I also contemplate questions about 'legitimate' information vs. 'disinformation' and who are the 'Illuminati', survivors, and wonder, too, how can we ever really know? I have a real hard time reading some of the confusing and far-fetched claims by high profile survivors, but I think what LilyPat's written, if I understand her correctly, about differing circumstances among survivors to be very important, and if some of what they say or write is outlandish, they may be, after all, just the messengers, and messengers not in charge of their own lives. I don't think there's a one-size-fits-all. Much as I don't like,
really don't like, New-Age jargon, I can understand, maybe begrudgingly, why some people seek to join, if they haven't been led into, an 'alternative' religion or community and once there, absorb and spout the propaganda.
Some thoughts I have to add to the mix because I'm reminded of a close co-worker at a center where I worked on-and-off for years. She suffered from a life-threatening disease, and had joined, really, turned her life over, to the center, which was more a cult. She was 100% dedicated to them, lived on the campus, studied all the teachings and doctrines, 'practiced' the principles and fluently spoke the 'language'. I participated very little in the group's activities; in fact, I worked on condition that I not be required to, but she and I became friends and sometimes got together outside the office. She was a talented artist, kind and seemed very vulnerable, but she could also suddenly turn, and with so much vehemence, working with her was like navigating a mine field. In retrospect, I think she might have been DID, because she'd have no recollection of what she'd said during a rage. I quit (the first time), because I couldn't work with her unpredictability and for a long time I was very angry and contemptuous of her dedication to the organization (I called her 'the nun'), but now I feel mostly compassion. I think that by initially joining the group,she may have been trying to save her life, but she was also used, really badly, especially by the founders, and one who was particularly sadistic. Though at the same time, at least during the time I was there, her health had stabilized. I think one reason we were drawn to each another was because, had we been conscious, we might have found similarities in our history. I sometimes think about her and wonder how she is.
About the 'Illuminati', my understanding is that of old, aristocratic and royal bloodlines that engineer, orchestrate and control societies. Historically powerful families, whose members are prominent in politics, banking, medicine, law, education, entertainment, etc... I read an article in a major state newspaper, that its ultra rich, multi-term senator, a member of several exclusive societies, clubs and councils, was distantly related to another very rich, multi-term, powerful senator, his contemporary, who also participated in some of the same, and other, organizations (not addressed in the newspaper article, of course). I read elsewhere that one of these senators is also related to a former U.S. president, but I don't know if they both are. (Burke's Peerage
http://www.burkespeerage.com/ traces the lineage of most American Presidents to European royalty. I'd be fascinated to learn more from Burke's but it costs to join, which I can't afford.) It wouldn't be surprising to learn that there are many other distant, and not-so distant bloodlines that intersect between politicians, major media and entertainment moguls, etc....... In horse breeding, pedigree is meticulously researched for validation and documentation and the same attention to detail of ancestry and breeding surely extends to people of the 1% upper, upper class.
I once worked as the bean counter for a millionaire couple's offshore interests. They were both descended from old money; coincidently, distantly related, fraternally, to one of the above senators. Their daughter shared his first name. (In addition to generational suffixes, there's a strange custom, at least of old moneyed families for parents to give their children, as first names, the last names of their ancestors. And it doesn't matter if it's a really
odd name, or even a name generally given to the other sex. Most likely an ancient tradition to establish a thread of identification of family members through the generations.) The trajectories their kids' lives were expected to follow were carefully laid out, probably before they were born: their friends, interests, private schools, universities, careers, etc......a very structured and not exactly enviable life, I discovered. Though the money would be nice.
The greatest sin is to be unconscious. ~ Carl Jung
We may not choose the parameters of our destiny. But we give it its content. ~ Dag Hammarskjold 'Waymarks'