Successful Boston Marathon Psyop Captures RI

[brainpanhandler]

don't you dare lecture me on how I react to criticism

[seemslikeadream]

please link to these threads you are talking about ..

[Hunter]

This shit really shouldnt need to be explained, after 9-11 we all had good honest and sincere questions about foreknowledge, the money trial, drills, building 7 etc, in short order all those questions were drowned out by NO NO YOURE WRONG IT WAS ALL A HOAX THE PLANES WERE HOLOGRAMS!!!. Same thing in Boston, it was PLENTY ENOUGH to ask questions about Agency XYZ recruiting and using informants to carry out these events, good questions about the brothers prior contact with these agencies and neo con intellectual elites, but that was quickly drowned out by NO THIS IS ALL FAKE AND THOSE WERE ACTORS!!!. Same thing with Sandy Hook, there was good questions to ask about the response to it, why didnt they respond by the book, everything about the response was different about this event, good solid questions were being raised and discussed and then they were quickly drowned out by NOPE, IT WAS A HOAX AND THEY ARE ALL ACTORS!!!!!.

Cant you see a pattern here and why some of us would take great issue with this BS want to to fight back to get our discussion back and take it away from those who want to end all discussion by turning it in to a three ring circus side show?

where is all this talk happening here? where is the pattern here?....if you're talking in general internet fine...then make that premiss and talk on but it is NOT HAPPENING HERE...don't confuse the two....just make that clear in this discussion you want to have...and don't start a thread just to shame a member and make him leave

Yes I am speaking in general on the internet, since RI is a small sample and small community it obviously does not happen at the level of bigger forums but it was enough to it needed to be countered and exposed for what it was.

[seemslikeadream]

then start your own OP without RI in the title

[seemslikeadream]

don't you dare lecture me on how I react to criticism

Jack and you can dish it out but you sure can't take it

[Hunter]

please link to these threads you are talking about ..

I really dont feel like searching for all the threads maybe someone else will do that, doesnt matter to me, I am speaking of what I saw, though you might start at the original Sandy Hook and Boston Marathon threads, they were long and quickly got ugly once the discussion turned in the direction of crisis actors and from that point on no real discussion took place as it devolved in to one personal attack after another and we were all guilty in one way or another for that happening.

[alan ford]

then he needs to change the title of this thread.....when was the last time you saw a no plane OP? If there was one I guess that would be one too many....but over run?....captures RI? No where near.....I would discuss something if the premiss had any merit but as far as I can tell it is practically non existent ...Jack always pisses and moans at me cause I can't take criticism of something I post....well that's calling the kettle black

he started this OP cause he had a problem with a poster and cleverly this thread was his way of getting rid of him ...Jack creates a problem that does not exist...we are not overrun ...we have not been captured ..not even frickin' close

he either wants to protect the other lowly members here from the evils of a single poster or keep RI Jack pure ..I'm not sure

It appears you don't want to discuss his idea, but are going in his personality and irrelevant things. My last few posts were suggestion to avoid that, aimed not only to yourself but generally I'd suggest is better for everyone reading this.

[Hunter]

I am really not here to argue with you SLAD, I understand your point and I am not saying you are wrong but I dont think Jack is wrong either, I think a lot of this stems from personal shit over the years and has less to do with any particular thread that was started. That is just what I see. Whatever, I am not the person you should have an issue with I am only calling it like it see it and admittedly I may be wrong. I am not taking sides or defending anyone, I am stating what I saw and what I believe it was all about, you can take that or leave it.

[seemslikeadream]

then he needs to change the title of this thread.....when was the last time you saw a no plane OP? If there was one I guess that would be one too many....but over run?....captures RI? No where near.....I would discuss something if the premiss had any merit but as far as I can tell it is practically non existent ...Jack always pisses and moans at me cause I can't take criticism of something I post....well that's calling the kettle black

he started this OP cause he had a problem with a poster and cleverly this thread was his way of getting rid of him ...Jack creates a problem that does not exist...we are not overrun ...we have not been captured ..not even frickin' close

he either wants to protect the other lowly members here from the evils of a single poster or keep RI Jack pure ..I'm not sure

It appears you don't want to discuss his idea, but are going in his personality and irrelevant things. My last few posts were suggestion to avoid that, aimed not only to yourself but generally I'd suggest is better for everyone reading this.

what it appears is that
I will discuss and am discussing the TITLE of the OP....and the content of the OP BEFORE it was edited...I will discuss the fact that RI has NOT been captured or is not on the brink of destruction. That is the title ..that is what I will discuss even though YOU do not want to discuss the title of the OP....when was discussing the title of an OP irrelevant?

[seemslikeadream]

I am really not here to argue with you SLAD, I understand your point and I am not saying you are wrong but I dont think Jack is wrong either, I think a lot of this stems from personal shit over the years and has less to do with any particular thread that was started. That is just what I see. Whatever, I am not the person you should have an issue with I am only calling it like it see it and admittedly I may be wrong. I am not taking sides or defending anyone, I am stating what I saw and what I believe it was all about, you can take that or leave it.

I don't want to argue with you either Hunter....I have a problem with Jack and this is not personal ...this is about Jack starting an OP as a result of an argument in another thread (he's the one that made it personal)...using a new OP to call out another member and then editing his post....I have a problem with the title of the OP and the reason for posting it....not necessarily the content in general ...but the accusation that RI has been captured ...because it has not

[alan ford]

then he needs to change the title of this thread.....when was the last time you saw a no plane OP? If there was one I guess that would be one too many....but over run?....captures RI? No where near.....I would discuss something if the premiss had any merit but as far as I can tell it is practically non existent ...Jack always pisses and moans at me cause I can't take criticism of something I post....well that's calling the kettle black

he started this OP cause he had a problem with a poster and cleverly this thread was his way of getting rid of him ...Jack creates a problem that does not exist...we are not overrun ...we have not been captured ..not even frickin' close

he either wants to protect the other lowly members here from the evils of a single poster or keep RI Jack pure ..I'm not sure

It appears you don't want to discuss his idea, but are going in his personality and irrelevant things. My last few posts were suggestion to avoid that, aimed not only to yourself but generally I'd suggest is better for everyone reading this.

what it appears is that
I will discuss and am discussing the TITLE of the OP....and the content of the OP BEFORE it was edited...I will discuss the fact that RI has NOT been captured or is not on the brink of destruction. That is the title ..that is what I will discuss even though YOU do not want to discuss the title of the OP....when was discussing the title of an OP irrelevant?

I'm sorry I just can't believe you are serious here with your answer. That's Monthy Python type of humor right?

[seemslikeadream]

so tell me alan ...do you think RI has been captured by a psyop member of RI? ...

how would you feel to be called out like that?

[Wombaticus Rex]

how would you feel to be called out like that?

Completely unaffected.

[seemslikeadream]

you didn't read the OP before it was edited ...did you?

[Hunter]

Did Jack say a particular MEMBER was intentionally and knowingly part of a psy op or did he say a psyop MEME had become popular here among folks who may not have fully understood who and what was behind such meme?