for detection of SARS-CoV-2 only. CDC is providing this advance notice for clinical laboratories to have adequate time to select and implement one of the many FDA-authorized alternatives.”
Many people believe this means the CDC is giving up on the PCR test as a means of “detecting the virus.” I don’t think the CDC is saying that at all.
They’re saying the PCR technology will continue to be used, but they’re replacing what the test is looking FOR with a better “reference sample.” A better marker. A better target. A better piece of RNA supposedly derived from SARS-CoV-2.
CDC/FDA are confessing there has been a PROBLEM with the PCR test which has been used to detect the virus, starting in February of 2020—right up to this minute.
In other words, the millions and millions of “COVID cases” based on the PCR test in use are all suspect.
To confirm this, the CDC document links to an FDA release titled, “SARS-CoV-2 Reference Panel Comparative Data.” [2] [2a] Here is a killer quote:
“During the early months of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, clinical specimens [of the virus] were not readily available to developers of IVDs [in vitro diagnostics] to detect SARS-CoV-2. Therefore, the FDA authorized IVDs based on available data from contrived samples generated from a range of SARS-CoV-2 material sources (for example, gene specific RNA, synthetic RNA, or whole genome viral RNA) for analytical and clinical performance evaluation. While validation using these contrived specimens provided a measure of confidence in test performance at the beginning of the pandemic, it is not feasible to precisely compare the performance of various tests that used contrived specimens because each test validated performance using samples derived from different gene specific, synthetic, or genomic nucleic acid sources.”
Translation: We, at the CDC, did not have a specimen of the SARS-CoV-2 virus when we concocted the PCR test for SARS-CoV-2. Yes, it’s unbelievable, right? And that’s the test we’ve been using all along. So we CONTRIVED samples of the virus. We fabricated. We lied. We made up [invented] synthetic gene sequences and we SAID these sequences HAD TO BE close to the sequence of SARS-CoV-2, without having the faintest idea of what we were doing, because, again, we didn’t have an actual specimen of the virus. We had no proof THERE WAS something called SARS-CoV-2.
This amazing FDA document goes to say the Agency has granted emergency approval to 59 different PCR tests since the beginning of the (fake) pandemic. 59. And, “…it is not feasible to precisely compare the performance of various tests that used contrived specimens because each test validated performance using samples derived from different gene specific, synthetic, or genomic nucleic acid sources.”
Translation: Each of the 59 different PCR tests for SARS-CoV-2 told different lies and concocted different fabrications about the genetic makeup of the virus—the virus we didn’t have. Obviously, then, these tests would give unreliable results.
BUT, don’t worry, be happy, because NOW, the CDC and the FDA say, they really do have actual virus samples of SARS-CoV-2 from patients; they have better targets for the PCR test, and labs should start gearing up for the new and improved tests.
In other words, they were lying THEN, but they’re not lying NOW. They were “contriving,” but now they’re telling the truth.
If you believe that, I have Fountain of Youth water for sale, extracted from the lead-contaminated system of Flint, Michigan.
Here, once again, I report virology’s version of “we isolated the virus”: [[3] thru [3i]]
They have a soup they make in their labs.
This soup contains human and monkey cells, toxic chemicals and drugs, and all sorts of other random genetic material. Because the cells start to die, the researchers ASSUME a bit of mucus from a patient they dropped in the soup is doing the killing, and THE VIRUS must be the killer agent in the mucus.
This assumption is entirely unwarranted. The drugs and chemicals could be doing the cell-killing, and the researchers are also starving the cells of vital nutrients.
There is no proof that SARS-CoV-2 is in the soup, or that it is doing the cell-killing, or that it exists.
Yet the researchers call cell-death “isolation of the virus.”
To say this is a non-sequitur is a vast understatement. In their universe, “We have the virus buried in a soup in a dish in the lab” equals, “We’ve separated the virus from all surrounding material.”
Virology equals “how to spread bullshit for a living and scare the world.” Other than that, it’s perfect.
SOURCES:
[1] https://www.cdc.gov/csels/dls/locs/2021 ... ing_1.html
[2] https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/cor ... ative-data
[2a] https://www.cdc.gov/csels/dls/locs/2020 ... _data.html
[3] blog.nomorefakenews.com/2020/12/18/sars-cov-2-has-not-been-proven-to-exist/
[3a] blog.nomorefakenews.com/2021/01/26/sars-cov-2-has-not-been-proven-to-exist-shocking/
[3b] blog.nomorefakenews.com/2021/04/21/isolation-of-sars-cov-2-refuted-in-step-by-step-analysis-of-claim/
[3c] blog.nomorefakenews.com/2021/04/26/the-non-existent-virus-and-the-implications/
[3d] blog.nomorefakenews.com/2021/05/20/the-pandemic-virus-that-doesnt-exist/
[3e] blog.nomorefakenews.com/2021/05/21/more-on-the-coronavirus-that-doesnt-exist-and-the-pink-demon/
[3f] blog.nomorefakenews.com/2021/05/31/wuhan-lab-bioweapon-gain-of-function-but-the-virus-doesnt-exist/
[3g] andrewkaufmanmd.com
[3h] drtomcowan.com
[3i] greatreject.org/dr-stefan-lanka-claims-about-viruses-are-false