Wombaticus Rex wrote:Crime in NYC is important. Crime in NYC has cost the entire world billions of dollars, yet they're still stopping innocent young hispanic and black males in the street every day....and actually providing active security details for the perpetrators.
Good point, profound even. Whatever else this summer's blockbuster psy-op is about it's a distraction from that. Also from the equally predictable Syria operation which is hitting some turbulence.
Wombaticus Rex wrote:The NYC cut crime by 1) outright cooking the books between senior admin and shift managers so that less crimes got reported, 2) rewriting laws to enable them to keep people behind bars longer, 3) demonstrating non-stop will to win any contest of force with organized gangs -- aka kill the shit out of people in the middle of the street like any other syndicate, 4) narrowing the scope of "crime" itself to the point it's basically a racial issue rather than a behavioral one.
The race issue is interesting in that whites often seem to be handled differently than non-white patsies, who are generally exterminated after being metaphorically dragged naked through the media, or dragged literally naked, like the Miami cannibal. White guys generally get to live until officially executed, like McVeigh, as long as they don't squeal on camera, like Oswald when he said he was a patsy. At that point he had to go. Speaking of color the red hair is pretty weird.
ida pingala wrote:justdrew wrote:lupercal wrote:PAUL BARRETT: We have to break down what has happened there, not talk about the Second Amendment, and instead say, "What have the police, what have the social workers, what have the politicians in those cities done?" and imitate it. New York has had some success in reducing the crime rate over the last 25 years. What’s happened here? How can it be replicated?
push the poor and desperate outside your statistical reporting boundary, into the 'sacrifice zones'
anyway, it's funny he thinks Cops did something to lower the crime rate. Cops almost exclusively respond after a crime. Who lowered the crime rate? Criminals. They chose to abstain (or had been already pushed out of the vicinity).
http://articles.latimes.com/2010/sep/14 ... e-20100914The nation's crime rate dropped 5% last year, continuing a 20-year trend that has cut the incidence of major crimes nearly in half, according to FBI statistics.
Crime experts have cited several possible explanations for the falling crime rate, including better policing, a swelling of the prison population, the decline of the crack cocaine epidemic and an aging population. But regardless of the reason, crime fell sharply during the 1990s and has declined gradually since then.
Yep holding out NYC as a model of effective policing on the basis of crime stats seems a dubious proposition indeed, and in fact that crossed my mind as soon as I heard the guy make his point, which passed without comment, hmm...