Cables Shine Light Into Secret Diplomatic Channels WIKI!

Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff

Re: Cables Shine Light Into Secret Diplomatic Channels WIKI!

Postby Plutonia » Tue Dec 28, 2010 12:13 am

Huh! Game based on “Conspiracy as Governance”, JA's essay de l'infamie.

Making Games For Freedom & Democracy

Image

Leaky World by Molleindustria

December 27, 2010
by gnomeslair

Glorious news everyone! The first game for the Wikileaks Stories project is finally here and it’s none other than the excellent Leaky World: a playable theory by Italian radical artists’ collective Molleindustria. Leaky World is obviously free to play and -less obviously- a lovely web game; a lovely, unique, innovative, smart and actually fun webgame, that gives gamers the pretty unique experience of protecting and connecting the world’s oppressive elites.

As for game designers, Leaky World should -and can- act as an excellent and imaginative example of what a Wikileaks Stories game can be and how political ideas can be translated into truly enjoyable games. It’s filled with novel ideas and seamlessly implements dozens of Wikileaks cables.

Image

Here’s how Molleindustria describe the game themselves:

This game is an interactive interpretation of the essay “Conspiracy as Governance” by Julian Assange, a fundamental document to understand Wikileaks and the concept of radical transparency as strategy for social change. We published the text below, in its most recent version.
Leaky world includes headlines about actual information leaks, mostly but not esclusively related to Wikileaks. Clicking on the headline pauses the game and opens a browser window on a news article.

Image

This is a wonderful game and an exceptional beginning for the Wikileaks Stories project.


Also, written about here, with this observation:

The game illustrates a conclusion one can’t help drawing from a reading of Assange’s lucid essay—that his theory of power is both informed and constrained by his experience of computing.

...one more example of the kind of inspired cultural hack of the Wikileaks drama we find compelling.
[the British] government always kept a kind of standing army of news writers who without any regard to truth, or to what should be like truth, invented & put into the papers whatever might serve the minister

T Jefferson,
User avatar
Plutonia
 
Posts: 1267
Joined: Sat Nov 15, 2008 2:07 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Cables Shine Light Into Secret Diplomatic Channels WIKI!

Postby Plutonia » Wed Dec 29, 2010 1:36 am

10ABUDHABI103

S E C R E T ABU DHABI 000103

NOFORN
SIPDIS
FOR NEA/ARP

E.O. 12958: DECL: 2020/02/24
TAGS: PREL PINS CJAN AE
SUBJECT: UAE REQUEST FOR USG ASSISTANCE IN INVESTIGATION OF KILLING
OF MAHMOUD AL-MABHOUH


CLASSIFIED BY: Doug Greene, DCM; REASON: 1.4(D)

¶1. (C/NF) On the margins of a meeting with visiting
Secretary Chu, on Feb 24 MFA Minister of State Gargash made a
formal request to the Ambassador for assistance in providing
cardholder details and related information for credit cards
reportedly issued by a U.S. bank to several suspects in last
month's killing of Hamas leader Mahmoud Al-Mabhouh in Dubai.

According to a letter Gargash gave the Ambassador (which
transmitted details of the request from Dubai Security authorities
to the UAE Central Bank), the credit cards were issued by
MetaBank, in Iowa. Embassy LEGATT is transmitting the request and
associated details to FBI HQ. Gargash asked that Embassy pass any
reply to the director of the General Directorate of State Security
(GDSS) in Dubai.

¶2. (S/NF) Comment: Ambassador requests expeditious handling
of and reply to the UAEG request, which was also raised by UAE
Foreign Minister Abdullah bin Zayed in a February 23 meeting with
Secretary Clinton in Washington.


¶3. (C/NF) Text of letter from GDSS to the Governor of the UAE
Central Bank:

Excellency Sultan Al-Suwiadi

UAE Central Bank Governor

Subject: Credit Cards

MC 5115-2600-1600-6190

MC 5115-2600-1600-5317

MC 5301-3800-3201-7106

General Management of The State Security offers greetings, and asks
your Excellency to direct the money laundry and suspicious
transactions unit at the Central Bank to urgently obtain details of
the above credit cards, in addition to details for purchases,
accounts, and payments on those cards, as the users of those cards
were involved in the murder of Mahmoud Mabhouh. Those cards were
issued by META BANK in the state of Iowa, USA.


Thank you for your kind cooperation.

END TEXT

(Letter is accompanied by a chart with identifying data for alleged
credit card users - scanned and emailed to NEA/ARP.)

OLSON
[the British] government always kept a kind of standing army of news writers who without any regard to truth, or to what should be like truth, invented & put into the papers whatever might serve the minister

T Jefferson,
User avatar
Plutonia
 
Posts: 1267
Joined: Sat Nov 15, 2008 2:07 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Cables Shine Light Into Secret Diplomatic Channels WIKI!

Postby seemslikeadream » Thu Dec 30, 2010 6:32 pm

WikiLeaks' Assange suggests secret U.S.-Arab collaboration at 'torture houses'

December 30, 2010 238No Comments

The Arab news network Al Jazeera yesterday aired more of its interview with Julian Assange, surely stirring concern over yet-to-be-released U.S. State Department cables that the WikiLeaks founder claims verify the existence of "torture houses" in the Middle East. Assange alleges that the CIA and top Arab officials have conspired to subvert the intent of international laws banning torture through a system whereby government agents in Washington, D.C., send people with suspected links to terrorist organizations for "interrogation" in Arab countries willing to use harsh techniques that would not be condoned inside the United States. "Many officials keep visiting U.S. embassies in their respective countries voluntarily to establish links with this key U.S. intelligence agency," Assange said in the interview, according to the Peninsula newspaper in Qatar. "These officials are spies for the US in their countries."


Assange also expressed fear that he could be assassinated -- a fear steeped in the anger that many politicians, including several in the United States (some whom have been embarrassed by cables), have expressed in the wake of WikiLeaks' release of scores of sensitive documents: "If I am forced, we could go to the extreme and expose each and every file that we have access to... Washington is also projecting me as a terrorist and wants to convince the world that I am another Osama bin Laden."
Mazars and Deutsche Bank could have ended this nightmare before it started.
They could still get him out of office.
But instead, they want mass death.
Don’t forget that.
User avatar
seemslikeadream
 
Posts: 32090
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 11:28 pm
Location: into the black
Blog: View Blog (83)

Re: Cables Shine Light Into Secret Diplomatic Channels WIKI!

Postby Plutonia » Thu Dec 30, 2010 7:19 pm

That's a clever move. Those Arab will be sure to squeeze their US "friends" to make sure they don't get outed.

If imprisoned or killed, Assange reportedly prepared to out CIA-linked Arab leaders

By Stephen C. Webster
Thursday, December 30th, 2010 -- 10:24 am

If imprisoned or killed, Assange reportedly prepared to out CIA linked Arab leaders

Middle Eastern leaders who've become friendly with the US Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) could face severe retribution from their local populations if WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange is killed or jailed for a lengthy amount of time.

That's because, in a recent interview with Arabic news network Al Jazeera, Assange allegedly warned that he had a document which reveals the identities of officials who voluntarily cultivated relationships with the CIA.

"These officials are spies for the US in their countries," he reportedly told the network.

“If I am killed or detained for a long time, there are 2,000 websites ready to publish the remaining files," Assange was quoted as having said. "We have protected these websites through very safe passwords."

He reportedly added that the files also reveal the locations of facilities where US prisoners are sent to be interrogated and tortured.

"If I am forced we could go to the extreme and expose each and every file that we have access to," he allegedly said.


The remarks were first carried outside of Al Jazeera by Qatar newspaper The Peninsula, then picked up stateside by progressive blog FireDogLake, triggering a CBS News report on the comments.

Assange allegedly showed the interviewer the file he was speaking of, but no names were stated publicly. The interview reportedly aired last night.

Video of the conversation -- part two of an earlier talk with Al Jazeera interviewer Ahmed Mansour -- was not available online Thursday morning and The Peninsula appeared to be the source offering most detail about the conversation.

A request for comment or confirmation, sent to Al Jazeera's press office in Qatar, went unanswered at time of publication.

It's not the first time Assange has threatened to release a potentially devastating cache of information onto the Internet.

"Due to recent attacks on our infrastructure, we've decided to make sure everyone can reach our content. As part of this process we're releasing archived copy of all files we ever released," WikiLeaks said in a message posted to its website earlier this month.

WikiLeaks took the precaution of posting a 1.4-gigabyte file on peer-to-peer networks, encrypted with a 256-digit key said to be unbreakable. Titled "insurance.aes256," the file was big enough to contain all the US cables said to be in WikiLeaks's possession, but there's no word on what it may actually contain.

The encryption makes it unreadable until passwords are supplied -- at which time all its contents, or just portions depending on which password is used, would become available to those who downloaded it.

"It's a ticking time bomb with a remote fuse," one expert told NBC News. "So this bomb can go off the second that they release the key and the key will spread around the internet in a matter of seconds."

Appearing on the BBC in early December, Assange's lawyer defended the move.

"They need to protect themselves," Mark Stephens said. "This is what they believe to be a thermo-nuclear device effectively in the electronic age.".


:doh: Mark Stephens
[the British] government always kept a kind of standing army of news writers who without any regard to truth, or to what should be like truth, invented & put into the papers whatever might serve the minister

T Jefferson,
User avatar
Plutonia
 
Posts: 1267
Joined: Sat Nov 15, 2008 2:07 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Cables Shine Light Into Secret Diplomatic Channels WIKI!

Postby JackRiddler » Thu Dec 30, 2010 7:30 pm

.

The encryption makes it unreadable until passwords are supplied -- at which time all its contents, or just portions depending on which password is used, would become available to those who downloaded it.


If true, it's another smart piece of planning.

.
We meet at the borders of our being, we dream something of each others reality. - Harvey of R.I.

To Justice my maker from on high did incline:
I am by virtue of its might divine,
The highest Wisdom and the first Love.

TopSecret WallSt. Iraq & more
User avatar
JackRiddler
 
Posts: 16007
Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2008 2:59 pm
Location: New York City
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Cables Shine Light Into Secret Diplomatic Channels WIKI!

Postby barracuda » Thu Dec 30, 2010 7:41 pm

Is anyone else sick of this ten cables per day bullshit? 'Cause I'm starting to be. We got TWO today. Talk about a long-term commitment to the project. I'm not sure my attention span can take it - I'm a goddamn AMERICAN ferchrissakes.
The most dangerous traps are the ones you set for yourself. - Phillip Marlowe
User avatar
barracuda
 
Posts: 12890
Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 5:58 pm
Location: Niles, California
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Cables Shine Light Into Secret Diplomatic Channels WIKI!

Postby Nordic » Thu Dec 30, 2010 9:42 pm

Some of this continues to fall into the "stuff we already know" category. Is Uzbekistan an "Arab" country? Because we already know the U.S. government sent people there to be boiled alive. Yes, no hyperbole, boiled alive.
"He who wounds the ecosphere literally wounds God" -- Philip K. Dick
Nordic
 
Posts: 14230
Joined: Fri Nov 10, 2006 3:36 am
Location: California USA
Blog: View Blog (6)

Re: Cables Shine Light Into Secret Diplomatic Channels WIKI!

Postby Simulist » Thu Dec 30, 2010 9:44 pm

Lee Greenwood would be so proud.
"The most strongly enforced of all known taboos is the taboo against knowing who or what you really are behind the mask of your apparently separate, independent, and isolated ego."
    — Alan Watts
User avatar
Simulist
 
Posts: 4713
Joined: Thu Dec 31, 2009 10:13 pm
Location: Here, and now.
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Cables Shine Light Into Secret Diplomatic Channels WIKI!

Postby JackRiddler » Thu Dec 30, 2010 11:09 pm

.

Boiled alive is "Stuff we Know"? I don't want to know, it's horrible, but I don't know and I should. Link please.

barracuda wrote:Is anyone else sick of this ten cables per day bullshit? 'Cause I'm starting to be. We got TWO today. Talk about a long-term commitment to the project. I'm not sure my attention span can take it - I'm a goddamn AMERICAN ferchrissakes.


Yes. We're stuck in a phase where faith is expected, and credibility afaic has been won but is contingent on how it turns out. Given how it's worked so far, I'm willing to believe and even anticipate Wikileaks "coming soon" announcements until proven otherwise. Who hasn't got expectations with the bank thing? But there are limits to it, I'd start losing faith in February. The laws of PR and of holidays in Western culture say it's reasonable to expect a lot in January. One worry is what machinations or even negotiations may be underway due to the slow process.

.
We meet at the borders of our being, we dream something of each others reality. - Harvey of R.I.

To Justice my maker from on high did incline:
I am by virtue of its might divine,
The highest Wisdom and the first Love.

TopSecret WallSt. Iraq & more
User avatar
JackRiddler
 
Posts: 16007
Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2008 2:59 pm
Location: New York City
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Cables Shine Light Into Secret Diplomatic Channels WIKI!

Postby JackRiddler » Fri Dec 31, 2010 1:01 am

http://www.theatlantic.com/internationa ... abwe/68598

Christopher R. Albon wrote:How WikiLeaks Just Set Back Democracy in Zimbabwe

By Christopher R. Albon

Last year, early on Christmas Eve morning, representatives from the U.S., United Kingdom, Netherlands, and the European Union arrived for a meeting with Zimbabwean opposition leader Morgan Tsvangirai. Appointed prime minister earlier that year as part of a power-sharing agreement after the fraud- and violence-ridden 2008 presidential election, Tsvangirai and his political party, Movement for Democratic Change (MDC), are considered Zimbabwe's greatest hopes for unseating the country's long-time de facto dictator Robert Mugabe and bringing democratic reforms to the country.

The topic of the meeting was the sanctions imposed on Zimbabwe by a collection of western countries, including the U.S. and E.U. Tsvangirai told the western officials that, while there had been some progress in the last year, Mugabe and his supporters were dragging their feet on delivering political reforms. To overcome this, he said that the sanctions on Zimbabwe "must be kept in place" to induce Mugabe into giving up some political power. The prime minister openly admitted the incongruity between his private support for the sanctions and his public statements in opposition. If his political adversaries knew Tsvangirai secretly supported the sanctions, deeply unpopular with Zimbabweans, they would have a powerful weapon to attack and discredit the democratic reformer.

Later that day, the U.S. embassy in Zimbabwe dutifully reported the details of the meeting to Washington in a confidential U.S. State Department diplomatic cable. And slightly less than one year later, WikiLeaks released it to the world.

The reaction in Zimbabwe was swift. Zimbabwe's Mugabe-appointed attorney general announced he was investigating the Prime Minister on treason charges based exclusively on the contents of the leaked cable. While it's unlikely Tsvangirai could be convicted on the contents of the cable alone, the political damage has already been done. The cable provides Mugabe the opportunity to portray Tsvangirai as an agent of foreign governments working against the people of Zimbabwe. Furthermore, it could provide Mugabe with the pretense to abandon the coalition government that allowed Tsvangirai to become prime minister in 2009.

It's difficult to see this as anything but a major setback for democracy in Zimbabwe. Even if Tsvangirai is not charged with treason, the opponents to democratic reforms have won a significant victory. First, popular support for Tsvangirai and the MDC will suffer due to Mugabe's inevitable smear campaign, including the attorney general's "investigation." Second, the Prime Minister might be forced to take positions in opposition to the international community to avoid accusation of being a foreign collaborator. Third, Zimbabwe's fragile coalition government could collapse completely. Whatever happens, democratic reforms in Zimbabwe are far less likely now than before the leak.

To their supporters, WikiLeaks and its founder Julian Assange are heroes of the democratic cause. Assange himself has claimed that his organization promotes democracy by strengthening the media. But in Zimbabwe, Assange's pursuit of this noble goal has provided a tyrant with the ammunition to wound, and perhaps kill, any chance for multiparty democracy. Earlier this month, Assange claimed that "not a single person, as far as anyone is aware, has been harmed" by Wikileaks' practices. This is no longer true, if it ever was.

Any damage to democratic reforms from WikiLeaks likely comes not from malice but naivety. Assange is probably not best described, as Vice President Joe Biden recently put it, a "high-tech terrorist." Rather, he, his organization, and their activist supporters believe that they can promote democracy by making an enemy of secrecy itself. What we're seeing in Zimbabwe, however, is that those methods won't necessarily be without significant collateral damage.

Image: Zimbabwean Prime Minister Morgan Tsvangirai. By Saul Loeb/AFP/Getty.

This article available online at:

http://www.theatlantic.com/internationa ... bwe/68598/
Copyright © 2010 by The Atlantic Monthly Group. All Rights Reserved.


Responses to above from
http://www.democraticunderground.com/di ... =439x83341

EFerrari wrote:The poster article for journalists siding with Officialdom re Wikileaks, calling it macaroni

Do I have this right? Wikileaks published a cable that showed the Prime Minister of Zimbabwe was secretly backing sanctions against his own country. The idea seems to be, democracy in Zimbabwe has no chance unless Zimbabwe is free to be threatened by the United States?

Wikileaks has tanked democracy in Zimbabwe -- by revealing to the populace that the Prime Minister was secretly colluding with the United States? Democracy has been thwarted by popular participation?

According to this journalist, democracy is what the political elites do in secret, apparently.

Amazing.


Random Thoughts wrote:A secret plot done in secret would be the set back.

Some think the way for people with a little more compassion or thought to make society better is to do it in secret. But then they have to dumb the people down, and form concepts of superiority complex, and the power gets to them.

The other group thinks you have to bring the population with you, with education to the better ideas like democracy, and compassion.

They were trying to use a dictatorial concept in secret to support democracy.

That is trying to use a bad ring of power for good. That is the temptation of the ring of power, to turn to its bad power trying to do good.

And why better ideas of education and transparency, bringing society with you as you learn, and not just consolidations of a few are better ideas.

Moderation in all things is also because consolidations in society create problems.


pnwmom wrote:Do you honestly not understand why an opposition leader

under a DICTATOR can't do all his fighting openly? Might have to make alliances with other countries, like the U.S., secretly?



Luminous Animal wrote:Actually, he was already fighting openly. The secret alliance

"The prime minister openly admitted the incongruity between his private support for the sanctions and his public statements in opposition.

...

If his political adversaries knew Tsvangirai secretly supported the sanctions, deeply unpopular with Zimbabweans, they would have a powerful weapon to attack and discredit the democratic reformer."

The reason why he had democratic public support is because he opposed the sanctions. The reason why he is in hot water is because he misled his constituency by secretly negotiating with the U.S. to ensure that the populace continued to suffer.


JackRiddler wrote:How is Tsvangirai a "democratic reformer" if he's lying to his constituents?

The sentence that undoes this article's argument:

"If his political adversaries knew Tsvangirai secretly supported the sanctions, deeply unpopular with Zimbabweans, they would have a powerful weapon to attack and discredit the democratic reformer."

It's not democratic if he claims one thing to get votes while doing the opposite in secret. Democracy means rule of the people, not fool the people.


I could have added: an Orwellian and elite understanding of "democratic." If it's good and I support it, then it's democratic; if it's bad, it's not democratic even if most people are for it. But democratic can of course be bad.

Pavulon wrote:Did you know that eating an Albino person cures aids?

depending on how much of your population is ignorant determines just how much information you need to put out there to impact change.

Same reason was given in Pakistan in the cable that was secret detailing a program to reclaim HEU from them (voluntary). Their rabble was the problem.


JackRiddler wrote:Did you know that opposition to sanctions and myths about AIDS are not the same thing?

First, thanks for your implicit admission that Tsvangirai is not a "democratic reformer" but someone you think should win in spite of the democratic will, perhaps for good reasons.

But come on now, you're making an implicit claim here, so back it up:

What part of the Zimbabwean people believe in eating albinos as an AIDS cure, and what part oppose the sanctions?

What is the overlap of the two sets?

How are the two ideas related programmatically? Are the Albino Eaters a leading group in the anti-sanctions coalition?

Do you believe there is a shared sickness that causes people both a) to want to eat albinos and b) not to want to have themselves be starved by sanctions?


Being far too nice. People are not rabble because they object when the US-UK-etc. impose sanctions that cause suffering to them, nor is this failure to celebrate comparable to some medieval thinking about an unrelated matter that probably is vastly exaggerated by propaganda. (German soldiers in WWI ate Belgian albino babies?) "Rabble" apparently is defined by a failure to celebrate US empire, and in this case by the writer's racism.

.
We meet at the borders of our being, we dream something of each others reality. - Harvey of R.I.

To Justice my maker from on high did incline:
I am by virtue of its might divine,
The highest Wisdom and the first Love.

TopSecret WallSt. Iraq & more
User avatar
JackRiddler
 
Posts: 16007
Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2008 2:59 pm
Location: New York City
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Cables Shine Light Into Secret Diplomatic Channels WIKI!

Postby Plutonia » Fri Dec 31, 2010 2:13 am

barracuda wrote:Is anyone else sick of this ten cables per day bullshit? 'Cause I'm starting to be. We got TWO today. Talk about a long-term commitment to the project. I'm not sure my attention span can take it - I'm a goddamn AMERICAN ferchrissakes.
It's the aperiodic reinforcement schedule- it'll drive you crazy.

Here have a cookie.

That's cables that have been published in "the Norwegian newspaper Aftenposten (and not yet elsewhere). " Is that 74 of them?

Thanks Jack for the Zimbabwe/Democracy discussion. Saying black is green is crazy-making too.
[the British] government always kept a kind of standing army of news writers who without any regard to truth, or to what should be like truth, invented & put into the papers whatever might serve the minister

T Jefferson,
User avatar
Plutonia
 
Posts: 1267
Joined: Sat Nov 15, 2008 2:07 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Cables Shine Light Into Secret Diplomatic Channels WIKI!

Postby Joe Hillshoist » Fri Dec 31, 2010 3:01 am

Cheers big ears.

That Cable about the Sri lankan govt buying weapons off Iran and North korea is interesting for me given the context of "Boat people"/asylum seeker/illegal immigrant debate in Australia.
Joe Hillshoist
 
Posts: 10616
Joined: Mon Jun 12, 2006 10:45 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Cables Shine Light Into Secret Diplomatic Channels WIKI!

Postby barracuda » Fri Dec 31, 2010 3:06 am

Plutonia wrote:It's the aperiodic reinforcement schedule- it'll drive you crazy.


I hope not, but at this rate I'll be an old man by the end of the release. Oh, I forgot - I'm pretty much an old man now.

Here have a cookie.


Thank you. Just FYI, some of these were already available on the mirror sites.

But yeah, mmmm... cookies. Don't mind if I do.
The most dangerous traps are the ones you set for yourself. - Phillip Marlowe
User avatar
barracuda
 
Posts: 12890
Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 5:58 pm
Location: Niles, California
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Cables Shine Light Into Secret Diplomatic Channels WIKI!

Postby Nordic » Fri Dec 31, 2010 3:10 am

The "boiling people alive" story is right here:

http://www.docudharma.com/diary/17079/n ... ture-story

(the words in the url have nothing to do with the story)

This was posted by yours truly back when I was posting at this particular site, after I was banned from Dailykos. I later left that site because they censor.

The meat of it is this:

CRAIG MURRAY, FMR. UK AMBASSADOR TO UZBEKISTAN: You know, I was a British diplomat for over 20 years. We still have a certain tendency in the British Foreign Office to look down on the rest of the world. I was seated one day in my office in the Foreign Office, which is a wonderful, palatial building in London from which a third of the world used to be governed. And I sat there, and the phone rang, and it said, "Oh, Craig, Charles here. Would you like to be ambassador in Uzbekistan?" And I said, "Yes, great, Charles. Thanks," thinking, where on Earth is Uzbekistan? And I said, "Why me?" And he said-and this is absolutely true-he said, "Well," he said, "you speak Polish, don't you?" And I said, "Yes, but I doubt the Uzbeks do." And he said, "No, but they speak Russian, old boy, and it's all the same thing."
So on the basis of my knowledge of a Slavic language, I found myself as ambassador to Uzbekistan, where nobody spoke Polish at all. Fortunately, I did pick up some Russian.

It's an awful place. It's a totalitarian dictatorship. I'd served in dictatorships before. There's a difference between-any dictatorship's bad, obviously. There's a difference between dictatorship and totalitarianism. Uzbekistan is totalitarian. Let me tell you about something that happened last week, just to give you an example, and it's not nearly as bad as the absolutely true story about the people who were boiled alive. Just last week, a British man of no political interest whatsoever who had married an Uzbek lady was on holiday in St. Petersburg. And his wife now has UK nationality but was traveling on her Uzbek passport, because that way she didn't have to apply for a Russian visa and they'd save $100. And she was arrested in Russia because her Uzbek exit visa had expired, because you still need permission to leave Uzbekistan-they still lock their population in. And the Russians shipped her back to Tashkent, where she's now in prison for having outstayed her exit visa, and the couple have been separated. And there's very little chance the man will ever see his wife again.

That's the kind of country it is. And as I say, that's a more workaday example than the boiled-alive people who were interrogated. But when you think of Uzbekistan, you have to think of a country that hasn't moved on since it left the Soviet Union. In fact, it left the Soviet Union in order to maintain the Soviet system; it left because it didn't want to implement the Gorbachev-style reforms. Its president, President Karimov, was one of the members of the Politburo who had moved to have Gorbachev arrested on that occasion when Yeltsin was standing on the tanks outside the [Russian] White House when he first came to great prominence in Western eyes. When you think of Uzbekistan, you have to think of the Soviet Union, but not Gorbachev's Soviet Union; you have to think of Brezhnev Soviet Union. And that's the kind of regime it is, but with, since independence, even more cruelty.

When I was going there, it was viewed as the United States' most important ally in Central Asia. The Americans had been given a very large airbase at Karshi-Khanabad, known as K2, from which supplies and operations were mounted into Afghanistan. I was told that there weren't that many British interested in Uzbekistan, and my primary interest was in supporting the Americans, supporting the American ambassador, and ensuring that Uzbekistan remained an ally in the war on terror. I was told that whenever I made any speech in public, was to refer to President Karimov of Uzbekistan as our ally on all occasions.

You know, there are over 10,000 political prisoners in Uzbekistan. Anybody who is a religious Muslim of any kind, no connection to terrorism, anyone who prays five times a day, is described, will be arrested as a terrorist. Any young man with a beard will be arrested. There are at least 700 Baptists in Uzbek jails because it is illegal to be a Baptist in Uzbekistan. Many people are there simply because they are political prisoners. If you enter an Uzbek prison, your chances of coming out alive are actually quite slim. They still have and operate the old Soviet gulags.

I found more and more evidence of abuse and torture. Torture in Uzbekistan isn't unusual. It happens to several thousand people every year. When I'm talking of torture, I'm not talking of marginal definitions of torture. I'm talking of people being raped with broken bottles. I'm talking of people having their children tortured in front of them until they sign the confessions. I'm talking of people being boiled alive.

And the intelligence from these torture sessions was being received by the CIA and was being passed on-I was eventually seeing it as it was passed on to me by MI6, because MI6 and the CIA shared all their intelligence. And there was a common thread. I was meeting, investigating the evidence of torture.

I met people who'd been tortured and escaped. I met people like the old widow, the photos of her son who'd been boiled alive. Her son was returned to her in a sealed casket, and she was ordered to bury the casket the next day, which Muslims would do anyway. They'd bury the body the very next day. But she was ordered not to open the casket, not to look at her son. It was returned to her from Jaslyk Prison. She did in the middle of the night. She was very, very brave and determined, the old lady. She got the casket open and the body out, and she took these photographs which showed that he had been boiled alive. And it was the chap who's now actually the chief pathologist of the UK who investigated the photographs for me and produced that conclusion.

When people were being tortured, as we spoke to-we even had letters smuggled out of jails. We were learning what people had to confess to under torture, and they were being told to confess to membership of al-Qaeda, they were told to confess that they'd been in training camps in Afghanistan, and they were told to confess that they had met Osama bin Laden in person.

And the CIA intelligence constantly echoed these themes. They spoke of Uzbeks having been in al-Qaeda, been in training camps, and having met Osama bin Laden. In fact, by now we were in 2002, 2003, and apparently we didn't know where Osama bin Laden was. And the way he managed to see thousands of Uzbeks every year, [it] should have been slightly easier to track him down, I felt.

It wasn't hard to put two and two together and work out that the fact that every political prisoner I ever knew of in Uzbekistan who was taken was tortured. And the fact that we knew what they were being forced to confess to under torture, and the fact that the CIA material came up with exactly the same rather dodgy narrative, it wasn't hard to put the two together and realize that the intelligence material was coming from torture.

But before I did anything, I wanted to make sure that I was on safe ground. So I asked my deputy, a lady called Karen Moran, to go to the American embassy and say to them, say to the head of the CIA station there, "My ambassador is worried because he thinks your intelligence may be coming from torture." And she came back and she reported to me that the reply from the head of the CIA station in Tashkent was, "Yes, of course it's coming from torture. We don't see that as a problem in the context of the war on terror."

Now, I did see that as a problem, particularly when I discovered that the CIA were bringing in people, flying in people to Uzbekistan, and handing them over to the Uzbek security services. I'd like to say that I was the one who discovered extraordinary rendition, but that's not quite true, because I presumed, I falsely presumed, that these people they were bringing in and handing over to the Uzbek security service were Uzbeks who had been captured elsewhere and brought back to Uzbekistan. I did not realize that in fact they were of many other nationalities and were being handed over in order to be tortured. That they were being tortured I knew. That Uzbekistan was a destination for the extraordinary rendition system from all over the world I really didn't quite realize at the time. We now know, following, for example, a Council of Europe investigation, that 90 percent of the airplanes that stopped at the famous secret prison in Poland had Tashkent as their next destination.

I complained back to London. I said we're getting this intelligence from torture. It's illegal, it's immoral, and it's unreliable. It's vastly exaggerating the strength of al-Qaeda in Central Asia.

How did I know it was unreliable? Well, let me just give you a couple of examples. We had one piece of intelligence which said that a detainee had admitted to being at a training camp at given coordinates in the hills above Samarkand in Tajikistan. And as it happened, my defense attaché, Colonel [inaudible] had recently been to that precise location, and there was nothing there. But my favorite example, because-when people were tortured, they not only had to confess to membership of al-Qaeda, but, remember, this torture was being done by the direct descendents of Stalin's KGB. Institutionally it was still Stalin's KGB as set up in Tashkent. And they had, exactly as under Stalin, to denounce other people. They were given names of people to denounce. Very often they didn't know the name of anyone on this list of names they were given. Sometimes they did. Sometimes they denounced relatives and classmates. But the intelligence would contain long lists of names of al-Qaeda members who had been denounced by detainees, and very often these were farcical. And I remember one long list of al-Qaeda members which I received in a CIA intelligence report, and I recognized one of the names. It was an old professor I knew who was a very brave old dissident, who had been a dissident in Soviet times, and I knew the man, and he was a Jehovah's Witness.

Now, there are not many Jehovah's Witnesses in al-Qaeda. I would be willing to bet that al-Qaeda don't even try and recruit Jehovah's Witnesses. Now, I'm quite sure that Jehovah's Witnesses would try and recruit al-Qaeda if they could, knocking on the cave door, saying, "Is Mr. bin Laden in? But I have a copy of The Watchtower for him." But I essentially found it hard to believe a lot of this intelligence. I got called back to London and I expected there, you know, to have a sensible talk about the merits or demerits of intelligence and how much evidence I had that it was obtained under torture. I was absolutely stunned, genuinely stunned-it changed my whole worldview in an instant-to be told that-and I knew it was coming from torture-that it was not illegal, because our legal advisers had decided that under the United Nations Convention Against Torture, it is not illegal to obtain or use intelligence gained from torture, as long as we didn't do the torture ourselves.


Oh, and they weren't just boiling people alive. They were also raping them with broken bottles, and torturing their children in front of them in order to extract false confessions out of people so they would have a paper trail to justify military action (i.e. state-sponsored terrorism).

I wrote another piece there the day before:

http://www.docudharma.com/diary/17069/f ... en-bottles

Which for some reason, the mod of that site, who is a psychotic assole, decided wasn't up to some kind of standard, and he sorta pissed all over it, so I redid it.

And yes, Obama's covering this all up, and it could be still going on for all we know.

That's why we pay our taxes. Oh yeah, I just got a bill for 2009 from the IRS. Apparently I didn't pay enough. Not enough of those broken bottles have my name on them apparently.

I don't post anywhere but here anymore. I gave up on those other sites. The one linked to here? If you write about Israel/Palestine, they'll just delete it. Without telling you. POOF it's gone.
"He who wounds the ecosphere literally wounds God" -- Philip K. Dick
Nordic
 
Posts: 14230
Joined: Fri Nov 10, 2006 3:36 am
Location: California USA
Blog: View Blog (6)

Re: Cables Shine Light Into Secret Diplomatic Channels WIKI!

Postby matrixdutch » Mon Jan 03, 2011 7:13 am

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/as_wikileaks_japan_whaling

US-Japan discussed 'action' against anti-whalers

By JAY ALABASTER, Associated Press Jay Alabaster, Associated Press
1 hr 42 mins ago

.TOKYO – Japanese and American officials discussed taking action to weaken a prominent anti-whaling group, with Tokyo insisting that Sea Shepherd's confrontations on the high seas actually hurt efforts to reduce whaling, U.S. diplomatic cables show.

The U.S. representative to the International Whaling Commission, Monica Medina, discussed revoking the U.S.-based conservation group's tax exempt status during a meeting with senior officials from the Fisheries Agency of Japan in November 2009, according to the documents released by WikiLeaks on Monday.

Sea Shepherd Conservation Society's yearly protest campaigns — which chase Japan's whaling fleet in boats trying to disrupt the hunt by fouling fishing lines and throwing rancid butter at whalers — have drawn high-profile donors and volunteers, and spawned the popular Animal Planet series "Whale Wars." In Japan, the harrassment is seen by some as foreign interferance in national affairs, making politicians wary of getting involved.

Action against Sea Shepherd would be a "major element" in achieving success at international negotiations on the number of whales killed each year, the cables cite the director general of Japan's fisheries agency, Katsuhiro Machida, as saying.

Referring to Sea Shepherd, Medina said "she believes the USG (U.S. government) can demonstrate the group does not deserve tax exempt status based on their aggressive and harmful actions," according the cables.

Paul Watson, founder of Sea Shepherd, said Japan has previously pressured foreign governments to take action against the group, such as revoking the registration of its ships. He said the organization had last been audited about two years ago, which is before the exchanges detailed in the cables.

"We have had our tax status since 1981, and we have done nothing different since then to cause the IRS (Internal Revenue Service) to change that," he told The Associated Press by telephone from his ship.

The diplomatic cables, posted on WikiLeaks' secret-sharing website early Monday but dated Jan. 1, show Japanese officials repeatedly told U.S. counterparts the group's actions were making whaling a political issue and hurting any chance of a compromise on the numbers of whales killed each year.

Sea Shepherd vessels are currently chasing Japan's whaling fleet in the Antarctic Ocean in the hopes of interrupting its hunt, which kills up to 1,000 whales annually and typically lasts from December to February.

Japan hunts whales under the research exemption to a 1986 worldwide ban on commercial hunts. Critics say there is no reason to kill the animals, and the research program amounts to commercial whaling in disguise because surplus meat from the hunt is sold domestically.

Protest ships harass the whaling fleet, and clashes between the sides often take place. On Saturday, Watson said that whalers had shot water cannons at anti-whaling activists nearby.

Last January, a Sea Shepherd boat was sunk after its bow was sheared off in a collision with a whaling vessel and a New Zealand protestor was later arrested after he boarded a Japanese whaling ship. He was taken to Tokyo and later deported.

The cables are dated before an International Whaling Commission meeting last year that was seen as a major chance to end a decades long stalemate. They show the U.S. worked with Japan in late 2009 to reach a deal on the issue, calling it an "irritant" in international relations.

The meeting ended without a major agreement.

"Action on the SSCS (Sea Shepherd Conservation Society) would be a major element for Japan in the success of the overall negotiations," a Japanese official said, according to one cable.

Watson said Monday that his group was against anything less than a complete stop to Japan's whaling program in Antarctica. The activists hope to block whaling activities for the Japanese fleet so it incurs deep financial losses.

"I don't think a solution is going to come through politics, it's going to come through economics," Watson told The Associated Press by telephone from his ship while pursuing the Japanese fleet.
Our truth consists of illusions that we have forgotten are illusions - Nietzsche
User avatar
matrixdutch
 
Posts: 228
Joined: Fri Jun 12, 2009 8:37 am
Blog: View Blog (0)
PreviousNext

Return to General Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 163 guests