Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff
Alchemy » Thu Jul 04, 2013 1:32 am wrote: HOWEVER, I think like Russ Baker at whowhatwhy told me, he is taking it slow and waiting for the tox report, he is on the case and he isnt one to speak soon or early but when he does speak he has all the facts gathered and is ready to draw some hard hitting conclusions, he is always usually the last one to speak on issues like this, he is still coming out with Boston Bombing stuff, so he takes his time and I also suspect a lot of others are just waiting for that tox screen/report to come out before they start publishing their findings as the tox screen/report is and should be a big part of any story that comes out about this so I am assuming that is what most everyone is waiting for before they start to tackle this issue an draw conclusions.
Alchemy » Thu Jul 04, 2013 2:54 am wrote:Nordic » Thu Jul 04, 2013 3:15 am wrote:Thanks for keeping on top of it, Alchemy.
The only other case I can think of that was so obvious and in-your-face was the "suicide" of the Washington DC Madame. I may have mentioned that upstream somewhere. You know, the one who warned that if she "committed suicide" that it wouldn't really be a suicide and lo and behold she "committed suicide" shortly thereafter.
Yes ABSOLUTELY! That was another one that was indeed a slap in the face and a warning to others. There is no doubt in my mind that woman did not kill herself and I also think Phillip Marshall was likely a hit but there are some things that came out to indicate he was troubled but that still doesnt explain why he would kill his kids and the fucking dog too.
Anyway please keep your eyes and ears open for any new developments wrt Hastings.
8bitagent » Thu Jul 04, 2013 8:22 am wrote: I dont see evidence of it so far but it would make sense since I feel he was onto something fierce), then it was done in a very niche black ops manner. I mean all it takes is one neighbor to see men in black clad outfits and the jig is up.
Canadian_watcher » Thu Jul 04, 2013 8:25 am wrote:8bitagent » Thu Jul 04, 2013 8:22 am wrote: I dont see evidence of it so far but it would make sense since I feel he was onto something fierce), then it was done in a very niche black ops manner. I mean all it takes is one neighbor to see men in black clad outfits and the jig is up.
I think the REALLY sad part is that that is absolutely, demonstrably not true at all. It's too easy to get around witness testimony.
bks » Thu Jul 04, 2013 6:39 am wrote:The tox report will at least at minimum be another piece of a puzzle, and even if the information within it cannot be wholly trusted there will be people who can read it carefully and tell whether there's something odd about the way the investigation is being conducted. It's data, in other words, and not just about what may or may not have been in his system.
Maybe that's overly hopeful.
Canadian_watcher » Thu Jul 04, 2013 8:47 am wrote:
This is my problem with capital S science
it's a racket.
bks » Thu Jul 04, 2013 7:39 am wrote:The tox report will at least at minimum be another piece of a puzzle, and even if the information within it cannot be wholly trusted there will be people who can read it carefully and tell whether there's something odd about the way the investigation is being conducted. It's data, in other words, and not just about what may or may not have been in his system.
Maybe that's overly hopeful.
brainpanhandler » Thu Jul 04, 2013 9:29 am wrote:Canadian_watcher » Thu Jul 04, 2013 8:47 am wrote:
This is my problem with capital S science
That unscrupulous people can hide behind a white coat and a degree and do unscrupulous things? That's an indictment of the scientific method?it's a racket.
Science?
8bitagent » Thu Jul 04, 2013 9:13 am wrote:Alchemy » Thu Jul 04, 2013 1:32 am wrote: HOWEVER, I think like Russ Baker at whowhatwhy told me, he is taking it slow and waiting for the tox report, he is on the case and he isnt one to speak soon or early but when he does speak he has all the facts gathered and is ready to draw some hard hitting conclusions, he is always usually the last one to speak on issues like this, he is still coming out with Boston Bombing stuff, so he takes his time and I also suspect a lot of others are just waiting for that tox screen/report to come out before they start publishing their findings as the tox screen/report is and should be a big part of any story that comes out about this so I am assuming that is what most everyone is waiting for before they start to tackle this issue an draw conclusions.
Yeah that's a good approach. With 9/11, there were a lot of erroneous "facts" and theories that even most truthers will agree didn't pan out. It's cliche to say, but we do live in a world where people expect immediate answers. Heck police were saying that out in Boston. I've zero knowledge of legal systems, detective work, etc. But as a lay person, I would think the #1 thing to find is the minutia of his last 48 hours. Credit/debit card uses, ATM uses if possible. Restaurants, etc. Beat by beat where he was, what he was doing, where his car was at. The cops sure seem to have that ready to go with alleged terror suspects.
8bitagent » Thu Jul 04, 2013 9:27 am wrote:Canadian_watcher » Thu Jul 04, 2013 8:25 am wrote:8bitagent » Thu Jul 04, 2013 8:22 am wrote: I dont see evidence of it so far but it would make sense since I feel he was onto something fierce), then it was done in a very niche black ops manner. I mean all it takes is one neighbor to see men in black clad outfits and the jig is up.
I think the REALLY sad part is that that is absolutely, demonstrably not true at all. It's too easy to get around witness testimony.
Well shoot, that's right too. I mean 700 people said they saw a missile streak up from the ocean to hit TWA 800....dozens saw shots fired from the grassy knoll...all of these hundreds of people are called "kooks" to this daybks » Thu Jul 04, 2013 6:39 am wrote:The tox report will at least at minimum be another piece of a puzzle, and even if the information within it cannot be wholly trusted there will be people who can read it carefully and tell whether there's something odd about the way the investigation is being conducted. It's data, in other words, and not just about what may or may not have been in his system.
Maybe that's overly hopeful.
Then there's the Henri Paul toxicology report. To me the biggest question is what the heck was Hastings doing between say, 3pm and 4:24 AM that day/night/morning.
Nordic wrote: i.e. Snowden and the other revelations that were supposed to drop but now, for some mysterious reason, seem to have been delayed.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 163 guests