seemslikeadream wrote:am I on your ignore list or not? It's hard to tell if I am suppose to respond to you
see pm.
Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff
seemslikeadream wrote:am I on your ignore list or not? It's hard to tell if I am suppose to respond to you
crikkett wrote:Alice wrote that personal attacks drove her off
and furthermore, she wasn't thrilled with the idea that everything she wrote would be attacked because she wrote it (a different fallacy that I can't remember the name of.)
beeblebrox wrote:The censorship and political correctness is getting a little stifling around here.
beeblebrox wrote:I'm with you on that, I'm glad I took the time to listen to it.
brainpanhandler wrote:seemslikeadream wrote:am I on your ignore list or not? It's hard to tell if I am suppose to respond to you
see pm.
seemslikeadream wrote:brainpanhandler wrote:seemslikeadream wrote:am I on your ignore list or not? It's hard to tell if I am suppose to respond to you
see pm.
yes I read it so I can't understand why you are still reading my posts and replying to them
seemslikeadream wrote:you were/are obsessed with eyeno and now I realize why you didn't answer my pm...
viewtopic.php?f=34&t=16700&start=600
yes there is EXTREME political correctness here, no doubt....(a recent addition)
can't give examples because I am for the first time in 7 years afraid to post something
....and a couple real bullies also
thanks to Saurian Tail for being brave enough to be able to say how she felt....at this point I have no bravery and that makes me sick to my stomach
.......but lots of other people didn't
dada wrote:You can tell a thread is potentially heading for trouble when you see so many quote boxes within quote boxes it looks like a fractal. Also when someone takes a post, splits it into separate sentences, and responds to each one. When I find myself going there, I know it's time to take a step back, let some water pass under the bridge. Just a general rule of thumb I find helpful.
barracuda wrote: [beeblebrox wrote:The censorship and political correctness is getting a little stifling around here.beeblebrox wrote:I'm with you on that, I'm glad I took the time to listen to it.
I'm having a hard time reconciling those two statements, because the Stewart Lee video seems to be insisting that there are clear reasons for regarding certain behaviors as abhorrent.
dada wrote:You can tell a thread is potentially heading for trouble when you see so many quote boxes within quote boxes it looks like a fractal. Also when someone takes a post, splits it into separate sentences, and responds to each one. When I find myself going there, I know it's time to take a step back, let some water pass under the bridge. Just a general rule of thumb I find helpful.
wintler2 wrote:What the fuck is the point of daily horror stories and ritual venting?
To promote or coordinate going-concern efforts to rein in abuses of power? Except that doesn't happen, theres just the horror story followed by hating and scapegoating, as if those evil police/soldiers/politicians bear all responsibility for everything bad, and we poor kittens can only mew pathetically about our lot. Orwells 2 minute hate is alive and well and conditioning slaves daily.
brainpanhandler wrote:beeblebrox wrote:Pierre d'Achoppement wrote:
I'm with you on that, I'm glad I took the time to listen to it.
Funny you say that, because I thought it was hilarious and I don't agree that:beeblebrox wrote:The censorship and political correctness is getting a little stifling around here.
In fact, I think that's a ridiculous contention. Got any examples?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 159 guests