ET Caught on Film - Humanoid Entity Hovers Above House in Br

Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff

Postby Attack Ships on Fire » Sun Nov 12, 2006 12:28 am

Thanks for the link to the Google Video clip, CC. Unfortunately, I can't discern anything of what the camera operation is shooting, so it's another "blobsquatch" (the euphanism used by Bigfoot investigators looking at blurry photos of a distant shape purported to be a Sasquatch.)

If this woman is really having these intense experiences, surely she could come better prepared for each encounter than just your average video recorder. Even a tripod would be beneficial in getting rid of the jarring motion blur.

I've got to side with Sagan and the paragons of science here: amazing claims require amazing proof, and I'm saying that as someone that believes in the fantastical nature of the phenomena.
Attack Ships on Fire
 
Posts: 527
Joined: Sat Jun 10, 2006 2:24 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby Cosmic Cowbell » Sun Nov 12, 2006 1:41 am

Attack Ships on Fire wrote:Thanks for the link to the Google Video clip, CC. Unfortunately, I can't discern anything of what the camera operation is shooting, so it's another "blobsquatch" (the euphanism used by Bigfoot investigators looking at blurry photos of a distant shape purported to be a Sasquatch.)


Agreed. I do suspect that the 'meat' has yet to be revealed. This is three minutes out of at least 1/2 hours worth. What was uploaded was the publisher's choice, not Paula's. A teaser if you will.

Attack Ships on Fire wrote:If this woman is really having these intense experiences, surely she could come better prepared for each encounter than just your average video recorder. Even a tripod would be beneficial in getting rid of the jarring motion blur.


I think she would agree here as well. And I think this has been done.

Attack Ships on Fire wrote:I've got to side with Sagan and the paragons of science here: amazing claims require amazing proof, and I'm saying that as someone that believes in the fantastical nature of the phenomena.


If someone is trying to prove something, your statement is true. If someone is simply sharing what they've experienced, and could care less who believes it (or not), this requirement doesn't apply. From my understanding, Paula leans towards the second category. As do I.

I'm not here to promote, prove or defend. I remain...curious.
User avatar
Cosmic Cowbell
 
Posts: 1774
Joined: Sun Jan 22, 2006 5:20 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Previous

Return to General Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 174 guests