Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff
BrandonD » Mon Jun 23, 2014 10:09 am wrote:I totally agree with what you guys are saying above, though I think you guys may not quite grasp what I am saying.
It is alright though because it no longer seems important, it is like someone who pointed out a piece of food on someone's face and it turned into some elaborate comical farce that was no longer worth the trouble.
BrandonD » Sun Jun 22, 2014 4:21 pm wrote:
In the case of 9/11, especially in the beginning if someone dared to publicly challenge the official story then our authority figures charged them with "attacking the victims of the tragedy". Quite clearly, the goal was to make the person feel shame so that he would shut up. There is no better word for this than 'intimidation', and from my perspective that is exactly what was taking place on the crisis actor thread.
BrandonD » Mon Jun 23, 2014 10:09 am wrote:It is alright though because it no longer seems important, it is like someone who pointed out a piece of food on someone's face
Searcher08 wrote:
seemslikeadream » Mon Jun 23, 2014 9:00 am wrote:we don't need nannies here...
seemslikeadream » Mon Jun 23, 2014 10:00 am wrote:we don't need nannies here....we don't need a member here all by himself deciding what should be censored at RI ...and that is EXACTLY what has happened....in all my years here there has been only one member that has successfully been able to censor discussion ...couple that with the nannies here....Houston we have a problem ...when I can not post an article from DissidentVoice ...there is a problem...period
and it's just not crazy conspiracy theories
JackRiddler » Mon Jun 23, 2014 9:03 am wrote:seemslikeadream » Mon Jun 23, 2014 9:00 am wrote:we don't need nannies here...
Sorry if you've confused discussion on a discussion board with "nannies." Maybe you'd feel better with a blog where you have comments off, so that no one will ever point out a problem with anything you post ever again?
JackRiddler » Mon Jun 23, 2014 1:53 pm wrote:Searcher08 wrote:
Brazil shows real bombs actually killing people.
Do you get extra points for preemptive appropriation of a fictional clip that doesn't support what you're saying?
JackRiddler » Mon Jun 23, 2014 1:53 pm wrote:Don't forget to seize Orwell and Jesus for whatever you stand for. Those always work.
seemslikeadream » Mon Jun 23, 2014 2:10 pm wrote:JackRiddler » Mon Jun 23, 2014 9:03 am wrote:seemslikeadream » Mon Jun 23, 2014 9:00 am wrote:we don't need nannies here...
Sorry if you've confused discussion on a discussion board with "nannies." Maybe you'd feel better with a blog where you have comments off, so that no one will ever point out a problem with anything you post ever again?
the only thing I'm confused about Jack is just when you are leaving
Hunter » Mon Jun 23, 2014 2:05 pm wrote:seemslikeadream » Mon Jun 23, 2014 10:00 am wrote:we don't need nannies here....we don't need a member here all by himself deciding what should be censored at RI ...and that is EXACTLY what has happened....in all my years here there has been only one member that has successfully been able to censor discussion ...couple that with the nannies here....Houston we have a problem ...when I can not post an article from DissidentVoice ...there is a problem...period
and it's just not crazy conspiracy theories
While I agree with you in spirit we also have rules against people posting holocaust denial shit and no planes crap, and for good reason. I bet dollars to donuts if Jeff were still active, the crisis actor shit would be added to that list in very short order.
JackRiddler » Mon Jun 23, 2014 9:03 am wrote:seemslikeadream » Mon Jun 23, 2014 9:00 am wrote:we don't need nannies here...
Sorry if you've confused discussion on a discussion board with "nannies." Maybe you'd feel better with a blog where you have comments off, so that no one will ever point out a problem with anything you post ever again?
Re: The Hum.
Postby elfismiles » Sat Jun 21, 2014 8:57 am
Wow, still reading but very good article here:
A Mysterious Sound Is Driving People Insane — And Nobody Knows What's Causing It
By Jared Keller June 19, 2014
http://mic.com/articles/91091/a-mysteri ... causing-it
But the bit that just sent the article in a different direction...
This a pressing public health issue. It is not just some casual annoyance, claims Kohlhase. The resulting infrasonic sounds blanketing the region could result in widespread vibroacoustic disease — an occupational disease occurring from long-term exposure to large pressure amplitude and low frequency noise — the symptoms of which include those often described by Hum suffers: depression, mood swings, insomnia and other stress-induced pathologies.
The Hum may transition from unexplained mystery to unfortunate byproduct of modernity, a fixture of human geography like light pollution.
State and local governments may finally be paying attention. Worried about the potential behavioral effects of the Connecticut Hum, Kohlhase dispatched concerned emails to state and local health officials laying out his research. Kohlhase was so persistent that he contacted Connecticut State Police investigators almost six weeks after the shooting at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Connecticut, insisting that the Hum allegedly produced by nearby gas pipelines could have had something to do with Adam Lanza's behavior leading up to the shooting. While law enforcement officials field a flood of calls from conspiracy theorists and pranksters following any major incident, investigators deemed the information Kohlhase provided "appropriate" for inclusion in the 7,000 images, audio files, videos and documents released to the public.
"The reason that it could've affected Lanza is that sound and vibrations can have extremely subtle, detrimental affects on someone who's fragile minded," explains Kohlhase. "Imagine if you're mentally ill or have a brain tumor or are just, well, fragile of mind. I am absolutely not an expert, but if sound sensitivity is such a serious issue to those on the autism spectrum, perhaps extremely low frequency sounds can result in a pernicious effect." Kohlhase points to Aaron Alexis, the defense subcontractor who battled mental health issues and scrawled "My ELF Weapon" into the stock of his shotgun before killing 12 people at the Washington Navy Yard in 2013. "He told his psychiatrist he'd been chased by vibrations. Look at a map of instances like this, in Washington, or the Gabby Giffords shooting in Arizona, and I bet you'll see that each place coincides with a Hum cluster."
Here is the fundamental problem facing Hum sufferers around the world: believability. Scientific data and anecdotal experiences of the Hum vary so much from region the world that it's still unclear whether VLF and ELF waves are the source of it, let alone a catalyst for mass murder. The idea of a mysterious noise driving people to suicide has given birth to all kinds of pseudoscientific conjecture, making the phenomenon a favorite for conspiracy junkies who suspect foul play by some malicious government scheme (or UFOs, obviously). The World Hum, a site devoted to exploring the "mysterious phenomenon being heard by thousands around the world," is riddled with byzantine entries about UFOs crashing in Siberia.
MacPherson knows how insane it sounds. "There's a terrible irony to the vision of a conspiracy nut in a tinfoil hat, trying to keep the government from beaming thoughts into their heads," laughs MacPhearson, "since aluminum does protect against some electromagnetic radiation. This is why you don't put that stuff in the microwave."
http://mic.com/articles/91091/a-mysteri ... ign=social
JackRiddler » Mon Jun 23, 2014 9:03 am wrote:seemslikeadream » Mon Jun 23, 2014 9:00 am wrote:we don't need nannies here...
Sorry if you've confused discussion on a discussion board with "nannies." Maybe you'd feel better with a blog where you have comments off, so that no one will ever point out a problem with anything you post ever again?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 150 guests