The Clitoris: A Recent Discovery in Human Anatomy (NSFW)

[Project Willow]

If a sincere but somewhat thin-skinned sensitive.

Then there is abuse, and I consider your continued postings of negative characterizations of me abusive at this point and I will ask you again to stop.

[Searcher08]

I remember the first time I saw Cytheria do what she does so well, I was like "WHOA!!! Now THERE is a woman who knows how to enjoy herself!", so imagine my deep deep joy joy and delight when I had a relationship with someone who a) had taught herself to squirt b) had lots of clitoral orgasms and c) vaginal orgasms too. These were three quite distinct experiences for her, described in totally different subjective terms for her.
I also had a partner who needed fifteen minutes to half an hour direct pointy end of a vibrator on her clit with all the sensitivity of an Irish Navy with a road drill. She had had some had experiences with men getting bored and switching on the TV (
I, on the other hand, gave her a round of applause after she wore out fresh Duracell batteries in one go. What a lady...
I find the range of a woman's response an Amazing Mystery (a la Iambe rather than Hitchcock


Funny coincidence - a few weeks ago there was a program about the rise of electricity and magnetism.

I was struck by the similarity of the phallus in vagina as being like a Faraday Induction system, right down to vaginal 'ribbing' looking like induction coils.


If something like this is going on, there may be a whole electromagnetic field generation aspect of sex occurring....

[brekin]

Searcher08 wrote:

If something like this is going on, there may be a whole electromagnetic field generation aspect of sex occurring....

Welcome, please hang your coat on the rack there...

[JackRiddler]

.

Come on everybody! Let's make this thread happy as an ice cream cone!

[brekin]

JackRiddler wrote:

Come on everybody! Let's make this thread happy as an ice cream cone!

hell ya! Like this guy. He can even double as the cheery mascot for clitoris awareness.

[Project Willow]

.

Come on everybody! Let's make this thread happy as an ice cream cone!

It should be a joyous discovery, once you get past the bit about it having been excised out of medical and general awareness for the better part of 2000 years of history.

[Searcher08]

Searcher08 wrote:

If something like this is going on, there may be a whole electromagnetic field generation aspect of sex occurring....

Welcome, please hang your coat on the rack there...

Ohhh yeah... Ahem...



(hey, I have ANOTHER idea about connecting the computers of the world together, so they can send information back and forth like a MOTORWAY OF IDEAS!11!!1!!! I think it might catch on!)

[Project Willow]

There's always far too much reading to be done and everyday my Internet usage shortens my attention span a little bit more.

These videos show the organ is probably not exactly ankh-like. The 3-D imaging renderings seemed to show the bulbs completely encircling the vagina and these and other do not, exactly. I'm still attempting to resolve the differences between the various images I've been able to collect.

Cue the cool jazz.












.............

The rather recent rediscovery of this anatomy is not without its controversy of course. The opposing view is championed by one Vincenzo Puppo, an Italian who rails against the myth of the G-spot and Dr. O'Connell's naming convention and a number of other details, in as many places as he can.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3175415/

...........

In my travels, I have managed to find related feminist art projects.
http://www.bonniefortune.info/everybody.html
http://www.zoo-mouse-key.com/books/iceberg.html

[slomo]

I remember the first time I saw Cytheria do what she does so well, I was like "WHOA!!! Now THERE is a woman who knows how to enjoy herself!", so imagine my deep deep joy joy and delight when I had a relationship with someone who a) had taught herself to squirt b) had lots of clitoral orgasms and c) vaginal orgasms too. These were three quite distinct experiences for her, described in totally different subjective terms for her.
I also had a partner who needed fifteen minutes to half an hour direct pointy end of a vibrator on her clit with all the sensitivity of an Irish Navy with a road drill. She had had some had experiences with men getting bored and switching on the TV (
I, on the other hand, gave her a round of applause after she wore out fresh Duracell batteries in one go. What a lady...
I find the range of a woman's response an Amazing Mystery (a la Iambe rather than Hitchcock

And once again I am reminded of the wonderful simplicity of gay male sex. I mean, the whole orgasm-trinity/where's-Waldo aspect of pleasing a female just sounds so -- complicated.

On the other hand, I am feeling sufficiently left out of the conversation that I do need to try to hijack the thread every so often...

[Project Willow]

Slomo

There are trade offs with everything. One sexpert claims there are 10 possible orgasm related erogenous zones in women, 8 in men. Women have longer, and some say, more intense orgasms than men. We have more nerve endings in our glans, not per square inch either, but total number. Sad thing is, a significant percentage of women can't manage an orgasm at all.

What I want to know and what I haven't yet been able to find out is how this clitoris organ structure might be involved in triggering the muscle contractions during orgasm, which can be quite convulsive.

.......

Here is another example of DISTURBINGLY INEXCUSABLE NEGLECT of the female body in medical research. Until 2009, again that magical year, the female homunculus had not been mapped.

What is the homunculus?

The neuroanatomical definition of homunculus is a "distorted" representation of the sensorimotor body map (and its respective parts) overlaid upon primary somatosensory and primary motor cortices. The above figure illustrates the sensory homunculus, where each body part is placed onto the region of cortex that represents it, and the size of the body part is proportional to its cortical representation (and sensitivity).

What did they find when they finally mapped it?

The clitoris is in the same place as the penis
Vaginal stimulation activates different areas of the brain to clitoral stimulation
Nipple stimulation not only activates the chest on the homunculus it also activates the genitals.

Some have argued that women who derive pleasure from vaginal stimulation do so because their clitoris is being indirectly stimulated, but the current findings contradict this. "They support the reports of women that they experience orgasm from various forms of stimulation," says Beverly Whipple, also of Rutgers University, who was not involved in the current study.

http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn20770-sex-on-the-brain-what-turns-women-on-mapped-out.html

Complicated, or perhaps more avenues can lead to more fun!





Interesting! I often draw my head from a top down view to indicate where I "feel" or remember the location of certain sections in the layout of my internal system. I've always placed the sex section on the right and to the back (near the art parts). Hmmmm.

[Searcher08]

I remember the first time I saw Cytheria do what she does so well, I was like "WHOA!!! Now THERE is a woman who knows how to enjoy herself!", so imagine my deep deep joy joy and delight when I had a relationship with someone who a) had taught herself to squirt b) had lots of clitoral orgasms and c) vaginal orgasms too. These were three quite distinct experiences for her, described in totally different subjective terms for her.
I also had a partner who needed fifteen minutes to half an hour direct pointy end of a vibrator on her clit with all the sensitivity of an Irish Navy with a road drill. She had had some had experiences with men getting bored and switching on the TV (
I, on the other hand, gave her a round of applause after she wore out fresh Duracell batteries in one go. What a lady...
I find the range of a woman's response an Amazing Mystery (a la Iambe rather than Hitchcock

And once again I am reminded of the wonderful simplicity of gay male sex. I mean, the whole orgasm-trinity/where's-Waldo aspect of pleasing a female just sounds so -- complicated.

On the other hand, I am feeling sufficiently left out of the conversation that I do need to try to hijack the thread every so often...

@slomo -
I feel I should point out I meant 'Irish navvy' NOT 'Irish Navy' above
"How was MsX last night, S08?"
"Oh she needed two patrol boats, four destroyers and an aircraft carrier to orgasm. "

[crikkett]

Funny coincidence - a few weeks ago there was a program about the rise of electricity and magnetism.

I was struck by the similarity of the phallus in vagina as being like a Faraday Induction system, right down to vaginal 'ribbing' looking like induction coils.


If something like this is going on, there may be a whole electromagnetic field generation aspect of sex occurring....

Yes! That's what I was trying to say a couple of pages ago. It's an exciting idea.
And I think the boys have a similar structure, so they can sparkle too.

[slomo]

I remember the first time I saw Cytheria do what she does so well, I was like "WHOA!!! Now THERE is a woman who knows how to enjoy herself!", so imagine my deep deep joy joy and delight when I had a relationship with someone who a) had taught herself to squirt b) had lots of clitoral orgasms and c) vaginal orgasms too. These were three quite distinct experiences for her, described in totally different subjective terms for her.
I also had a partner who needed fifteen minutes to half an hour direct pointy end of a vibrator on her clit with all the sensitivity of an Irish Navy with a road drill. She had had some had experiences with men getting bored and switching on the TV (
I, on the other hand, gave her a round of applause after she wore out fresh Duracell batteries in one go. What a lady...
I find the range of a woman's response an Amazing Mystery (a la Iambe rather than Hitchcock

And once again I am reminded of the wonderful simplicity of gay male sex. I mean, the whole orgasm-trinity/where's-Waldo aspect of pleasing a female just sounds so -- complicated.

On the other hand, I am feeling sufficiently left out of the conversation that I do need to try to hijack the thread every so often...

@slomo -
I feel I should point out I meant 'Irish navvy' NOT 'Irish Navy' above
"How was MsX last night, S08?"
"Oh she needed two patrol boats, four destroyers and an aircraft carrier to orgasm. "

Ooooooh! OK, that makes it slightly easier to understand. I was worried that for all you straight folks, orgasmic bliss would have to depend upon the vicissitudes of diplomacy in the British Isles.

What is the homunculus?....

I would be interested if anyone ever tied this idea together with that of the chakra system. My experience is that the energy flow of chakras is "real" (though not physiological), and I would bet that a more detailed map might reveal clusters that correspond to those centers.

[Nordic]

bump

[Project Willow]

I see your bump and raise you another G-Spot article.

Actually, I've been drawing and working on clitorises all week! I've got a another few posts in the draft pile and something much bigger that I hope to complete and launch this weekend.

In reviewing this thread I see there are errors and contradictions just in the scant material I've posted. There is so much yet to discover and sort out.

http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1743-6109.2009.01231.x/abstract

REVIEWS: The Clitoral Complex: A Dynamic Sonographic Study
....
Results.  The coronal planes during perineal contraction and finger penetration demonstrated a close relationship between the root of the clitoris and the anterior vaginal wall.

Conclusions.  We suggest that the special sensitivity of the lower anterior vaginal wall could be explained by pressure and movement of clitoris' root during a vaginal penetration and subsequent perineal contraction. The G-spot could be explained by the richly innervated clitoris. Foldes P, and Buisson O. The clitoral complex: A dynamic sonographic study. J Sex Med 2009;6:1223–1231.

Does anyone have a Wiley account?