Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff
by DrEvil » Thu Jan 02, 2025 7:20 pm
by Grizzly » Sat Jan 04, 2025 6:25 pm
by Belligerent Savant » Mon Jan 06, 2025 9:21 pm
The COVID “vaccines” damage the brain and DEVASTATE mental health, as confirmed by a recent wave of eye-opening studies.
The shots increase your risk of:
1. Ischemic stroke (+44%)
2. Hemorrhagic stroke (+50%)
3. Transient ischemic attack (+67%)
4. Myelitis (+165%)
5. Myasthenia gravis (+71%)
6. Alzheimer’s (+22.5%)
7. Cognitive impairment (+137.7%)
8. Depression (+68.3%)
9. Anxiety disorders (+43.9%)
10. Sleep disorders (+93.4%)
Epidemiologist Nicolas Hulscher writes, “The most probable mechanism behind this damage is likely toxic Spike protein accumulation and persistence in the skull-meninges-brain axis, as evidenced by Rong et al., Morz and Mikami et al., and over 300 other studies, which can be found in the Spike Protein Pathogenicity Research Library.”
“Using mRNA to hijack cells in various organ systems to produce a highly toxic [spike] protein that persists in the body for months to years was one of the worst ideas in human history,” Hulscher says.
...
COVID-19 mRNA Injections Dose-Dependently Increase Risk of SARS-CoV-2 Infection by Up to 121%
Risk by Number of Vaccine Doses:
1–2 Doses: Adjusted OR = 1.63 (95% CI: 1.08–2.46)
→ This corresponds to a 63% increased odds of COVID-19 infection compared to unvaccinated individuals.
3–4 Doses: Adjusted OR = 2.04 (95% CI: 1.35–3.08)
→ This corresponds to a 104% increased odds of COVID-19 infection compared to unvaccinated individuals.
5–7 Doses: Adjusted OR = 2.21 (95% CI: 1.07–4.56)
→ This corresponds to a 121% increased odds of COVID-19 infection compared to unvaccinated individuals.
.
https://petermcculloughmd.substack.com/ ... injections
by stickdog99 » Mon Jan 06, 2025 10:53 pm
by Belligerent Savant » Mon Jan 13, 2025 4:28 pm
The largest COVID-19 'vaccine' safety study ever conducted, involving 99 million 'vaccinated' individuals, confirmed that the injections are NOT SAFE. They dramatically increased the risks of:
1. Up to a 610% increased risk of myocarditis following mRNA platform injection.
2. 378% increased risk of acute disseminated encephalomyelitis (ADEM) following mRNA injection.
3. 323% increased risk of cerebral venous sinus thrombosis (CVST) following viral-vector injection.
4. 249% increased risk of Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) following viral-vector injection.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38350768/
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/a ... 0X24001270
by Grizzly » Tue Jan 14, 2025 8:53 pm
by Grizzly » Wed Jan 15, 2025 10:08 pm
by BenDhyan » Fri Jan 24, 2025 12:41 am
https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2025/1/24/united-nations-confirms-us-will-leave-world-health-organization-in-2026?traffic_source=rss
United Nations confirms US will leave World Health Organization in 2026
The United States is set to officially withdraw from the World Health Organization (WHO) in January 2026 after the UN body received a formal letter from US President Donald Trump this week.
UN deputy spokesperson Farhan Haq said on Thursday that the withdrawal was now set in motion after Trump pledged on Monday – his first day in office – to withdraw the US from the WHO and to put an end to future funding of the organisation.
“I can confirm we have now received the US letter on the WHO withdrawal. It is dated 22 January 2025. It would take effect a year from yesterday, on 22 January 2026,” Haq said.
Trump also ordered Secretary of State Marco Rubio and the director of the US government’s Office of Management and Budget to “pause the future transfer of any United States Government funds, supports, or resources to the WHO”.
Washington has recalled all US government personnel working with the WHO and ordered them to cease participating in negotiations on a WHO-led global treaty on dealing with pandemics.
With the departure of the US, the WHO will lose its most important financial backer.
The US contributes about 18 percent of the organisation’s funding, which amounted to about $261m between 2024 and 2025. That contribution is followed in second place by China at $181m. The WHO’s loss of its top donor will impact the global health agency’s ability to address major crises from tuberculosis to HIV/AIDS and global pandemics, according to experts.
Trump had accused the WHO of mishandling the COVID-19 pandemic during his first term in office and had sent a request to withdraw from the organisation in July 2020.
That withdrawal attempt was thwarted when Trump lost the 2020 presidential election to Joe Biden, who immediately withdrew the order once in office.
Many health experts have accused Trump and his administration of botching the US’s response to the COVID-19 pandemic, which claimed the lives of hundreds of thousands of Americans.
On Tuesday, the WHO issued a statement saying it regretted the announced departure of the US and pointed out that its work “plays a crucial role in protecting the health and security of the world’s people, including Americans”.
“We hope the United States will reconsider and we look forward to engaging in constructive dialogue to maintain the partnership between the USA and WHO, for the benefit of the health and wellbeing of millions of people around the globe,” the WHO said.
The US joined the WHO in 1948 through joint resolutions from both Congressional houses, which leaves a question mark over whether Trump can unilaterally pull US membership without congressional approval, according to Jean Galbraith, a professor at the University of Pennsylvania Law School.
Trump’s Republican party controls both the US Senate and House of Representatives, but the withdrawal could still be challenged in court, legal experts said. “Trump made a unilateral decision to pull out of WHO. But we joined WHO in 1948 by an act of Congress. Trump needs Congress’ approval to withdraw,” Lawrence Gostin, director of the O’Neill Institute for National and Global Health Law at Georgetown University, wrote on social media.
“His decision is too catastrophic to be made without Congress and the courts. As director of a WHO Center, I am considering a lawsuit,” Gostin said.
by liminalOyster » Sun Jan 26, 2025 12:27 am
CIA assesses lab leak most plausible source of Covid-19, though with low confidence
By Katie Bo Lillis, CNN
Updated 4:43 PM EST, Sat January 25, 2025
The CIA now assesses the virus that causes Covid-19 more likely originated from an accidental lab leak in China, rather than occurring naturally, according to a statement from the agency Saturday, just days after Director John Ratcliffe took the reins.
The agency has for years said it did not have enough information to determine which origin theory was more likely — and its new assessment is only a “low confidence” judgment. It still deems that a natural-origin scenario remains possible.
But the determination to declassify and make that assessment public represents one of the first major moves by Ratcliffe, who has long favored the theory that the pandemic originated from research being done in China and vowed in an interview published in Breitbart on Thursday that he would make the issue a Day 1 priority.
“I’ve been on record as you know in saying I think our intelligence, our science, and our common sense all really dictates that the origins of COVID was a leak at the Wuhan Institute of Virology,” Ratcliffe told Breitbart. “But the CIA has not made that assessment or at least not made that assessment publicly. So I’m going to focus on that and look at the intelligence and make sure that the public is aware that the agency is going to get off the sidelines.”
A US official emphasized the new assessment predates the Trump administration. The agency’s director under former President Joe Biden, Bill Burns, had pushed analysts to take a position on the origins of the pandemic, and this assessment was made and published within the US government before Donald Trump took office Monday, the official said.
It was not made based on new intelligence gathered by the US government — officials have long said such intelligence is unlikely to surface so many years later — and instead was reached after a review of existing information.
“CIA continues to assess that both research-related and natural origin scenarios of the COVID-19 pandemic remain plausible,” a CIA spokesperson said in a statement Saturday.
“We have low confidence in this judgement and will continue to evaluate any available credible new intelligence reporting or open-source information that could change CIA’s assessment.”
Every US intelligence agency still unanimously maintains that Covid-19 was not developed as a biological weapon, but there remains no consensus as to the virus’s origins, according to a report issued by the Office of the Director of Intelligence in 2023.
And almost all American intelligence agencies also assess that the virus itself was not genetically engineered, the report states.
But the intelligence community has been unable to determine with high confidence whether the pandemic originated from a lab leak or occurred in the wild, and has remained divided on that question.
Many scientists believe the virus occurred naturally in animals and spread to humans in an outbreak at a market in Wuhan, China. Proponents of the “lab leak theory,” meanwhile, believe the virus occurred as a result of work in a Chinese lab, the Wuhan Institute of Virology.
The theory, which has been the subject of much focus by Republican lawmakers, was embraced by Trump in his first term. The State Department under Trump launched an effort to prove the virus originated in a Chinese lab, but it was shut down by Biden’s administration.
This story has been updated with additional information.
by Belligerent Savant » Sun Jan 26, 2025 11:24 pm
@NickHudsonCT
This is the playbook. With no requirement to maintain Fauci’s popularity they can change to the other side of the false dichotomy, which also just happens to validate the pandemic preparedness agenda. How many gullible nitwits will fall for this? Many, many, many.@shellenberger
The CIA now agrees with other intel agencies that Covid came from China. Finally. Incredible it took the election of Trump for the truth to come out. We reported 18 months ago that the patients zero worked in the Wuhan lab. Now let's get truth on Russiagate, laptop, JFK & UAPs.
@TonyMar68854421
Whether you think sars-cov2 exists or not this tweet is still relevant in understanding that a pathogen was circulating in 2019, yet excess mortality was in most jurisdictions lower than 5yr average until interventions were introduced after WHO announcement on 11 March, 2020@TonyMar68854421
PROOF virus has been in circulation since at least Sept 2019 yet the panic & hysteria only began after “discovery” in China. RT
Evidence of early circulation of SARS-CoV-2 in France: findings from the population-based “CONSTANCES” cohort | SpringerLink
https://link.springer.com/article/10.10 ... 20-00716-2Evidence of early circulation of SARS-CoV-2 in France: findings from the population-based “CONSTANCES” cohort
Published: 06 February 2021
Using serum samples routinely collected in 9144 adults from a French general population-based cohort, we identified 353 participants with a positive anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG test, among whom 13 were sampled between November 2019 and January 2020 and were confirmed by neutralizing antibodies testing. Investigations in 11 of these participants revealed experience of symptoms possibly related to a SARS-CoV-2 infection or situations at risk of potential SARS-CoV-2 exposure. This suggests early circulation of SARS-CoV-2 in Europe.
Feb 20, 2021
Dec 15, 2021
by Grizzly » Tue Jan 28, 2025 10:18 pm
by Belligerent Savant » Fri Jan 31, 2025 12:09 pm
Belligerent Savant » Fri Jan 31, 2025 11:08 am wrote:.
Also, a side-note that needs to be added here, as I will no longer simply let it slide:
Elvis typed:You lack the imagination to create a better world.
YOU, and many like you, failed the fucking litmus test -- BIG TIME -- during 2020 - ~2022. We were put to the test. Draconian, overtly fascist/totalitarian measures were pushed on populations. MASS NON-COMPLIANCE/CIVIL DISOBEDIENCE WOULD HAVE PREVENTED IT.
Instead, those of your ilk took the COWARDLY/COMPLIANT/COMPLICIT route, blindly subscribing to questionable narratives, dutifully complying in affronts, and COWARDLY going along with otherizing/segregations of fellow citizens based on their personal health choices. SHAME to you and all those that acted in this way and NOW (again, in an act of cowardice) avoid taking ownership of it or otherwise attempt to brush it aside as, "They -- Authority -- were just doing what they thought was best at the time" BS rhetoric.
I lost a job (though fortunately I regained another one without 'skipping a beat'; many others were not as fortunate). My better-half lost a job as well. All due to mandates. I spoke out at school board meetings, repeatedly, against masking children, and also against the attempts to force harmful (or not: doesn't matter) products on kids. All while many that claim to support "justice" and "citizen rights" kept themselves muzzled -- literally and figuratively -- as they pointed fingers at those that (bravely) refused to comply despite IMMENSE social pressure to submit.
You have NO place to speak about "imagination to create a better world". Get the fuck out of here with such delusions.
Keep allowing yourself to be misdirected; one of many examples for how the controls are kept on us.
by Harvey » Fri Jan 31, 2025 7:11 pm
by Grizzly » Fri Jan 31, 2025 10:05 pm
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 173 guests
