Jersey investigation into child abuse

Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff

Postby blanc » Sat Aug 02, 2008 5:04 am

FWIW pepsified this analysis is pretty close to what I believe to be the process or reason for abuse by people who are wealthy enough to have pretty much anything they want, and those who are comfortably wealthy enough to have very decent lives; then criminals supply, factions within govt utilise.
I also think its no good trying to think yourself into the motivation, to understand by the normal empathetic processes. A choice has been made, its not most people's.
blanc
 
Posts: 1946
Joined: Sun Feb 05, 2006 4:00 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby Stephen Morgan » Sat Aug 02, 2008 5:30 am

Yes, they're perverts who enjoy it. And yes, it's an initiation, like a mafioso performing a hit to become a made man. And yes, there's the binding-through-common-guilt, the blood cement as the Germans call it.

But don't neglect the mystical aspects. The left hand path of Tantra is all about breaking taboos to free yourself from the mental shackles of the human herd. Those who wish to own the herd rather than run with it would naturally try to break free of the taboos of normal people and put themselves in opposition to civilised society. Raping and murdering children is the ultimate taboo breaking in modern society. That, they believe, gives them access to their suppressed mental powers.
Those who dream by night in the dusty recesses of their minds wake in the day to find that all was vanity; but the dreamers of the day are dangerous men, for they may act their dream with open eyes, and make it possible. -- Lawrence of Arabia
User avatar
Stephen Morgan
 
Posts: 3736
Joined: Thu Apr 19, 2007 6:37 am
Location: England
Blog: View Blog (9)

human

Postby hava1 » Sat Aug 02, 2008 6:00 am

Nikitacat (quite a name....a bit triggering, my perps called me nikita at some point after the movie went out) hi.

My take on "why" is that probably this is one of the wide range of human behaviors which is more common than people would like to think. I am sent back to the scriptures, as a historical-anthro source, and discover that ritual abuse was very common, we are talking about 2-3-4 millenia back, not such a long time. Same goes for the roman empire (Robert graves is nice illustration of those times). I think that the 20th century was a bit confusing and misleading in terms of what we are led to think about society and practices.Apparently, genocide, ritual abuse, human sacrifice, common theft, etc. are the norm and there was an optimistic (denial) trend, aided by the mass media which is a fairly new phenomenon. We get our info on society from unreliable sources. Looking at art, paintings, literature we see a change towards unrealistic description of life and the human mind and society.

My present time summation of this experience (re my own life story) is that the level of collusion is immense, and I don't anymore attribute innocence or ignorance to most people. Perhaps they don't know everything (they don't want to), but the get the sense of what is happening in the dark corners and they condone by silence and by silencing actively, because there's a huge benefit to the multitudes from these rituals and crimes. I see it as an "economy" of suffering and exploitation. People benefit from an intense, secretive, over exploitation of a relatively few number of victims, and they know instinctively that its like income tax, if it is going to be allocated justly, they will have to pitch in their share. I think same goes for slavery, its a very tempting and convenient arrangement for the larger part of the group.

Ritual abuse is basically, throwing to the fire a few helpless creature who take on a lot more than they should, eventually, usually they are totally consumed and "eaten" so to speak. Therefore, its on the spectrum of slavery and prostitution, namely, who takes on the burden of the "poison" in society, the "dirty work".

The involvement of intel/gov is an extension of the same principle, with the gov in the role of "group representatives" and the intel as a form of elite but also a form of "keepers of the inner secrets".

Much like economy, it becomes very hard to change the order, and make it more egalitarian, or "just". I also think the business of WAR takes after the same principles. Its ganging up on neighboring collective, mostly looting, to make a short cut and resolve economic and political tensions within the offensive party (the aggressor). The mental or cultural justifications are a matter of style, but basically those who "break the taboos" are acting on behalf of a collective will, to discharge "shaddows" to act out aggression etc.

Rtual abuse in Israel, involving intel/arms industry/politicians is, IMHO, done under a consensus. ONce the people find a different way, or they find it to be exaggerated, or counter productive, they will make it stop. One has to appeal to interest, not to ethics IMHO, again. I think that this might be shocking, but I see many validations. One, for instance is the lack of serious police work (universally) into these cases. The very very very nominal compensation awarded to recognized victims, etc.

Our civilization was founded on the notion that the gods need human sacriifice to be appeased, and this has not changed much, but I would say it is a social creation and reflects our human society. Practically, its advisale to find a nicer "job" within a group, if possible, and/or change the location/group.
hava1
 
Posts: 1141
Joined: Tue Sep 12, 2006 1:07 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby blanc » Sat Aug 02, 2008 1:58 pm

picking out just one small phrase from the post above, re the paucity of police work. in the jersey case, we see that testimony plus physical evidence (remains of five children) is not considered enough for a murder prosecution. testimony I'm aware of has been unsupported by physical remains primarily because no resources to obtain those physical proofs have been made available. this is the norm. in one case the police response was a mind boggling assumption, that searching for such proofs was unlikely to provide evidence for prosecution. this response I have in writing.
that persons can bring complaints of serious crimes including murder and have them ignored is a significant pointer to the state of our society, which basks in a self congratulatory image of democracy and justice - interdependent elements btw, no justice equals no democracy.
collusion is a strong term to use for the willing wearing of blinkers, peeping under them occasionally and deciding one can't believe one's eyes.
blanc
 
Posts: 1946
Joined: Sun Feb 05, 2006 4:00 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby winston smith » Thu Aug 14, 2008 5:15 am

User avatar
winston smith
 
Posts: 98
Joined: Tue Oct 02, 2007 8:45 am
Location: Uk
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby winston smith » Thu Aug 14, 2008 6:02 am

Syvrets blog is informative.

http://stuartsyvret.blogspot.com/

As can be seen by reading my last posting, the established facts are these:.....................2: The final exposure of a vast catalogue of abuse will, obviously, lead to both criminal and civil legal cases.


I hope Im wrong and hes right.
User avatar
winston smith
 
Posts: 98
Joined: Tue Oct 02, 2007 8:45 am
Location: Uk
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby chillin » Wed Nov 12, 2008 10:20 am

Jersey police chief admits there were no child murders at home - just ancient bones

Philippe Naughton

The two police officers now in charge of the long-running Jersey child abuse probe definitively ruled out claims of murder today and revealed that suspicious bone fragments found under a former children's home could have dated from the 15th century.

In his first briefing in charge, David Warcup, the island's new deputy chief officer, expressed "much regret" at inaccurate information given out by his predecessor. He said that Lenny Harper had been wrong to suggest that youngsters might have been murdered and dismembered at the Haut de la Garenne hostel.

"There is no suggestion there has been murder or any bodies destroyed," Mr Warcup said.

Mr Warcup added: "It is very unfortunate and I have much regret that information has been given by police that was not strictly accurate."

His colleague Detective Superintendent Michael Gradwell, who took over day-to-day control of the inquiry when Mr Harper retired in August, went on to discredit many of the findings announced since the operation went public in February.

Mr Gradwell said that the belief that forensic teams had uncovered secret underground chambers which some victims referred to as punishment rooms where they were kept in solitary confinement, drugged, beaten and raped was "wrong". They were "just cellars".

Referring to metal found in the cellar which detectives had thought might have been used as shackles, he said: "There was no evidence or indication to suggest this is anything suspicious...What we are saying today is that this is just rusty metal."

He said that the bones, which had been taken of evidence of murder at the children's home, dated "from 1470 to 1670" – well before the building was built.

Mr Gradwell, who in his previous job with Lancashire Police led the investigation into the death of 19 Chinese cockle-pickers at Morecambe Bay, added: "The purpose of today is to say there is a child abuse inquiry but in terms of Haut de la Garenne, there was no murder."

He also shied away from apportioning blame to Mr Harper, adding: "I am not judge, juror or executioner – I am not looking to apportion blame."

But the officers' statements are likely to prove highly controversial on the island, where campaigners have called on the UK Government to intervene and set up a homicide inquiry.

Senator Stuart Syvret, a former minister for health and social services, had claimed earlier that that officers were trying to "rubbish" Mr Harper’s work by denying any children were murdered.

He said that the press conference was being held "to attempt to smear and rubbish the work of Lenny Harper and thus attempt to justify the dismissal and abandoning of certain aspects of the Haute de la Garenne investigation, including the possibility of child deaths having occurred there, and certain of the more serious abuse claims".

Mr Harper, who is now living in Ayrshire, Scotland, has defended himself. He told the Daily Telegraph: "I have been saying for some time that the most likely outcome was that it would be impossible to date the bones accurately and so there would not be enough evidence to launch a homicide investigation.

"When we found bone fragments and teeth in a home where we were investigating alleged abuse, what did people expect us to do? Ignore it? You won’t find any police force in the country which would have kept that quiet."

So far three people have been charged and are awaiting trial in the abuse inquiry.

The investigation was launched in 2006 but scandal surrounding the home, which has been used as a youth hostel in recent years, emerged in February when officer discovered what was initially thought to be part of a child's skull. Following that find, scores of people came forward claiming to have been drugged, raped and beaten at the home between the early 1960s and 1986.

The press conference was shown pictures of the item discovered in February and Mr Gradwell confirmed that it bore no relation to claims of child abuse because it dated back to the Victorian era and was more likely to be a coconut.


http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/u ... 137143.ece
chillin
 
Posts: 596
Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2005 8:56 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby Gouda » Wed Nov 12, 2008 4:28 pm

chillin, just saw your post after I'd started a new thread on this latest development. Moderators, better for me to merge here and delete the new thread?
User avatar
Gouda
 
Posts: 3009
Joined: Tue Sep 13, 2005 1:53 am
Location: a circular mould
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby winston smith » Wed Dec 10, 2008 7:39 am

User avatar
winston smith
 
Posts: 98
Joined: Tue Oct 02, 2007 8:45 am
Location: Uk
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby RocketMan » Wed Dec 10, 2008 6:50 pm

This is just like the McMartin case, except in extreme slow motion. And with shards of physical evidence. Did the previous head investigator retire at the normal age? I also wonder how the successor was picked and from where.

It must be insulting beyond imagination to all those brave alleged victims who have come out about this issue even now, years after.

There's also the pesky issue of that one perv with a penchant for the satanic who came and went seemingly freely around the premises at one time.

Any recent news on Haut-de-la-Garenne, anyone?
-I don't like hoodlums.
-That's just a word, Marlowe. We have that kind of world. Two wars gave it to us and we are going to keep it.
User avatar
RocketMan
 
Posts: 2813
Joined: Mon Mar 10, 2008 7:02 am
Location: By the rivers dark
Blog: View Blog (0)

Home to something evil

Postby American Dream » Sun Mar 15, 2009 3:37 pm

http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/2009/ ... la-garenne

Home to something evil
What really happened at Haut de la Garenne, the children's home at the centre of the Jersey care scandal last year? Cathy Scott-Clark and Adrian Levy report on a building that still houses some very dark secrets
Cathy Scott-Clark
The Guardian, Saturday 14 March 2009


How Jersey's tourism bosses must have lamented the marketing slogan they chose last year: "Small enough to really get to know, yet still big enough to surprise."

It was supposed to mark a campaign to rejuvenate the holiday business.

Instead, it served to highlight a child abuse scandal that erupted on the island.

The story had first trickled out in November 2007, gaining almost no press attention. Following a covert police inquiry into allegations of mistreatment in the island's care homes, police and the NSPCC in London had appealed to former residents to come forward. By January 2008, hundreds were said to have made contact, reporting physical and sexual abuse, mostly at Haut de la Garenne, a grim, Victorian industrial school that had, until the mid-80s, served as Jersey's main children's home. Soon, Jersey was in the grip of one of the largest police child abuse inquiries seen anywhere in Britain.

How would the tiny island and its 88,000 residents hold up? They pride themselves on their traditionalism (the pound note survives here) and an independent spirit that locals refer to as the Jersey Way. The mantra, reflecting a closed community that knows how to look after itself, is credited with transforming the place from a bourgeois bucket-and-spade resort in the 50s into the oyster-shucking tax haven it is today. So potent is the lure of the island's low-tax, non-intrusive regime that the level of wealth required of prospective settlers has risen to stratospheric levels: only those who can pay a residency fee of about £1m and show assets in excess of £20m need apply. The lucky few include racing driver Nigel Mansell, golfer Ian Woosnam, broadcaster Alan Whicker and writer Jack Higgins, as well as hundreds of reclusive tycoons, who have made the island the third richest compact community in the world, after Bermuda and Luxembourg.

And then February 2008 arrived like a fist in the face. All anyone on the outside looking in could talk about was paedophiles. Then Jersey police announced they were investigating murder as well as complaints of physical and sexual abuse: witnesses said they recalled seeing the corpses of children at Haut de la Garenne; others claimed to have found bones buried beneath the foundations.

What made it worse for those on the inside was that the crisis had been started by an outsider, a Northern Irish copper called Lenny Harper, second-in-command of the island's police force, and the antithesis of the Jersey Way. Instead of managing bad news, Harper had teams of forensics specialists excavating for it. Every day, sitting on a granite wall outside the home, Harper regaled the world's press with stories that "something evil" had happened there - Haut de la Garenne had been a virtual charnel house. The first find was a sliver of human skull on 23 February. As the investigation progressed, the supposed tally rose to "six or more" bodies buried beneath the home.

By August last year, Harper had retired, to be replaced by a new policeman from the British mainland. More experienced than Harper, detective superintendent Mick Gradwell was a veteran whose cases included the deaths of 23 Chinese cockle-pickers at Morecambe Bay in 2004.

At his first press conference, on 12 November, Gladwell stunned reporters with his findings: "There were no bodies, no dead children, no credible allegations of murder and no suspects for murder." Only three bone fragments could be definitely said to be human, he said - and they dated from the 14th to 17th centuries. Newspapers ran gleeful headlines: "Lenny Harper lost the plot." By the time we arrived on Jersey in February 2009, a year after the digging had begun, it was as if Harper and his inquiry had never existed.

The Jersey establishment was triumphant. One of the island's most senior social workers expressed a view we were to hear many times: "I'm not saying all the former children's home residents are liars but some have misremembered," he said. "Some have embellished and a small number have been telling porkies to get money." Nothing was wrong with the island. Jersey was off the hook. It was all a cock-up.

Nothing could be further from the truth.

Among the thousands of statements that still line the shelves of Harper's old incident room, and in the testimony of former residents and workers at Haut de la Garenne and other institutions across Jersey, many of whom we tracked down and interviewed, harrowing stories are buried.

Over a period of three decades, residents of the care homes made repeated complaints that they were being sexually and physically abused. A series of damning reports was produced, following confidential inquiries into these institutions, most of which went unheeded. Few prosecutions ensued.

It is true to say there were no corpses. However, the testimony provides compelling evidence of a catastrophic failure within Jersey's children's services that ran a regime so punitive, they preferred to lock up problem children en masse than deal with them in their own homes: four times more children, proportionately, are imprisoned in Jersey than in its nearest neighbour, France. And what happened to them once in care was something that Harper's team, had they not been distracted by murder plots, came close to exposing.

Harper clashed with the Jersey Way as soon as he was appointed head of police operations in 2002. A career officer, he had been office-bound for a few years and on Jersey he wanted to get back to real policing. Summing him up, one former Jersey colleague told us that Harper "was a bit of a pit bull" who found himself on a small island where discretion and subtlety were valued above all else. Early attempts at making his mark, including a clear-out of illegally held weapons and a curtailment of the often cosy relationship between local police and businessmen, made him instant enemies. Harper, who now lives in Ayrshire, told us: "I started getting death threats. But I'd been on the streets of Northern Ireland."

His most significant problem was recognising the limits of his power. Jerseymen trace their ancestry back to the medieval Dukedom of Normandy and a feudal culture survives. The island is divided into 12 parishes, each governed by a connétable or head constable, who between them raise a private volunteer police force, the Honorary Constabulary. It might sound like a toytown operation, but these so-called "hobby bobbies" form a network of neighbours, friends and relatives licensed to arrest and charge fellow islanders through powers vested in them by the 500-year-old States Assembly.

The assembly - made up of the connétables, their deputies and 12 elected senators, many of them multimillionaires - is supervised by the bailiff, Jersey's highest officer, who is appointed by the Queen, while the task of upholding the law and keeping the hobby bobbies in check falls to the attorney general. These two key posts are currently held by brothers, Sir Philip and William Bailhache, members of one of the oldest and most powerful families on Jersey. At the bottom of the heap are the 240 officers of the States of Jersey Police, imposed on the island in the 50s but even today requiring attorney general Bailhache's approval to charge anyone with anything more serious than a traffic citation.

It was a system that frustrated newcomer Lenny Harper, until he found an ally inside the attorney general's office. This was a mainlander who similarly mistrusted the Jersey Way and told Harper of a "web of child abusers" who he claimed all knew each other. He also alleged the attorney general's office appeared reluctant to prosecute. When we put this to William Bailhache, he replied that Harper had repeatedly suggested his office was "soft" on child abuse - this is untrue, he says, and so is the suggestion that he was reluctant to prosecute. "I have signed many indictments for people charged with child abuse offences, some of them historic. Several cases have resulted in substantial sentences of imprisonment."

Harper recalls: "I was cautious at first. The allegations reached into many worthy organisations, including the Sea Cadets and the St John Ambulance, and there were whispers about establishment men. One name that kept cropping up was Paul Every, a commanding officer in the island's Sea Cadets." Every had also served as a senior civil servant.

Harper dug around, discovering that Every's name had surfaced in connection with child porn offences during Operation Ore in 1999. In late 2004, Harper applied for a warrant to search the Sea Cadets' HQ. He was refused. Harper then contacted the Jersey Sea Cadets directly: "They completely ignored me and refused to sack Every." When the States Assembly, too, declined to act, and Harper received a message from the attorney general's office that it was reluctant to prosecute, Harper began to suspect a cover-up. He says, "What made things more fraught was that some of my own officers were in the Sea Cadets." (On this case, the attorney general comments: "It is absolutely not the case that I decided not to prosecute Every. It is true that one of my officials wrongly gave Mr Harper that impression.")

Harper pressed on, and in January 2005 had Every arrested and his home computer seized. On it, police recovered a cache of child porn and evidence that Every had scoured the internet for "naked sea cadets". Still unable to persuade the local Sea Cadets to act, Harper wrote in August 2005 to the youth organisation's national HQ in London, and finally Every was removed from his position. The following month, Harper arrested Roger James Picton, another Sea Cadet volunteer; Picton was found guilty of indecent assault on a schoolgirl in February 2006 and Every was convicted of child porn offences that December.

In early 2007, convinced there was a broad network of abusers operating on the island and mindful of Jersey's steadfast refusal to introduce a sex offenders' register, Harper began reviewing statements made by Sea Cadets who had alleged abuse. He discovered that many had been in care, especially in Haut de la Garenne. Calling up their care files, Harper found that a member of Jersey police's family protection team, Brian Carter, had been there before him. Carter was no longer in the force, but finding him on the island was easy. It turned out that in 2004 Carter had noticed an unusually high incidence of suicide among men who had passed through Haut de la Garenne. Reviewing the records of 950 former residents, he discovered that a significant number had complained of sexual and physical abuse, describing similar acts and perpetrators, going back to the 50s. Shockingly, even though supervisors at the homes had dutifully noted the complaints, none had been properly investigated.

Carter had sought out victims and taken statements detailing how they were allegedly beaten and raped by older children and staff, and also by Sea Cadet officers, St John Ambulance volunteers and at least one senator in the States Assembly. In April 2006, Carter handed the dossier to Jersey CID. Nothing happened.

Suspecting that allegations of crimes against hundreds of children were being brushed under the carpet, Carter quit the force in late 2006. Now, Harper alerted Graham Power, head of Jersey's police, to the dossier. Appalled, Power contacted the Association of Chief Police Officers which launched an independent inquiry, currently being handled by South Yorkshire. In September 2007, Power gave Harper the go-ahead to launch a full-scale child abuse investigation, with Carter re-employed as a civilian investigator. Together they set up an incident room at Jersey police headquarters in Rouge Bouillon, St Helier. Detective inspector Alison Fossey, another outsider, originally from Strathclyde, was called in to help sift through the first of 4,000 children's files.

Abuse claims were rife. Haut de la Garenne was at the centre; other child facilities on the island were also implicated, including a secure unit called Les Chenes and a "group home", Blanche Pierre. Harper ordered his men to find and interview as many victims as they could - something that proved difficult because several former care home residents had already spoken to Carter and were disillusioned when nothing came of it.

Fearful that his inquiry would collapse, it was then that Harper went public, making an appeal for witnesses to come forward, with the backing of the NSPCC. "I was summoned to the chief minister's office and given a rollicking," Harper claims. "CM Frank Walker told me, 'Stop calling these people victims. It's not proven yet. You can't say that. Do you realise what you are doing here can bring the government down?' " We tried to contact Walker, but he declined to respond.

A firestorm now swirled across the island. Harper recalls: "The NSPCC opened a helpline and the phones went haywire." Former Haut residents talked of being slammed into walls, punched and slapped. One victim from Les Chenes claimed to have been knocked out by a staff member and told police, "The supervisor put a foot on my chest and stood on me, screaming, 'This is what we do to scum like you!' " Former care home children also detailed sadistic sexual abuse, with residents raping their dorm mates and supervisors doing the same.

Dozens of potential protagonists were thrown up by the new inquiry, the same names having also been identified by victims in the Carter report. One of them, a former Jersey senator, Wilfred Krichefski, who died in 1974, was known as the "Fat Man" among Haut residents who accused him of multiple rapes. Other Haut victims claimed to have been "lent out" to men who took them sailing into international waters before forcing them to have sex - crimes thus committed outside Jersey's jurisdiction. Colin Tilbrook, a former headmaster at Haut de la Garenne in the 60s, was repeatedly named as having roamed the corridors at night with a pillow tucked under his arm with which to stifle the screams of the children he raped. Jersey social services had never investigated Tilbrook, who went on to secure a job in the early 70s on the British mainland. When news of the Jersey investigation became public, Tilbrook's foster daughter, by then in her 30s, came forward to reveal that he had repeatedly raped her when she was a child.

Like Krichefski, Tilbrook was dead, as were others accused, including Jim Thomson, the superintendent of Haut de la Garenne in 1979, who was repeatedly accused of abuse. It was the living that presented Harper's team with the knottiest problems. The list of those who had worked at the homes included the serving education director, Tom McKeon, and his deputy, Mario Lundy. Both were interviewed by police earlier this year; both vigorously deny any wrongdoing.

The inquiry was delivered a blow when, in January 2008, Harper's deputy, DI Alison Fossey, went to the mainland on a strategic command course. Fossey had a law degree and had worked in child protection for most of her career. She was a details person, while Harper had a more scattergun approach. In her absence, the investigation was transformed by lurid claims of bodies and murder. One police report from this time states, "Among the [Haut] victims were a few who said that children had been dragged from their beds at night screaming and had then disappeared." A local builder who had done renovations there in 2003 said he had found what he thought were children's bones and shoes. These items had been disposed of by the Jersey pathologist. Harper remained suspicious. On 5 February 2008, he flew to Oxford to take advice from LGC Forensics, a crime scene service used by forces across the UK.

Two weeks later, an LGC team encamped at Haut de la Garenne. A squad of technicians in white suits pored over the site. Central to it all were two sniffer dogs, Eddie and Keela, which Harper took to describing as his "canine assets". They were veterans deployed in the search for missing Madeleine McCann in Portugal, although the controversy caused there should have served as a warning to Harper. In Portugal, the dogs had crawled over a car used by Gerry and Kate McCann, and sounded the alarm. The Portuguese police then claimed that the McCanns had killed their daughter, when what the dogs had actually picked up on was both parents' legitimate proximity to death, working in hospitals.

At Haut de la Garenne, the dogs made straight for the place where in 2003 the builder said he had found bones. A senior police officer recalled, "They did cartwheels on the spot. And Harper went through the roof." As in Portugal, the dogs had smelled something but could not differentiate between ancient remains and a contemporary murder. But at 2pm on 23 February, caution cast aside, Harper called a press conference, telling reporters police believed that the partial remains of a child were buried there.

Over the following months, £7.5m would be spent sifting 100 tonnes of earth. By the time DI Fossey returned, there were 65 milk teeth, 165 bone fragments and two lime-lined pits dominating the inquiry.

Meanwhile the child abuse investigation, which had already identified 160 alleged victims, was, Harper claimed, taking flak. Harper was called to the attorney general's office after his team charged a former Haut warder with indecently assaulting underage girls at the home from 1969 to 1973. William Bailhache demanded that a lawyer appointed by his office be inserted into the inquiry to assess the evidence before any arrest or charges could be preferred - common practice on the mainland, he says.

The police sent the lawyer details of a further five suspects, including a former police officer and two couples. Hearing nothing for two months, Harper went ahead and arrested the 50-year-old former police officer on 12 June last year. The attorney general's lawyer had the man released the next day, citing a lack of evidence. Likewise he vetoed charges being laid against one of the two couples. That left only Jane and Alan Maguire, a couple now living in France, and their case, too, went nowhere.

Bailhache told us: "It would no doubt have been much easier for me personally if I had simply waved prosecutions through. However, had I done so I would have been failing in my duty... Actions on my part which Mr Harper no doubt interpreted as frustrating a prosecution were rather directed at ensuring that any prosecution which was properly brought had the best chance of succeeding."

In the end, Harper charged only two other individuals, both peripheral, one of whom, in a terrible irony, also claims to have been a child victim of abuse at Haut de la Garenne in the 70s.

Once Lenny Harper retired in August 2008, and the murder inquiry was discredited, some island officials were concerned that the investigation into the abuse allegations might collapse, too.

The alarm had been raised in 1979, following the death of a two-year-old at the hands of a foster parent. Two years later, visiting social workers David Lambert and Elizabeth Wilkinson, concerned that none of the proposed improvements had been put in place, launched a full-blown inspection. Their confidential report, taking a broader look at Jersey society, concluded that while the island was reinventing itself as a haunt for jetsetters, there was a neglected group afflicted by a "high incidence of marital breakdown, heavy drinking, alcoholism and psychiatric illness". These problems were exacerbated by a small island mentality that demanded everyone "conform to acceptable public standards".

Children rebelled in small ways: dropping litter, swearing, facing down the police, having parties on the beach. On Jersey, all of these "offences" were, according to Lambert and Wilkinson, often sufficient to get a child into serious trouble. And once children had come to the attention of the police, it was almost inevitable that they would enter Jersey's care home system. Without any provision for children to be bailed, most were incarcerated on remand, placed alongside children taken from their families, often for such reasons as "giving the mother a break". In this rural backwater, one in 10 children had been in care, a ratio far higher than on the mainland.

Once in care, the real problems began, with predatory residents, some with criminal records, bunked with the vulnerable. Cases were almost never reviewed; Lambert and Wilkinson found in one group of 65 children, 36 had remained invisible inside the system for more than 10 years. This was the more likely if parents made little fuss, or even, in some cases, left the island. One of the invisible told us how he had been incarcerated at Haut de la Garenne for being repeatedly sarcastic to the hobby bobbies; he stayed in care for eight years, he says, without ever seeing a trained social worker, during which time he claimed to have been raped by adults and fellow inmates alike.

At the time of Lambert and Wilkinson's visit, Haut was run by superintendent Jim Thomson. Like many then working in the Jersey care system, he had no professional qualifications. Thomson, who would be accused of sexual and physical abuse in Harper's 2008 inquiry, was found by Lambert and Wilkinson to have created a "highly unsatisfactory" environment that focused on corporal punishment for "boys aged 10 to 15", some of them locked in remand cells for days at a time. It was an institution ripe for abusers, especially at night when only one staff member was on duty for 45 children sleeping in four distant wings. Haut was "not suitable for any of the tasks in which it is currently engaged".

Nick (not his real name) was resident at the time. He told us he had been taken, aged 11, to Haut de la Garenne in "a large white van with bars on its windows" after his mother abandoned him in 1975. He said: "The dorm was at the end of a rabbit warren of corridors and consisted of eight hospital-style beds lined up against opposite walls. Most of the boys were in their teens and had been in the home for years." No sooner had he arrived than he was beaten up and his possessions stolen. "At night they would never come to check up on you. The younger boys would be tied down on their beds and raped by the older lads." He survived only because he was a boxer and he was allowed to stay with foster parents at weekends, a time when adults were said to come and prey on the children left behind.

According to the 1981 report, other homes caused concern, too, for their punitive regimes; chief among them was Blanche Pierre with its new house parents, Jane and "Big Al" Maguire. But the extent of the allegations against the Maguires would not be properly investigated for another 18 years. One of their former charges was Dannie Jarman, now 28, who moved into Blanche Pierre when her mother was diagnosed with cancer in 1985, ending up in a hospice. "I wasn't allowed to visit her," Dannie told us. "Two weeks after her funeral, I was told she was dead. I was repeatedly told that our mum hadn't brought us up right and had never wanted me." Other children later levelled accusations about the extremely harsh conditions.

No one would have known about it had Dannie Jarman not got drunk one night in 1998 and thrown a brick through the Maguires' bedroom window. When the Maguires called the police, former residents, including Dannie, were brought in for questioning. After they repeated their allegations of abuse, the police turned around their inquiry and charged the Maguires instead.

The then attorney general, Michael Birt, today the island's deputy bailiff, sought advice from counsel who suggested that while this home "might possibly have been one that was run on a somewhat Dickensian basis, the strict regime applied by the Maguires would have not been regarded as unusual in pre-politically correct times. Indeed it is quite likely members of the jury would have some sympathy for people who in order to instil a sense of discipline in their charges threaten to wash a child's mouth out with soap and water." The counsel suggested: "The evidence is extremely weak." Birt, who declined to comment when we approached him, dropped the charges. Following an internal inquiry, Jane Maguire was subsequently sacked by Jersey social services.

Another inquiry focused on Jersey's elite Victoria College after the head of maths was jailed for four years in April 1999 for indecently assaulting a pupil. In his report, Stephen Sharp, a former chief education officer for Buckinghamshire, criticised senior staff and school governors, who included bailiff Sir Philip Bailhache, for failing to act speedily or adequately. It had taken 15 years for the teacher to be caught and Sharp concluded: "The handling of the complaint was more consistent with protecting a member of staff and the college's reputation than safeguarding the best interests of pupils."

Haut de la Garenne eventually closed in 1986, Blanche Pierre in 2001, but when Kathie Bull, a British child behaviour expert, was called in the following year to inspect the island's children's services, she found the situation had worsened. So many children were now being locked up that the island's institutions operated a "hot-bedding" system to cater for them, which in the case of Les Chenes included children sleeping on a pool table. Discipline was meted out in The Pits, a punishment block consisting of four bare concrete cells. The island's youth justice system was backwards and brutal, Bull concluded, and she made 50 recommendations, including the establishment of a Children's Executive.

Four years later, when Simon Bellwood, a British social worker, was employed to close Les Chenes and move the secure unit to a new, purpose-built site, he was startled to find the old regime still in force: "I met children who spent months at a time, near naked, in bare, concrete punishment blocks." When he made public his concerns in 2007 - following a long-running dispute with some of the old regime who were still in positions of authority - he was sacked; the then health minister, senator Stuart Syvret, who had vocally championed those who alleged they had been abused, was voted out of office for his "intemperate and ill-considered statements in the assembly".

Two years on, Mick Gradwell's team is trying to pick up the pieces of the abuse inquiry. The attorney general has been handed evidential files against key suspects by the police, and says he expects to make his decisions in the next few weeks. Bellwood, Syvret and others are keeping up the pressure on Jersey's States Assembly, and lobbying UK justice minister Jack Straw to call a full, independent inquiry (the subject of a court hearing to be held in London next Tuesday). But, many of the victims of the care homes of Jersey are convinced that nothing can outflank an island establishment that often saw little wrong in what had gone before and is reluctant to embrace the future prescribed by the social work experts.

The guardians of the Jersey Way continue to thrive, such as the sprightly Iris Le Feuvre, elected to the States Assembly for almost 20 years, who as president of the education committee oversaw Haut de la Garenne, Les Chenes and Blanche Pierre during some of their most troubled times. Now retired, the 80-year-old, whose husband Eric was for years a hobby bobby, lives in St Lawrence parish. "Granny's coming," she shouts as an over-excitable Tibetan spaniel barks at the gate, and ushers us into her front room. Le Feuvre, who collected an MBE from Buckingham Palace in 2002, says of Haut de la Garenne: "It's been a terrible business. But mostly I feel for William and Sir Philip Bailhache. They've been through so much."

But what of the victims? She smiles: "Oh, such a fuss has been made. My father always used a belt on me. It did me the world of good."
American Dream
 
Posts: 19946
Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2007 4:56 pm
Location: Planet Earth
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby elfismiles » Fri Apr 10, 2009 5:02 pm

Is this the most MSM coverage a big abuse case has garnered? Has anyone seen coverage of this here in the US?

Haut de la Garenne: Why abuse on this level could happen again

Image
Sex attacker Edward Paisnel abused many children before convicted and was a regular visitor at the children's home

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... again.html


Fintan Dunne audio on Jersey Child Abuse Scandal
http://rigorousintuition.ca/board/viewtopic.php?t=23561
http://breakfornews.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=4038

OneSmartRat even shows up in the thread
http://breakfornews.com/forum/viewtopic ... 0913#40913

Horrendous Abuse at Jersey Childrens' Home Unfolding - The Complete BBC Coverage - Thursday, March 6, 2008
http://aconstantineblacklist.blogspot.c ... drens.html

... meanwhile in Texas:

Believing the Children
BY JORDAN SMITH
Image
In 1992, Fran and Danny Keller were convicted of multiple counts of child sexual abuse at their Oak Hill day care center and sent to prison for 48 years. It's likely they were innocent. Indeed, it's very likely that no crime ever occurred – except an absurd and overzealous prosecution

http://www.austinchronicle.com/gyrobase ... d%3A759086

Entire issue online in PDF:
http://www.austinchronicle.com/download ... onicle.pdf

News: March 27, 2009

http://www.austinchronicle.com/gyrobase ... oid=759086
User avatar
elfismiles
 
Posts: 8512
Joined: Fri Aug 11, 2006 6:46 pm
Blog: View Blog (4)

Postby Stephen Morgan » Sat Jul 11, 2009 5:21 pm

http://stuartsyvret.blogspot.com/2009/07/william-bailhaches-prosecution-service.html

Syvret to be arrested, investigation into child abusers cancelled.
Those who dream by night in the dusty recesses of their minds wake in the day to find that all was vanity; but the dreamers of the day are dangerous men, for they may act their dream with open eyes, and make it possible. -- Lawrence of Arabia
User avatar
Stephen Morgan
 
Posts: 3736
Joined: Thu Apr 19, 2007 6:37 am
Location: England
Blog: View Blog (9)

Postby pepsified thinker » Mon Jul 13, 2009 1:30 pm

Fucking unbelievable--'Outrageous' in the literal sense of the word.

thanks for updating this story, though the news is bad.
"we must cultivate our garden"
--Voltaire
pepsified thinker
 
Posts: 1025
Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2006 11:15 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby Stephen Morgan » Tue Jul 14, 2009 1:17 pm

It's interesting to see Syvret attacking the parttless system of the Channel Islands then go across to Craig Murray's blog and see him blaming all our problems on the party-system.
Those who dream by night in the dusty recesses of their minds wake in the day to find that all was vanity; but the dreamers of the day are dangerous men, for they may act their dream with open eyes, and make it possible. -- Lawrence of Arabia
User avatar
Stephen Morgan
 
Posts: 3736
Joined: Thu Apr 19, 2007 6:37 am
Location: England
Blog: View Blog (9)

PreviousNext

Return to General Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 141 guests