by wordspeak2 » Sat Sep 10, 2011 8:52 am
Rocketman wrote:
"But his admittedly principled stand on non-intervention is unfortunately amply offset by his fanatical hatred of any and all central structures aimed at providing for the less well off. "
That's the best one-line sum-up of Ron Paul I've seen yet. Fuck Ron Paul. Great thread. But....
Does this also mean, "Fuck the Ron Paul support base"? Because I'm going to disagree. IMO the Paul campaign is more of a good thing than a bad thing it's galvanized a lot of anti-fascists. And these people are all different; some are hard-line libertarians like Ron Paul, while others aren't. Essentially all of them are anti-imperialist and oppose the Drug War. I've speaking as a leftist who's worked for years in the drug policy reform movement, so I've worked with plenty of libertarians or quasi-libertarian types. Micro-capitalists and the like. In my opinion a populist anti-fascist movement isn't going to get anywhere until traditional leftists unify with people like this. I know that's an extremely broad statement. The former may be easy to define, but the latter isn't, and in many cases homophobic fundamentalist Alex Jones listeners are not worth allying with. However, imo in many more cases libertarian "patriot" types *are* worth allying with, and a wide populist tent is absolutely necessary in the realpolitik of contemporary fascism.
Exactly how to do this? I don't know. But if you want to end foreign wars and the Drug War we have a good starting point. Let's run better anti-fascist candidates, maybe even start a new party (let's face it- the Green Party is pathetic. Better to start from scratch.) I think that people who want to abolish Social Security and Medicare entirely are a distinct minority out there. At least, I haven't met many, but I do live in a very blue state.
Actually, in the very general sense I feel strongly about this. I'm looking at a book right now by CIA agent Chip Berlet called "Right-Wing Populism in America: Too Close For Comfort." It's an attack on the historical roots of what we see manifesting in the popularity of Alex Jones and Ron Paul, etc. "Right-wing populism" is a funny term, but if Chip Berlet is concerned enough to write a book attacking it, that means the intelligentsia sees it as a threat. It's not about the left unifying with the Tea Party, per se, as was proposed on a different thread- there are plenty of people out there who are not Tea Partiers, nor socialists, but decent people who are opposed to the insane onslaught of fascism. They're desperate for something to connect with, and right now what they have is Ron Paul. We need them all if we're going to have any chance of winning.