Redpill Right?

Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff

Re: Redpill Right?

Postby justdrew » Mon Nov 30, 2015 12:14 am

Wombaticus Rex » 29 Nov 2015 17:43 wrote:
Iamwhomiam » Sun Nov 29, 2015 8:23 pm wrote:Eh? Ever hear of the Republican Party?


Equally sarcastically: Ever hear of Donald Trump?

Working class is the key distinction here. I see this reflex a lot in my personal life, since I have family and friends on the activist fringes of so many "sides" of our kayfabe culture...but here's the jig: Twelve out of twelve months, leftist - and especially "liberal" Democrat - discourse will recycle the Lumpenproleteriat False Consciousness cop-out ... that working class white people vote Republican "against their own self-interest."

It's either true or it is not.

Either the GOP is the party of crazy, reactionary poor white people, or it's actually a sick, century-old psy-op whereby smart, cynical wealthy elites play reactionary poor white people like a motherfucking muppet, for fun and profit.

You know, like the DNC.


hmm. I wasn't aware the DNC was getting much play with "reactionary poor white people," except as a muppet to be painted with whatever bullshit "other" narrative the gop wants to roll out in any given season.

also, it ^, could be BOTH, some crazies are smart, cynical and even occasionally wealthy.
By 1964 there were 1.5 million mobile phone users in the US
User avatar
justdrew
 
Posts: 11966
Joined: Tue May 24, 2005 7:57 pm
Location: unknown
Blog: View Blog (11)

Re: Redpill Right?

Postby General Patton » Mon Nov 30, 2015 12:27 am

If by crazies you mean wealthy GOP donors, they legitimately have no clue how much the working class, including white ones, have come to despise them. The donor class is very focused on a small subset of issues that do not effect the broader voting public. I haven't met them all, but the ones I have met are legit clueless. And the consultants they hire aren't bringing much to the table besides an inflated ego (see: Rick Wilson, Liz Mair).
штрафбат вперед
User avatar
General Patton
 
Posts: 959
Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 11:57 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Redpill Right?

Postby tapitsbo » Mon Nov 30, 2015 10:19 am

What does it mean that I find myself agreeing with much of what General Patton AND Luther Blisset are saying in a thread like this?
tapitsbo
 
Posts: 1824
Joined: Wed Jun 12, 2013 6:58 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Redpill Right?

Postby Wombaticus Rex » Mon Nov 30, 2015 11:06 am

tapitsbo » Mon Nov 30, 2015 9:19 am wrote:What does it mean that I find myself agreeing with much of what General Patton AND Luther Blisset are saying in a thread like this?


Basically, that the constellation of wedges and magnets -- triggers and narratives -- which has shaped US politics since the Reagan Era is now collapsing under the weight of reality. Both major parties have bled out a plurality which now respresents a majority of US citizens.

And we will get fooled again.

Just not by the same product lines.
User avatar
Wombaticus Rex
 
Posts: 10896
Joined: Wed Nov 08, 2006 6:33 pm
Location: Vermontistan
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Redpill Right?

Postby Luther Blissett » Thu Mar 10, 2016 3:46 pm

It's delightful to me that the two creators of the myth from which redpillers draw their name are trans women.

There was a tweet today to that effect, but I can no longer find it, and I felt like stealing the sentiment anyway.
The Rich and the Corporate remain in their hundred-year fever visions of Bolsheviks taking their stuff - JackRiddler
User avatar
Luther Blissett
 
Posts: 4994
Joined: Fri Jan 02, 2009 1:31 pm
Location: Philadelphia
Blog: View Blog (0)
Previous

Return to General Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 155 guests